SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

desibasha

Member Since
Apr. 11, 2018
Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
Forum Posts
48
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 1, 2020 at 10:37 p.m.
Thread: Rating All Brad Treliving Trades
Those are just awful trades. You can't sit there and say we picked Dube with the pick so its a win. Giving up:

3rd for Bollig
2nd for Elliott
3rd/5th for Stone
2nd for Lazar
3rd+ for Smith
1st/2nd/2nd for Hamonic
4th for Fantenberg
4th for Forbort
3rd for Gustafsson
1st/2nd/2nd for Hamilton

Thats a lot of picks and only useful player out of the whole list was Hamilton. Smith was garbage, Elliott was trash etc etc...
Thats 1st, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, 4th, 4th, 5th = Two 1st, Six 2nds, Four 3rds, Two 4th, One 5th.

Picks that came in
2nd/3rd for Glencross
2nd for Baertchi
2nd/4th for Hudler
2nd+ for Russell
6ht for Jones
4th for Hamonic
3rd for Lucic
4th for Frolik

All junk...Adding up to Four 2nds, Two 3rds, Three 4th, One 6th...

Net loss: Two 1st, Two 2nds, Two 3rds...4ths/5ths/6ths are just a wash...

For a badly constructed team that is just awful. Thats a fail grade. I don't know how a GM still keeps his job after that.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 26, 2020 at 3:21 p.m.
Thread: Rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Silkysmooth42</b></div><div>Bruins overpay, but not by much
Id say Debrusk and a 2nd with a conditional 3rd that becomes a 2nd if he gets say 60 points</div></div>

Keep in mind Boston picks are late. Also in Boston he doesn't have to carry the offence like in Calgary. He will be sheltered and likely do really well.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheFlamingC</b></div><div>U probably could get 3rd overall and Brannstrom for Tkachuk. Tkachuk is only a year older than Brannstrom and way better so they'd have to add from there. If you look at 3rd overall picks from the last 10 years, only about half are anywhere close to Tkachuk. You might have to add a pick on our side or a prospect however because the 3rd overall pick and Brannstrom will both likely be good to great players</div></div>

Possibly but a top 5 pick is pretty good plus other goodies. Ill take top 3 if they offered but I think this is fair for both sides.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>benjgc</b></div><div>CBJ decline. We're not giving up an exciting, ELC forward in any deal that doesn't bring back Tkachuk, Monahan or Gaudreau. (Not 1-for-1, but those three are the caliber of player that would have to be part of the return.)</div></div>

What would you offer for Backlund? If youd want him?
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 10, 2020 at 2:30 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 30, 2019 at 3:24 a.m.
Thread: Flames Trade w Ott Det CBJ ANA
Still just 25, Monahan goes back home to junior hockey town. Ott gets a really good C and Calgary unites Tkachuk brothers.
Anaheim has always had interest in Bennett, Kase gives Calgary some skill. Change of scenery for both guys.
CBJ can use some C help and get the more skilled player. Anderson gives Calgary size in the bottom six.

The least realistic is likely the Larkin-Gaudreau swap. But both are struggling and Gaudreau I think at this point wants to play closer to home. Larkin is 23, Gaudreau 26 so both in their prime. Yzerman isn't afraid of using small forwards with his history in Tampa. Larkin gives Calgary top 6 more speed and size, Gaudreau gives Det additional skill.

If Hall sings here for that amount great, if not you move M.Tkachuk back to LW and promote Mangipanne (Whos already part of that line) or Anderson.

What do you guys think?