SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who do you trade to upgrade backup and RHD

Created by: BigAnderson
Team: 2019-20 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 2, 2019
Published: Dec. 2, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The Leafs have a lot of depth at forward but desperately need an upgrade in goal behind Andersen. Which of Johnsson, Kerfoot, Kapanen, do you think would net biggest/best return paired with Ceci to upgrade our backup goalie and right side defense. I think all 3 are good young players but are ultimately replaceable internally if it means getting stronger elsewhere on the roster. Ceci hasn’t been terrible, but he’s not top pairing material and doesn’t mesh well on the ice with Rielly. He’s better suited playing safer minutes and not against teams top lines (unless you’re a team in tank mode)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$83,747,143$0$70,000-$2,247,143
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,634,000$11,634,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,893,000$10,893,000
RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$694,444$694,444 (Performance Bonus$70,000$70K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$675,000$675,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,300,000$5,300,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 2, 2019 at 6:37 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 389
Jake Muzzin for Brendan Guhle and a second
Dec. 2, 2019 at 6:37 p.m.
#2
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
No one.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 6:38 p.m.
#3
Hawks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 1,665
As a Hawks fan I’d be willing to part with Crawford or Lehner for Johnson or Kapanen. Hawks would have to retain 50% to make cap work for both. Hawks get to infuse some youth and speed while Toronto gets a championship winning goalie as rental for playoffs. Also a chance to resign him or trade him in June since you’ll hold UFA rights.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 6:42 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 221
Likes: 64
Quoting: Jamiepo
No one.


Hutch is not getting it done. A move has to be made
Dec. 2, 2019 at 6:46 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 221
Likes: 64
Quoting: Jco5ta5
As a Hawks fan I’d be willing to part with Crawford or Lehner for Johnson or Kapanen. Hawks would have to retain 50% to make cap work for both. Hawks get to infuse some youth and speed while Toronto gets a championship winning goalie as rental for playoffs. Also a chance to resign him or trade him in June since you’ll hold UFA rights.

Johnsson for Lehner I’d jump at. I’d probably trade Kappy for him too but I’d be less happy about it.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 6:50 p.m.
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,518
Likes: 22,676
This trade Ceci at any cost is silly. He certainly hasn't been the Leafs worse RHD. I felt sorry for Ceci for most of season. He was paired with the very irresponsible defensively Reilly. Reilly gets points on the PP and even strength but is liability to the Leafs when the Leafs don't have possession. But of course folks look at the Reilly and his points and Reilly is the teflon man....no criticism allowed.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 6:52 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Picks is all this team has to really trade.
I doubt they break up the forward group. They need their defensive prospects because they are so thin there and will be looking for 5 bodies in the off season.
Their forward prospect group kind of sucks.
So That's what they have to trade. Picks. Only way they move a forward is for cap space.
There is defensive help out there.
Brodie, Moore and Miller from Boston (not that they would help you but it's good they are on the market) if the penguins are out (most likely) Schultz.
You can get help defensively. But the problem is TOR won't be the only team looking. WPG is most likely going to go after someone to help their defense.

They will need to find a backup as well. I'm just going to be honest. A team see's they have no decent backup. The first thing they are going to do is run the goalie.
If that's all it takes to get to the cup, someone will do it.
I could easily see Tom Wilson plow into Anderson and laugh his ass off on the way to the dressing room. Would not surprise me at all if that is all that it took for him to help the caps to play for a cup.
No doubt boston would do it too. Hell you are talking about a team who went out to Knee on Knee guys last year. You go into games with that backup, you are getting torched.
Playoff hockey is one rough goonish event.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 6:56 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 463
Likes: 133
Johnsson should be on the block
Dec. 2, 2019 at 7:03 p.m.
#9
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Those guys will net you a back up goalie for sure, I don’t think it will get you a huge upgrade on D though.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 7:05 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 221
Likes: 64
Quoting: palhal
This trade Ceci at any cost is silly. He certainly hasn't been the Leafs worse RHD. I felt sorry for Ceci for most of season. He was paired with the very irresponsible defensively Reilly. Reilly gets points on the PP and even strength but is liability to the Leafs when the Leafs don't have possession. But of course folks look at the Reilly and his points and Reilly is the teflon man....no criticism allowed.

I don’t think I said trade him at all costs. He’s simply not top pair material and by default it seemed he was put there by Babcock and left there when Keefe took over. Ceci plays a similar game to Rielly just not as well. It’s why they don’t work together. They both like to take chances to make a break out defensively or pinch heavily in the offensive zone. He’d probably look a lot better paired with Muzzin who’d be more willing and able to cover up his mistakes. I don’t know if Holl is quite ready for top pair minutes and responsibility but I’d like someone more like him with Rielly because he doesn’t flash one way or the other. He just makes simple safe plays and that’s who you want with a run’n’gun type D man like Rielly. That’s my thoughts on Ceci anyway. He’s not bad, his style just doesn’t mesh with what Toronto needs from him, and at 4.5 he’s an obvious candidate to move to get below the cap
Sufferingleafsfan liked this.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 7:10 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 221
Likes: 64
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Those guys will net you a back up goalie for sure, I don’t think it will get you a huge upgrade on D though.

Thing is I don’t think we need a huge upgrade on D. Just a changing of style on at least one player back there. Need another guy that plays like Holl but more seasoned in playing other teams top lines
Dec. 2, 2019 at 7:33 p.m.
#12
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: BigAnderson
Hutch is not getting it done. A move has to be made


That doesn’t mean you trade roster players...
Sufferingleafsfan liked this.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 7:41 p.m.
#13
Sufferingleafsfan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 114
Likes: 24
Quoting: Jamiepo
That doesn’t mean you trade roster players...


I wouldn't move anyone from the Leafs top-9 forward pool for a backup and I don't think you have to. These calls for sending one of our better wingers in Johnsson and Kapanen who are on good deals with term to Chicago for Lehner or Crawford who both have zero term are ridiculous.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 7:44 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 221
Likes: 64
Quoting: Jamiepo
That doesn’t mean you trade roster players...


When you’re in a cap crunch and none of them would be considered core pieces you do. They’re more valuable as trade chips. Only saying move one of the forwards not all 3
Dec. 2, 2019 at 7:50 p.m.
#15
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,560
Likes: 11,192
A mid-tier prospect could net a reasonable backup.

Toronto is best to wait until Keefe's got at least 15-20 in with the team to see how the defense stacks up with his method vs babcocks. They've been +7 in GD since he took over compared to the -6 Babcock left at, and their xGA/60 is 6th best in the league since then. If they end up moving Ceci I think they should be looking for a top 4 capable replacement, preferable someone that would pair with Rielly. If they do make a trade, I think only one of the their 3M guys should be moved (Johnsson, Kap, Kerfoot) if need be.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 7:57 p.m.
#16
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: BigAnderson
When you’re in a cap crunch and none of them would be considered core pieces you do. They’re more valuable as trade chips. Only saying move one of the forwards not all 3


Let’s sit back and see what happens. If I were betting my money would be on picks and prospects.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 8:16 p.m.
#17
Hawks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 1,665
Quoting: BigAnderson
Johnsson for Lehner I’d jump at. I’d probably trade Kappy for him too but I’d be less happy about it.


I’d probably want Kapanen if I was the Hawks.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 8:19 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 221
Likes: 64
Quoting: Jamiepo
Let’s sit back and see what happens. If I were betting my money would be on picks and prospects.

Dubas has been on record number of times now saying he doesn’t want to move any more picks right now. Our high end prospect pool is getting pretty thin and I wouldn’t move Liljegren, Sandin, or Korshkov at all. Comparatively speaking, Johnsson at 3.4 is proven top 6 possibly to drop to our 3rd line. He’s more valuable to a team needing too 6 help if his minutes end up going down to 13/14 a night. I’d rather lose Johnsson for help else where than Timashov for nothing
Dec. 2, 2019 at 8:23 p.m.
#19
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: BigAnderson
Dubas has been on record number of times now saying he doesn’t want to move any more picks right now. Our high end prospect pool is getting pretty thin and I wouldn’t move Liljegren, Sandin, or Korshkov at all. Comparatively speaking, Johnsson at 3.4 is proven top 6 possibly to drop to our 3rd line. He’s more valuable to a team needing too 6 help if his minutes end up going down to 13/14 a night. I’d rather lose Johnsson for help else where than Timashov for nothing


So prospect pool is weak... move Johnsson and move up prospects? Fail to see the logic there. Moving Johnsson for a backup goalie would be dumb. If you acquire an rhd you need to move ceci. Would need to be a firm upgrade.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 8:23 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 221
Likes: 64
Quoting: Jco5ta5
I’d probably want Kapanen if I was the Hawks.


If it’s Kapp, then it has to be Lehner and they have to retain half. He not untouchable but he’d be the one I’d want to see moved the least
Dec. 2, 2019 at 8:31 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 221
Likes: 64
Quoting: Jamiepo
So prospect pool is weak... move Johnsson and move up prospects? Fail to see the logic there. Moving Johnsson for a backup goalie would be dumb. If you acquire an rhd you need to move ceci. Would need to be a firm upgrade.

You’re not bringing up a prospect. If you move Johnsson out, either Kerfoot or Moore could play third line LW and it still be a really good third line
Dec. 2, 2019 at 8:40 p.m.
#22
Hawks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 1,665
Quoting: BigAnderson
If it’s Kapp, then it has to be Lehner and they have to retain half. He not untouchable but he’d be the one I’d want to see moved the least


There’s no doubt that Lehner is the better goalie but does Crawford’s track record make him the better candidate? Lehner has 10 playoff games played. Crawford has more playoff series wins than that. Plus 2 Stanley Cups and was on the practice squad during the 2010 run.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 8:41 p.m.
#23
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: BigAnderson
You’re not bringing up a prospect. If you move Johnsson out, either Kerfoot or Moore could play third line LW and it still be a really good third line


Lol... no that’s not how it works. Johnsson is 1lw. That means when he goes everyone in the depth chart takes a step up.

I’m not against moving Johnsson, for the right return.
Dec. 2, 2019 at 8:53 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 221
Likes: 64
Quoting: Jamiepo
Lol... no that’s not how it works. Johnsson is 1lw. That means when he goes everyone in the depth chart takes a step up.

I’m not against moving Johnsson, for the right return.


He goes behind Mikheyev and Hyman when Marner comes back. That puts him at 3LW. Move him out, you can either put Moore back there, or move Kerfoot over and line Spezza up at the 3C. Which is what Keefe did before Kerfoot’s suspension. The idea is to improve your team where it’s weakest by using what you have a surplus of. Leafs have a large surplus of undersized, gritty players who can score. What they don’t have is a back up goalie that lets in less than 4 goals a game
Dec. 2, 2019 at 9:03 p.m.
#25
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: BigAnderson
He goes behind Mikheyev and Hyman when Marner comes back. That puts him at 3LW. Move him out, you can either put Moore back there, or move Kerfoot over and line Spezza up at the 3C. Which is what Keefe did before Kerfoot’s suspension. The idea is to improve your team where it’s weakest by using what you have a surplus of. Leafs have a large surplus of undersized, gritty players who can score. What they don’t have is a back up goalie that lets in less than 4 goals a game


No... Johnsson is 1 lw... nothing to do with marner. When marner returns Hyman and mikheyev can duel it out for 2 lw.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll