Quoting: keep_ups12
Well you traded nylander for jokiharju so it's not terrible. You can still live with that
Quoting: Smithcd995
Of course. Everything else is almost laughable though. At least hit on like 2 of these for the love of god.
Quoting: sabres1108
hahahahaha :_((((((
Quoting: Smithcd995
I feel ya dawg.
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
On what planet does a bottom pairing LD like Zadorov get you Mantha? Noway Detroit moves Mantha for a bottom pairing LD Zadorov doesn't have that kind of value.
the same comment could be made about nearly every team drafts.
The only two that really stick out are Reinhart and Nylander as the next player taken was significantly better.
I would just as soon have Ristolainen over Horvat. BTW check out how old Burns and Chara were when they suddenly became all stars. They were actually very ordinary at Ristolainen's age, and Chara was very bad.
While Klefbom is certainly better than Armia, Armia is far from a bust (Nylander), but MTL and CHI passed on him as well.
DET, LAK and FLA all also passed on Necas: OTT, WSH; and SJS all passed on Teräväinen; OTT, SJS, and CBJ all passed on Mantha; OTT, WSH, SJS and CHI all passed on Vasilevskiy (BTW if you actually watch Girgensons play he is a really good checking forward), only CHI and FLA passed on Kuznetsov, so none of those were the obvious slam dunks of Sam and Alex. The same players you are crying about Buffalo passing on were also passed over by OTT, CHI 3 times, WSH & SJS twice.
The only really bad picks were the Murray picks as other team also passed on every player you chose was passed over at least twice by other teams.
I would take Ristolainen over Horvat, Armia is actually looking OK now, Girgensons is really strong on the puck, Zadorov and Pysyk are doing well only Nylander looks really bad and the jury is still out on Mittelstadt. If Murray had only kept Zadorov, Armia, Pysyk and drafted Draisaitl and Sergachev the team would be a LOT better than they are now.