SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

what is the price

Created by: BruinsTalk
Team: 2021-22 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 16, 2022
Published: Mar. 16, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
ANA
    What is the price for either or both?
    2.
    3.
    CHI
      Price?
      4.
      NYI
        Price?
        5.
        6.
        SJS
          Price?
          7.
          8.
          WPG
            Price?
            9.
            OTT
              Price?
              Buried
              DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
              2022
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the CGY
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              2023
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              2024
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              Logo of the BOS
              ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
              35$81,500,000$111,505,841$1,956,507$1,050,000-$30,005,841
              Left WingCentreRight Wing
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $6,125,000$6,125,000
              LW
              NMC
              UFA - 4
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $6,875,000$6,875,000
              C
              M-NTC, NMC
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $6,666,667$6,666,667
              RW
              M-NTC, NMC
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $6,000,000$6,000,000
              LW
              NMC
              UFA - 4
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $5,250,000$5,250,000
              C, RW
              M-NTC, NMC
              UFA - 5
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $3,100,000$3,100,000
              RW
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $3,800,000$3,800,000
              LW, C, RW
              NMC
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $2,375,000$2,375,000
              C, LW
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $3,675,000$3,675,000
              RW, LW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $1,750,000$1,750,000
              LW, C
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $750,000$750,000
              LW, RW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $1,050,000$1,050,000
              LW, RW
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $2,463,139$2,463,139
              RW, LW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
              $1,533,333$1,533,333
              LW, RW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $800,000$800,000
              RW, C
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
              $1,500,000$1,500,000
              LW
              UFA - 3
              Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
              $4,137,500$4,137,500
              RW, C
              NMC
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
              $3,640,000$3,640,000
              C, LW, RW
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Ottawa Senators
              $749,250$749,250
              C, LW
              UFA - 1
              Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $3,687,500$3,687,500
              LD
              UFA - 3
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $4,900,000$4,900,000
              RD
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $5,000,000$5,000,000
              G
              NMC
              UFA - 4
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $3,000,000$3,000,000
              LD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 3
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $4,100,000$4,100,000
              RD
              UFA - 6
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$125,000$125K)
              G
              RFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $3,000,000$3,000,000
              LD
              UFA - 3
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $1,000,000$1,000,000
              RD
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
              LD
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
              $2,602,778$2,602,778
              LD
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
              $4,600,000$4,600,000
              LD/RD
              UFA - 4
              Logo of the New York Islanders
              $1,450,000$1,450,000
              RD
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
              $1,800,000$1,800,000
              RD
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the San Jose Sharks
              $725,000$725,000
              LD
              UFA - 1
              Logo of the Seattle Kraken
              $2,750,000$2,750,000
              LD/RD
              UFA - 2
              Logo of the Seattle Kraken
              $3,375,000$3,375,000
              LD
              M-NTC
              UFA - 1
              ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
              LD/RD
              RFA - 1
              Logo of the Boston Bruins
              $725,000$725,000
              LD/RD
              UFA - 1

              Embed Code

              • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
              • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

              Text-Embed

              Click to Highlight
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 11:07 a.m.
              #1
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Aug. 2018
              Posts: 6,366
              Likes: 2,258
              Giroux for Debrusk and a 2nd is a good starting point that might work for both, although I would see a fairly good prospect being included from BOS.

              Braun alone probably gets a 2nd, and with no clauses, and retention and a RD, theres probably a good market out there.
              BruinsTalk liked this.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 11:20 a.m.
              #2
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Aug. 2020
              Posts: 2,486
              Likes: 940
              1st for Mayfield.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 11:22 a.m.
              #3
              Thread Starter
              Bruinsallday
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 98
              Likes: 21
              Quoting: Isles10
              1st for Mayfield.


              I think that is too much, For Boston anyway.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 11:23 a.m.
              #4
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 11,353
              Likes: 11,350
              For Hagel, judging from reports of comparable offers that have already been turned down, it starts with a high prospect and a 1st, even then you would still have to add. CHI really doesn't want him going anywhere it seems like. But maybe they are just holding out until the last minute. No one knows whats going on with CHI. They're pretty vague and most of their "being transparent" seems like lip service.
              BruinsTalk liked this.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 11:25 a.m.
              #5
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Aug. 2020
              Posts: 2,486
              Likes: 940
              Quoting: BruinsTalk
              I think that is too much, For Boston anyway.


              Yeah I agree, but that's the starting point when you consider his contract, usage, experience, role, rd etc.
              BruinsTalk liked this.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 11:28 a.m.
              #6
              Thread Starter
              Bruinsallday
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 98
              Likes: 21
              Quoting: Garak
              For Hagel, judging from reports of comparable offers that have already been turned down, it starts with a high prospect and a 1st, even then you would still have to add. CHI really doesn't want him going anywhere it seems like. But maybe they are just holding out until the last minute. No one knows whats going on with CHI. They're pretty vague and most of their "being transparent" seems like lip service.


              Interesting. He's got another 2 years? signed? Seems like a high price if they want more than a 1st and a high prospect and ++. The term is nice though as well as the cap hit
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 11:34 a.m.
              #7
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 11,353
              Likes: 11,350
              Quoting: BruinsTalk
              Interesting. He's got another 2 years? signed? Seems like a high price if they want more than a 1st and a high prospect and ++. The term is nice though as well as the cap hit


              He is still pretty darn young, and he is a legit top 6 forward on a bottom 6 contract for two more years. Also his play style is very desirable for any team in the league. So, it's not exactly a rational exact value, but the fact that CHI has no reason to trade a guy like him, so teams will have to over pay to get him.
              BruinsTalk liked this.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 11:36 a.m.
              #8
              Thread Starter
              Bruinsallday
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 98
              Likes: 21
              Quoting: Garak
              He is still pretty darn young, and he is a legit top 6 forward on a bottom 6 contract for two more years. Also his play style is very desirable for any team in the league. So, it's not exactly a rational exact value, but the fact that they have no reason to trade a guy like him, so teams will have to over pay to get him.


              I do not disagree. I just do not see him enough and I hate to make judgement off stats. The few times I do see him, I like him. Not sure what Chicago is doing to be honest. I would not trade him but it's in the rumor mill.
              Garak liked this.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 11:37 a.m.
              #9
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 11,353
              Likes: 11,350
              Quoting: BruinsTalk
              I do not disagree. I just do not see him enough and I hate to make judgement off stats. The few times I do see him, I like him. Not sure what Chicago is doing to be honest. I would not trade him but it's in the rumor mill.


              For sure. I doubt they will trade him unless it is an offer they just cannot refuse.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 11:38 a.m.
              #10
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 5,618
              Likes: 2,764
              Quoting: Garak
              He is still pretty darn young, and he is a legit top 6 forward on a bottom 6 contract for two more years. Also his play style is very desirable for any team in the league. So, it's not exactly a rational exact value, but the fact that CHI has no reason to trade a guy like him, so teams will have to over pay to get him.


              Quoting: BruinsTalk
              I do not disagree. I just do not see him enough and I hate to make judgement off stats. The few times I do see him, I like him. Not sure what Chicago is doing to be honest. I would not trade him but it's in the rumor mill.


              i dont understand why hes even "available" 23 year old 20 goal scorer? with a good contract? why would you move him now?
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 12:02 p.m.
              #11
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 11,353
              Likes: 11,350
              Quoting: hanson493
              i dont understand why hes even "available" 23 year old 20 goal scorer? with a good contract? why would you move him now?


              He isn't "available". Teams have just been calling on him anyway. And since it came out that offers had been made, and everyone seems to want him, people just keep speculating on what a Hagel trade might look like. But I think, to CHI's actual front office, he is untouchable. BUT no one is ever really untouchable.
              BruinsTalk liked this.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 12:02 p.m.
              #12
              Once a Kings Fan Too
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2018
              Posts: 40,912
              Likes: 25,722
              A first plus a good prospect for Rakell, or a second plus a better prospect; Lindholm gets a little more.
              BruinsTalk liked this.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 12:12 p.m.
              #13
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 5,618
              Likes: 2,764
              Quoting: Garak
              He isn't "available". Teams have just been calling on him anyway. And since it came out that offers had been made, and everyone seems to want him, people just keep speculating on what a Hagel trade might look like. But I think, to CHI's actual front office, he is untouchable. BUT no one is ever really untouchable.


              i mean ide hope so. thats the type of player you regret moving.
              Garak liked this.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 12:18 p.m.
              #14
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2016
              Posts: 2,869
              Likes: 1,896
              Quoting: OldNYIfan
              A first plus a good prospect for Rakell, or a second plus a better prospect; Lindholm gets a little more.


              I think this is about right. I do think Rakell gets a bit less than this though. To me, Rakell is around the value of a '23 1st to a contender (assumed late pick). Lindholm is more like a 1st and a good prospect
              OldNYIfan liked this.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 12:18 p.m.
              #15
              NYI
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2016
              Posts: 3,523
              Likes: 1,116
              Clifton, Vaakanainen, and a 2nd for Mayfield.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 1:17 p.m.
              #16
              Thread Starter
              Bruinsallday
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 98
              Likes: 21
              Quoting: slapshot723
              Clifton, Vaakanainen, and a 2nd for Mayfield.


              I would do Clifton and 2nd. Not Vaakanin that deal. I think Vaak can be at least a 5-6 on most teams. Not sure Mayfield is top 4.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 1:22 p.m.
              #17
              we miss leo k
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Feb. 2018
              Posts: 6,014
              Likes: 5,131
              Quoting: BruinsTalk
              I would do Clifton and 2nd. Not Vaakanin that deal. I think Vaak can be at least a 5-6 on most teams. Not sure Mayfield is top 4.


              2/3 of his even strength minutes this season have been top pair with Adam Pelech - positive GF/GA ratio and pretty much even in shots/chances when they're on the ice together - and if anyone should know about how the Islanders' system works with regards to shot/chance ratios, it's a Bruins fan. Not saying Mayfield is a slam dunk top pair guy, but he's definitely proven this season that he can be a reliable top 4/PK1 type defender. Throw in an extra year of control at $1.45M and you can see why Islanders fans are placing such a high value on him.
              BruinsTalk liked this.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 1:26 p.m.
              #18
              Thread Starter
              Bruinsallday
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Jun. 2019
              Posts: 98
              Likes: 21
              Quoting: dannibalcorpse
              2/3 of his even strength minutes this season have been top pair with Adam Pelech - positive GF/GA ratio and pretty much even in shots/chances when they're on the ice together - and if anyone should know about how the Islanders' system works with regards to shot/chance ratios, it's a Bruins fan. Not saying Mayfield is a slam dunk top pair guy, but he's definitely proven this season that he can be a reliable top 4/PK1 type defender. Throw in an extra year of control at $1.45M and you can see why Islanders fans are placing such a high value on him.


              I like him, I do not mean to disparage him. I would like him more on a bottom pairing in Boston. It depends who he is paired with. but you see him more then me.
              Mar. 16, 2022 at 1:36 p.m.
              #19
              we miss leo k
              Avatar of the user
              Joined: Feb. 2018
              Posts: 6,014
              Likes: 5,131
              Quoting: BruinsTalk
              I like him, I do not mean to disparage him. I would like him more on a bottom pairing in Boston. It depends who he is paired with. but you see him more then me.


              I honestly think he's the proverbial "hat on a hat" in Boston - you've already got McAvoy & Carlo at RD1/RD2, so he's more of a luxury at RD3 (similar to how he projects out on next year's Isles depth chart behind Ryan Pulock/Noah Dobson.) He definitely needs to be paired with a guy who can push the offense a little better - his time being paired with Andy Greene or Zdeno Chara has had some really ugly moments this season. I think he'd pair up well with Grzelcyk on the B's, if they swung a trade - I'd make the other pairs something like Forbort-McAvoy and Reilly-Carlo and roll 3 pairs instead of having that Forbort-Clifton pair it seems Cassidy tries to keep around 15 minutes a night
              BruinsTalk liked this.
               
              Reply
              To create a post please Login or Register
              Question:
              Options:
              Add Option
              Submit Poll