SalarySwishSalarySwish

2024 opening night

Created by: Wadejos123
Team: 2024-25 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 13, 2024
Published: Apr. 13, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
This team probably shows a little more compete in 2024 than 2025 and still secures one last high lottery pick before a bunch of the kids transition into NHL time. I think it will be a quiet offseason on both the UFA and trade front. Likely one last transitionary year before taking a bigger step forward

Forwards:
Moore back to college, Nazar signs and goes to Rockford, Lardis back to the OHL, Ludwinski and Dach AHL. Guttman looks ready for an NHL spot but i'm not sure it's at center. Probably rotates around that bottom 6 till he finds his groove. Slaggart might bounce around a bit but he's older and looks like an NHL bottom 6 guy to me. Unless we get Celebrini no 2024 draft pick will be here. Sign a Middle C center to fill the hole for a year while you evaluate whether Nazar, Moore, and 2024 drat pick will be ready to take an NHL forward spot or two in 2025.

Defense:
Hawks have 4 young lefties that deserve NHL icetime. I think you take the early part of the year to see if any can play their off hand, and if not you trade the odd man out. Overpay a little for a vet Rd who's not a liability like Megna and Tinordi are and is okay being in the press box a bit collecting a check while we evaluate the young guys

Goalies:
Should be the same as it was this year. You could make the argument for signing a better backup that gives you a better chance to win every night than soderblom, but I think they ride it out with him on the last year of his deal. He's been better down the stretch and probably would be even better without Megna and Tinordi turning the puck over right in front of him 10 times a game
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$950,000
1$950,000
1$950,000
1$950,000
1$950,000
8$5,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
1$4,000,000
Trades
CHI
  1. Forsberg, Anton
  2. 2024 1st round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Late first for very early 2nd swap - similar to Mrazek. Sens probably only move back something like 6-8 slots here. You can just keep forsberg in the press box every night if Soderblom plays at an NHL level
OTT
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (CHI)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$88,500,000$67,882,500$0$5,832,500$20,617,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
LW, C
RFA
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RW
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$855,833$855,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
LW, C
RFA
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Apr. 13 at 8:56 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 749
Likes: 543
Interesting but I think we can just attach Forsberg and one of the 4ths we have to some team and they’d take him for the season.
TheBoyDuddus liked this.
Apr. 13 at 9:34 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 10,673
CHI shouldn't do that.
Apr. 13 at 10:16 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
Edited Apr. 13 at 10:25 a.m.
We should stay away from Roslovic, not the right guy for 2C even short term or the Hawks system.

Highly doubt Vlasic would sign an 8 year deal at $5.2M. Remember, as a 22 year rookie against the toughest assignments, he's ranked top 3 defensive players in the defensive zone. If Vlasic were never to improve from this season, unlikely given his age and the improvement from a year ago, he'd be worth $6M minimum to $8M on a 8 year deal. He and his agent are not only wouldn't take a penny less, they will bet on him improving and thus almost certainly don't want a 8 year deal unless it's around $8M which the Hawks probably wouldn't do. For that reason, he's likely a 3 year bridge and going to land anywhere from $3M to $5M on a 3 year bridge deal is my guess. If I'm Chicago though, I'd push to lock him up between $6M and $7M on a 8 year deal as that will look like a bargain in a few years with Vlasic almost certainly improving and the cap continuing to rise. We could be looking at the best shutdown defender in the league in a couple years, and I'd argue if he had played 6 less games last season in the NHL and could qualify for the Calder, he'd be in the conversation right behind Bedard and Faber with a pretty good argument.

I think the Hawks bring in a cheap RHD vet for 1 or 2 years until Rinzel (or Levshunov if the Hawks draft him) are ready for the show. Keep rotating Del Mastro, Kaiser, Crevier and Philips all getting chances to play 20 games on the left side 3rd line. The good news is all 4 have shown they can play in the league to varying degrees with Del Mastro probably ahead of the class of 4. Certainly at least 1 or 2 will get moved in the next couple years. The question mark to me is Allan. Can Allan play on his off-side in the NHL and be good enough in a 3rd line role? He's played a fair amount on his off-side, so could be interesting or perhaps the Hawks don't think highly enough of him. My rankings of those 5 are as follows; Del Mastro, Kaiser, Crevier, Alan, Phillips in that order. It's a logjam for sure.
Garak and Wadejos123 liked this.
Apr. 13 at 10:39 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 10,673
Edited Apr. 13 at 10:51 a.m.
Quoting: ChiHawk
Highly doubt Vlasic would sign an 8 year deal at $5.2M. Remember, as a 22 year rookie against the toughest assignments, he's ranked top 3 defensive players in the defensive zone. If Vlasic were never to improve from this season, unlikely given his age and the improvement from a year ago, he'd be worth $6M minimum to $8M on a 8 year deal. He and his agent are not only wouldn't take a penny less, they will bet on him improving and thus almost certainly don't want a 8 year deal unless it's around $8M which the Hawks probably wouldn't do. For that reason, he's likely a 3 year bridge and going to land anywhere from $3M to $5M on a 3 year bridge deal is my guess. If I'm Chicago though, I'd push to lock him up between $6M and $7M on a 8 year deal as that will look like a bargain in a few years with Vlasic almost certainly improving and the cap continuing to rise. We could be looking at the best shutdown defender in the league in a couple years, and I'd argue if he had played 6 less games last season in the NHL and could qualify for the Calder, he'd be in the conversation right behind Bedard and Faber with a pretty good argument.


I disagree with this. Shutdown dmen don't make $8M. If he signed at $5.2M for 8 years, he would be overpaid for the first 2 to 4 years of the contract. Which means overall, he will have made more money in total than he would have on a bridge plus his contract after the bridge deal. At his peak, as a shutdown defenseman, $5.2M should be right in line with market value. The only way he gets $8M or more is if he adds a ton of offense to his game. Which is possible, but, again, the overpayment in the first few years of the contract should be able to make up for that discrepancy, and if they structure the contract properly and backload the deal, he will be making that much or close enough to it in the back half of the contract, just at a lower AAV, which helps the team.

Contract structure:

@ a $5.18M AAV x 8 years

Actual salary:
Year 1: $3M
Year 2: $3M
Year 3: $3M
Year 4: $4.5M
Year 5: $5.5M
Year 6: $6.5M
Year 7: $8M
Year 8: $8M
Apr. 13 at 10:49 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,080
Likes: 9,404
Edited Apr. 13 at 10:58 a.m.
Quoting: Garak
I disagree with this. Shutdown dmen don't make $8M. If he signed at $5.2M for 8 years, he would be overpaid for the first 2 to 4 years of the contract. Which means overall, he will have made more money in total than he would have on a bridge plus his contract after the bridge deal. At his peak, as a shutdown defenseman, $5.2M should be right in line with market value. The only way he gets $8M or more is if he adds a ton of offense to his game. Which is possible, but, again, the overpayment in the first few years of the contract should be able to make up for that discrepancy, and if they structure the contract properly and backload the deal, he will be making that much or close enough to it in the back half of the contract, just at a lower AAV, which helps the team.


No way. Gudas just signed this season for $4M and he's 33 years old. Brodin signed at 28 years old for $6M 3 years ago. McDonagh signed at 30 years old for $6.75M 5 years ago. Slavin signed 6 years ago, age 23 at $5.3M which is probably the closest to Vlasic...6 years ago!

With a 22 year old on a long term deal playing at the level of those players today, and you're paying for future ability obviously and against a rising cap, those comps aren't going to land Vlasic. Player contracts are based on a % against the total cap obviously. When all those players signed the cap limits were lower and they were much older aside from Slavin. Not only would he NOT be overpaid at $5.2M next year...that would be about fair market value (at least in the ballpark), he would be way underpaid in a few years against a rising cap to boot.
See All