SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

a realistic Blues offseason

Created by: Shylo_Moxii
Team: 2020-21 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 9, 2020
Published: Sep. 9, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Biggest thing on capfriendly.
-Blues need to sign Pietrangelo
-Blues need cap space, so let's make every other team benefit because we don't think STL has space.
-Blues will re-sign Dunn to a bridge deal especially when Dunn has arbitration rights, and I'm sure he's gonna use it.
-Colton Parayko is one of the Top Defenseman on the Blues and in the League. Blues are contending. Blues don't want a bunch of spare parts that we won't use in a Cup push.

Spare Parts meaning guys like Hainsey, at some trades Dermott, I don't see a problem with Johnsson, but at the end of the day it's not worth it for the Blues.

We'll just leave it at that.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,000,000
2$800,000
2$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$9,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Steen, Alexander
1$1,500,000
Trades
1.
STL
  1. 2020 4th round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Buffalo needs a 2C, while Bozak is not an amazing 2C and probably on the decline, still a serviceable stop gap for the next year until Cozens is ready to take the role.
BUF
  1. Bozak, Tyler
Additional Details:
Blues need some cap relief, and while Bozak could probably fetch a 3rd, I'm not sure anyone would be willing to go up to that value, and in order to get the deal done Blues need to make some compromises to make it work.
2.
STL
  1. 2020 4th round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
While I'm not sure New Jersey is a right fit, Blues definitely need to make cap work, and I'm pretty sure that under the circumstances, Sanford is very tradable. I think he could be for quite a few teams, and honestly a 4th Round Pick is pretty decent. He's had good numbers, but I can't help but think that him on a line with O'Reilly had something to do with that. So him being traded Sanford is not the most consistent of players, but he's definitely not a bottom feeder.
NJD
  1. Sanford, Zachary
Additional Details:
Blues at this point still need a couple million to salvage and the best way to do that is what I think is using Kyrou, and Kostin as forward support. It's time for them to move up the lineup, and I think Sanford is one of the guys who's the odd man out.
3.
STL
  1. 2020 5th round pick (DET)
Additional Details:
Under conditions that Detroit buys him out and telling Steen they will sign him again once bought out. I don't think Steen would be upset at waiving it, and this could be done with any number of teams done. I'm not gonna get worried with the pick that Detroit sends back at this point all that matters is he is sent and re-signed to the team.
DET
  1. Steen, Alexander
  2. 2020 1st round pick (STL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the STL
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the DET
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2022
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$69,597,181$306,349$637,500$11,902,819
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,350,000$5,350,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Steen, Alexander
$1,500,000$1,500,000
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$758,333$758,333
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,475,000$1,475,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,400,000$4,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,275,000$3,275,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,375,000$1,375,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$700,000$700,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 9, 2020 at 3:05 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 1,224
I'd accept this as Detroit but I'm pretty sure there's a rule against trading away a player for the other team to buyout so you can resign them
Shylo_Moxii and aedoran liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 3:06 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 3,509
I’d do this from Detroit, I think we’ve discussed something even more beneficial to STL in this.

DET - Steen (buyout), 2020 1st
STL - VGK 2021 3rd


Quoting: redwingsfan04
I'd accept this as Detroit but I'm pretty sure there's a rule against trading away a player for the other team to buyout so you can resign them

Technically, it would have to be like the Orpik situation where there isn’t a deal in place for him to return to STL.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 3:07 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: redwingsfan04
I'd accept this as Detroit but I'm pretty sure there's a rule against trading away a player for the other team to buyout so you can resign them


No, rules are against you signing a player after buying him out. there isn't any issue with trading him to other team to buy him out then sign him again.
redwingsfan04 and aedoran liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 3:07 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 589
Quoting: redwingsfan04
I'd accept this as Detroit but I'm pretty sure there's a rule against trading away a player for the other team to buyout so you can resign them


it happened with orpik in the grubaur deal
Shylo_Moxii liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 3:11 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 1,224
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
No, rules are against you signing a player after buying him out. there isn't any issue with trading him to other team to buy him out then sign him again.


Ok I wasn't sure. I just know that I've been yelled at in other ACGM's for proposing a similar situation

Quoting: Vermathex
it happened with orpik in the grubaur deal


I believe there wasn't a plan for him to come back in that deal which was why it was allowed
Shylo_Moxii liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 3:14 p.m.
#6
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,974
Likes: 5,381
Wings accept
aedoran and Shylo_Moxii liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 3:22 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 190
Likes: 101
You have created a roster where we just don't have to move Steen, but you still give up our first and bring him back...

You have $2.83m in cap space after you're finished, with 24 players. Don't sign Steen again and we're at $4.33m. Take Foley off the roster because his career is over and were at about $5.26m with 22 players (including Tarasenko).

Why are we using our first to get rid of the $5.75m Steen cap hit instead of just finding another half million in space? Like moving Gunnarsson and replacing him on the roster with Mikkola?
RClay321 liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 3:29 p.m.
#8
Lets Go Blues
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,786
Likes: 4,336
100% ok with these moves, might even look into a veteran backup with that cap space, depending on the org's faith in Husso. Could probably get a little more for Sanford, or just keep him if it means Mac^2 is in the top9. Might get a better pick back if we send #26 with Steen, but that's small potatoes tbh.
Shylo_Moxii liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 4:46 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: A_K
100% ok with these moves, might even look into a veteran backup with that cap space, depending on the org's faith in Husso. Could probably get a little more for Sanford, or just keep him if it means Mac^2 is in the top9. Might get a better pick back if we send #26 with Steen, but that's small potatoes tbh.


Well the big question is Hofer or Husso. I like Hofer, but I feel Husso is more ready than Hofer at the moment.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 4:55 p.m.
#10
Lets Go Blues
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,786
Likes: 4,336
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Well the big question is Hofer or Husso. I like Hofer, but I feel Husso is more ready than Hofer at the moment.


Yeah I think Hofer is at least a year away, and Husso is at that point where you gotta give him a shot. Competitive team though, so he'll have a short leash. Realistically, we'll probably be right at the cap ceiling and be adding a minor league veteran like a Louie Domingue or Anton Forsberg to be 3rd string/first call-up. Next year will be v interesting with UFA Binner, a full look at Husso in the show, and Hofer looking for a spot.
Shylo_Moxii liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 5:26 p.m.
#11
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 939
Quoting: A_K
Yeah I think Hofer is at least a year away, and Husso is at that point where you gotta give him a shot. Competitive team though, so he'll have a short leash. Realistically, we'll probably be right at the cap ceiling and be adding a minor league veteran like a Louie Domingue or Anton Forsberg to be 3rd string/first call-up. Next year will be v interesting with UFA Binner, a full look at Husso in the show, and Hofer looking for a spot.


Alright, here me out:

Step 1: The Rangers buyout the King.

Step 2: The Blues, previously noted for signing another elite goalie at the end of his career who should have never played for another franchise, sign Lundqvist to a one year, one million dollar deal to compete with Husso in camp. He wins the backup job.

Step 3: We re-sign Pietrangelo, Tarasenko comes back good as new, and Lundqvist thrives behind a better defense, allowing them to tandem well. A well rested Binnginton has a nice rebound year, does well in the playoffs and we win another cup, checking the last box off of Lundqvist's career to-do-list.

Step 4: Profit
A_K and BluesBandit liked this.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 5:33 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: TheEarthmaster
Alright, here me out:

Step 1: The Rangers buyout the King.

Step 2: The Blues, previously noted for signing another elite goalie at the end of his career who should have never played for another franchise, sign Lundqvist to a one year, one million dollar deal to compete with Husso in camp. He wins the backup job.

Step 3: We re-sign Pietrangelo, Tarasenko comes back good as new, and Lundqvist thrives behind a better defense, allowing them to tandem well. A well rested Binnginton has a nice rebound year, does well in the playoffs and we win another cup, checking the last box off of Lundqvist's career to-do-list.

Step 4: Profit


From what I have heard. Rangers are keeping Lundqvist and making Georgiev the odd man out.
Sep. 9, 2020 at 5:37 p.m.
#13
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 939
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
From what I have heard. Rangers are keeping Lundqvist and making Georgiev the odd man out.


I've heard the opposite. The Athletic had an article yesterday which said this:

"But where will Lundqvist be in October? Or November?

It won’t be at Madison Square Garden, unless there’s a press conference there to announce his retirement. He won’t be there to play on opening night, whenever that occurs, unless he’s there in a visitor’s uniform.

All signs point to The King being done as a Ranger, as unfortunate as that sounds. The reality of the situation supersedes sentimentality. And allowing players to retire in their uniform, while a nice, romantic idea, is generally bad business.

.....


There remains a slim chance another club makes a huge offer for Alexandar Georgiev and the Rangers decide to keep Lundqvist on the books (and deal other contracts to get under the cap), thus avoiding the dead cap space ($5.5 million this season, $1.5 million in ’21-22) the buyout would bring. Slim, slim, slim.

....

Another source, with some knowledge of Lundqvist’s thinking, said he knows that the goaltender is done with the Rangers."

I don't actually think the Blues should sign him or anything, but yeah I think he's done with NYR
Sep. 9, 2020 at 6:19 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 491
I’d hope Sanford can get a lot more than a 4th. He was on pace for 20g this year and is only making 1.5 next season.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll