SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fiala

Created by: sensibleguy
Team: 2022-23 Ottawa Senators
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 9, 2022
Published: Mar. 14, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$7,000,000
2$1,500,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
8$7,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,500,000
Trades
OTT
  1. Fiala, Kevin [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
After the playoffs but before the draft
MIN
  1. Järventie, Roby
  2. 2022 1st round pick (OTT)
Additional Details:
Lottery protected, if Ottawa wins a lottery pick, then the 2023 1st round pick is exchanged instead
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NYI
2023
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NSH
2024
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$69,480,714$0$3,100,000$12,019,286

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,205,714$8,205,714
LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,975,000$4,975,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
RFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$3,600,000$3,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$762,500$762,500
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$600,000$600K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,000,000$8,000,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,687,500$4,687,500
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$787,500$787,500
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,300,000$1,300,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 14, 2022 at 10:39 p.m.
#1
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,275
Likes: 24,117
Imagine that pick ends up 1st or 2nd next year. I don’t think the Sens are trading a pick that isn’t top 2 protected in 2023
jet11567 liked this.
Mar. 14, 2022 at 10:51 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 1,265
Sens could get a fiala deal done without trading their first. I also like the idea of Dumba to the sens
Mar. 14, 2022 at 11:05 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
I think our 1sts should be untouchable until we’re a consistent playoff team (2024 is the earliest 1st that I would think should be in play, as long as the team has made the playoffs twice by then). We can probably get Fiala without it too. Pieces like Greig, our 2nd, and Brannstrom could be added, which should be helpful for the Wild (cheap, young players with upside that can be solid contributors over the next few seasons of cap hell).
Mar. 14, 2022 at 11:12 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Serf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,417
Likes: 1,461
Quoting: csick
Imagine that pick ends up 1st or 2nd next year. I don’t think the Sens are trading a pick that isn’t top 2 protected in 2023


If that pick ends up a 1st or 2nd in 2023, this team is in trouble, and please no Ranger comments.
Mar. 14, 2022 at 11:13 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 520
Quoting: jet11567
Sens could get a fiala deal done without trading their first. I also like the idea of Dumba to the sens


Ye
Quoting: jet11567
Sens could get a fiala deal done without trading their first. I also like the idea of Dumba to the sens


Yeah no. They wouldn't get fiala done without a 1st
sensibleguy liked this.
Mar. 14, 2022 at 11:13 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,490
Likes: 1,104
Quoting: csick
Imagine that pick ends up 1st or 2nd next year. I don’t think the Sens are trading a pick that isn’t top 2 protected in 2023


Even if the pick ends up being just outside the lottery... thats a really tough pill to swallow. Anything from 3-7 would be ROUGH.
Mar. 14, 2022 at 11:13 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Serf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,417
Likes: 1,461
Quoting: jet11567
Sens could get a fiala deal done without trading their first. I also like the idea of Dumba to the sens


Quoting: Alfie11
I think our 1sts should be untouchable until we’re a consistent playoff team (2024 is the earliest 1st that I would think should be in play, as long as the team has made the playoffs twice by then). We can probably get Fiala without it too. Pieces like Greig, our 2nd, and Brannstrom could be added, which should be helpful for the Wild (cheap, young players with upside that can be solid contributors over the next few seasons of cap hell).


Wow, and I thought my offer would be considered not enough
Mar. 14, 2022 at 11:16 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 1,265
Quoting: Wildnochance
Ye

Yeah no. They wouldn't get fiala done without a 1st


Sens have a very deep prospect pool they have the pieces to get fiala without giving up a first. Also the market for Fiala wont be that big because he wants alot of money and this years free agency class is loaded with wingers
Mar. 14, 2022 at 11:16 p.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 520
Quoting: Alfie11
I think our 1sts should be untouchable until we’re a consistent playoff team (2024 is the earliest 1st that I would think should be in play, as long as the team has made the playoffs twice by then). We can probably get Fiala without it too. Pieces like Greig, our 2nd, and Brannstrom could be added, which should be helpful for the Wild (cheap, young players with upside that can be solid contributors over the next few seasons of cap hell).


Minnesota is keeping dumba. Then has Calen addison, Ryan o'Rourke, Carson lambos, damon hunt, jack peart who Minnesota will likely sign after his season, etc.. all of this to say Erik brannstom doesn't do anything for Minnesota as we are stacked at d. Plenty of teams will offer a 1st and prospect for fiala for fiala easily.
Mar. 14, 2022 at 11:18 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 520
Quoting: jet11567
Sens have a very deep prospect pool they have the pieces to get fiala without giving up a first. Also the market for Fiala wont be that big because he wants alot of money and this years free agency class is loaded with wingers


Well other teams will offer a 1st. Plenty of teams will make room for players like fiala. If Minnesota won't get a 1st, then can manage to keep fiala for 1 year , and or trade him during deadline. Minnesota isn't going to just accept whatever for fiala.
Mar. 14, 2022 at 11:19 p.m.
#11
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,275
Likes: 24,117
Quoting: jet11567
Sens have a very deep prospect pool they have the pieces to get fiala without giving up a first. Also the market for Fiala wont be that big because he wants alot of money and this years free agency class is loaded with wingers


We could probably get away if we traded Greig. But hard to see Dorion trading him
sensibleguy liked this.
Mar. 16, 2022 at 11:44 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 10,506
Likes: 3,721
Quoting: TheBoyDuddus
Even if the pick ends up being just outside the lottery... thats a really tough pill to swallow. Anything from 3-7 would be ROUGH.


That's what I was thinking... maybe it's how the OP worded it?

"if Ottawa wins a lottery pick, then the 2023 1st round pick is exchanged instead"

I mean, our pick is 5th OA at the moment... we got Sanderson at that spot in 2020... That's a really HUGE pill to swallow. Fiala is 8 years older than this prospect and will be expensive RIGHT AWAY vs a guy who will be 3 years on ELC.

Quoting: Wildnochance
Plenty of teams will offer a 1st and prospect for fiala for fiala easily.


Not all 1sts have the same value... very important to understand that.

How many Colorado/Tampa's first would you need to move up and get Ottawa's current 5th OA pick?
TheBoyDuddus liked this.
Mar. 16, 2022 at 12:55 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,441
Likes: 3,159
Quoting: Xspyrit
That's what I was thinking... maybe it's how the OP worded it?

"if Ottawa wins a lottery pick, then the 2023 1st round pick is exchanged instead"

I mean, our pick is 5th OA at the moment... we got Sanderson at that spot in 2020... That's a really HUGE pill to swallow. Fiala is 8 years older than this prospect and will be expensive RIGHT AWAY vs a guy who will be 3 years on ELC.



Not all 1sts have the same value... very important to understand that.

How many Colorado/Tampa's first would you need to move up and get Ottawa's current 5th OA pick?


A better wording would in point of fact be to make it top 7 protected. That's more than fair. I think. If that pick is in the 7-12 range, then it becomes less of an issue. But if it's 7th or higher, that's where the Sens need to draw the line.

Even as a Wild fan, I'd agree that it shouldn't be moved if it's higher than 7th ova.
Mar. 16, 2022 at 12:57 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 3,387
Quoting: RazWild
A better wording would in point of fact be to make it top 7 protected. That's more than fair. I think. If that pick is in the 7-12 range, then it becomes less of an issue. But if it's 7th or higher, that's where the Sens need to draw the line.

Even as a Wild fan, I'd agree that it shouldn't be moved if it's higher than 7th ova.


So if it's 7th, do we get it or not?
Mar. 16, 2022 at 1:15 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,441
Likes: 3,159
Quoting: Caerii
So if it's 7th, do we get it or not?


That's the rub. It's a draft day trade at that point.

Honestly, it'd be up to the Sens. They probably hold onto it until whomever is picking 6th is done and depending if the player that they want is still there or not. If they are, they likely use it on their guy. If not, then the scenario opens up that they are willing to move it for Fiala.
Mar. 16, 2022 at 1:21 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 10,506
Likes: 3,721
Quoting: RazWild
A better wording would in point of fact be to make it top 7 protected. That's more than fair. I think. If that pick is in the 7-12 range, then it becomes less of an issue. But if it's 7th or higher, that's where the Sens need to draw the line.

Even as a Wild fan, I'd agree that it shouldn't be moved if it's higher than 7th ova.


I could agree to that but makes me nervous still... I mean, look at this (this was Bob McKenzie's Mid-Season Draft Rankings) :

1 Shane Wright Kingston (OHL)
2 Logan Cooley USA U-18 (USHL)
3 Joakim Kemell JYP (SM Liiga)
4 Matt Savoie Winnipeg (WHL)
5 Juraj Slafkovsky TPS (SM Liiga Jr.)
6 Ivan Miroshnichenko Omsk (VHL)
7 David Jiricek Plzen (CZE)
8 Danila Yurov Magnitogorsk (MHL)
9 Simon Nemec Nitra (SVK)
10 Conor Geekie Winnipeg (WHL)
11 Brad Lambert Lahti (SM Liiga)
12 Jonathan Lakkerimaki Djurgardens (SWE J-20)
13 Cutter Gauthier USA U-18 (USHL)
14 Frank Nazar USA U-18 (USHL)
etc


Look at the guys still available at #9 to #12

We don't know how it'll play out but it looks to be quite similar to 2020 top-15
RazWild liked this.
Mar. 16, 2022 at 1:39 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 4,441
Likes: 3,159
Quoting: Xspyrit
I could agree to that but makes me nervous still... I mean, look at this (this was Bob McKenzie's Mid-Season Draft Rankings) :

1 Shane Wright Kingston (OHL)
2 Logan Cooley USA U-18 (USHL)
3 Joakim Kemell JYP (SM Liiga)
4 Matt Savoie Winnipeg (WHL)
5 Juraj Slafkovsky TPS (SM Liiga Jr.)
6 Ivan Miroshnichenko Omsk (VHL)
7 David Jiricek Plzen (CZE)
8 Danila Yurov Magnitogorsk (MHL)
9 Simon Nemec Nitra (SVK)
10 Conor Geekie Winnipeg (WHL)
11 Brad Lambert Lahti (SM Liiga)
12 Jonathan Lakkerimaki Djurgardens (SWE J-20)
13 Cutter Gauthier USA U-18 (USHL)
14 Frank Nazar USA U-18 (USHL)
etc


Look at the guys still available at #9 to #12

We don't know how it'll play out but it looks to be quite similar to 2020 top-15


Well, two things are certain.

1) Miroshnichenko and Yurov are going to drop like a rock in the projected rankings because of the NHL cutting ties with the KHL. They likely won't be picked until the 2nd round now because of that and what's going on in Ukraine right now.

2) Outside of maybe Nemec and Lambert there's not going to be a player who's ceiling will be higher than what Fiala's is. Which is to say an elite top-line playmaking winger with gamebreaking talent.

Geekie and Lakkerimaki are presently considered to top out as 2nd line players. Gauthier and Nazar, middle-sixers.

To be blunt, Fiala is frankly better than anyone or anything you could draft in that range and the Sens can afford him.
Mar. 16, 2022 at 2:00 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 10,506
Likes: 3,721
Quoting: RazWild
Well, two things are certain.

1) Miroshnichenko and Yurov are going to drop like a rock in the projected rankings because of the NHL cutting ties with the KHL. They likely won't be picked until the 2nd round now because of that and what's going on in Ukraine right now.

2) Outside of maybe Nemec and Lambert there's not going to be a player who's ceiling will be higher than what Fiala's is. Which is to say an elite top-line playmaking winger with gamebreaking talent.

Geekie and Lakkerimaki are presently considered to top out as 2nd line players. Gauthier and Nazar, middle-sixers.

To be blunt, Fiala is frankly better than anyone or anything you could draft in that range and the Sens can afford him.


1) I wish I wouldn't have to acknowledge this FFS. The thing is we talk about how it affects the Ukrainians, but this will affect a lot of Russians too. I feel bad for them too

2) I know, outside of a few choices at the top, most players who will be better than Fiala (might not be many) will probably be outside the top-15 anyway. But as a team you (should) have confidence in your scouting and think you can make the "steal" of the first round. That's where this point become important : The thing is Fiala is 8 years older than these prospects and will be expensive RIGHT AWAY vs a guy who will be 3 years on ELC.

All that said, I'm very close to say "let's go". Only top-3 protected brings back Duchene memories (2019's pick ended up 4th OA but could have been 1st), top-7 protected makes it more "manageable" lol
Mar. 16, 2022 at 9:36 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Serf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,417
Likes: 1,461
Quoting: Xspyrit
That's what I was thinking... maybe it's how the OP worded it?

"if Ottawa wins a lottery pick, then the 2023 1st round pick is exchanged instead"

I mean, our pick is 5th OA at the moment... we got Sanderson at that spot in 2020... That's a really HUGE pill to swallow. Fiala is 8 years older than this prospect and will be expensive RIGHT AWAY vs a guy who will be 3 years on ELC.



Not all 1sts have the same value... very important to understand that.

How many Colorado/Tampa's first would you need to move up and get Ottawa's current 5th OA pick?


Quoting: RazWild
A better wording would in point of fact be to make it top 7 protected. That's more than fair. I think. If that pick is in the 7-12 range, then it becomes less of an issue. But if it's 7th or higher, that's where the Sens need to draw the line.

Even as a Wild fan, I'd agree that it shouldn't be moved if it's higher than 7th ova.


Quoting: Caerii
So if it's 7th, do we get it or not?


I just tagged the three people involved in this conversation, ignore which specific comment I tagged.

I meant top3 protected. I think Fiala is as good as any 4OA-6OA picked player, and Fiala fits this teams timeline. There's a lot less risk involved with Fiala over a future 4OA-6OA pick, IMO. If you don't agree that's fine, that's why we do this, to exchange our points of view.

I appreciate all the comments BTW.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll