SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fla Car Bos Final Offers

Created by: MNBassman
Team: 2019-20 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 21, 2020
Published: Feb. 21, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
To the future...
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
2$925,000
Trades
1.
2.
3.
MIN
    An unwashed jockstrap
    4.
    MIN
    1. Backes, David
    2. 2020 1st round pick (BOS)
    5.
    MIN
    1. 2020 4th round pick (SJS)
    CGY
    1. Hartman, Ryan ($500,000 retained)
    Additional Details:
    To any playoff-bound team in need of a semi-useful 4th line grinder.
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the BOS
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    2021
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    2022
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the MIN
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$64,211,049$0$1,950,000$17,288,951
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $925,000$925,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $4,750,000$4,750,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $916,666$916,666 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $1,487,500$1,487,500
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
    RW, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $7,538,462$7,538,462
    LW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RW, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $874,125$874,125
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Florida Panthers
    $925,000$925,000
    RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
    $925,000$925,000
    C
    RFA - 5
    Logo of the Boston Bruins
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $7,538,462$7,538,462
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $5,187,500$5,187,500
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $2,166,667$2,166,667
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $750,000$750,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $2,250,000$2,250,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $785,000$785,000
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $700,000$700,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    $925,000$925,000
    RD
    RFA

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 9:34 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 20,129
    Likes: 8,987
    Edited Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.
    Final answer is no. Couple of prospects. Or a 2nd. Or a 3rd and a prospect. Yes. 1st....no.

    Want the 1st, add Staal and we add a couple prospects.

    And no, not Studnicka, Urho, Beecher
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 9:35 a.m.
    #2
    GM Tom Dundon
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 8,962
    Likes: 3,664
    EDM declines
    JayTea and MNBassman liked this.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 9:36 a.m.
    #3
    Bcarlo25
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 22,589
    Likes: 7,393
    Well that’s definitely a no to that final offer from boston. Really bad deal for them.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 9:40 a.m.
    #4
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2018
    Posts: 6,784
    Likes: 1,915
    This is atrocious.

    Trocheck for Brodin straight up is fair, in no way whatsoever is Eric Staal worth 2 good prospects.

    Dumba's not worth a top centre prospect. The Wild will end up keeping him if they stick to that ask.

    Give Galchenyuk a chance. The kid just got there and hasn't looked that bad so far, geez.

    That's probably the cost to move Backes but with this years draft being so deep I highly doubt the Bruins would consider that.

    Hartman, meh. He's not an impact player so it's whatever really.

    Back to the drawing board on these offers.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 9:41 a.m.
    #5
    14m in dead cap
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2019
    Posts: 3,690
    Likes: 3,144
    Much as I'd like the Florida trade to happen, seems bad for Florida. If they're pushing hard to win now with Bob, a more reasonable trade is probably Minnesota sends over Brodin and Staal (money retained as needed) and Florida sends back Noel, Borgstrom and a 1st along with a cap dump to make the money work. Seems fair for a team going for it and gives Minnesota some assets to rebuild around. Rebuild, not retool.
    MNBassman liked this.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:15 a.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 2,426
    Likes: 365
    You made my day with "unwashed jockstrap" and I thank you for that.
    MNBassman liked this.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:20 a.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 7,261
    Likes: 2,706
    Quoting: Gofnut999
    Final answer is no. Couple of prospects. Or a 2nd. Or a 3rd and a prospect. Yes. 1st....no.

    Want the 1st, add Staal and we add a couple prospects.

    And no, not Studnicka, Urho, Beecher


    Quoting: Bcarlo25
    Well that’s definitely a no to that final offer from boston. Really bad deal for them.


    Backes will cost at least a second to move, Foligno is the best defensive forward in the game, easily worth at least another second, probably more with what everyone else has gone for this year
    MNBassman liked this.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:22 a.m.
    #8
    Bcarlo25
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 22,589
    Likes: 7,393
    Quoting: AFOX10900
    Backes will cost at least a second to move, Foligno is the best defensive forward in the game, easily worth at least another second, probably more with what everyone else has gone for this year


    Negative.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:23 a.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 7,261
    Likes: 2,706
    Quoting: Bcarlo25
    Negative.


    Because...?
    MNBassman liked this.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:28 a.m.
    #10
    Thread Starter
    MNBassman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 8,407
    Likes: 3,647
    Quoting: Bcarlo25
    Negative.


    Foligno is a very, very good player! He is the perfect add to any team with Cup aspirations. He’s big, fast, very physical, kills penalties, scores a bit, and can play up and down the lineup to make matchups work. He’s worth a 2nd and a 4th on his own easily!
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    MNBassman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 8,407
    Likes: 3,647
    Quoting: JayTea
    Much as I'd like the Florida trade to happen, seems bad for Florida. If they're pushing hard to win now with Bob, a more reasonable trade is probably Minnesota sends over Brodin and Staal (money retained as needed) and Florida sends back Noel, Borgstrom and a 1st along with a cap dump to make the money work. Seems fair for a team going for it and gives Minnesota some assets to rebuild around. Rebuild, not retool.


    I would probably prefer that return as I’m not sold on Trochek as a fit for the Wild’s future plans.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:32 a.m.
    #12
    Bcarlo25
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 22,589
    Likes: 7,393
    Quoting: MNBassman
    Foligno is a very, very good player! He is the perfect add to any team with Cup aspirations. He’s big, fast, very physical, kills penalties, scores a bit, and can play up and down the lineup to make matchups work. He’s worth a 2nd and a 4th on his own easily!


    Ummmm I’m not going to 100% disagree with that. He’s a good player. Brings a lot to the table, particularly defensively. To some teams, he might be worth a 2nd and a 4th. The bruins are the best defensive team in hockey. They don’t really have any gaps in terms of defensive forwards. Are they going to make the move for him and pop him on the fourth line for two years at just under 3 million? Cap situation gets very very tight moving forward depending on what happens with Grzelcyk and Krug.

    If Sweeney moves his first round pick, it’s going to be for a big boy addition. If you wanted to rework this for Backes, a 2nd, and a good (no, you’re not getting studnicka!) prospect for foligno, there might be something there.
    MNBassman liked this.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:38 a.m.
    #13
    14m in dead cap
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2019
    Posts: 3,690
    Likes: 3,144
    Quoting: MNBassman
    I would probably prefer that return as I’m not sold on Trochek as a fit for the Wild’s future plans.


    I'd prefer Guerin sell everything not bolted down and start a long overdue rebuilt. Brodin, Staal, Dumba, Foligno all have value and could bring in a return to help a rebuild. Anyone 25 or older that can be traded needs to go. If Soucy has another good season, I'd look at trading him too next year too. They have vets who aren't going anywhere, so it's not like the roster will be a bunch of kids without leadership.

    Put the C on Spurgeon next year and let him lead through the rebuild. He's not going anywhere and he's a fantastic role model for the young players.
    MNBassman liked this.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:38 a.m.
    #14
    Thread Starter
    MNBassman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 8,407
    Likes: 3,647
    Quoting: Ryminister_27
    This is atrocious.

    Trocheck for Brodin straight up is fair, in no way whatsoever is Eric Staal worth 2 good prospects.

    Dumba's not worth a top centre prospect. The Wild will end up keeping him if they stick to that ask.

    Give Galchenyuk a chance. The kid just got there and hasn't looked that bad so far, geez.

    That's probably the cost to move Backes but with this years draft being so deep I highly doubt the Bruins would consider that.

    Hartman, meh. He's not an impact player so it's whatever really.

    Back to the drawing board on these offers.


    (I’m ignoring this incredible display of ignorance)
    wabit liked this.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:41 a.m.
    #15
    Thread Starter
    MNBassman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 8,407
    Likes: 3,647
    Quoting: JayTea
    I'd prefer Guerin sell everything not bolted down and start a long overdue rebuilt. Brodin, Staal, Dumba, Foligno all have value and could bring in a return to help a rebuild. Anyone 25 or older that can be traded needs to go. If Soucy has another good season, I'd look at trading him too next year too. They have vets who aren't going anywhere, so it's not like the roster will be a bunch of kids without leadership.

    Put the C on Spurgeon next year and let him lead through the rebuild. He's not going anywhere and he's a fantastic role model for the young players.


    I’m still ticked off at Guerin for signing Spurgeon to that asinine contract! Imagine what he could bring right now in the rental market if Guerin wasn’t so stupid...
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 10:49 a.m.
    #16
    14m in dead cap
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2019
    Posts: 3,690
    Likes: 3,144
    Quoting: MNBassman
    I’m still ticked off at Guerin for signing Spurgeon to that asinine contract! Imagine what he could bring right now in the rental market if Guerin wasn’t so stupid...


    Guessing that was a Leipold move. Fenton screwed up by not addressing Spurgeon one way or the other before the draft. He couldn't sign a deal, but they could have had a handshake agreement ready for July 1 which would have given Fenton options if it was too much. Instead Fenton was on vacation July 2nd with that unresolved. That couldn't have made Leipold happy.
    MNBassman liked this.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 11:07 a.m.
    #17
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2018
    Posts: 6,784
    Likes: 1,915
    Quoting: MNBassman
    (I’m ignoring this incredible display of ignorance)


    LOL
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 11:33 a.m.
    #18
    Thread Starter
    MNBassman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 8,407
    Likes: 3,647
    Quoting: JayTea
    Guessing that was a Leipold move. Fenton screwed up by not addressing Spurgeon one way or the other before the draft. He couldn't sign a deal, but they could have had a handshake agreement ready for July 1 which would have given Fenton options if it was too much. Instead Fenton was on vacation July 2nd with that unresolved. That couldn't have made Leipold happy.


    I agree!
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 11:33 a.m.
    #19
    Ryan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 154
    Likes: 22
    Quoting: Caniac555
    EDM declines


    I honestly think the Wild could get a 3rd rounder for him, just gotta find the right sucker
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 11:35 a.m.
    #20
    Thread Starter
    MNBassman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 8,407
    Likes: 3,647
    Quoting: RFenger
    I honestly think the Wild could get a 3rd rounder for him, just gotta find the right sucker


    I hope you’re right - anything they get for Galchenyuk is gravy.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 11:55 a.m.
    #21
    14m in dead cap
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2019
    Posts: 3,690
    Likes: 3,144
    Quoting: RFenger
    I honestly think the Wild could get a 3rd rounder for him, just gotta find the right sucker


    He had a decent game in Vancouver the other night, with a goal and the shootout winner. If they retain salary, he's probably worth a 3rd or 4th.
    MNBassman liked this.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 11:58 a.m.
    #22
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 3,275
    Likes: 623
    The Florida is complete garbage. Trocheck for Brodin one for one but in reality Wild should add. If not then Cats will look elsewhere.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 12:36 p.m.
    #23
    Thread Starter
    MNBassman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 8,407
    Likes: 3,647
    Quoting: Kosterjr
    The Florida is complete garbage. Trocheck for Brodin one for one but in reality Wild should add. If not then Cats will look elsewhere.


    So then would the Wild. Brodin is a better player than Trochek!
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 12:48 p.m.
    #24
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 8,223
    Likes: 3,642
    Quoting: JayTea
    Guessing that was a Leipold move. Fenton screwed up by not addressing Spurgeon one way or the other before the draft. He couldn't sign a deal, but they could have had a handshake agreement ready for July 1 which would have given Fenton options if it was too much. Instead Fenton was on vacation July 2nd with that unresolved. That couldn't have made Leipold happy.


    Fenton did nothing wrong with the handling of Spurgeon's contract.
    -There wasn't going to be a handshake deal for less than market value. Edler ($6mx2) was signed before July 1st, then Myers ($6mx5) on July 1st set the floor for for any contract Spurgeon should have taken. Mid July Trouba ($8mx8) set the ceiling.
    -Fenton made and offer heard Spurgeon's contract demands and just probably walked away from the table.
    -Spurgeon had a career year and had a full season of play left for MN. Signing any 30yo, injury prone player for big money/term after a career year is a mistake. Let some of the season play out some before sitting back down. It was more likely that the player comes down from his career year and his contract will too.
    -Roster flexibly for the season and beyond. Spurgeon would be a heck of a trade chip to have right now. There is the expansion draft to consider. There is also the cap to make work.

    I'm not bashing Spurgeon here. This would all be his agent, not him doing the contract stuff. Agents get paid a lot of money to do this and they are pretty good at what they do. Fenton might not have been good at his job; he is looking better in hindsight; but I have no issues with how he handled Spurgeon.
    MNBassman liked this.
    Feb. 21, 2020 at 1:02 p.m.
    #25
    Thread Starter
    MNBassman
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 8,407
    Likes: 3,647
    Quoting: wabit
    Fenton did nothing wrong with the handling of Spurgeon's contract.
    -There wasn't going to be a handshake deal for less than market value. Edler ($6mx2) was signed before July 1st, then Myers ($6mx5) on July 1st set the floor for for any contract Spurgeon should have taken. Mid July Trouba ($8mx8) set the ceiling.
    -Fenton made and offer heard Spurgeon's contract demands and just probably walked away from the table.
    -Spurgeon had a career year and had a full season of play left for MN. Signing any 30yo, injury prone player for big money/term after a career year is a mistake. Let some of the season play out some before sitting back down. It was more likely that the player comes down from his career year and his contract will too.
    -Roster flexibly for the season and beyond. Spurgeon would be a heck of a trade chip to have right now. There is the expansion draft to consider. There is also the cap to make work.

    I'm not bashing Spurgeon here. This would all be his agent, not him doing the contract stuff. Agents get paid a lot of money to do this and they are pretty good at what they do. Fenton might not have been good at his job; he is looking better in hindsight; but I have no issues with how he handled Spurgeon.


    I have stated it 100 times - the Spurgeon signing was incredibly stupid!! He should have been traded to for the highest bid and the (much needed) rebuilding process would be way ahead of where it is today.
    There is no doubt in my mind that idiot owner, Craig Leipold mandated the whole thing!
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll