Forums/Armchair-GM

Wright Direction

Created by: tylerstenson
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 1, 2021
Published: Dec. 1, 2021
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. Boldy, Matthew
  2. Rask, Victor
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (MIN)
MIN
  1. Miller, J.T. ($2,500,000 retained)
2.
VAN
  1. Fabbro, Dante
  2. Glass, Cody
NSH
  1. Rathbone, Jack
  2. Poolman, Tucker
  3. Boeser, Brock
3.
VAN
  1. 2022 2nd round pick (BOS)
Any team. Some team will pay around this price at TDL to get depth piece
BOS
  1. Motte, Tyler
Buyouts
  • Braden Holtby: $500,000
  • Jake Virtanen: $50,000
Retained Salary Transactions
  • J.T. Miller: $2,500,000 (47.62%)
Recapture Fees
  • Roberto Luongo: $3,035,212
DRAFT YEARROUND 1ROUND 2ROUND 3ROUND 4ROUND 5ROUND 6ROUND 7
2022
VAN
MIN
BOS
WPG
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
2023
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
2024
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES BONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$75,747,325$648,780$4,082,500$5,752,675
Left WingCenterRight Wing
MIN
Boldy, Matthew
$880,833
LW, RW
RFA - 2
VAN
Pettersson, Elias
$7,350,000
C
RFA - 3
VAN
Garland, Conor
$4,950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
VAN
Pearson, Tanner
$3,250,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 3
VAN
Horvat, Bo
$5,500,000
C
UFA - 2
VAN
Höglander, Nils
$891,667
LW, RW
RFA - 2
VAN
Dickinson, Jason
$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
NSH
Glass, Cody
$863,333
C
RFA - 1
VAN
Podkolzin, Vasily
$925,000
RW
RFA - 3
VAN
Di Giuseppe, Phillip
$750,000
LW
UFA - 1
MIN
Rask, Victor
$4,000,000
C
UFA - 1
VAN
Lockwood, William
$842,500
RW
RFA - 1
VAN
Lammikko, Juho
$750,000
C, LW, RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
VAN
Hughes, Quinn
$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 6
NSH
Fabbro, Dante
$2,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
VAN
Demko, Thatcher
$5,000,000
G
UFA - 5
VAN
Ekman-Larsson, Oliver
$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
VAN
Myers, Tyler
$6,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
VAN
Halák, Jaroslav
$1,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 1
VAN
Burroughs, Kyle
$750,000
RD
UFA - 2
VAN
Hamonic, Travis
$3,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 2
VAN
Hunt, Brad
$800,000
LD
UFA - 1
VAN
Schenn, Luke
$850,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
VAN
Ferland, Micheal
$3,500,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 2
VAN
Sutter, Brandon
$1,125,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
VAN
Keeper, Brady
$762,500
RD
UFA - 2
VAN
Highmore, Matthew
$725,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 1, 2021 at 4:22 p.m.
#1
Canucks...
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 502
I'm a Canucks fan, but man this is deeply flawed. First off, Wild aren't parting ways with Boldy. The Nashville deal is a huge overpayment by Vancouver, Boeser still has substantial value and Poolman's contract isn't as much of an anchor as some people make it out to be. Fabbro is valuable, but he's nothing compared to Boeser, and Cody Glass is more of a reclamation project rather than a prospect with potential now. Plus Rathbone shouldn't be in that deal whatsoever

As for the Motte trade, I can see some teams being desperate enough to be willing to give up a 2nd rounder for him, but I don't know how likely that is to happen. I can also see a scenario where Vancouver decides to re-sign Motte since he's such an important piece to their roster
RazWild, TanSor, pwisch17 and 1 other person liked this.
Dec. 1, 2021 at 4:22 p.m.
#2
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 358
Likes: 171
Nobody is giving you a 2nd round pick for Motte. He is a replacement level forward making more than a million bucks. a 5th would be generous
pwisch17 liked this.
Dec. 1, 2021 at 4:24 p.m.
#3
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 2,231
You're not getting Boldy. Or Rossi.
TanSor, pwisch17 and OutCold13 liked this.
Dec. 1, 2021 at 4:34 p.m.
#4
Beautiful Idiot
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 127
Likes: 34
Quoting: Black61
Nobody is giving you a 2nd round pick for Motte. He is a replacement level forward making more than a million bucks. a 5th would be generous


I would push back on this, I think motte and a late rounder is worth a 2nd.
Dec. 1, 2021 at 4:37 p.m.
#5
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 776
Not only is that trade an overpayment, but we also need Boldy more than we need Miller.
TanSor, pwisch17 and OutCold13 liked this.
Dec. 1, 2021 at 4:50 p.m.
#6
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 358
Likes: 171
Quoting: BeautifulIdiot
I would push back on this, I think motte and a late rounder is worth a 2nd.


Explain to me why because all i see is

Undersized forward.

career high 16 points.

career 82 game average 18 points

Is not a centre (so no faceoff skills)

turns 27 in march (so no upward trajectory due to age)

Is making over a million bucks as a 4th liner.

Has either been scratched or injured for the majority of the last few years (only has played 66 of 148 regular season games since the start of 19-20)

None of that screams anything close to a 2nd round pick
pwisch17 and RaZZe liked this.
Dec. 1, 2021 at 5:02 p.m.
#7
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 255
Likes: 58
Quoting: BeautifulIdiot
I would push back on this, I think motte and a late rounder is worth a 2nd.


At the TDL, a late second or third is what he fetches. The PK ability and style of play makes that a no brainer given that multiple teams would have interest.
BeautifulIdiot liked this.
Dec. 1, 2021 at 5:06 p.m.
#8
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 255
Likes: 58
Quoting: Knuckl3s
I'm a Canucks fan, but man this is deeply flawed. First off, Wild aren't parting ways with Boldy. The Nashville deal is a huge overpayment by Vancouver, Boeser still has substantial value and Poolman's contract isn't as much of an anchor as some people make it out to be. Fabbro is valuable, but he's nothing compared to Boeser, and Cody Glass is more of a reclamation project rather than a prospect with potential now. Plus Rathbone shouldn't be in that deal whatsoever

As for the Motte trade, I can see some teams being desperate enough to be willing to give up a 2nd rounder for him, but I don't know how likely that is to happen. I can also see a scenario where Vancouver decides to re-sign Motte since he's such an important piece to their roster


Why not trade him and THEN re-sign him?? If he goes elsewhere, so be it. That kind of flawed thinking has left us with this roster and a very thin farm system. The team really needs to start maximizing its assets.
Dec. 1, 2021 at 5:07 p.m.
#9
Canucks...
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 502
Quoting: Boldirev
At the TDL, a late second or third is what he fetches. The PK ability and style of play makes that a no brainer given that multiple teams would have interest.


Quoting: Black61
Nobody is giving you a 2nd round pick for Motte. He is a replacement level forward making more than a million bucks. a 5th would be generous


Bottom six forwards can be above replacement level you know. If you think Motte is a replacement forward, then you clearly haven't watched enough Canucks hockey
Boldirev liked this.
Dec. 1, 2021 at 5:12 p.m.
#10
Beautiful Idiot
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 127
Likes: 34
Quoting: Boldirev
At the TDL, a late second or third is what he fetches. The PK ability and style of play makes that a no brainer given that multiple teams would have interest.


Sorry, I was thinking TDL the whole time, he isnt there for his offensive abilities, just for defence, and any team at the tdl would be a late round pick so a 2nd is probably what he would get in that situaiton
Boldirev liked this.
Dec. 1, 2021 at 5:13 p.m.
#11
Canucks...
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 502
Quoting: Boldirev
Why not trade him and THEN re-sign him?? If he goes elsewhere, so be it. That kind of flawed thinking has left us with this roster and a very thin farm system. The team really needs to start maximizing its assets.


If you are referring to Motte, then I would say that you might be underestimating the value of having the players signing rights to extend them before free agency if you want. Obviously UFA signing rights don't have very much trade value if any, but if you trade a player as a rental, it's not the wisest move to hope that you will be able to reclaim that player back in free agency when the reason that you were able to sell that player as a rental in the first place probably means that there is a sizeable market for that player
Dec. 1, 2021 at 6:52 p.m.
#12
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 255
Likes: 58
Quoting: Knuckl3s
If you are referring to Motte, then I would say that you might be underestimating the value of having the players signing rights to extend them before free agency if you want. Obviously UFA signing rights don't have very much trade value if any, but if you trade a player as a rental, it's not the wisest move to hope that you will be able to reclaim that player back in free agency when the reason that you were able to sell that player as a rental in the first place probably means that there is a sizeable market for that player


You take your chances obviously, but he doesn't make or break this team one way or the other.
Dec. 1, 2021 at 10:46 p.m.
#13
Canucks...
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 502
Quoting: Boldirev
You take your chances obviously, but he doesn't make or break this team one way or the other.


Of course
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Remove Option
Submit Poll