DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
14
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
EnKay29
Member Since
Jul. 13, 2021
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
52
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 17, 2022 at 1:04 a.m.
Thread:
Lou Tube
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dannibalcorpse</b></div><div>If Ben Chiarot pulls in a 1st+4th+B-prospect, there's no way that package gets Scott Mayfield - he's younger than Chiarot, has a lower cap hit that doesn't need any retention, and isn't a pending UFA at the end of this season - you get him for 2 playoff runs, not just one. You might think it's an overpay, but blame Florida then - they've set the standard, and it would be foolish for Lou to take less for Mayfield.
If Varlamov would waive for Toronto, that deal is close but probably needs a nudge more. A 1st straight up for Varlamov is fair (again, you're getting 2 playoff runs out of him since he's signed next year as well.) Mrazek is a negative asset at this point and if you want the Islanders to take him back, then you have to include a pick, which is there. But the Islanders aren't just going to eat $2.5M this season and next out of the goodness of their hearts.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dannibalcorpse</b></div><div>If Ben Chiarot pulls in a 1st+4th+B-prospect, there's no way that package gets Scott Mayfield - he's younger than Chiarot, has a lower cap hit that doesn't need any retention, and isn't a pending UFA at the end of this season - you get him for 2 playoff runs, not just one. You might think it's an overpay, but blame Florida then - they've set the standard, and it would be foolish for Lou to take less for Mayfield.
If Varlamov would waive for Toronto, that deal is close but probably needs a nudge more. A 1st straight up for Varlamov is fair (again, you're getting 2 playoff runs out of him since he's signed next year as well.) Mrazek is a negative asset at this point and if you want the Islanders to take him back, then you have to include a pick, which is there. But the Islanders aren't just going to eat $2.5M this season and next out of the goodness of their hearts.</div></div>
The Islanders say no? I dont think the leafs would be willing to do this. Timmy is arguably better (IMO he is) than Mayfield, more team control and way younger. He is more valuable than any part of the montreal package.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 16, 2022 at 1:31 p.m.
Thread:
First steps into a rebuild
Yeah the leafs say no. Middleton is not much better than Dermott, if he is even better at all. So that at best is a wash. A first and 2 seconds is not worth the change for Riemer. Crazy overvalue
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 14, 2022 at 7:42 p.m.
Thread:
My thoughts
I mean it is easy to look back with revisionist history on every move. I do not think signing a super star C in the middle of his prime is ever a bad thing. He has been excellent for the leafs the minute he signed. Sure Dubas has had some not so great moves but no GM bats 1.000. Signing Marchment to 4 million a year and signing Pietro would be worst for the Franchise than what actually happened. People were begging for Dubas to move Kadri after being suspened twice in the playoffs (which he did again). Was it a great move? No, but in fairness he went for Brodie instead but Kadri wouldnt waive his NMC. There was no way in hell Marner was accepting 8 million. I think if he was the leafs would have done that. Losing guys like Gardiner, Hyman, JVR and others for nothing is unfortunate but sometimes it is worth it. Trading them for a prospect or a pick when they are trying to compete makes not sense as it makes your team worse currently, instead they used those players services when they were cheap and a cost surplus, and did not resign them to big contracts after. Like imagine this team gave JVR 7 Million or Hyman 5.5. They would be in way worse situations. Also Gardiner barely played after he left Toronto due to injury. Being able to find cheap players to replace through free agency or the draft (So Sandin for Gardiner and Bunting for Hyman) has been a huge strength for Dubas. I know the team has not had crazy success in the playoffs, but Dubas has been a really good GM since taking over. He has made decent trades, good free agency decisions and great drafting.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 14, 2022 at 7:28 p.m.
Thread:
Wilson
All of these trades are wild and not that great. Willy is worth a lot more than Wilson. Chara is barely an NHL player at this point and the leafs have a lot of current D who are better. Also Fleury, Dehaan and Strome are not a big enough upgrade on Mrazek, Holl and Kase to be worth our Top D prospect, a first and a second when we are already low on picks
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 24, 2022 at 4:46 p.m.
Thread:
Playoff Lines
I am not sure why Toronto would want Chara. He would be worse than all of their Dmen right now at this point in his career. Plus with the leafs lack of draft picks giving one up for someone who is barely moves the needle is not worth it
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 6, 2022 at 11:54 p.m.
Thread:
Deadline Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>biased_leafs_fan</b></div><div>Good Trades!
I like both of them for the leafs, but idk if the other teams would do it
I dont think Seattle parts ways with Soucy that easilly(could be wrong), Soucy has been pretty decent on Seattle iirc(probs need to add a 4th or 5th for a sweetner)
I like 2nd one, but I think leafs retain a bit on ritchie since I dont think Arizona wants cap dumps with term
Good post tho!
(holl on line 1 D tho >:( )</div></div>
Thank you! I tried being more realistic than most trades on here. Holl is definitely not on the first pair. I said in the description I didnt edit the pairings i just left them (tho I thought I put Rielly and Brodie together)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 28, 2021 at 2:16 p.m.
Thread:
Small tweaks plus Rielly Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>I cannot for the life of me imagine where you got this insane concept of "good money vs. bad money." There is no difference between money spent at the NHL level and money spent at the AHL level; whether a team is $9 million under the cap or $11 million or $5 million is irrelevant. And just where do you think Engvall's $1.25 million is going? Anaheim already has 14 forwards in line for the 2021-2022 season, and every single one of them is worth more to us than Engvall could ever possibly be, so even assuming that our GM lost his mind and acquired Engvall, it would be to replace someone else, which doesn't shift money onto the NHL roster at all. And do you think that if we traded Kodie Curran, we wouldn't replace him on the San Diego roster with another defenseman? So that doesn't shift money OFF the AHL books, either.
Your entire theory is cuckoo, and even worse than your over-evaluation of Pierre Engvall as someone we would trade Kodie Curran for even-up, let alone add anything more than an equipment bag.</div></div>
The concept of good money versus bad money is simple. Curran is a 31 year old AHL D one a one way contract so he makes a million dollars next season where ever he plays. Engvall is an NHL caliber forward who makes 1.25 million next season. Anaheim is not a wealthy team, so spending a million dollars on an AHL player is not good for them. Yes they are not saving actually dollars but the value output of the money spent is greater with Engvall. The fact that you fail to understand that concept is sad. Its like when Columbus traded Horton for Clarkson, Clarkson was not worth his contract but he would give them NHL minutes for the money while Horton gave them nothing. It is the same concept. You can replace Curran in the AHL for someone making under 100k. The difference in value between the 2 is big, I understand Mahura would be too much, that is why in the comment section below I said i would do Max Golod. So that is a million dollar AHL D man and a undrafted Free agent signing that played in the ECHL for a NHL player. The fact you wouldnt take that means youre an idiot. Engvall scored at 0.3 PPG last season playing 4th line minutes and is 25 and Plays center. He isnt the best player ever but that would place him as the 9th highest scorer among regular forwards for the ducks last season, and if the ducks had 14 forwards better than Engvall they wouldnt have finished in second last place.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 28, 2021 at 12:03 a.m.
Thread:
Small tweaks plus Rielly Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mr_Gardoki</b></div><div>The Rangers don't need Rielly though. They have a pipeline of very good LD's coming up right now. Not to mention the space they'll next year for Zib, Fox and Kakko.</div></div>
Yes they do. But in this scenario they lose Jones (because the trade). So left side they are left with Miller, Robertson and Lindgren. I do not think any of those guys will be as good as Rielly. So not getting a top 2 D man because young D men who might be top 4 D is kinda dumb in my opinion. They also have 28 million dollars in cap space next offseason, not factoring in any trades they can make to clear up space.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 27, 2021 at 11:58 p.m.
Thread:
Small tweaks plus Rielly Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>"The cost of taking on that money"?!?!? Curran's cap hit is $1 million and Engvall's is $1.25 million. And we wouldn't pay more than a fifth-round draft pick for him even if we needed yet another bottom-6 left-handed forward, which we don't. And right now, Josh Mahura has the same standing in our plans as Timothy Liljegren does in yours.
No, no, no.</div></div>
It saves useless money. Curran makes a million to play in the AHL while Engvall makes just over a million to contribute in the NHL. The actual dollars saved isnt their but the quality on the dollars spent changes. That is massive. And sure the Mahura might be too much that is why i mentioned the other prospects in the comments below.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 3, 2021 at 9:03 p.m.
Thread:
Rielly trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Devil1122</b></div><div>He can play both and he literally won the best defensive forward in the QMJHL</div></div>
That is interesting I didnt know he won the best defensive forward award. I didnt even know the Q handed that out! I guess he must have improved dramatically there because his draft year he was horrible on that side of the puck my bad!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 3, 2021 at 9:00 p.m.
Thread:
Rielly trade ideas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Juiceman</b></div><div>You’re heavily overvaluing Reilly. He’s worth a first and third at most. Teams aren’t gonna trade a first and A-B prospects for a rental….</div></div>
If you read the description is said these trades are under the assumption that he signed an extension. So he is not a rental. Also, that is definitely not his value. He is a top pair dman, those cost more than a first and 3rd. Look at the recent trades for inferior players
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 3, 2021 at 8:56 p.m.
Thread:
Rielly trade ideas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Juiceman</b></div><div>I didn’t miss it, Philly just got fleeced. No other team with a brain would’ve done the trade….</div></div>
There was multiple teams interested in risto so i think over teams would have gotten fleeced. Both Risto and Jones got a lot and both are worse than Rielly. Now both are tall right handed d men who are overvalued because of that so i tried adjusting to the place accordingly.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 3, 2021 at 8:55 p.m.
Thread:
Rielly trade ideas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ZachHymanForTheHart</b></div><div>It’s funny how everyone values players on here.
Ristolainen can’t play defence, he fetched 13th overall and a 2nd rounder.
Jones also can’t play defence, he fetched two firsts (one of which was 11th overall) and a top prospect in Boqvist.
Everyone on here is so quick to say “Rielly isn’t worth that” but in reality, he is.
Rielly isn’t all that amazing of a defender but is at least on par if not better than both of those two. He is also miles better offensively than Risto and at least on par with Jones.
Now, I’m not saying Morgan Rielly is this amazing dman that should demand a king’s ransom but he would bring in something near Jones.
A source on Twitter (that has not been revealed, so we can’t be absolutely certain of it’s reliability but we can use some common sense) stated that Morgan Rielly’s current value would be near Jones’, 2 firsts and a good prospect.
You can argue all you want but it is true. Morgan Rielly is not “only worth a first and a third.” He is a guy who plays top pair and can produce offensively at an elite level, despite his struggles this year.</div></div>
I agree. I think it is the thing where everyone overvalues their own guys and undervalues others, heck I fall victim to that too. But looking at what Jones and Risto got, i tried building these trades off of that. I figured that because Jones as more name brand i guess Rielly wouldnt be valued the same as him. But he is definitely better than Risto, but risto is big and right handed (the things nhl teams overvaule). So I felt that trade would be a good comparison considering that i said these trades are under the assumption he signed an extension.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 3, 2021 at 8:52 p.m.
Thread:
Rielly trade ideas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ZachHymanForTheHart</b></div><div>I will agree that these three teams specifically probably don’t get Rielly, none of them need him.</div></div>
Im curious what teams you think could use Rielly than?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 3, 2021 at 8:51 p.m.
Thread:
Rielly trade ideas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Salzy</b></div><div>Ducks easily decline, they have no use or need for a 27 year old pending UFA
The logic you put for why ANA makes that trade is insanely flawed and almost completely false</div></div>
Im not sure if this changes your opinion on the trade but i said in the description that these trades are under the assumption that he signs an extension as part of the trade!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 3, 2021 at 7:19 p.m.
Thread:
Rielly trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NYRxLundqvist</b></div><div>You’re on the pipe if you think Reilly is better than Jones and if you truly believed that you wouldn’t have Reilly signing for 7x7</div></div>
Rielly is definitely better than Jones. Jones is not as good as some people think. Jones also singed 9.5 per which i dont think he is deserving of. Rielly is also not deserving of 9 million dollars pluss, I think 7 is reasonable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 3, 2021 at 6:40 p.m.
Thread:
Rielly trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NYRxLundqvist</b></div><div>Imagine thinking Reilly is worth that much</div></div>
I mean Seth Jones who is worse than Reilly just went for Boqvist (better than Mercer) a fist and a pick swap so why wouldnt Rielly be worth somewhat similar.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 3, 2021 at 6:38 p.m.
Thread:
Rielly trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Such an underrated point here.
Two-way right-handed centers don’t grow on trees.
Mercer is a keeper.</div></div>
Mercer is neither a Center or a two way player. Have you seen his junior numbers, he is below average defensively. Plus Eliteprospects has him listed as a Right winger. If you think the package is not fair that is fine, just dont overrate your own prospects just because he is yours.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 27, 2021 at 12:18 a.m.
Thread:
Dubas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood</b></div><div>Bunting has as much a chance of being a 4th liner or even an AHL player as he does of being a plug and play 1st liner. I'd wager it's more likely he's barely an NHL player. So to give him 1.5 is ridiculous. If someone else does, they can afford him not panning out. TO literally can't afford that happening. Give him close to the league min and it makes a lot more sense. As for the other guy, I'll reference Kerfoot again, he was supposed to be the answer for 3C and that certainly hasn't worked. But this guy who had one good season on a bad team is probably going to be it. He definitely won't be exposed when he's now a bottom 6 player on a much better team. It's a risk the Leafs can't afford. Find a bargain, then absolutely I would give these guys a shot but for this price it's wildly risky.</div></div>
Idk what youre reading but I gave Bunting 1 million. Suter makes 3 million, that combined 4 not 4.5. That is 500k more than kerfoot alone. I agree Bunting is not a top line player. However, the leafs cannot afford to pay a top line player to line up next AM and MM like a landeskog. Bunting put up really good counting and possession stats in his short stint in the NHL and has been a prominent player in the AHL. This is similar to what Marchessault did before he broke out in Florida. I belive they were both the same age and free agents when that happened. Plus, he is making 1 million dollars. That is nothing, you can put him in the minors and it doesnt go towards the cap so the leafs can actually afford that. It is a worth while gamble in case he can maintain what he did in his short stint last season and plays well next to the the star players, then you get a solid player for 1 million on the dot. For Suter, yeah he has played 1 year in the nhl but he was better than kerfoot. Plus, how would he be exposed playing further down the lineup on a better team? If anything you think he would do better going up against worst competition. Cap space is valuable, youre right. Bunting is a flyer that cost nothing who you hope can play well enough where he doesnt slow down the stars and you get a kerfoot replacement cheaper and better. I am failing to see how this doesnt make sense if anything they will get more money in free agency
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 27, 2021 at 12:17 a.m.
Thread:
Dubas
Idk what youre reading but I gave Bunting 1 million. Suter makes 3 million, that combined 4 not 4.5. That is 500k more than kerfoot alone. I agree Bunting is not a top line player. However, the leafs cannot afford to pay a top line player to line up next AM and MM like a landeskog. Bunting put up really good counting and possession stats in his short stint in the NHL and has been a prominent player in the AHL. This is similar to what Marchessault did before he broke out in Florida. I belive they were both the same age and free agents when that happened. Plus, he is making 1 million dollars. That is nothing, you can put him in the minors and it doesnt go towards the cap so the leafs can actually afford that. It is a worth while gamble in case he can maintain what he did in his short stint last season and plays well next to the the star players, then you get a solid player for 1 million on the dot. For Suter, yeah he has played 1 year in the nhl but he was better than kerfoot. Plus, how would he be exposed playing further down the lineup on a better team? If anything you think he would do better going up against worst competition. Cap space is valuable, youre right. Bunting is a flyer that cost nothing who you hope can play well enough where he doesnt slow down the stars and you get a kerfoot replacement cheaper and better. I am failing to see how this doesnt make sense if anything they will get more money in free agency.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 26, 2021 at 11:07 p.m.
Thread:
Dubas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood</b></div><div>But Bunting played on a different team, that means he's better than anyone on TO. Same with Suter, one season of moderate success on one of the worst teams in the league means he's amazing and we need to spend 4.5 million on two guys who are no bodies. These armchair GM's are getting worse and worse</div></div>
It never says that Bunting is the best player on the team. He had a good stretch and hopefully you can plug and play someone cheap next to AM and MM and contributes. And yeah Suter had a pretty good season last season and is 25 years old, there would be a market place for him. Plus evolving hockeys model has him at 3.2 for 2 years so i Actually went cheaper. They arent nobodies just because you arent aware of who they are. Also, just because you dont like it doesnt mean you can be an asshole. How about you make some points instead of some hyperbolic straw man arguments
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 26, 2021 at 11:03 p.m.
Thread:
Dubas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KakkoForMauriceRichardAward</b></div><div>1-Granlund isn't a center
2-Kerfoot isn't replaced on the PK
3-too much $$ spent on G and the F depth still isn't great. Bunting is unproven, Kase sucks and as previously mentioned you play a non center at center
4-Robertson is likely making the team</div></div>
Granlund is literally listed as a center and took nearly 500 faceoffs last season. Yeah that not top in the league but demonstrates he played a lot down the middle last season. Dubas said in his press conference that Goalie is a top priority and idk how you can find a decent one that is cheap. Kase is good, just often injured. With the leafs medical staff he would hopefully be able to perform in a bottom 6 role
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 15, 2021 at 11:00 p.m.
Thread:
Hopeful but doubtful
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Blues pass.</div></div>
Im curious as to why? You're picking up a fine 4/5 D man for relatively cheap. He can slot in below Parayko and Faulk and is a lot better than Bortuzzo.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 15, 2021 at 10:58 p.m.
Thread:
Hopeful but doubtful
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Imagine875948</b></div><div>Pens decline
Dermott + 4th or 2nd (depending on prospect) + prospect for Desmith and McCann</div></div>
You're not getting a second for a player you would lose for free otherwise. Plus why would you want dermott? You already have d men you have to protect. I was being beneficial giving you a 3rd as well considering there would be a market for McCann
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 13, 2021 at 6:49 p.m.
Thread:
Realistic i think maybe
Why would the leafs want matherson? He sucks and makes a lot of money for a long time. Rielly is literally a top pair D man that the pens President Drafted. He would be the pens best D man other than maybe Marino. Your'e Giving up a few bottom 6 forwards, a late first and a 24 year old prosepect for a year of a Top Pair D plus getting a serviceable bottom 6 forward who is younger than both. I am finding it hard to figure out how this is "nonsense"
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com