SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fix the D they said

Created by: SammyT_51
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 27, 2020
Published: Sep. 27, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$4,000,000
2$725,000
1$850,000
1$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Wennberg, Alexander
1$1,500,000
Trades
1.
2.
TOR
  1. 2020 1st round pick (VAN)
NJD
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
Additional Details:
Devils apparently want a young U26 player on a solid deal with term and are willing to give up 18th or 20th overall for it LMFAO so just use Andreas Johnsson. Gimme 20th for Johnsson lol
3.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$79,427,283$0$0$2,072,717

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Wennberg, Alexander
$1,500,000$1,500,000
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:11 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 187
Likes: 36
Keep dreaming on that Devils deal buddy haha.

Johnsson is worth a 3rd rounder
exo2769, zyyyp and JRoss liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:11 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 2,085
haha this is is so unrealistic, a third line forward would never get a 1st round pick in a deep draft with the assumption they will be a top 6 scoring forward despite minimal evidence to the contrary
zyyyp liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:12 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Toby_flenderson
Keep dreaming on that Devils deal buddy haha.

Johnsson is worth a 3rd rounder


he is worth 2nd, I was mostly joking with that deal as you can clearly see. But there is a rumour that devils want u26 young player with term for one of those picks so..
Toby_flenderson liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:12 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
haha this is is so unrealistic, a third line forward would never get a 1st round pick in a deep draft with the assumption they will be a top 6 scoring forward despite minimal evidence to the contrary


I was mostly joking with that deal but then again.. Kappy got 1st++ lol
Toby_flenderson liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:14 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 434
Quoting: SammyT_51
I was mostly joking with that deal but then again.. Kappy got 1st++ lol


I think he was also joking about how johnsson could probably get the same as kappy. But that could just be the context I read it in.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:14 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 1,275
All teams pass.

The value is just not there.
zyyyp liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:16 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Trevorchef
All teams pass.

The value is just not there.


There is value in all three of them. Johnsson one is mostly a joke but other two are serious.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:21 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 1,486
you must've missed the part of the quote where he said "top-six forward" if you think you're getting 20th overall this year for Johnsson you're out to lunch lmfao
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:21 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: zyyyp
you must've missed the part of the quote where he said "top-six forward" if you think you're getting 20th overall this year for Johnsson you're out to lunch lmfao


Kappy got 1st++ so you never know who teams consider top-6 forward lol
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:24 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 1,486
Quoting: SammyT_51
Kappy got 1st++ so you never know who teams consider top-6 forward lol


yeah because Rutherford is senile, can guarantee you nobody is giving a 1st for Johnsson.
chungus liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:24 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 1,275
Quoting: SammyT_51
There is value in all three of them. Johnsson one is mostly a joke but other two are serious.


Not nearly enough for the teams involved to consider them.

All teams pass.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:27 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Trevorchef
Not nearly enough for the teams involved to consider them.

All teams pass.


Cernak for Liljegren is absolutely fair for both sides no questions asked.

Ducks would be getting rid of Keslers money and contract, Lundestrom gets included as price to pay. Kerfoot, Dermott for Manson is more than fair..
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:28 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: zyyyp
yeah because Rutherford is senile, can guarantee you nobody is giving a 1st for Johnsson.


Why are you taking a joke so seriously LMFAO? I know Johnsson isnt getting 1st back.. 2nd for sure but not 1st lol just chill
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:31 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 1,275
Quoting: SammyT_51
Cernak for Liljegren is absolutely fair for both sides no questions asked.

Ducks would be getting rid of Keslers money and contract, Lundestrom gets included as price to pay. Kerfoot, Dermott for Manson is more than fair..


No, it isn't but, I'm not going to go back and forth with you on this today.

Liljegren is an AHL defensman. Cernak is a top four defensman. That trade is so lopsided towards the Leafs its crazy. (No surprise there).

What makes you think that the Ducks want to rid themselves of Kessler's contract? There is no indication that is the case. They also don't need another 3rd line centre making 3.5 million dollars just to remove a top four RHD in the process.

No man... You are really off the mark here on all three of these trades.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:33 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 1,275
Quoting: SammyT_51
Why are you taking a joke so seriously LMFAO? I know Johnsson isnt getting 1st back.. 2nd for sure but not 1st lol just chill


No... not a 2nd for sure either. Overpaid middle six winger coming off a bad year and a bad injury. There are no "for sure's" at the moment in the NHL. Johnsson does not have the value.

If it is a joke, why include it and then get defensive when people call you out on it?
zyyyp liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:41 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Trevorchef
No... not a 2nd for sure either. Overpaid middle six winger coming off a bad year and a bad injury. There are no "for sure's" at the moment in the NHL. Johnsson does not have the value.

If it is a joke, why include it and then get defensive when people call you out on it?


He is getting a 2nd back. But as you said, there are no for sures so he can get a 1st back or he can get a 3rd back (if 3rd is offer I dont see Leafs pulling the trade for exact reasons mentioned).

Because I wanted to include it. To see if people would get it or not and they didnt. Which is cool.

Quoting: Trevorchef
No, it isn't but, I'm not going to go back and forth with you on this today.

Liljegren is an AHL defensman. Cernak is a top four defensman. That trade is so lopsided towards the Leafs its crazy. (No surprise there).

What makes you think that the Ducks want to rid themselves of Kessler's contract? There is no indication that is the case. They also don't need another 3rd line centre making 3.5 million dollars just to remove a top four RHD in the process.

No man... You are really off the mark here on all three of these trades.


Yeah Liljegren is in exact same spot Cernak was a year and half ago. Barely getting into NHL. Tampa doesnt have cap to afford his extension, Leafs do. Tampa would want similar Dman on ELC, that is Liljegren who is very very very good prospect and I think he would be great for Tampa right away.

some teams work with internal cap.. Anaheim from what Ive heard is one of them and Leafs would be wise to explore helping them and at the same time getting pieces that are somewhat valuable for them. Kerfoot is valuable player defensively and I think he is valuable piece on trade market. They are also getting a younger top-4 D back for that older top-4 D so.. I think thats fair deal.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:45 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 2,085
Quoting: SammyT_51
Why are you taking a joke so seriously LMFAO? I know Johnsson isnt getting 1st back.. 2nd for sure but not 1st lol just chill


ironically, if we're talking about Top 6 potential, Johnsson played in the top 6 a lot more than Kappy ever did

Maybe call rutherford and he'll mishear Johnsson for "Johnson" at 3 1/2 million and trade a 1st for him
SammyT_51 liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:47 a.m.
#18
Thread Starter
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 14,152
Likes: 5,738
Quoting: Lyle_Bubas
ironically, if we're talking about Top 6 potential, Johnsson played in the top 6 a lot more than Kappy ever did

Maybe call rutherford and he'll mishear Johnsson for "Johnson" at 3 1/2 million and trade a 1st for him


And he was better for Leafs than Kapanen ever but shhhhhhh that doesnt fit the narrative.
chungus liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 11:50 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 1,275
Quoting: SammyT_51
He is getting a 2nd back. But as you said, there are no for sures so he can get a 1st back or he can get a 3rd back (if 3rd is offer I dont see Leafs pulling the trade for exact reasons mentioned).

Because I wanted to include it. To see if people would get it or not and they didnt. Which is cool.



Yeah Liljegren is in exact same spot Cernak was a year and half ago. Barely getting into NHL. Tampa doesnt have cap to afford his extension, Leafs do. Tampa would want similar Dman on ELC, that is Liljegren who is very very very good prospect and I think he would be great for Tampa right away.

some teams work with internal cap.. Anaheim from what Ive heard is one of them and Leafs would be wise to explore helping them and at the same time getting pieces that are somewhat valuable for them. Kerfoot is valuable player defensively and I think he is valuable piece on trade market. They are also getting a younger top-4 D back for that older top-4 D so.. I think thats fair deal.


Your overvaluing of Leafs players is absolutely staggering.

Go ahead and get your last word in now as you must do. I see no point in continuing this conversation.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 12:06 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 2,085
Edited Sep. 27, 2020 at 12:11 p.m.
Quoting: SammyT_51
And he was better for Leafs than Kapanen ever but shhhhhhh that doesnt fit the narrative.


In 125 games for the leafs, Johnsson had 30G, 67P, +12
In 202 games for the leafs, Kappy had 41G, 90P, +6

Johnsson played roughly 3/4 of the time Kappy did in the 18/19 season, matching his scoring and getting 2 more primary assists and 3 less secondary assists. He had substantially less giveaways too, more than the difference in their ice time.

Even this year, with almost double the ice time and 28 more games played, Kappy had 5 more goals, 3 more primary assists and 7 more secondary assists.

For some reason, the leafs deployed him as a defensive forward despite the fact that him being on the ice made them much more likely to get shelled in their own end, he's definitely not great defensively (then again, neither is johnsson)

At worst, I'd say the two guys are basically equal tbh. Not to mention all the off ice drama, sleeping late on practices etc. that kappy had
EddieBower liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 1:01 p.m.
#21
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 2,896
Quoting: SammyT_51
Cernak for Liljegren is absolutely fair for both sides no questions asked.

Ducks would be getting rid of Keslers money and contract, Lundestrom gets included as price to pay. Kerfoot, Dermott for Manson is more than fair..


The ducks aren’t paying anyone to take an insured contract that’ll end up LTIR when they’re current real money expense is closer to ~$10M less than cap hit and especially not a former 1st rounder.

They also don’t want a bottom 6 fwds or bottom pair D for a top 4. (I know, Manson is the worst player of all time)
Trevorchef liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 1:23 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 1,275
Quoting: Jah1722
The ducks aren’t paying anyone to take an insured contract that’ll end up LTIR when they’re current real money expense is closer to ~$10M less than cap hit and especially not a former 1st rounder.

They also don’t want a bottom 6 fwds or bottom pair D for a top 4. (I know, Manson is the worst player of all time)


Exactly my point. Thank you.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll