Canucks won’t retain, but apart from that it’s definitely an offer I see them taking

Your right, i guess i dint have to have them retain i did have 2.5 million cap space so i agree

there’s no reason for the sens to give up the better goalie with the lower cap hit lol. since he resigned forsberg’s not on the market anymore anyway

Montreal passes we don't want/need Dermott and a 2nd isn't enough to convince us to take him trade Savard let alone trade him with retention.

So you are giving up a 1st, high value young RD (who likely immediately becomes the best RD in Vancouver) and a kid ripping up the OHL as well as a 3rd for a more expensive Kerfoot. What a horrible deal.

This was initially created before the trade deadline. How is Dermott (who’s on the Canucks) getting traded to Montreal?

Dude, Ottawa is not giving you Forsberg for free. Pay up, we also don't want another expensive backup that won't play. Forsberg has been one of the best goalies in the NHL and his extension on deadline day proves that Ottawa wants to keep him.

Forsberg >>>> Mrazek

The difference between them is a lot more than a 4th, especially when contracts are taken into consideration. Mrazek is seen as a cap dump rn and Forsberg is a borderline 1 rn.

Are leafs fans still salty they didn’t land Garland last offseason?

Love to trade a very good goalie for a completely **** one just to get a 4th

@IconicHawk no I didn't even know that was a possibility then

Just a question

@IconicHawk oh sorry i didn't mean it in a bad way

not sure what leads you to believe that Forsberg will be available after he was just extended and has locked in the starter position for next season. Especially not when all they're getting back is a 4th to take on Mrazek