SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Plans if Dvorsky is Ready

Created by: tstrauss16
Team: 2024-25 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 13, 2024
Published: Apr. 13, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Offseason Moves - Draft
1st Round: Depending on where we fall. I can see the Blues taking a stab at Adam Jiricek. I think we need to see how the WJC18 plays out in case someone like Henry Mews or Charlie Elick stands out and becomes a top 16 prospect.
- Potential Binnington Trade: Maybe a sleeper trade candidate here, but the Blues could look to move Binnington to a team like New Jersey or Los Angeles. I think we could retain $2M on Binnington and get a rather favorable return after the season Binnington put up. See trade #4 as an example of a trade to New Jersey. If this were to happen, we should draft a defenseman with New Jersey’s pick and draft a forward with our own. We can take a depth RD in the 2nd round like Roberts or Badinka.

Offseason Moves - Trades
- Buchnevich: I think we move Buchnevich to get some future assets. I think Chesley is a great pick up at RD and the Blues get a potential draft pick between ~14-20th overall next season.
- Hayes: Does not need to be to Boston but I think we retain half and look for a late round draft pick coming back.
- Hague: Acquiring Hague would be a solid decision for St. Louis. He’s 25 and fits the target age range for St. Louis. In return, Vegas acquires an offensive minded defenseman that is team controlled and will be fairly cheap and can run a power play.

Offseason Moves - Free Agency
- Alexandrov: Simple extension here. He’s a depth player that can slide into the lineup.
- Perron: Bring back Perron on a one-year deal to have him retire a Blue. He’d be a fantastic leader and role model for Dvorsky during his rookie year.
- Sign a RW: Have a few options of targets here. I think we would target Marchessault, Toffoli, DeBrusk or Sprong here. Ideally, we want to move this player to the 3rd line in 2025-26 when Snuggerud is in the NHL. Time the contract to expire when we anticipate Stenberg making an impact in the NHL (at least 2 years - 1 year in SHL and 1 year in AHL).

Future Outlook
- Blues would sign Snuggerud and Chesley to 3-year entry level deals that expire in the 2027 offseason.
- Next summer, Stenberg signs a 3-year entry level deal and moves to North America to play in the AHL during the 2025-26 season.
- Blues add Chesley and at least 6 first or second round prospects in the next 2 drafts to the pipeline.

Blues Top 5 Prospects (Noted 2024-25 Team)
- 1. RW Jimmy Snuggerud (NCAA - Minnesota)
Projected Arrival: 2025-26
- 2. LD Theo Lindstein (AHL - Springfield)
Projected Arrival: 2026-27
- 3. RW Otto Stenberg (SHL - Frölunda HC)
Projected Arrival: 2026-27
- 4. RD Ryan Chesley (NCAA - Minnesota)
Projected Arrival: 2026-27
- 5. LD Michael Buchinger (AHL - Springfield)
Projected Arrival: 2027-28
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$775,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$7,750,000
3$5,500,000
3$4,500,000
3$4,500,000
1$4,500,000
Trades
1.
STL
  1. Chesley, Ryan [Reserve List]
  2. 2025 1st round pick (WSH)
2.
STL
  1. 2025 6th round pick (BOS)
BOS
  1. Hayes, Kevin ($1,785,714 retained)
Additional Details:
Anywhere for a 6th round pick
3.
4.
STL
    2024 1st round pick (NJD)
    NJD
      Binnington, Jordan ($2,000,000 retained)
      2024 2nd round pick (TOR)
      Retained Salary Transactions
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2024
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the TOR
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the NYR
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the NYI
      2025
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the WSH
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the BOS
      2026
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      Logo of the STL
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      23$87,675,000$80,006,530$0$1,212,500$7,668,470
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
      LW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $8,125,000$8,125,000
      C, RW
      UFA - 7
      $4,500,000$4,500,000
      RW, LW
      UFA
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $835,833$835,833
      LW, RW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $6,500,000$6,500,000
      C, LW
      NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $8,125,000$8,125,000
      RW
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $4,500,000$4,500,000
      LW, RW
      NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$800,000$800K)
      C
      RFA - 2
      $4,500,000$4,500,000
      RW, LW
      UFA
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $1,250,000$1,250,000
      LW, RW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $852,500$852,500
      C
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $1,500,000$1,500,000
      RW, C
      UFA - 2
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
      $2,294,150$2,294,150
      LD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $6,500,000$6,500,000
      RD
      NTC
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $4,000,000$4,000,000
      LD
      NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $6,500,000$6,500,000
      RD
      NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $775,000$775,000
      G
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $6,500,000$6,500,000
      LD
      NTC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $800,000$800,000
      RD
      RFA - 2
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $800,000$800,000
      LD/RD
      RFA - 1
      $7,750,000$7,750,000
      RW, LW
      UFA
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $775,000$775,000
      C
      RFA
      $5,500,000$5,500,000
      RW, LW
      UFA
      Logo of the St. Louis Blues
      $775,000$775,000
      LW
      UFA - 2
      $4,500,000$4,500,000
      RW, LW
      UFA

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Apr. 13 at 2:47 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Aug. 2019
      Posts: 3,814
      Likes: 3,286
      I could see a kevin Hayes buyout tbh.
      tstrauss16 liked this.
      Apr. 13 at 2:52 p.m.
      #2
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2023
      Posts: 566
      Likes: 292
      Quoting: Friendly_Cannon
      I could see a kevin Hayes buyout tbh.


      Agreed. Saves about a million for the two remaining years then only coats less and 700k for 2 more when cap goes up drastically. Philly takes the hit as well
      tstrauss16 and Friendly_Cannon liked this.
      Apr. 13 at 3:03 p.m.
      #3
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 1,119
      Likes: 346
      Quoting: Friendly_Cannon
      I could see a kevin Hayes buyout tbh.


      Quoting: StDetroitBlueWings
      Agreed. Saves about a million for the two remaining years then only coats less and 700k for 2 more when cap goes up drastically. Philly takes the hit as well


      I didn’t even think of that. Doesn’t make sense to buy out Krug yet
      Apr. 13 at 3:05 p.m.
      #4
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 88
      Likes: 50
      I think it's not out of the realm of possibility Dvorsky will make the team (although I'd rather him start the season in Springfield), especially now Snuggerud opted for another year with te Gophers. However, don't expect too much from Dvorsky if he does make i, as It will probably be in a similar role as Thomas played in his first season with limited icetime.

      BTW, I'd rather keep Hayes if the return is only going to be a 6th after retaining on him. We're not going to be contenders next season and we need warm bodies anyway.

      That Binner trade is brutal for the Blues BTW... After how he played this season Binner at full value is probably already a 1st round pick, not even mentioning us retaining on him. I also don't see why we're adding a 2nd?

      @Ryan Chesley: we need a much better prospect if we're getting WSH 1st as a return.
      tstrauss16 liked this.
      Apr. 13 at 3:07 p.m.
      #5
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2023
      Posts: 490
      Likes: 327
      People keep trying to trade players to Boston and then sign DeBrusk with the money they save in the trade. I have yet to see an instance where Boston would not just re-sign DeBrusk.
      Apr. 13 at 3:08 p.m.
      #6
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 1,119
      Likes: 346
      Quoting: Beauterham
      I think it's not out of the realm of possibility Dvorsky will make the team (although I'd rather him start the season in Springfield), especially now Snuggerud opted for another year with te Gophers. However, don't expect too much from Dvorsky if he does make i, as It will probably be in a similar role as Thomas played in his first season with limited icetime.

      BTW, I'd rather keep Hayes if the return is only going to be a 6th after retaining on him. We're not going to be contenders next season and we need warm bodies anyway.

      That Binner trade is brutal for the Blues BTW... After how he played this season Binner at full value is probably already a 1st round pick, not even mentioning us retaining on him. I also don't see why we're adding a 2nd?

      Ryan Chesley: we need a much better prospect if we're getting WSH 1st as a return.


      All great points. I think maybe we somehow sneak out of this draft with 3 firsts potentially. Find a suitor for Binnington and Buchnevich. Dvorsky can start in the AHL. The point I’m making is I don’t think we need to sign a 2C for the sake of having Dvorsky fill the role sooner than later.
      Apr. 13 at 3:09 p.m.
      #7
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 1,119
      Likes: 346
      Quoting: SJSF
      People keep trying to trade players to Boston and then sign DeBrusk with the money they save in the trade. I have yet to see an instance where Boston would not just re-sign DeBrusk.


      Mainly just showing options at RW for the Blues.
      SJSF liked this.
      Apr. 13 at 3:31 p.m.
      #8
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2016
      Posts: 8,036
      Likes: 3,235
      I love Buch but can't see Caps spending that much on a 28yo that can be a UFA next summer. Think they'll spend their assets on 25 and younger guys.
      NoVaSpartan liked this.
      Apr. 13 at 4:08 p.m.
      #9
      mokumboi
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2019
      Posts: 29,454
      Likes: 11,404
      I see what you're going for with the Buch trade, but I don't think Washington bothers with him and if they did, I do not like the return.

      I also see zero point in splurging on a winger. If we go get a veteran forward, it should be a 2C placeholder so we can move Schenn to the wing and nothing else. And if Binnington and Buch are gone, what is even the point? Those are all win now signings. And most of them are too high a salary anyway.

      I also have no clue how you got the idea Hague can run a PP. You must be mixing him up with someone else. Don't really care to hand them Perunovich anyway. Any salary moved out of Vegas should be bargain basement cheap because they are mega-f***ed as things stand.

      I do like the idea of Hague, though, and would not be mad at Frenchy coming home to star some emotion in the group when things get hairy or dull edged.

      That said,
      Apr. 13 at 5:13 p.m.
      #10
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 1,119
      Likes: 346
      Quoting: mokumboi
      I see what you're going for with the Buch trade, but I don't think Washington bothers with him and if they did, I do not like the return.

      I also see zero point in splurging on a winger. If we go get a veteran forward, it should be a 2C placeholder so we can move Schenn to the wing and nothing else. And if Binnington and Buch are gone, what is even the point? Those are all win now signings. And most of them are too high a salary anyway.

      I also have no clue how you got the idea Hague can run a PP. You must be mixing him up with someone else. Don't really care to hand them Perunovich anyway. Any salary moved out of Vegas should be bargain basement cheap because they are mega-f***ed as things stand.

      I do like the idea of Hague, though, and would not be mad at Frenchy coming home to star some emotion in the group when things get hairy or dull edged.

      That said,


      I meant Perunovich can run the PP for Vegas, if that is what you are referring to. I was trying to say that Vegas would be getting an offensive minded defenseman that is cheap and can run a PP unit.

      Outside of that, great points. I’m interested to see what we do at the draft. I’m not loving our options at 16
      Apr. 13 at 5:41 p.m.
      #11
      mokumboi
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2019
      Posts: 29,454
      Likes: 11,404
      Quoting: tstrauss16
      I meant Perunovich can run the PP for Vegas, if that is what you are referring to. I was trying to say that Vegas would be getting an offensive minded defenseman that is cheap and can run a PP unit.

      Outside of that, great points. I’m interested to see what we do at the draft. I’m not loving our options at 16


      Ahh I misread that. I hear ya on picking D at 16, but I do not think we will end up picking at 16.
      tstrauss16 liked this.
      Apr. 13 at 6:47 p.m.
      #12
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 1,119
      Likes: 346
      Quoting: mokumboi
      Ahh I misread that. I hear ya on picking D at 16, but I do not think we will end up picking at 16.


      Where do you think we land? Or are you suggesting we trade up? Which I agree with
      mokumboi liked this.
      Apr. 13 at 9:48 p.m.
      #13
      mokumboi
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2019
      Posts: 29,454
      Likes: 11,404
      Quoting: tstrauss16
      Where do you think we land? Or are you suggesting we trade up? Which I agree with


      Trade up. Several teams above us are already loaded with young Dmen, and we have some good trade up ammo. The primary goal should be to land Dickinson or Buium or Silayev.
      tstrauss16 liked this.
      Apr. 13 at 10:06 p.m.
      #14
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 1,119
      Likes: 346
      Quoting: mokumboi
      Trade up. Several teams above us are already loaded with young Dmen, and we have some good trade up ammo. The primary goal should be to land Dickinson or Buium or Silayev.


      I am huge on Buium. Who do you think our team targets would be? And would we basically trade our second to move up?
      Apr. 14 at 12:57 a.m.
      #15
      mokumboi
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2019
      Posts: 29,454
      Likes: 11,404
      Quoting: tstrauss16
      I am huge on Buium. Who do you think our team targets would be? And would we basically trade our second to move up?


      I'd imagine Dickinson is #1, but also likely the hardest one to trade up for. I'm sure Buium is right up there. Obviously, Silayev is kinda like a lefty Parayko, so he'd be great even if it takes him a couple years to get out of Russia (which it might not considering current events).

      Judging from past trade ups, our 2nd can probably squeak us into the top 10. Of course, we also have the NYR 2nd and two 3rds in our pocket, plus all our picks moving forward.

      I think there's a solid chance 8-10 could score us Buium. For Dickinson, we probably need at least 6th. Then theres Silayev and even Yakemchuk who could be exceplent snares. I'm not so high on Parekh because he’s fairly awful defensively.

      We've been killing drafts recently, so I'm confident we'll end up happy. In fact, our draft crew is probably the part of the organization I have the most confidence in by a good margin.
      tstrauss16 liked this.
      Apr. 14 at 9:50 a.m.
      #16
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 1,119
      Likes: 346
      Quoting: mokumboi
      I'd imagine Dickinson is #1, but also likely the hardest one to trade up for. I'm sure Buium is right up there. Obviously, Silayev is kinda like a lefty Parayko, so he'd be great even if it takes him a couple years to get out of Russia (which it might not considering current events).

      Judging from past trade ups, our 2nd can probably squeak us into the top 10. Of course, we also have the NYR 2nd and two 3rds in our pocket, plus all our picks moving forward.

      I think there's a solid chance 8-10 could score us Buium. For Dickinson, we probably need at least 6th. Then theres Silayev and even Yakemchuk who could be exceplent snares. I'm not so high on Parekh because he’s fairly awful defensively.

      We've been killing drafts recently, so I'm confident we'll end up happy. In fact, our draft crew is probably the part of the organization I have the most confidence in by a good margin.


      I think you are right here. Our scouting and draft crew has been killing it since the Jake Neighbours pick in recent years. I think trading up is the best approach as like you said I’m not high on Parekh or Jiricek from my end. Silayev would be awesome to draft and it seems like he has been falling as of late. I anticipate him to continue to fall since Russia won’t be competing in the WJC in a month.
      Apr. 14 at 8:27 p.m.
      #17
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2023
      Posts: 1,032
      Likes: 428
      Quoting: mokumboi
      I'd imagine Dickinson is #1, but also likely the hardest one to trade up for. I'm sure Buium is right up there. Obviously, Silayev is kinda like a lefty Parayko, so he'd be great even if it takes him a couple years to get out of Russia (which it might not considering current events).

      Judging from past trade ups, our 2nd can probably squeak us into the top 10. Of course, we also have the NYR 2nd and two 3rds in our pocket, plus all our picks moving forward.

      I think there's a solid chance 8-10 could score us Buium. For Dickinson, we probably need at least 6th. Then theres Silayev and even Yakemchuk who could be exceplent snares. I'm not so high on Parekh because he’s fairly awful defensively.

      We've been killing drafts recently, so I'm confident we'll end up happy. In fact, our draft crew is probably the part of the organization I have the most confidence in by a good margin.


      Quoting: tstrauss16
      I think you are right here. Our scouting and draft crew has been killing it since the Jake Neighbours pick in recent years. I think trading up is the best approach as like you said I’m not high on Parekh or Jiricek from my end. Silayev would be awesome to draft and it seems like he has been falling as of late. I anticipate him to continue to fall since Russia won’t be competing in the WJC in a month.


      I would assume that the Blues try to explore many avenues to trade up, but my from my point of view Jiricek feels like a safety net of sorts. I am pretty confident that if no team is willing to do a trade like last year that we will have Jiricek at the very least to pick up with the 16th pick. Despite injuries he still has good 2nd pair potential.

      My bigger hope is that we can pick up someone like Alfons Freij in the second round.
      tstrauss16 liked this.
      Apr. 14 at 8:42 p.m.
      #18
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2015
      Posts: 360
      Likes: 33
      Quoting: SJSF
      People keep trying to trade players to Boston and then sign DeBrusk with the money they save in the trade. I have yet to see an instance where Boston would not just re-sign DeBrusk.


      And if DeBrusk was willing to sign that deal it would have been signed already.
      Apr. 15 at 4:43 p.m.
      #19
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 1,119
      Likes: 346
      Quoting: BDHockey
      I would assume that the Blues try to explore many avenues to trade up, but my from my point of view Jiricek feels like a safety net of sorts. I am pretty confident that if no team is willing to do a trade like last year that we will have Jiricek at the very least to pick up with the 16th pick. Despite injuries he still has good 2nd pair potential.

      My bigger hope is that we can pick up someone like Alfons Freij in the second round.


      Who is Freij? What’s the situation with him?
      Apr. 16 at 11:01 a.m.
      #20
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2023
      Posts: 1,032
      Likes: 428
      Quoting: tstrauss16
      Who is Freij? What’s the situation with him?


      Average size swedish LD who is a really solid skater and transition guy. I view him as a really good sleeper pick if we can grab him with one of our second rounders. Not unrealistic that he could be top 4 D, but in my eyes he is a high end 3LD
      tstrauss16 liked this.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll