SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Depth from Detroit

Created by: SankFeravalli
Team: 2021-22 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 28, 2022
Published: Feb. 28, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Detroit is sells off a couple of pending UFAs, while adding a top 100 pick and effectively replacing Namestnikov with Compher who is signed for another year. Compher was the captain at University of Michigan (not that it really matters now).

Colorado brings back a familiar player in Namestnikov who, in my opinion, plays Swiss Army role better than Compher. They also add a solid depth defenseman who matches their style. Most importantly, they gain cap space which can be used elsewhere, while adding to their roster.
Trades
COL
  1. Namestnikov, Vladislav ($1,000,000 retained)
  2. Stecher, Troy ($850,000 retained)
DET
  1. Compher, J.T.
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (COL)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2023
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2024
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$76,868,963$1,741,463$3,350,000$4,631,037
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$0$0
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$908,333$908,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$725,000$725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,075,000$1,075,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 28, 2022 at 4:37 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
I think thats a very bad deal for the Avs, giving up too much and not really improving. Namestnikov is very blah, weak on the puck, he really disappeared in the playoffs.

Stretcher is meh too. I dont think giving up a 2nd with serviceable player in Compher really helps out the avs. Burning a high draft pick to min max your roster
Xqb15a, Dumpsterfire and TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 5:06 p.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 7,792
Likes: 4,483
Detroit's not retaining on two cheap contracts, Dan Rosen of NHL.Com pretty much said that Detroit will be dealing Greiss before the TDL so he's one retention and Leddy will will be the other one since both have the most expensive contracts on the team. So Yzerman will retain on both Greiss and Leddy and that's it as they're already retaining on Panik for the next 2 years.
Dumpsterfire and aedoran liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 5:16 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,638
Likes: 9,246
Not a fan. Don’t think Namestikov is an upgrade over Compher especially in the playoffs where love him or hate him Jim Tim the ginger has a knack for agitation. Namestikov is kind of meh in the physical department. Stetcher I think there are better options out there.
TJTwolf liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 5:18 p.m.
#4
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,731
Likes: 8,330
I'd retain on 1 but not both, we need some flexibility.
aedoran liked this.
Feb. 28, 2022 at 11:56 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2015
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 324
Quoting: coga16
I think thats a very bad deal for the Avs, giving up too much and not really improving. Namestnikov is very blah, weak on the puck, he really disappeared in the playoffs.

Stretcher is meh too. I dont think giving up a 2nd with serviceable player in Compher really helps out the avs. Burning a high draft pick to min max your roster


Quoting: Xqb15a
Not a fan. Don’t think Namestikov is an upgrade over Compher especially in the playoffs where love him or hate him Jim Tim the ginger has a knack for agitation. Namestikov is kind of meh in the physical department. Stetcher I think there are better options out there.


Fair points. Here’s my thought process with this general concept - Colorado is able to buy themselves cap space while adding to their team.
Namestnikov for Compher is essentially a swap. Similar role, similar usage, similar production. They’re different styles of player. I thought Namestnikov was fine in his short time with Colorado two years ago. 4 goals in 12 playoffs games is solid for his role. I also thought he played up the lineup when called upon better than Compher has been able to. I understand he can be soft on the puck. I appreciate Compher’s ability to be an agitator, but I think his perceived physicality within the flow of the game is overrated. Namestnikov is actually at 2.4 hits/60 while Compher is at 2.1 this season.
I’m also a fan of Stecher’s game. Even if Byram comes back, I don’t think they have enough depth on defense to get through 4 rounds of the playoffs. There are inevitably going to be injuries, especially considering the injury history of all their current defensemen. Stetcher just came back from injury (ironically), so he hasn’t played a lot this year. But he’s been solid as a third pair guy for the duration of his career, and his skating ability fits Colorado’s style. He doesn’t really PK, so that’s a negative.
The second round pick plus a roster player is pricey. But, in my opinion, Colorado is adding to their team while also buying cap space to do more elsewhere.
Xqb15a and Gutty liked this.
Mar. 1, 2022 at 8:22 a.m.
#6
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,584
Likes: 4,618
Quoting: Mergus80
Fair points. Here’s my thought process with this general concept - Colorado is able to buy themselves cap space while adding to their team.
Namestnikov for Compher is essentially a swap. Similar role, similar usage, similar production. They’re different styles of player. I thought Namestnikov was fine in his short time with Colorado two years ago. 4 goals in 12 playoffs games is solid for his role. I also thought he played up the lineup when called upon better than Compher has been able to. I understand he can be soft on the puck. I appreciate Compher’s ability to be an agitator, but I think his perceived physicality within the flow of the game is overrated. Namestnikov is actually at 2.4 hits/60 while Compher is at 2.1 this season.
I’m also a fan of Stecher’s game. Even if Byram comes back, I don’t think they have enough depth on defense to get through 4 rounds of the playoffs. There are inevitably going to be injuries, especially considering the injury history of all their current defensemen. Stetcher just came back from injury (ironically), so he hasn’t played a lot this year. But he’s been solid as a third pair guy for the duration of his career, and his skating ability fits Colorado’s style. He doesn’t really PK, so that’s a negative.
The second round pick plus a roster player is pricey. But, in my opinion, Colorado is adding to their team while also buying cap space to do more elsewhere.

Nice of you to elaborate so thoroughly, well done.

I wouldn't mind Namestnikov as a cheap depth add, but not at this price. If Avs need capspace they can trade Compher for a pick instead of using one of only two top 60 picks they have in the next two drafts.
Mar. 2, 2022 at 2:56 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 553
A 2nd for Namestnikov works. Add another 2nd for retention on Stecher and taking Compher.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll