The Hagel price is reported by DFO. I doubt it be that high but will be close. Hagel is 1.5m at 3 years. He's very good. I wouldn't really mind giving that much up tbh.
Yeah this seems about right. He's not getting traded though. Dehaan at 50% for a 2nd makes sense for both sides imo though
If hawks acutally are going through a rebuild not what they did in the off-season this just feel like a price they would trade him for. A good 1st round plus a prospect plus b prospect sounds too good. I think if he do it be a bit lower than this maybe a worst asset than the b prospect
If hawks acutally are going through a rebuild not what they did in the off-season this just feel like a price they would trade him for. A good 1st round plus a prospect plus b prospect sounds too good. I think if he do it be a bit lower than this maybe a worst asset than the b prospect
My point is just that TOR isn't offering Amirov+1st+ for Hagel. If they do then hawks accept, but they won't offer that. And I wouldn't trade Hagel for just Amirov or just the 1st, so that's why I don't see a deal happening
Yeah my thinking was Hagel would cost something like a Robertson and a 2nd. I love the player and the contract obviously, but that does seem a bit much to me. But man he would look nice on the leafs.
My point is just that TOR isn't offering Amirov+1st+ for Hagel. If they do then hawks accept, but they won't offer that. And I wouldn't trade Hagel for just Amirov or just the 1st, so that's why I don't see a deal happening
I acutally think this is a trade dubas would make so. I watch a lot of hawks hockey and I liked the Kampf signing and they were looking at Kampf. They had to see Hagel too plus getting Hagel plus a dman sounds really good especially for the cap hit
Yeah my thinking was Hagel would cost something like a Robertson and a 2nd. I love the player and the contract obviously, but that does seem a bit much to me. But man he would look nice on the leafs.
It's alot but when you think of getting a d with it and that Hagel is 23. 2 years after this year AND is a rfa. Sounds really good
Sorry this real doesn't make sense. Leafs are flush with cost efficient LWers (and LHD). Seems ridiculous to give up young assets for a position that is already strong.
Sorry this real doesn't make sense. Leafs are flush with cost efficient LWers (and LHD). Seems ridiculous to give up young assets for a position that is already strong.
Hagel is good for now and future with his contract. Dehaan can play RD. The major thing is how Hagel is (he's good) and his term plus cap
The price for Hagel will be high given they don’t want to trade him. He doesn’t fall in the category of guys that will be moved but can be for the right price. Similar situation of Tampa acquiring Goodrow. I’d accept if this offer came through.
Hagel for a 1st and Robertson...Hawks need to get blown away to move him and that's probably what it would take given that they've already been offered a 1st and prospect, the prospect needs to be a higher end guy and maybe the Hawks move him.
Now is Hagel worth that...no if you look at his contribution on the ice solely, but yes, it's situational for a contending team the next couple years that needs a top 6 winger and is up against the cap as his contract is hugely attractive and he's proven unlike Robertson at this point.