Minnesota says no

Kerfoot is on pace for 50+ points this year and is a PKer. A 2nd for Kerfoot is a disappointing return for a guy with another year left after this, no way Minnesota says no

Would hate to give up Hoglander but Canucks accept that

Sure they do. We don't need any more wingers, we have plenty of PKers already, we don't need to buy high on a career year, and we have no interest in his cap hit next season. So Minnesota declines.

I mean if they don’t need him that makes more sense, I moreso thought your comment was based on straight up value, my bad (tho Kerfoot can play C as well)

Kerfoot can't play C. He has tried and it's failed miserably

Robertson sniped one tonight I’m keeping him in the top 6 he looks good

That’s a very steep price for Hoglander

Minnesota has no use for Kerfoot, And if Fletcher moves Sanheim he'll get a far better off then this. So both Minnesota and Philly say No.

1) Toronto says no.
2) Minnesota says no.
3) Toronto says no.

Philly would be fools not to take that deal

Robertson, Holl has no value and a late 1st and 2nd round pick for Sanheim and Braun. Yeah like i said Fletcher can do better if he moves Sanheim.

Robertson has no value ? Seriously?

I said Holl has no value not Robertson.

Ummm....

You seriously think that a top 50 prospect in the league in Robertson has no value?

Man is this horrid for the Leafs. No improvement this season and the Leafs lose term and futures.

Dude i did not say that Robertson has no value, I said Holl has no value. Look what i said 3 post above Holl has no value not Robertson.

God, I hate to be a grammar nazi then. Because I absolutely despise them. But in any event you should of used commas, in that post, because it literally reads out that you think neither player has value.

*Robertson, Holl... who has no value, a late 1st, and a 2nd round pick isn't enough for Sanheim and Braun.*

Edit: And now I see you added the comma.

But I digress. The fact Toronto is paying Philadelphia a top 50 prospect on top of a 1st, even with the caveat it's a late one, for Sanheim makes this an absolute overpay.

As a Wild fan, I'm already intimately aware of the fact that Fletcher's a idiot. But even he's not so stupid to turn that down. Chuck takes that in a heartbeat.

Try looking at my post again there's a comma after Robertson. I said Holl has no value never once said that Robertson doesn't.

You edited your original comment, after the fact, to put that comma in. It wasn't there to start, and wasn't there when everyone started harping on you. Because if it was, you wouldn't of gotten this much flak for it and everyone would have understood your point that you meant Holl. Regardless of his value.

Proof of this is @jet11567's post where he quotes your original post. It very clearly shows there wasn't a comma there.

Let it go. I'm done talking about it.

As it stands, no one gives two ****s about Holl or his value to the deal. Or his lack of it. Robertson's inclusion makes this an overpayment. Toronto turns it down. Bottom line.

He was the 2C in the playoffs and played great; and was also the 3C for most of the past 2 seasons before this where he performed well but didn’t produce greatly due to playing the “shut down role” for the Leafs