Quoting: exo2769
A couple of things. ANA had a number of issues, but Lindholm himself being injured was a huge issue. As for who has progressed further in their rebuild. Generally, yes I do agree, but I could also see a counterpoint suggesting ANA is just as far along. ANA just shed Getzlaf and doesn't have any of their older guard still around which allows for more cap space to sign productive UFAs. Guys like Zegras and Drysdale and this year's pick will go a long way toward helping their future. The Hawks are still reliant on Kane for offense and Keith was their highest ATOI Dman last year.
As for the taxes...it's not quite as big a deal as people make it out to be. It's not nothing for sure, but taxes get paid to the state in which the game is played...so most years each of these guys have to file something like 20 different state returns...and even 12.3% state income tax for the state of California if you play the Kings or Ducks. YES, 41 home games means more games played in California, but if he came to the Hawks a $5M per year salary is a $350k difference in state taxes. Yeah, that's a lot of money, but I'd argue there are bigger items that overtake this tax delta. Starting with your agent negotiation $5.35M vs $5M. But then the whole...winning vs money thing.
Yes, very aware of the tax situation. Lindholm's next contract will likely be about $7M. $3.5M being taxed at 13.3% is $465K versus in Illinois at 4.95% is $173,250 so $291,750 difference which to anyone is a big chunk of change. Additionally, any investments or additive businesses Lindholm has get taxed at that income rate which can overtime far exceed his annual salary making California even less attractive. California is also one of those states that they don't care if you have another home in Nevada, Florida, Texas, etc. As long as you have a home in california you owe california income taxes...very unfriendly if you make over $1M a year and they are ruthless. So that said, I understand what you're saying only being a $291,750 and negotiable by the agent (which is true) but it's not just salary, it's exponential when you start talking about money sitting in investments for that player.
I agree that Zegras and Drysdale are awesome pieces and this year's pick should help as well, but Anaheim is still behind the Hawks IMO and don't have as much revenues to support the organization. How many times have you heard of a player wanting to leave the Hawks? There's a good reason for it. Other teams aren't so fortunate and not saying people don't want to play in Anaheim, just saying the Hawks have a lot to offer players with fanbase, perks, facilities, etc. that are top notch. I think those play into a players decision as well.