SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

ekpaul87

Member Since
Jun. 19, 2015
Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
2nd Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
Forum Posts
894
Posts per Day
0.3
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 25, 2018 at 7:53 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 11, 2018 at 10:57 a.m.
Thread: Tear it down
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Claebom</b></div><div>The other side of that thinking, though, is that while Jack Hughes' ceiling is much higher than Hoffman's there's only a 15-20% chance of actually getting him and then the chance he doesn't actually turn out; the latter is obviously very unlikely, but there's always a chance (ahem, Daigle). Instead with a trade like this, you get a 100% chance of having a top line winger who, with the right linemates (and not Tom Pyatt and J.G. Pageau), could likely hit 30 goals. I do agree that Stone is probably the better fit given his age and position, but he's also going to cost an arm and a leg in comparison. He's bordering on becoming a recognized star in the league who just finished the season over a point a game on a garbage team, so unless the Avs are ready to pay up or they have Adam Larsson lying around (cause apparently that's the price for star wingers) Stone is completely untouchable.

I think the deal is close for both teams. The Avs get a late first, a late third and a top line 25+ G, 50-60 P winger with pedigree who is absolutely dynamite on the PP (albeit slightly older than ideal but can help them compete right now) and the Sens get a young middle 6 player who came off a great year, however much of it was based on unsustainable percentages (his shooting percentage was through the roof), and their original pick which will likely be in the top 5 and give them a chance at another great prospect to add to their pipeline. I think the Sens add a bit more but it's pretty close.</div></div>

Hughes is suppose to be better than Matthews. Thats why the pick is worth so much
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 5, 2018 at 3:12 p.m.