SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Max rebuild

Created by: justaBoss
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 5, 2021
Published: Feb. 5, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Assuming Toews is done for good - he ends up LTIR bound for the rest of his career.

Buying out Seabrook to free up a slot with protections.

Expansion draft
CHI protects
7F: Toews, Kane, Debrincat, Strome, Nylander, Highmore, Hagel
3D: Keith, Zadorov, Jones
1G: Lankinen

Seattle picks: Lucas Wallmark
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,750,000
2$2,550,000
2$1,750,000
2$875,000
2$875,000
1$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,000,000
1$750,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Jones, Caleb
  2. 2022 1st round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
2020-21 Trade deadline deal
EDM
  1. Entwistle, Mackenzie
  2. Murphy, Connor ($1,925,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Janmark, Mattias
2.
CHI
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
2020-21 Trade deadline deal
TOR
  1. 2021 5th round pick (CHI)
Additional Details:
Söderberg, Carl
3.
CHI
    Expansion draft pick
    EDM
    1. Wallmark, Lucas [RFA Rights]
    Additional Details:
    To Seattle
    4.
    CHI
    1. Rask, Victor
    2. Sokolov, Dmitry [RFA Rights]
    3. 2021 1st round pick (PIT)
    4. 2022 2nd round pick (MIN)
    MIN
    1. Strome, Dylan
    2. 2022 5th round pick (CHI)
    Additional Details:
    2021 NHL Entry Draft deal
    5.
    CHI
    1. 2021 1st round pick (CBJ)
    CBJ
    1. Jones, Caleb
    2. Shaw, Andrew ($975,000 retained)
    3. 2022 3rd round pick (CHI)
    6.
    CHI
    1. Miller, Colin
    2. 2021 4th round pick (BUF)
    3. 2022 4th round pick (BUF)
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the CBJ
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the BUF
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    2022
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the BUF
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    2023
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$66,724,342$452,439$4,532,500$14,775,658
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $3,700,000$3,700,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
    C, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $2,625,000$2,625,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $6,400,000$6,400,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $2,550,000$2,550,000
    RW, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, C
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
    LW, C, RW
    RFA - 1
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $725,000$725,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Minnesota Wild
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $5,538,462$5,538,462
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $800,000$800,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $850,000$850,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
    $3,875,000$3,875,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $875,000$875,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $10,500,000$10,500,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $875,000$875,000
    LW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $725,000$725,000
    RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Feb. 5, 2021 at 7:17 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 20,087
    Likes: 7,486
    Every team says no
    Feb. 5, 2021 at 7:20 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 138
    Likes: 48
    You are out of your mind if you think EDM does that trade.
    gretzkyghosts liked this.
    Feb. 5, 2021 at 7:24 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 42,279
    Likes: 19,166
    Until we see Kane on the block, it's just a "medium" rebuild
    Feb. 5, 2021 at 7:29 p.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Thank you Pavelski
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,813
    Likes: 31,489
    Quoting: BornInAGretzkyJersey
    You are out of your mind if you think EDM does that trade.


    I mean, they strengthen their defense and their depth, their biggest weaknesses, via this trade, while confirming that they won't lose important assets during the expansion draft.

    If they view themselves as a playoff team, they need to do some moves. This is one idea.

    See what TB paid for Coleman for instance. Murphy at 50% retained is close to that in terms of money, and in terms of player value I'd say Murphy is above Coleman.
    Feb. 5, 2021 at 7:29 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Thank you Pavelski
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,813
    Likes: 31,489
    Quoting: NHLfan10506
    Until we see Kane on the block, it's just a "medium" rebuild


    Well true.
    Feb. 5, 2021 at 8:03 p.m.
    #6
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 12
    Likes: 6
    Wild gm refused to trade dumba for Vincent Trocheck, he refused to trade dumba for Sean Monahan. So wild gm isn't trading for Dylan strome. Wild can get better c through trade or free agency once the expansion date comes & passes.
    Lightman13 liked this.
    Feb. 5, 2021 at 8:53 p.m.
    #7
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2020
    Posts: 34,958
    Likes: 21,259
    If Dubas would want anyone from Chicago its Pius Suter lul. Give Matthews his Lions brother and make the Suter-Matthews-Marner line. The other person I would have said is Murphy but Holl is playing some incredible hockey so I dont think its needed.
    Feb. 5, 2021 at 10:05 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 4,516
    Likes: 3,189
    If Toews gets put onto LTIR and is done. Then he doesn't need to be protected, thereby freeing up a spot anyway. Buying out Seabrook would essentially free up two protection spots not just the one if Toews is also LTIR'ed.

    That is also a massive overpayment for Strome.

    That's a insta-no from Guerin, and while I don't like Rask, he is more or less a serviceable 4th line center even if he’s barely a NHL caliber level player only half the time. The issue is more to do with the fact he’s overpaid not really anything else. What he lacks in speed he kinda makes up for with his decent shot and a penchant for scoring at critical moments. Ironically, if he was paid like $2M less, nobody would care or **** about him. He's also a pretty cheap buyout, so this idea that a team would be doing us a favor and could demand a 1st for him is kinda silly.

    Drop the 1st, retain half on Rask, and swap out Sokolov for someone better. Sokolov is pretty much a bust at this point, so switch him for someone like Firstov to even out the trade value.

    Rask (50% retained)
    Firstov
    2022 2nd (MIN)

    For

    Strome
    2022 5th (CHI)
    Lightman13 liked this.
    Feb. 5, 2021 at 10:34 p.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2017
    Posts: 19,383
    Likes: 9,921
    Quoting: RazWild
    If Toews gets put onto LTIR and is done. Then he doesn't need to be protected, thereby freeing up a spot anyway. Buying out Seabrook would essentially free up two protection spots not just the one if Toews is also LTIR'ed.

    That is also a massive overpayment for Strome.

    That's a insta-no from Guerin, and while I don't like Rask, he is more or less a serviceable 4th line center even if he’s barely a NHL caliber level player only half the time. The issue is more to do with the fact he’s overpaid not really anything else. What he lacks in speed he kinda makes up for with his decent shot and a penchant for scoring at critical moments. Ironically, if he was paid like $2M less, nobody would care or **** about him. He's also a pretty cheap buyout, so this idea that a team would be doing us a favor and could demand a 1st for him is kinda silly.

    Drop the 1st, retain half on Rask, and swap out Sokolov for someone better. Sokolov is pretty much a bust at this point, so switch him for someone like Firstov to even out the trade value.

    Rask (50% retained)
    Firstov
    2022 2nd (MIN)

    For

    Strome
    2022 5th (CHI)


    Hawks aren't moving Strome for a bag of magic beans. He's easily the best player in the AGM and better then Firstov and a mid to late 1st or 2nd is nothing more then magic beans in a very shallow draft in the first and 2nd rounds. In last year's draft, maybe strome for a mid first, but otherwise keep Strome. Very few 23 year olds are putting up points at rate of .75ppg, and that's exactly what Dylan has been doing since becoming a Hawk. Very hard to find that in a B+ prospect, a 2nd round pick, a late 1st or even a mid 1st in the 2021 draft. Giant crap shoot not worth taking. Bottom line, Hawks have zero reason to move Strome. A year or two from now, Dach will eventually be the 1C, Strome the 2C, and Toews (if he comes back) the 3C; that's a pretty strong middle for the next few years.
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 6:03 a.m.
    #10
    Thread Starter
    Thank you Pavelski
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,813
    Likes: 31,489
    Edited Feb. 6, 2021 at 6:08 a.m.
    Quoting: TogoBornPride29
    Wild gm refused to trade dumba for Vincent Trocheck, he refused to trade dumba for Sean Monahan. So wild gm isn't trading for Dylan strome. Wild can get better c through trade or free agency once the expansion date comes & passes.


    What the f*ck does Dumba have to do with this? He's not included in the exchange in the slightest.

    It's Sokolov+1st for Strome, and a 2nd for taking Rask's contract off Wild's hands.
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 6:06 a.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    Thank you Pavelski
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,813
    Likes: 31,489
    Quoting: RazWild
    If Toews gets put onto LTIR and is done. Then he doesn't need to be protected, thereby freeing up a spot anyway. Buying out Seabrook would essentially free up two protection spots not just the one if Toews is also LTIR'ed.

    That is also a massive overpayment for Strome.

    That's a insta-no from Guerin, and while I don't like Rask, he is more or less a serviceable 4th line center even if he’s barely a NHL caliber level player only half the time. The issue is more to do with the fact he’s overpaid not really anything else. What he lacks in speed he kinda makes up for with his decent shot and a penchant for scoring at critical moments. Ironically, if he was paid like $2M less, nobody would care or **** about him. He's also a pretty cheap buyout, so this idea that a team would be doing us a favor and could demand a 1st for him is kinda silly.

    Drop the 1st, retain half on Rask, and swap out Sokolov for someone better. Sokolov is pretty much a bust at this point, so switch him for someone like Firstov to even out the trade value.

    Rask (50% retained)
    Firstov
    2022 2nd (MIN)

    For

    Strome
    2022 5th (CHI)


    That counteroffer is a joke. Strome is absolutely worth more than two 2nd rounders and a cap dump.

    The initial offer is, as said previously, Sokolov+1st for Strome, which imo is fair for a 24 year old 50 point C. CHI agrees to take Rask's whole contract for a 2nd, like DET did with Staal.
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 6:08 a.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Thank you Pavelski
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,813
    Likes: 31,489
    Quoting: aadoyle
    If Dubas would want anyone from Chicago its Pius Suter lul. Give Matthews his Lions brother and make the Suter-Matthews-Marner line. The other person I would have said is Murphy but Holl is playing some incredible hockey so I dont think its needed.


    Can't see Suter moving. ExD exempt young C. Very valuable for CHI.
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 8:08 a.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2020
    Posts: 4,516
    Likes: 3,189
    Quoting: justaBoss
    That counteroffer is a joke. Strome is absolutely worth more than two 2nd rounders and a cap dump.

    The initial offer is, as said previously, Sokolov+1st for Strome, which imo is fair for a 24 year old 50 point C. CHI agrees to take Rask's whole contract for a 2nd, like DET did with Staal.


    How is it any different than what the original offer was.

    Overpayed 4th liner
    A draft bust (Failed Prospect)
    Unprotected 1st
    2022 2nd rounder

    OR

    Same 4th liner at actual payed value
    Player with middle six potential (B-level Prospect)
    2022 2nd rounder

    Strome is better than his brother, there is no doubt about that. Doesn't change the fact that like his brother he's a middle sixer and not a top six center.

    He hit 51 points once, and benefited from playing with Kane. And hasn’t been close since. He might be a 40 point player, and even if he is, I wouldn't give up a unprotected 1st for him. His brother did much the same with Panarin. Would you give up a unprotected 1st for Ryan Strome?

    Until I see otherwise, I maintain Dylan had a career year riding the coattails of one of the leagues best wingers.

    Hell, Jason Zucker once scored 60+ points in a season. Does that make him a 60 point player then? Zucker could no doubt be a consistent 50 point player playing in the Penguins top six, doubt he would do so on the Wild.

    I could see a scenario where Strome hits 40 on a regular basis if he gels with one of Fiala or Kaprizov. But let's not pretend he isn't anything more then a low-end 2C.
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 8:37 a.m.
    #14
    Thread Starter
    Thank you Pavelski
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,813
    Likes: 31,489
    Quoting: RazWild
    How is it any different than what the original offer was.

    Overpayed 4th liner
    A draft bust (Failed Prospect)
    Unprotected 1st
    2022 2nd rounder

    OR

    Same 4th liner at actual payed value
    Player with middle six potential (B-level Prospect)
    2022 2nd rounder

    Strome is better than his brother, there is no doubt about that. Doesn't change the fact that like his brother he's a middle sixer and not a top six center.

    He hit 51 points once, and benefited from playing with Kane. And hasn’t been close since. He might be a 40 point player, and even if he is, I wouldn't give up a unprotected 1st for him. His brother did much the same with Panarin. Would you give up a unprotected 1st for Ryan Strome?

    Until I see otherwise, I maintain Dylan had a career year riding the coattails of one of the leagues best wingers.

    Hell, Jason Zucker once scored 60+ points in a season. Does that make him a 60 point player then? Zucker could no doubt be a consistent 50 point player playing in the Penguins top six, doubt he would do so on the Wild.

    I could see a scenario where Strome hits 40 on a regular basis if he gels with one of Fiala or Kaprizov. But let's not pretend he isn't anything more then a low-end 2C.


    I'd absolutely take that first package. Nothing in the second package is likely turning into something, but with first rounders the possibility is much higher. I don't think anyone views two seconds being as valuable as one first rounder.

    One year of Rask at fourth line production won't change much. See Bjugstad for instance. Getting him from PIT half retained cost you a grand total of 7th round pick. It doesn't matter if his value in a vacuum goes from 0,5 to 1 in the scale of x/100.

    Also, Strome was in pace for 53 points last year on a normal length year. He's a good 2C for pretty much any team, and relatively young at that. If CHI isn't getting a first for the guy, they'd rather just keep him than take such an useless punt.
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 12:32 p.m.
    #15
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 12
    Likes: 6
    Quoting: justaBoss
    What the f*ck does Dumba have to do with this? He's not included in the exchange in the slightest.

    It's Sokolov+1st for Strome, and a 2nd for taking Rask's contract off Wild's hands.


    Read it again instead of cussing people. Minnesota isn't paying or trading for Dylan strome or care about moving rask
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 12:34 p.m.
    #16
    Thread Starter
    Thank you Pavelski
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,813
    Likes: 31,489
    Quoting: TogoBornPride29
    Read it again instead of cussing people. Minnesota isn't paying or trading for Dylan strome or care about moving rask


    Sorry about the language. Just don't see any correlation between the players MIN might be after and what is Dumba's perceiced value for the Wild.

    I don't see any clear reason why Wild wouldn't be interested in Strome.
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 12:38 p.m.
    #17
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 12
    Likes: 6
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Sorry about the language. Just don't see any correlation between the players MIN might be after and what is Dumba's perceiced value for the Wild.

    I don't see any clear reason why Wild wouldn't be interested in Strome.


    Because he isn't better than trocheck, or sean Monahan that Minnesota gm has said no to
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 12:42 p.m.
    #18
    Thread Starter
    Thank you Pavelski
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,813
    Likes: 31,489
    Quoting: TogoBornPride29
    Because he isn't better than trocheck, or sean Monahan that Minnesota gm has said no to


    While I agree that MIN won't trade Dumba for whatever reasons to those guys, what correlation that has on a Sokolov+1st for Strome trade?

    Are you implying that Dumba's value = Sokolov+1st?
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 12:52 p.m.
    #19
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2021
    Posts: 12
    Likes: 6
    Quoting: justaBoss
    While I agree that MIN won't trade Dumba for whatever reasons to those guys, what correlation that has on a Sokolov+1st for Strome trade?

    Are you implying that Dumba's value = Sokolov+1st?


    I am just telling you that Vincent trocheck, & Sean Monahan are better c's than strome. being that wild gm didn't want them, he wouldn't be interested in Dylan strome
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 12:56 p.m.
    #20
    Thread Starter
    Thank you Pavelski
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2017
    Posts: 32,813
    Likes: 31,489
    Quoting: TogoBornPride29
    I am just telling you that Vincent trocheck, & Sean Monahan are better c's than strome. being that wild gm didn't want them, he wouldn't be interested in Dylan strome


    One thing - I'm almost certain that Wild did WANT one of them. What they didn't want is to pay the amount their respective teams wanted for those guys.

    Strome could come cheaper than these guys, and has the potential to surpass one of them. Still only 24, relatively young guy.
    Feb. 6, 2021 at 3:38 p.m.
    #21
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2020
    Posts: 34,958
    Likes: 21,259
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Can't see Suter moving. ExD exempt young C. Very valuable for CHI.


    True but when toews and dach come back they may move him. Cause stroke, toews and dach will be the top 9
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll