SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames flat cap Lucic CBO and Florida Barkov trade

Created by: NerveFWC
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: May 12, 2020
Published: May 12, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$800,000
2$2,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,250,000
2$2,500,000
1$2,800,000
7$8,500,000
6$6,000,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
CGY
ANA
  1. Lucic, Milan
Additional Details:
CBO
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$76,664,166$0$457,500$4,835,834

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$5,900,000$5,900,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,800,000$2,800,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 12, 2020 at 11:48 a.m.
#1
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
You can’t be serious. Why are you doing the special teams on a joke post?
arab05 liked this.
May 12, 2020 at 11:50 a.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
This is the first Barkov trade that actually have good value! But cap wise Florida are looking to lowered their Salary cap so Calgary would have to take back stralman at least to make it work even at least,
NerveFWC liked this.
May 12, 2020 at 11:57 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 19
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
You can’t be serious. Why are you doing the special teams on a joke post?


It's time for you to get over 89. But just to humor me, what part of it is a joke to you? I thought it was a fairly realistic trade offer and realistic for the UFA signings IMO. I guess you'll never please everyone though.
BuFfaLOFaN liked this.
May 12, 2020 at 12:01 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 6,514
Quoting: Sebybbq
This is the first Barkov trade that actually have good value! But cap wise Florida are looking to lowered their Salary cap so Calgary would have to take back stralman at least to make it work even at least,


Yes, alot more realistic than the trades from NYR....
NerveFWC and Pharow liked this.
May 12, 2020 at 12:11 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 19
Quoting: Sebybbq
This is the first Barkov trade that actually have good value! But cap wise Florida are looking to lowered their Salary cap so Calgary would have to take back stralman at least to make it work even at least,


I haven't paid a lot of attention to Stralman, but looking at his current cap hit I'm not sure how a deal would work if we had to take him back. I feel like his contract is negative value (but I could be wrong, just haven't seen him play a lot lately) and we would be giving up a bit much if he had to be included at his full salary.
May 12, 2020 at 12:12 p.m.
#6
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,457
Likes: 3,411
Good Barkob trade

I wouldn't have signed Hall though. Cap will be flat next year and maybe even the year after depending on how much revenue the league can generate without having fans in the stands. That means in 2 years this team would be screwed trying to sign everyone. Gaudreau, Barkov and Tkachuk will all be wanting raises.
NerveFWC liked this.
May 12, 2020 at 12:13 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,106
Likes: 7,777
1. Florida isn't trading Barkov
2. Thank you for buying out Lucic as it helps Edmonton's cap situation
Kotkaniemi15 and NerveFWC liked this.
May 12, 2020 at 12:15 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 748
If Florida decides to trade Barkov then they are going into full rebuild mode which would make Hanifin and Monahan not desirable money wise. Your trade is fine value wise but I think that they would probably ask for Dube, Mangiapane, Valimaki and a first
NerveFWC and MisstheWhalers liked this.
May 12, 2020 at 12:16 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 19
Quoting: Subbanator7667
Good Barkob trade

I wouldn't have signed Hall though. Cap will be flat next year and maybe even the year after depending on how much revenue the league can generate without having fans in the stands. That means in 2 years this team would be screwed trying to sign everyone. Gaudreau, Barkov and Tkachuk will all be wanting raises.


Unfortunately I think we will be losing Gaudreau when he hits FA. Because of that I could see a trade for him happening as early as this offseason or next just to get value for him. Which would help in signing Barkov and Chucky. Giordano also coming off the books will help as well in 2 years.
May 12, 2020 at 12:20 p.m.
#10
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: NerveFWC
It's time for you to get over 89. But just to humor me, what part of it is a joke to you? I thought it was a fairly realistic trade offer and realistic for the UFA signings IMO. I guess you'll never please everyone though.


What on earth does “get over 89” mean?
Anyways, the Barkov trade is obviously ridiculous. Regardless of whether you think he’s better than MacKinnon/Draisaitl or not (I’m not getting into that right now) he’s still a top 5 centre in the league and making only $5.9 million. Barkov is completely untouchable, just like Crosby, McDavid, Draisaitl, MacKinnon, Malkin, Pettersson, etc. are untouchable. You’re not getting him by giving up a fringe 1C, an ok top 4 defenseman, and 2 late 1st round picks.
May 12, 2020 at 12:28 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 19
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
What on earth does “get over 89” mean?
Anyways, the Barkov trade is obviously ridiculous. Regardless of whether you think he’s better than MacKinnon/Draisaitl or not (I’m not getting into that right now) he’s still a top 5 centre in the league and making only $5.9 million. Barkov is completely untouchable, just like Crosby, McDavid, Draisaitl, MacKinnon, Malkin, Pettersson, etc. are untouchable. You’re not getting him by giving up a fringe 1C, an ok top 4 defenseman, and 2 late 1st round picks.


Like I said, you can't please everyone. You're probably right that they won't move him it's rare we see #1 centres moved, BUT at least others seem to think that the trade value is there and that's all I care about. No need to be a Debbie Downer, Negative Nancy or a Killjoy Kotkaniemi.
May 12, 2020 at 12:29 p.m.
#12
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: NerveFWC
Like I said, you can't please everyone. You're probably right that they won't move him it's rare we see #1 centres moved, BUT at least others seem to think that the trade value is there and that's all I care about. No need to be a Debbie Downer, Negative Nancy or a Killjoy Kotkaniemi.


Alrighty. But seriously, what does “get over 89” mean?
May 12, 2020 at 12:31 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 19
Quoting: CD282
1. Florida isn't trading Barkov
2. Thank you for buying out Lucic as it helps Edmonton's cap situation


Most likely true, but it's always fun to try things out. I'm sure you as a fan are hoping for more than just 4th liners and a 5/6 dman being signed.
Also. if it helps Calgary, I could care less if it helps out any other team. Even if it has to be the Oilers. Unfortunately I think the CBO is unlikely to happen. But, one can only dream that Looch and Neal caphits will be gone this summer am i right?
CD282 liked this.
May 12, 2020 at 12:34 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 19
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Alrighty. But seriously, what does “get over 89” mean?


Lol, was just a little shot at the Flames vs Canadiens cup win in 89. You came in fairly aggressive. Sorry about that, was probably a little cheeky on my end.
Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
May 12, 2020 at 1:04 p.m.
#15
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: NerveFWC
Lol, was just a little shot at the Flames vs Canadiens cup win in 89. You came in fairly aggressive. Sorry about that, was probably a little cheeky on my end.


Ah ok. Sorry about that. I wasn’t alive when that happened, so it wasn’t something that clicked in my mind when I read it.
NerveFWC liked this.
May 12, 2020 at 3:38 p.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,081
Likes: 1,433
Quoting: NerveFWC
I haven't paid a lot of attention to Stralman, but looking at his current cap hit I'm not sure how a deal would work if we had to take him back. I feel like his contract is negative value (but I could be wrong, just haven't seen him play a lot lately) and we would be giving up a bit much if he had to be included at his full salary.


My point wasn’t that Stralman is valuable or not. Florida can’t take over 11 millions in salary and just gave under 6 millions. That just not goiing to work. That why i said Calgary would need to take stralman, that would even money at least.
NerveFWC liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll