DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
2
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
ItsBreach
ItsBreach
Member Since
Jun. 27, 2022
Favourite Team
New York Rangers
Forum Posts
140
Posts per Day
0.2
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 8 at 8:39 a.m.
Thread:
last couple of hours for armchair gm deadline fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Vatrano is wildly overrated for what Anaheim wants
Rangers haven’t shown any interest in Buch sadly</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Vatrano is wildly overrated for what Anaheim wants
Rangers haven’t shown any interest in Buch sadly</div></div>
as much as i do agree with this, drury has been pretty good with keeping rumors behind closed doors. since he took over, there have only been 4 players that have been 'expected' to be moved to the rangers. of those 4, three happened (kane, wennberg and goodrow with yesterday being the first 'blunder') and even yesterday, the rangers were truly a finalist. they were stubborn on who they didn't want to move (which works for me) and i don't think the pens would've sent him to nyr anyway. although the canes seem to have gotten him at a steal of a price... but they were also very clear on no contract extension prior. so who knows, nyr might've seen that as a deal breaker
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 8 at 8:36 a.m.
Thread:
last couple of hours for armchair gm deadline fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Habs_22_14_20</b></div><div>Othmann + a 2024 1st should be the price for Buch half retained</div></div>
rangers have made obvious they won't be moving othmann, kakko or perreault unless they're blown away by something. love buch, but even with the extra year, he's not worth giving up one of those three + a first (or more)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 8 at 8:34 a.m.
Thread:
Today wishlist
i think nyr would accept this. although this would have to be a later in the day deal and "settle" for this if they're outbid on everyone else. they don't have too many more roster spots to fill. but the value for that trade fits both teams
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 1:40 p.m.
Thread:
deadline week
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ittookten</b></div><div>Interestingly I think a 2nd and a prospect woudl secure Wennberg with 50% retained - proposed as much myself here: https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/811743
However, we've no interest in Goodrow for the next 3 years and certainly not for the compensation of just a 5th and a 6th. You'd need to find someone who actually wants him, which may be a tad difficult.</div></div>
yeah which makes it difficult. the rangers aren't 'that' crunched for cap with a few ltirs, so they could prob just get wennberg at full. something close to: wennberg and a 6th, for goodrow, (prospect: insert robertson/sykora), a 2nd and a 3rd/4th. something like this could be an incentive where the initial trade has some lower value, but player/team performance ups the overall return
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 1:37 p.m.
Thread:
deadline week
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caps123</b></div><div>You forgot to add a 3rd in the trade for Edmundson.</div></div>
he's not worth that much. maybe a low 4th, but a 3rd would be an overpay, let alone adding more picks on top
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 8:35 a.m.
Thread:
chaos
do i even need to comment how unrealistic this is?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 1 at 8:54 a.m.
Thread:
Blow it up
the trade with nyr isn't awful, but i don't believe a first would be going the other way. two rentals for a first and a nhl ready offensive defenseman? not a chance
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 5 at 3:30 p.m.
Thread:
ugh rangers
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GeneralLandro</b></div><div>Why would you trade Schneider for Durzi? You already have your PP1 and PP2 QB’s in Fox and Miller
Schneider will play that shutdown role you need and that the more expensive Durzi will not</div></div>
he's been ok for the rangers but that's about it. he really doesn't do much of anything and isn't great on defense
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 5 at 3:29 p.m.
Thread:
ugh rangers
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gmonwy</b></div><div>Flames accept and claim him right back</div></div>
yeah i didn't really know who this was (and you could insert a lot of people in here) but i needed to get rid of a forward and add a dman for the ahl team
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 5 at 3:17 p.m.
Thread:
Cheaper Ideas Asset-Wise
why would the rangers trade trouba (their literal captain) at retained for two rfas?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31 at 10:08 a.m.
Thread:
How close is this
isn't kevin hayes have a career low year? i think nyr would be open to a reunion but wow
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31 at 10:07 a.m.
Thread:
Kakko
even with the rumors, i don't see kakko being sent anywhere unless it's in a package for a high level player. they won't trade him for a middle 6 forward
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31 at 10:06 a.m.
Thread:
What is the value of these players
rempe would be interesting, i think that value is moderatley fair. for saros, i think you can get more. i understand the down year, but you're not necessarily getting much in return for a perennial top 10 goalie. the trade with cbj would need more going their way, they spent a lot to acquire him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 30 at 10:22 a.m.
Thread:
Not going all in but still buying
rangers and isles won't make a trade unless it was for draft picks and nothing else
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 30 at 10:21 a.m.
Thread:
24 season
although an interesting trade for nyr, not sure why they would trade a current dman for a prospect and a pick. an actual nhl player would need to be going the other way
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 26 at 10:44 a.m.
Thread:
Question to Rags fans
he's played well for nyr, but it's almost like he hit an informal ceiling. he was progressing every game but has kinda been on and off. his defense has slipped and his offense has been okay. a lot of boneheaded dzone clears and isn't great defending oddman rushes (no one is great at this, but it tends to always go in when it is him). he might be packaged at the deadline honestly if they can upgrade his position. if he can stay healthy and improve his game a bit, a swap for dvorak would be intriguing, but most likely unrealistic. a mid first round pick would do it, if we're talking draft picks.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 26 at 10:38 a.m.
Thread:
Sharks sell tiers
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>matthias893</b></div><div>San Jose only has one retention slot available, so using it on a deal that brings back a 5th or 6th would be a waste. Contenders with tight cap situations will pay a premium to fit a player in before playoffs, and it doesn't even have to be one of the Sharks trade candidates, we could be the third team on other trades too. A player like Hoffman might only be tradeable with retention, but I'm betting that isn't going to be the best return for using that last slot.</div></div>
oh yeah that's true i forgot there's a cap for retentions. maybe the sharks will take back goodrow with open arms :)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 25 at 9:11 a.m.
Thread:
my personal realistic deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ginandtacos</b></div><div>CHI could be thrilled to get anything for a guy they just signed for nothing, but it also wouldn't surprise me if they see Megna as a cheap guy worth having around moving forward.</div></div>
yeah they are about 15 guys in the nhl that could be slotted for this, but he's a cheap stay at home defenseman who somehow has a positive +/- (although only 11 games) with CHI this year. like i said, this trade could be done with half the teams in the league, but it provides an insurance policy later on. also on an expiring deal, i don't see him staying with chicago
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 25 at 9:06 a.m.
Thread:
Sharks sell tiers
i think labanc and hoffman have more value than you think. sj won't be blown away by an offer, but hoffman at 50% (2250000) might fetch a 3rd/4th. he's been ok this year and could provide some offense to a struggling bottom 6 on a playoff team. labanc might be a bit harder, but since he's on an expiring deal, you take what you can get. he's another case of 50% (2362500) might get sj a 5th or 6th rounder, which would only be beneficial to the sharks
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 25 at 8:43 a.m.
Thread:
BR targets
out of these "top targets" i think they most beneficial and realistic would be eberle. at 50% retained, they could make it work. in an ideal world, moving goodrow would make life so much easier, but it won't happen. acquiring eberle at 50% retained (2750000) would keep nyr under the cap, but would leave little room to make improvement outside of that. with the current roster and players moved to the taxi squad, they would have 325k. in this case, they could acquire a defenseman at around 1.125M (swapping the place of one of the rangers bottom 3 defenseman
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 25 at 8:34 a.m.
Thread:
Re-Tool 2
that's an overpay for the rangers for two borderline rentals. miller + garand + first round + prospect (robertson or henriksson) would do it. you'd get nyr's best goalie prospect, a very solid offensive dman that needs a mental reset, a first rounder and a nhl ready prospect
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 25 at 8:31 a.m.
Thread:
hmmm
both fanbases would erupt if nyr and pitt made this move
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 24 at 2:52 p.m.
Thread:
nyr quiet deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>squashmaple</b></div><div>Severson can play both sides reasonably well (meaning he is a perfectly serviceable middle pair guy). Aside from his two boneheaded mistakes a game, he and Boqvist have been acceptable as a pairing. I won't be surprised to see the team move Provorov this summer.</div></div>
i think he is more of an offseason departure (provorov). could see bean now, especially if someone give them around a 3rd rounder
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 24 at 1:08 p.m.
Thread:
nyr quiet deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CaseyFlyman</b></div><div>Yeah, that absolutely works for Columbus. Bean's been quietly decent on the 3rd pair on an awful team.</div></div>
yeah i believe that is fair value. he's been a good dman and can contribute on offense when needed
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 24 at 1:08 p.m.
Thread:
nyr quiet deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SomeonesOffended</b></div><div>I think you should be able to get a 4th coming back minimum on the duclair trade</div></div>
yeah something around there. retaining some money will up his value and the rangers don't have too many middle picks. would've chosen a third for duclair (retained)
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com