DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
SlickWilly
Member Since
Nov. 7, 2017
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
3271
Posts per Day
1.4
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 hours ago
Thread:
Every NHL teams must sign UFA
Have you seen Jarred Tinordi play? He was the worst player on the second worst team in the league.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 hours ago
Thread:
Cant wait for the playoffs
Hawks decline. Dvorak contract is a negative, Kovacevic and a 3rd isn't that enticing, would rather just keep Dach.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 10:33 p.m.
Thread:
My recommended lines and special teams for winning 3 in a row against Florida
I recommend asking Bergeron to come out of retirement
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 9:44 p.m.
Thread:
jones rumour
The thing that makes this rumor absolute nonsense is that to the Leafs, Foligno is a cap dump. A bad contract. But the Hawks have no reason to dump his contract because <strong>we dont need cap space</strong>. So why would we pay to dump him? It just doesnt make any sense for either team
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 3:52 p.m.
Thread:
Re-Build On the Fly
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Well I guess if you think that Turcotte is so much closer to being a top 6 F than Dach is, you're entitled to your opinion. Don't think there will he too many folks in that boat with you. Dach definitely has enough skill to grow into a 2nd line winger. He's already a better shooter than big bro Kirby. And only one year as a pro at this point. It's way too early to move on from Dach if you're the Hawks.</div></div>
I guess for me, I don't see it as "moving on" from Dach here. I'm not advocating to trade him for nothing. You're using an asset to gain a better asset. Sometimes it takes guys a little bit longer to get going than others. You're seeing it in Lafreniere this postseason. Carter Verhaeghe didn't start popping off until he was 25. Now I'm not saying he's going to be carter verhaeghe, but there is a reason he was a top 5 draft prospect. He had his flashes this season. With some consistency and some playing time, who knows. I just don't see that same upside in Dach.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 2:21 p.m.
Thread:
Re-Build On the Fly
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Gonna disagree as well. Dach is a big body who likes to mix it up along the boards and go to the front of the net. Hawks are woefully short of that organizationally. Turcotte is approaching reclamation project status. Hawks have multiple players now with his same skill set who have just as much upside. Don't see this as a W for the Hawks in any way.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CoachQ</b></div><div>Respectively disagree. Turcotte hasn't come near his upside yet, either in Ontario or LA. He's going to need to be a top six player, and he hasn't shown the ability to do that in the NHL yet (I understand he's behind Kopitar, Danault and Dubois). I know that Dach has had injury concerns, but he's slated to be a middle six forward who's willing to go to the front of the net, which the Hawks need more than another speedy center.</div></div>
I'll never understand the Dach glazing. We quite literally have 2 guys on the team right now who have the same profile as Dach in Slaggert and Entwistle and like 3 more sitting in Rockford.
I saw someone say it with regards to the Leafs with their situation and I whole heartedly agree. You don't need star players AND guys who can play with grit, you need star players who play with grit. Turcotte, while he probably doesn't turn into a superstar at this point, still has the chance to be a top 6 guy with the sandpaper you need on a playoff run. Dach will never be a top 6 guy.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:46 a.m.
Thread:
Re-Build On the Fly
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CoachQ</b></div><div>I don't see the Hawks wanting to trade Dach, particularly for Turcotte who hasn't shown much so far. They've also had Englund and let him walk so I doubt they want him again, especially where the blue line is where the Hawks have the most depth.</div></div>
Colton Dach doesn't have the same upside as Turcotte, and has had his own injury concerns the past couple years to boot. Dach and a 3rd for Turcotte would be a win on our end
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:43 a.m.
Thread:
Re-Build On the Fly
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>habs_trade_churner_50</b></div><div>Would the Hawks want Turcotte at all?
If so what would the offer look instead?
Is that offer even worth it?</div></div>
I mean I'd be interested if he could be had for cheap, but the Kings would be selling based on potential, and it's probably not worth it at this point in the rebuild spend resources on unrealized potential.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:28 a.m.
Thread:
Re-Build On the Fly
I doubt the Kings would let go of Turcotte that easily
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 4:31 p.m.
Thread:
This is the end
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Viqsi</b></div><div>No objection from this Jackets fan. Would be curious about Blackhawks fans' perspective on it; I imagine it's the second remaining year on Laine's deal that would cause 'em to flinch.</div></div>
Doesn't dig into Bedard's post ELC years, sign me up for that 1st rounder
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Fri. at 11:53 a.m.
Thread:
Poll Who Should the Hawks Take
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Agree. While we have a hole at top line RHD (I think Rinzel is going to be an great 2nd liner on the right), we have a bigger hole at RW with zero natural RW'ers, let alone top 6, in the prospect pool.</div></div>
Yeah I mean even lumping forwards in together as a whole, you see what's happened with reichel, development isn't guaranteed. You never know who's gonna top out as a 3rd liner or who's gonna make it through. Nazar and Moore are off to good starts in their development but you just never know. You need that blue chip elite prospect that you feel confident penciling in there for the next 15 years.
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Fri. at 11:38 a.m.
Thread:
Poll Who Should the Hawks Take
I want Demidov personally, but if we go Levshunov i'm still going to be pretty hyped about it. As long as we don't go off the board I'll trust what KD is cookin
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 11:37 a.m.
Thread:
I love Demidov
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WhoCares_ItsAFantasyGame</b></div><div>I'm not going to criticize the trade itself, but look at it and wonder why.
I'm thinking that this would go through only if CHI want a defenseman and accept to pass on another forward, even if it's Demidov. They may want to increase their blue line skills in order to set Bedard's future team and ensure a better set of defensive players, hence pick one of the many that will still be there at 5th. On that note, they may comeback and ask for Barron, Harris, Kovacevic, Struble OR Mailloux to be added to the deal, but they would remove one of the WIN or CGY picks to replace it with one of these players. Also, depending on which player it is, HABS may remove one of those first, but provide a 2nd or 3rd instead.</div></div>
If the Hawks wanted a defenseman, they would just take Levshunov at 2, they're not going to trade down and risk him not being there at 5. Either way, Davidson is going to draft his guy. It's going to take a massive overpay to get him out of 2.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Thu. at 9:50 p.m.
Thread:
Demidov
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks</b></div><div>If Chicago isn’t sold on Demidov this is a good move for them, I like Roy he has talent and 2 1sts isn’t bad to move down 3 spots</div></div>
I understand the thought for the Chicago trade, but if we aren't sold on Demidov I imagine they would just take Levshunov instead of trading down. Either way unless you significantly overpay I don't think Davidson trades out of 2
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 11:37 p.m.
Thread:
Get Grit trade pick
Even if Dickinson and Buium would project better than Vlasic, it would not fit our timeline better. I can't imagine that would send a great message to Bedard to say that "hey we developed this guy who is massive and has the potential to be one of the better defensive defensemen in the league but we traded him for 10 OA so we can stay bad for another couple years."
BTW i'm gonna need you guys to be good next year. I was planning on whipping out my Jack Hughes jersey this spring and am very disappointed to not be doing so!
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Wed. at 10:08 a.m.
Thread:
Mock draft - Post lottery
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LIRIK</b></div><div>I considered the forwards in the core too.
I got Levshunov as the clear number 2 in this draft. He's a future top pairing complete RHD.</div></div>
Yes, that is true, but the point is that our current D core already has size, so adding more size to the back end doesnt really solve an issue then. I could see that being a point made if you're targeting Lindstrom.
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Tue. at 11:32 p.m.
Thread:
Mock draft - Post lottery
I agree that RD is a need for the Hawks, but you are INCREDIBLY incredibly far off about size on the future D-core. Korchinski is 6'2, Vlasic is 6'6, Del Mastro is 6'4, Sam Rinzel is 6'4... We got size. We just need some real top pairing guys to emerge
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 10:00 p.m.
Thread:
The vision for next season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kyle_Davidson</b></div><div>2025-26 is the year of Hagens and the demigod?</div></div>
This seems unethical... who wins the Calder?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 9:46 p.m.
Thread:
2025-26 with Demigod
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>For sure. I was pretty high on Mewes going into this season, his profile seemed to fit what CHI is trying to build, but he has not progressed, and even more so, a lot of other players have rather easily passed him over. I love Emery's game. I do not like Elick much, though. Plus, Elick doesn't really fit Davidson's vision, IMO.</div></div>
Fair enough. I still like Badinka as well. My only exception to our point is if Yakemchuk somehow falls to 20. I'd take him without thinking twice. But i doubt it. I feel there's gonna be an early run of defensemen, someone will get overdrafted, and one of the good forwards are gonna fall to us at 20.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 9:36 p.m.
Thread:
The vision for next season
Only 1 year. Demidov turned down an extension in russia, so his contract will expire at the end of the 2024-25 season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 9:33 p.m.
Thread:
2025-26 with Demigod
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Truth. A forward at 20th is probably going to be the BPA. But, Elick and Mewes don't impress me at all, though. If they want an RD in the 2nd round, I'd be looking at Emery, Brunicke, Badinka, Danford, Gill, or Kleber, depending on who is available.</div></div>
That's fair. My views on Mews come from a little bit of backing based on his D-1, but I really like Emery's athleticism. In the end, I trust Davidson to evaluate talent. But if we could get Demidov at 2 and Teddy Stiga, Sennecke, or Tarik Parascak at 20 (I think Hage and Chernyshov will be gone)... oooooooooiiiiiii
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 8:42 p.m.
Thread:
Congrats
IDK if you do the Wordle everyday, but today's word was Musty. That's when I knew the Sharks were getting him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 8:38 p.m.
Thread:
2025-26 with Demigod
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>I'm still not a fan of Jiricek at 20th overall. I'd maybe consider him in the 2nd round, but I like Emery and Brunicke more. At 20th OA, I'm looking at Sennecke, Basha, Chernyshov, or Hage. I might even be fine with them taking Stiga there, he has risen up the rankings a ton and in my viewings, I f#$%ing love the kid.
Next year, I like a lot of guys. Hagens, Martone, Hensler, Spence, Frondell, Ryabkin, McQueen, Misa, Trethewey, etc. Should also be a good haul for the rebuild no matter where we land.</div></div>
Agree. I think for efficiency's sake, it's better to draft another forward at 20 and then pick whoever of Mews or Elick falls to us at 34 (i like them better than who you listed but the point remains)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 6 at 5:08 p.m.
Thread:
Rebuild Phase 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JordanCGrant</b></div><div>He hates losing though and has made comments to that fact. Move him to a current playoff team and I think he waives his trade protection.</div></div>
Meh. Maybe he would. I would be very shocked if conversations got that far with anyone
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 6 at 5:03 p.m.
Thread:
Rebuild Phase 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JordanCGrant</b></div><div>I actually like Jones as a player. He is overpaid by a $1-2million with more term than he deserved, but he is here. The contract isn't great given that so i would rather upgrade in quality of player especially given the strength of our defensive prospects.</div></div>
Seth Jones practically forced his way here and now that he's endured what should be the worst 2 years of the rebuild, I doubt he asks to leave
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com