SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Necas to Vancouver

Created by: Caniac2000
Team: 2024-25 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: May 19, 2024
Published: May 21, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$5,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$9,000,000
6$5,000,000
7$7,000,000
Trades
1.
CAR
  1. Brännström, Erik [RFA Rights]
  2. 2024 4th round pick (FLA)
2.
CAR
  1. Höglander, Nils
  2. Podkolzin, Vasily
  3. 2025 1st round pick (VAN)
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Drury, Jack [RFA Rights]
  2. Necas, Martin [RFA Rights]
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
2025
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
2026
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$87,700,000$85,415,833$0$350,000$2,284,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$9,750,000$9,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,750,000$7,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$918,333$918,333
LW
RFA - 3
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,820,000$4,820,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$905,833$905,833
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$950,000$950,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$7,750,000$7,750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 21 at 11:41 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 2,001
Let's do Necas to Ottawa instead grin
May 21 at 11:42 a.m.
#2
PDG over PDO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 5,239
Likes: 4,220
Canucks pass, no interest in moving Hoglander. take out him and your closer on value. Lindholm stays in Vancouver for 49mil
The_Rocket and mv21227 liked this.
May 21 at 11:42 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: StutzlesNumber1Fan
Let's do Necas to Ottawa instead grin


Pinto, 1st, 2nd, and Jarventie?
StutzlesNumber1Fan liked this.
May 21 at 11:43 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: theleano1
Canucks pass, no interest in moving Hoglander. take out him and your closer on value. Lindholm stays in Vancouver for 49mil


Hoglander is the only piece here that would make Carolina do this. The 1st could drop to a 2nd, but Hoglander HAS to be included here
May 21 at 11:44 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 2,001
Quoting: Caniac2000
Pinto, 1st, 2nd, and Jarventie?


Pinto is way more valuable than anyone in that Vancouver deal, so no. Joseph, Jarventie, Boston pick + 2025 2nd.
May 21 at 11:44 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
As a Canucks fan - yeah, I probably do that. Maybe without the 2nd, though?

4 relatively solid future pieces for one top-6 winger and a guy who has decent potential, but has yet to hit. And Necas WAS only a 53-point guy with middling underlying numbers. Still, I really like him as a top-line option, and he is right in the wheelhouse of the kind of player (age, play style) that Vancouver should pursue.

Feels more likely that Necas goes to a team like San Jose or Ottawa for a package like this, though.
May 21 at 11:44 a.m.
#7
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 3,654
Canucks pass easily. Can find a 2nd line winger for considerably cheaper elsewhere
May 21 at 11:45 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: StutzlesNumber1Fan
Pinto is way more valuable than anyone in that Vancouver deal, so no. Joseph, Jarventie, Boston pick + 2025 2nd.


Joseph's a cap dump for Carolina since there are just 10 other players in the system that could do what he does for much cheaper, would need to have someone like Pinto in the deal to get Carolina's interest.
StutzlesNumber1Fan liked this.
May 21 at 11:47 a.m.
#9
PDG over PDO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 5,239
Likes: 4,220
Quoting: Caniac2000
Hoglander is the only piece here that would make Carolina do this. The 1st could drop to a 2nd, but Hoglander HAS to be included here


Yeah I think Vancouver goes elsewhere then. Hoglander had practically had the same amount of goals as Necas without any powerplay time what so ever. At 1.1mil it's almost impossible replace that type of value at that cap hit. No doubt Necas is a good player but if it means losing Hoglander Vancouver looks elsewhere for their top 6 winger
May 21 at 11:49 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 2,001
Quoting: Caniac2000
Joseph's a cap dump for Carolina since there are just 10 other players in the system that could do what he does for much cheaper, would need to have someone like Pinto in the deal to get Carolina's interest.


Fair point but that Vancouver trade you acquired two 3rd liners (Hog likely a 2nd liner tho) and two picks which are worse than what the Sens offer and also included Drury lol.
May 21 at 12:32 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 11,268
Likes: 10,089
Take out Hoglander and it’s fair value based on other RFA winger trades
May 21 at 12:38 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: mv21227
Take out Hoglander and it’s fair value based on other RFA winger trades


Hoglander would be the entire reason for Carolina to do that. Removing him removes Carolina's reason to make this deal
May 21 at 12:39 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: theleano1
Yeah I think Vancouver goes elsewhere then. Hoglander had practically had the same amount of goals as Necas without any powerplay time what so ever. At 1.1mil it's almost impossible replace that type of value at that cap hit. No doubt Necas is a good player but if it means losing Hoglander Vancouver looks elsewhere for their top 6 winger


Necas played 3rd line minutes with guys that are not close to the same caliber Hoglander played with, and Necas got very limited PP time on the second unit. He's a top line winger, and it's something the Canucks are crying out for. You're not going to find a better alternative to Necas, especially when Guentzel is re-signed
May 21 at 12:45 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 11,268
Likes: 10,089
Quoting: Caniac2000
Hoglander would be the entire reason for Carolina to do that. Removing him removes Carolina's reason to make this deal


Having Hoglander for 1.1M is gonna be really important for the Canucks next year. He’s likely gonna be in the top 6 this season and we need another top 6 winger to go along with him. Moving him creates another hole in the top 6 that we can’t replace for the cap hit he’s making
May 21 at 12:50 p.m.
#15
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 4,907
Likes: 3,227
Quoting: Caniac2000
Pinto, 1st, 2nd, and Jarventie?


I mean i like necas but its debatable that hes more valuable than pinto at all, let alone a 1st 2nd and our best forward prospect better than pinto
athrin liked this.
May 21 at 12:50 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: mv21227
Having Hoglander for 1.1M is gonna be really important for the Canucks next year. He’s likely gonna be in the top 6 this season and we need another top 6 winger to go along with him. Moving him creates another hole in the top 6 that we can’t replace for the cap hit he’s making


Adding Necas fills a much larger hole, so it opens up a smaller one in the bottom six, but gives you a genuinely scary top six for the first time in a long time
May 21 at 12:51 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: Borocop
I lmean ike necas but its arguable hes more valuable than pinto at all, let alone a 1st 2nd and our best forward prospect better than pinto


No... Necas is EASILY more valuable than Pinto, stop it. Pinto's career high is what, 35 points? Necas is a 70 point winger, he's quite considerably better
May 21 at 12:54 p.m.
#18
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 4,907
Likes: 3,227
Quoting: Caniac2000
No... Necas is EASILY more valuable than Pinto, stop it. Pinto's career high is what, 35 points? Necas is a 70 point winger, he's quite considerably better


i mean sure you can make that argument. Hes still not a 1st 2nd and our best forward prospect more valuable though lol. Thats completly delusional
athrin liked this.
May 21 at 12:55 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: Borocop
i mean sure you can make that argument. Hes still not a 1st 2nd and our best forward prospect more valuable though lol. Thats completly delusional


He's something close to that in terms of more value than Pinto... trying to argue against that is delusional lmao
May 21 at 1:26 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 5,220
Likes: 1,750
Quoting: Caniac2000
He's something close to that in terms of more value than Pinto... trying to argue against that is delusional lmao


Agree with the general sentiment that Necas is better than Pinto, but the open issue is you are not counting the contract he has to sign.

Isn’t that really the ONLY reason you are discussing trading him in the first place. It is a consideration in the value equation here because you would simply let Guentzel go and sign Necas if it wasn’t.

IMO, Necas provides a lot of value. I’d be seeing if Utah would be willing to give up some of their many picks
May 21 at 1:30 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: Celtics21
Agree with the general sentiment that Necas is better than Pinto, but the open issue is you are not counting the contract he has to sign.

Isn’t that really the ONLY reason you are discussing trading him in the first place. It is a consideration in the value equation here because you would simply let Guentzel go and sign Necas if it wasn’t.

IMO, Necas provides a lot of value. I’d be seeing if Utah would be willing to give up some of their many picks


Carolina can keep both Jarvis and Necas quite easily, in this scenario I've created, just don't sign Lindholm. The reason they'd entertain moving Necas is because he wants out. He's got arb rights to remove an offer sheet threat, he's an RFA so there's compensation and rights regardless. His QO is only 3 mill, so he's not going unqualified. Carolina have all the leverage in any Necas deal. Not to mention, Pinto is also an RFA, so it doesn't take into account the deal he would sign
May 21 at 1:43 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 5,220
Likes: 1,750
Quoting: Caniac2000
Carolina can keep both Jarvis and Necas quite easily, in this scenario I've created, just don't sign Lindholm. The reason they'd entertain moving Necas is because he wants out. He's got arb rights to remove an offer sheet threat, he's an RFA so there's compensation and rights regardless. His QO is only 3 mill, so he's not going unqualified. Carolina have all the leverage in any Necas deal. Not to mention, Pinto is also an RFA, so it doesn't take into account the deal he would sign


Don’t think they have to worry about not signing Lindholm anyway. Seems odd to acquire the Eagle and then bury him on the fourth line and trade Necas at the same time.

Also I thought your team was trying to sign Jarvis long term as opposed to giving him a bridge contract?

Do you think Pesce signs for that or takes a bigger payday elsewhere?
May 21 at 2:29 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 5,220
Quoting: Celtics21
Don’t think they have to worry about not signing Lindholm anyway. Seems odd to acquire the Eagle and then bury him on the fourth line and trade Necas at the same time.

Also I thought your team was trying to sign Jarvis long term as opposed to giving him a bridge contract?

Do you think Pesce signs for that or takes a bigger payday elsewhere?


Pesce wants term. Kuznetsov's fine in a depth role, but he can't play top six minutes. The problem is now, Carolina have two centers for each of the bottom six roles and it's problematic. No 2C, but 4 3C's.

Jarvis is getting bridged, why wuld they sign him long term? They need as much cap room as they can get this summer, and the best way to do that is bridge Jarvis.

Pesce wants term over more money, which is the big factor. He might get a larger AAV offer somewhere, but I doubt it'll be at the term he wants
May 21 at 2:34 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 5,220
Likes: 1,750
Quoting: Caniac2000
Pesce wants term. Kuznetsov's fine in a depth role, but he can't play top six minutes. The problem is now, Carolina have two centers for each of the bottom six roles and it's problematic. No 2C, but 4 3C's.

Jarvis is getting bridged, why wuld they sign him long term? They need as much cap room as they can get this summer, and the best way to do that is bridge Jarvis.

Pesce wants term over more money, which is the big factor. He might get a larger AAV offer somewhere, but I doubt it'll be at the term he wants


Ok. I’ve been under the impression that the primary reason Necas is available is because they don’t want to allocated long term money to him and would rather invest in both Guentzel and Jarvis. Probably the wrong impression, but definitely one that I have from listening to the podcasts
May 21 at 2:52 p.m.
#25
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 8,297
Likes: 1,501
NYR got a low return for Buchnevich cause nobody wanted to pay him 5.8m. Necas return will be in the middle of that & this, certainly not this
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll