SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Why do the ducks want to keep Manson

Created by: Jack_
Team: 2019-20 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 23, 2020
Published: Apr. 23, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Hes almost 29 and hes starting to decline. Hes got two years left and the ducks wont be good for either of those two seasons. Signing him after his current contract expires wont be a good idea, he'll want term and he shouldn't get term. Keeping him makes no sense. They're rebuilding manson shouldn't be in their long term plans. If he is they could just resign him as a ufa. I almost guarantee they will trade him as a rental or next season so te team gets 1.5 years of him but they should just trade him now so they can get the best possible return.

Unless theres something I'm missing I dont understand why they would want to keep him. They could literally replace him with Cody Ceci and it wouldn't make a difference. They could sign ceci as a ufa and they would be better off then if they were to just keep manson.

The trade doesnt have much to do with this but I would like it to happen
Trades
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$65,384,457$0$1,200,000$16,115,543
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$874,125$874,125
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,133,333$1,133,333
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 8
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,125,000$1,125,000 (Performance Bonus$1,200,000$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,166$894,166
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$675,000$675,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 23, 2020 at 4:19 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,015
Likes: 14,647
If he is no different than ceci, then just keep ceci.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 4:21 p.m.
#2
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,658
1) we don’t want Ceci
2) we don’t need Kapanen
3) Kesler is on LTIR so there’s no need to move him
4) the only we’d accept for Manson is a prospect RHD or top scorer
OldNYIfan and brocklesnar liked this.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 4:22 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
If he is no different than ceci, then just keep ceci.


Theres a huge difference between the two. It shouldn't matter to the ducks tho. They'll be bad no matter what, I used ceci as an example but they could get anyone to play those minutes. The ducks will be bad with manson and even worse with ceci which is good for them.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 4:24 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
1) we don’t want Ceci
2) we don’t need Kapanen
3) Kesler is on LTIR so there’s no need to move him
4) the only we’d accept for Manson is a prospect RHD or top scorer


they wont get that for manson. Its dumb for them to get assets to help them now. What they should be doing us getting future assets
Apr. 23, 2020 at 4:24 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,015
Likes: 14,647
Quoting: Jack_
Theres a huge difference between the two. It shouldn't matter to the ducks tho. They'll be bad no matter what, I used ceci as an example but they could get anyone to play those minutes. The ducks will be bad with manson and even worse with ceci which is good for them.


just because they aren't good doesn't mean they should give away players.
Ajp_18, OldNYIfan and brocklesnar liked this.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 4:25 p.m.
#6
Xx_Zegras46_xX
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,658
Quoting: Jack_
they wont get that for manson. Its dumb for them to get assets to help them now. What they should be doing us getting future assets


If it’s dumb than leafs fans should just give up cause clearly they don’t want to give the Ducks what they want for what the Leafs want.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 4:27 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
just because they aren't good doesn't mean they should give away players.


Definitely not but from what I've read they want to keep him and I dont understand why they would at all. Selling him right now isnt a good idea because of the season hes had but they should give him 25 games of reasonably easy minutes that he can dominate and a team will overpay for him. Keeping him just to play those minutes seems so pointless and wasteful
Apr. 23, 2020 at 4:27 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Ceci is trash, Kesler is already on record stated that he's not waiving his NMC. Those pieces are nowhere near enough for Josh Manson. None of the pieces are of any benefit to Anaheim especially Cody Freaking Ceci.
OldNYIfan and brocklesnar liked this.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 4:28 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
If it’s dumb than leafs fans should just give up cause clearly they don’t want to give the Ducks what they want for what the Leafs want.


That has absolutely nothing to do with what I said at all. I said it would be stupid to keep him
Apr. 23, 2020 at 4:30 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Ceci is trash, Kesler is already on record stated that he's not waiving his NMC. Those pieces are nowhere near enough for Josh Manson. None of the pieces are of any benefit to Anaheim especially Cody Freaking Ceci.


They dont need manson. They will be bad if he plays on the ducks or if he doesn't. Ceci gives them a far better chance at a high pick then manson would. High pick+future assets+ceci>manson and it isnt close. They dont have any need for him at all
Apr. 23, 2020 at 4:50 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 6,839
Likes: 5,304
The only explanation is that they're either stupid or think they are better than they are (which happens). It makes no sense for them to keep him basically for all the reasons you already said. With or without him they are likely not a playoff team for the remainder of his contract so it makes sense not only to recoup younger assets for him but also just commit to sucking, and therefore better your draft position and by extension your future.
Jack_ liked this.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 5:09 p.m.
#12
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,421
Likes: 2,902
The same could be said for TOR keeping Marner. 33M locked up in 3 players isn’t how you compete in this league but leaf fans hate that idea.
brocklesnar liked this.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 5:19 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: Jah1722
The same could be said for TOR keeping Marner. 33M locked up in 3 players isn’t how you compete in this league but leaf fans hate that idea.


That isnt the same thing at all. That's not even in the same universe. That's like saying tampa bay will have to trade hedman because the weather in Australia is nice today.

On another level the leafs were something like a top 5 team in the league since Keefe took over so your point is invalid
Apr. 23, 2020 at 5:22 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 5,157
Likes: 5,976
Ducks dont "want" to keep or move him, like any team with any player they want an appropriate package that fills needs they have to move whomever

in this Manson to the Leafs case the reasonable ask is Liljegren and a 2nd, but it isnt a good example becuase it isnt a good trade fit seeing how badly both teams need RD

In General a B level prospect and a second is more than a reasonable ask

But Bob Murray is an old school GM and wont move him for that I feel becuase he loves Manson
OldNYIfan and brocklesnar liked this.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 5:29 p.m.
#15
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,421
Likes: 2,902
Quoting: Jack_
That isnt the same thing at all. That's not even in the same universe. That's like saying tampa bay will have to trade hedman because the weather in Australia is nice today.

On another level the leafs were something like a top 5 team in the league since Keefe took over so your point is invalid


I thought the point you were trying to make was about winning a Stanley Cup? Guess not. My bad.
OldNYIfan and brocklesnar liked this.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 5:33 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: Jah1722
I thought the point you were trying to make was about winning a Stanley Cup? Guess not. My bad.


No. Anaheim will be bad with or without manson. The smartest thing for them to do is to trade him for the best return possible. At the draft or early on in the next season would be the best time to do that. From what I've read the ducks want to keep him and it's really pointless to do so
Apr. 23, 2020 at 5:39 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Because they don't have another RD in the system.
OldNYIfan and brocklesnar liked this.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 5:40 p.m.
#18
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,849
Likes: 25,670
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
The only explanation is that they're either stupid or think they are better than they are (which happens). It makes no sense for them to keep him basically for all the reasons you already said. With or without him they are likely not a playoff team for the remainder of his contract so it makes sense not only to recoup younger assets for him but also just commit to sucking, and therefore better your draft position and by extension your future.


I'm surprised by this comment because I've grown accustomed to seeing intelligent insight from you. By the same token, Toronto isn't a serious playoff contender with that porous gong show you all so laughably call a defense for the balance of Freddie Andersen's contract, so why not commit to sucking and trading HIM while you can still get future assets for him?

Winning matters. You put the best team on the ice that you can. "Commit to sucking" and you end up like Arizona or Buffalo. It takes time to instill a tradition and expectation of winning, as all of your team's first-round exits shows. Your GM has a chance to "better your draft position and by extension your future" by simply keeping Patrick Marleau and your first-round draft pick this year and making some other adjustments, thereby insuring a much better team in 2021-2022. How come he didn't?
Salzy and brocklesnar liked this.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 5:50 p.m.
#19
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,421
Likes: 2,902
Quoting: Jack_
No. Anaheim will be bad with or without manson. The smartest thing for them to do is to trade him for the best return possible. At the draft or early on in the next season would be the best time to do that. From what I've read the ducks want to keep him and it's really pointless to do so


Exactly. Your point is about winning a Stanley Cup. TOR won’t win paying 3 guys 33M.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 5:55 p.m.
#20
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,849
Likes: 25,670
“The Ducks wont be good for either of those two seasons.” “It shouldn’t matter to the Ducks tho. They’ll be bad no matter what.” “The Ducks will be bad with Manson and even worse with Ceci which is good for them.” “They will be bad if he plays on the Ducks or if he doesn’t.” Your hatred for the Ducks, and your outsize unhappiness that Anaheim won’t give you Manson on your terms, shines through virtually every comment you make about the Ducks or Manson or Toronto’s feckless defense. Wah, wah, wah. Stop whining like a petulant sissy throwing a tantrum at not getting what you want. Winning matters, and learning how takes time. With Manson, we’ll have a good chance of winning a playoff series before you do.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 5:57 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: AFOX10900
Because they don't have another RD in the system.


They can literally sign anyone. Sacrificing good future assets just because they need someone to play is pointless
Apr. 23, 2020 at 5:59 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Quoting: Jack_
They can literally sign anyone. Sacrificing good future assets just because they need someone to play is pointless


Yes, just sign anyone to fill a first pair and great leadership role, that easy, you can just find them on the streets
OldNYIfan liked this.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 6:07 p.m.
#23
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,849
Likes: 25,670
Quoting: AFOX10900
Yes, just sign anyone to fill a first pair and great leadership role, that easy, you can just find them on the streets


I can't WAIT to hear his caterwauling when Pietrangelo signs elsewhere. "Why Did He Decide to Play Elsewhere?" will be the Team Title. I can already hear the sniffling.
Apr. 23, 2020 at 6:07 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: OldNYIfan
“The Ducks wont be good for either of those two seasons.” “It shouldn’t matter to the Ducks tho. They’ll be bad no matter what.” “The Ducks will be bad with Manson and even worse with Ceci which is good for them.” “They will be bad if he plays on the Ducks or if he doesn’t.” Your hatred for the Ducks, and your outsize unhappiness that Anaheim won’t give you Manson on your terms, shines through virtually every comment you make about the Ducks or Manson or Toronto’s feckless defense. Wah, wah, wah. Stop whining like a petulant sissy throwing a tantrum at not getting what you want. Winning matters, and learning how takes time. With Manson, we’ll have a good chance of winning a playoff series before you do.


Lmao I dont hate the ducks at all. I've got a few friends who are big ducks fans and I watch them whenever I can. Sure I would love manson but there are better, cheaper options. All the comments I made are true. I dont care who they trade him to but the smart move would be to trade him keeping him is the stupidest thing they can do.

Jesus christ dude, I dont even know what to say. I'm not sure who hurt you but not everyone is like that. There are lots of fish in the sea, you will find someone else.

You're comment about winning a series with Manson is great though. The ducks wont be near the playoffs for the next few season. His contract expires in two seasons and they'll be a lottery team for both. Keeping manson to be a 27th place team instead of being in 28th or 29th is absolutely insane
Apr. 23, 2020 at 6:10 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Kings v5 GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1,626
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I'm surprised by this comment because I've grown accustomed to seeing intelligent insight from you. By the same token, Toronto isn't a serious playoff contender with that porous gong show you all so laughably call a defense for the balance of Freddie Andersen's contract, so why not commit to sucking and trading HIM while you can still get future assets for him?

Winning matters. You put the best team on the ice that you can. "Commit to sucking" and you end up like Arizona or Buffalo. It takes time to instill a tradition and expectation of winning, as all of your team's first-round exits shows. Your GM has a chance to "better your draft position and by extension your future" by simply keeping Patrick Marleau and your first-round draft pick this year and making some other adjustments, thereby insuring a much better team in 2021-2022. How come he didn't?


The leafs should be trading Andersen this offseason.

The difference between the two situations is the leafs are a very good team and the ducks are a very bad team. I'm not sure if you realized but teams are able to rebuild without becoming Edmonton or buffalo. Stop comparing apples and oranges
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll