SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

LAK ANA PHI

Created by: Leafsfan416
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 2, 2020
Published: Jun. 2, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,675,000
2$825,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Kupari, Rasmus
  2. Roy, Matt
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (LAK)
  4. 2021 2nd round pick (STL)
2.
ANA
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi
  2. Koster, Mike [Reserve List]
  3. Mikheyev, Ilya [RFA Rights]
  4. 2020 4th round pick (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Friedman, Mark [RFA Rights]
PHI
  1. Bracco, Jeremy [RFA Rights]
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,743,949$0$0$2,756,051
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$863,333$863,333
C, LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,675,000$2,675,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$825,000$825,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 2, 2020 at 11:19 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 192
Why trade Rielly? his contract is great, a fan favorite and is loved by all his teammates
Jun. 2, 2020 at 11:24 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 817
Likes: 241
Quoting: MatthewsDynasty
Why trade Rielly? his contract is great, a fan favorite and is loved by all his teammates


I’ve posted a Rielly trade before. I still think moving him makes sense. I might be alone on this idea, rational being the Leafs are trading from a position of strength. I love Rielly but it has been said he could be looking at at contract comparable to Oliver Ekman-Larrson (8,250,000). I just don't see a scenario where they have the cap space to resign him and Anderson (or adding a new goalie). With Muzzin singed for the next 4 years, I'd rather keep Dermott and Sandin, let them develop and move Rielly while he still has a team friendly contract to trade.
I was looking at adding assets and picks but you could also look at doing a one for one for a RD.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 11:31 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 1,275
I actually don't think that this is far fetched.

Some solid ideas here.

It would suck to lose Rielly, (and that'll never happen with this management regime), but, some sound logic here.

Most Leaf fans want to have their cake and eat it too. I understand your points.

Thanks for posting.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 11:40 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 2,279
The value is probably there for the LA trade. And Reilly would probably look pretty stellar next to DD. I just don't see why LA does this when they are in the midst of a rebuild. 4 potentially solid pieces of a rebuild gone.

I see so many Leafs fans trading for Roy or other Kings. I think the Kings are essentially done trading until the kids start to determine who stays and who goes themselves. We're not going to trade with you just to help your cap situation.
OldNYIfan and KINGS67 liked this.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 11:59 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 817
Likes: 241
Quoting: PuckLuck_77
The value is probably there for the LA trade. And Reilly would probably look pretty stellar next to DD. I just don't see why LA does this when they are in the midst of a rebuild. 4 potentially solid pieces of a rebuild gone.

I see so many Leafs fans trading for Roy or other Kings. I think the Kings are essentially done trading until the kids start to determine who stays and who goes themselves. We're not going to trade with you just to help your cap situation.


I get you are rebuilding but then are you just going to waste the rest of the years of Kopitar and Doughty. Are they cool with another 2-3 years of losing? I not saying this is the right move but I would think at top 6 of Doughty, Rielly, Walker, Clague, Bjornfot and Anderson would be really solid. IMO
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 12:07 p.m.
#6
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Leafsfan416
I’ve posted a Rielly trade before. I still think moving him makes sense. I might be alone on this idea, rational being the Leafs are trading from a position of strength. I love Rielly but it has been said he could be looking at at contract comparable to Oliver Ekman-Larrson (8,250,000). I just don't see a scenario where they have the cap space to resign him and Anderson (or adding a new goalie). With Muzzin singed for the next 4 years, I'd rather keep Dermott and Sandin, let them develop and move Rielly while he still has a team friendly contract to trade.
I was looking at adding assets and picks but you could also look at doing a one for one for a RD.


What hand they shoot doesn't matter all that much under Keefe. Especially since the defence are encouraged to hold the puck and swing back and forth. If there is a lane on the left they go that way, if it closes off they swing back and often switch sides anyways.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 12:08 p.m.
#7
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,463
Likes: 26,207
The Rielly trade is bold, creative thinking.

Ultimately, I think that the Kings decline due to Rielly's two-year term (which is the reason why you're trading him). It's a very close question, though.

The Ducks trade just doesn't make sense for Anaheim. Kapanen and Mikheyev are forwards and Koster is a 19-year-old unsigned 6th-round left-handed LD, i.e., someone who has absolutely no value to us when we have 9, count 'em 9, potentially viable LD's with more experience and potential. In short, I don't think we'd be trading you Manson unless we got Liljegren or else a vast overpayment in return.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 12:12 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 2,279
Quoting: Leafsfan416
I get you are rebuilding but then are you just going to waste the rest of the years of Kopitar and Doughty. Are they cool with another 2-3 years of losing? I not saying this is the right move but I would think at top 6 of Doughty, Rielly, Walker, Clague, Bjornfot and Anderson would be really solid. IMO



Couple of comments:

1) Morgan Reilly isn't suddenly going to make this a competitive roster. He wouldn't change the team from pretender to contender, because there are still so many holes up front. This trade gives up 4 significant pieces that now can't be used to fill those other holes.

2) Losing Roy creates an imbalance of LD/RD, which the Kings aren't huge fans of. You mention 4 left and 2 right D. Also, you're not wrong in that the players you mention are going to be a solid group (hopefully), but Clague, Bjornfot and Anderson are all too green to be competitive for two years at least, if not more. So why move the 4 pieces to begin with if you're only talking about a year difference in when the team might be competitive?

3) "Waste" is a strong word. We won two Cups with them. No matter what, they weren't wasted. Now, they've got the experience and leadership to teach the next group of kids what that feels like. In a few years when the Turcottes/Vilardi's take over as 1C/2C or somehwere similar in the lineup, we'll still have Kopi as a 2C or 3C. I'm willing to bet on that. And Drew still has tons of good years ahead. He's had a tough go, but he's played with terrible or inexperienced linemates for the past 3 years. Once Bjornfot or someone else is brought in, he'll stabilize. I have faith in his ability. His game has never revolved around speed or offense, but his superior sense of the game, his hockey IQ. That doesn't disappear with age.

The organization seems to think the best bet to be competitive with Drew and Anze again is to hope the kids come up quickly. There's no immediately correct answer, but I think the team is doing it the correct way. That's why the trade won't work for LA.
Leafsfan416 and OldNYIfan liked this.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 12:15 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 6,873
Likes: 5,331
Edited Jun. 2, 2020 at 12:25 p.m.
Quoting: OldNYIfan
The Rielly trade is bold, creative thinking.

Ultimately, I think that the Kings decline due to Rielly's two-year term (which is the reason why you're trading him). It's a very close question, though.

The Ducks trade just doesn't make sense for Anaheim. Kapanen and Mikheyev are forwards and Koster is a 19-year-old unsigned 6th-round left-handed LD, i.e., someone who has absolutely no value to us when we have 9, count 'em 9, potentially viable LD's with more experience and potential. In short, I don't think we'd be trading you Manson unless we got Liljegren or else a vast overpayment in return.


Koster is a RHD. Also 4th round, not 6th (not that that makes any difference to his value).

Edit: Actually, I may be confusing my prospects. - Yes, I was. I had Mac Hollowell in my mind for some reason.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 12:29 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 817
Likes: 241
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
Koster is a RHD. Also 4th round, not 6th (not that that makes any difference to his value).

Edit: Actually, I may be confusing my prospects. - Yes, I was. I had Mac Hollowell in my mind for some reason.


Prospect Profile Mike Koster

Koster is a stellar puck-moving defenseman, while it appears from his stats that he is an offensive specimen, he looks more like a Travis Dermott or a Nick Jensen. He is serviceable defenseman who can glide up the ice and carry the puck without many flaws. His transitional play is solid. Not only can he skate up the ice and evade the opposition, but he will make accurate passes in the neutral zone to help set up a clean zone entry.

In addition to Koster’s puck control and transition play, he is a strong skater. Koster has wheels and he will show them off at a consistent rate. Not only is his speed exceptional, but his edge-work is flawless. Koster uses his inside and outside edges throughout his stride. He also manages to skate backwards with no issues. Koster leans on his arms to help him glide backwards and can transition quickly from backwards to forwards and vice-versa.

In the clip below from Leafs Prospects, you can check out Koster’s beautiful puck control and skating ability.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 12:33 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 6,873
Likes: 5,331
Quoting: Leafsfan416
Prospect Profile Mike Koster

Koster is a stellar puck-moving defenseman, while it appears from his stats that he is an offensive specimen, he looks more like a Travis Dermott or a Nick Jensen. He is serviceable defenseman who can glide up the ice and carry the puck without many flaws. His transitional play is solid. Not only can he skate up the ice and evade the opposition, but he will make accurate passes in the neutral zone to help set up a clean zone entry.

In addition to Koster’s puck control and transition play, he is a strong skater. Koster has wheels and he will show them off at a consistent rate. Not only is his speed exceptional, but his edge-work is flawless. Koster uses his inside and outside edges throughout his stride. He also manages to skate backwards with no issues. Koster leans on his arms to help him glide backwards and can transition quickly from backwards to forwards and vice-versa.

In the clip below from Leafs Prospects, you can check out Koster’s beautiful puck control and skating ability.


I'm aware of who he is - I just got my names mixed up for a moment.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 12:38 p.m.
#12
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 41,463
Likes: 26,207
Hollowell might actually change my mind about this trade. And although Mikheyev is clearly an upgrade on DesLauriers, Nic fills a certain niche for us and we don't need any more LW prospects, so you could take them out of the deal.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 1:08 p.m.
#13
Formerly Los Patos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 3,516
Likes: 2,038
I like these. These are all decent looking trades
Jun. 2, 2020 at 1:47 p.m.
#14
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 34,961
Likes: 21,259
If Rielly was to go a guy like Parayko would need to come back. Blues wouldnt do that so we aint moving him

So the kings trade is a no
Anaheim trade an even bigger no (we aint trading 2 good wings for Manson
Only good trade so far is the bracco one and thats it.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 1:59 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 3,817
Likes: 1,679
Never thought of this. Probably because wits so unlikely Rielly gets traded... I’d do it.

Kings D:
Rielly - Doughty
Anderson - Walker
Bjornfot - ufa/trade
Clague
Jun. 2, 2020 at 2:36 p.m.
#16
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,734
Likes: 23,354
More unwarranted love for two guys just because they are RHD.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 3:06 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,837
Likes: 6,253
I wouldn't do this if I were the Kings.

Reilly is fantastic and the trade value is acceptable, but rebuilding teams shouldn't trade their high-round draft picks, especially for players that will be UFAs before the team is ready to compete again. That 2020 pick is 35th overall. The 33rd pick last year got them Kaliyev.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 3:37 p.m.
#18
Pmwalker
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 944
Likes: 302
Philly doesn’t have the RD depth do to make this trade and really don’t need wingers anyway. Friedman should get third pairing duties next season I’d imagine with Braun hitting free agency and only Myers and Niskanen ahead of him.
Jun. 2, 2020 at 5:43 p.m.
#19
Best In The World
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 658
Ducks decline, unless a RHD prospect is coming back.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll