SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Shakeup

Created by: SevenLeg
Team: 2022-23 New York Islanders
Initial Creation Date: May 1, 2022
Published: May 1, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,100,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$775,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$775,000
1$775,000
1$1,500,000
4$3,250,000
Trades
1.
NYI
  1. Suter, Ryan
  2. 2022 5th round pick (DAL)
DAL
  1. Bailey, Josh
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (NYI)
2.
NYI
  1. Dadonov, Evgeni
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Cap dump by VGK, but still a useful top 9 forward.
3.
NYI
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (VGK)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the NYI
2023
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
2024
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$77,464,963$245,796$1,287,500$5,035,037
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Islanders
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 1
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$750,000$750,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,750,000$5,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Islanders
$6,150,000$6,150,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the New York Islanders
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,100,000$5,100,000
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RD
UFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Islanders
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
UFA
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the New York Islanders
$1,100,000$1,100,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 1, 2022 at 10:43 a.m.
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,771
Likes: 31,482
I'd take that. It frees us from the risky Suter contract given it goes until he's 40 and also brings us a decent mid-6 winger.
May 1, 2022 at 10:54 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 15,056
Likes: 12,108
Quoting: justaBoss
I'd take that. It frees us from the risky Suter contract given it goes until he's 40 and also brings us a decent mid-6 winger.


I would also make this trade. Anything to get Bailey off the Isles.
May 1, 2022 at 11:21 a.m.
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,771
Likes: 31,482
Quoting: Db1899
I would also make this trade. Anything to get Bailey off the Isles.


He's that bad?
May 1, 2022 at 12:05 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 15,056
Likes: 12,108
Quoting: justaBoss
He's that bad?


He’s an empty calorie scorer who only puts up points because he’s given a ton of ice time in high leverage situations. Horrible defensively, doesn’t drive offense at all. He’s a passenger with great passing ability
May 1, 2022 at 1:27 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 1,406
Quoting: Db1899
I would also make this trade. Anything to get Bailey off the Isles.


Yeah i wouldnt. That suter contract is terrible.
May 1, 2022 at 1:31 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 1,398
I don't see Varlamov as goalie situation resolution for Sabres, so Buffalo pass.
May 1, 2022 at 1:40 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 15,056
Likes: 12,108
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Yeah i wouldnt. That suter contract is terrible.


Both contracts are awful. I’ll take the risk with Suter.
May 1, 2022 at 3:47 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Sabres say “maybe”
I’m sure they’d be looking at other options first though
May 1, 2022 at 6:23 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 618
Quoting: Buffalove
Sabres say “maybe”
I’m sure they’d be looking at other options first though


I agree with this - I think stat wise he looks like he's been solid and consistent but I'd want to know more about his health and just what type of guy he is - The NY press has some articles where they are basically saying he shouldn't be a starter and is too expensive to be a backup.
May 1, 2022 at 10:00 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 1,406
Quoting: Db1899
Both contracts are awful. I’ll take the risk with Suter.


I hate the hypocrisy of it all. You b*tch about lou getting old guys but then you wanna trade for a 37yo whose contract runs till hes 40. And dont forget the nmc he has so it might be unmoveable. Its a terrible trade for nyi but since the cool narrative rn is get rid of bailey no matter what you jump on that train 🤡🤡🤡
May 1, 2022 at 10:07 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 15,056
Likes: 12,108
Quoting: Islesforthecup
I hate the hypocrisy of it all. You b*tch about lou getting old guys but then you wanna trade for a 37yo whose contract runs till hes 40. And dont forget the nmc he has so it might be unmoveable. Its a terrible trade for nyi but since the cool narrative rn is get rid of bailey no matter what you jump on that train 🤡🤡🤡


What’s hypocritical about wanting to take the risk with Suter over Bailey? Considering their level of play and cap hit, it is far more likely Suter will provide more value than Bailey.

Bailey is 33 YO, he is so bad at 5v5 that whatever team he is on is better off A. making him 13 F or B. Only using him for special teams. Bailey hurts his team at 5v5 whenever he’s on the ice, Suter was a star defenseman most of his career and is aging pretty well. At this point any team that Bailey is on the top 9 can’t make the playoffs, he’s that much of a liability.
SevenLeg liked this.
May 1, 2022 at 10:31 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2020
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 1,406
Quoting: Db1899
What’s hypocritical about wanting to take the risk with Suter over Bailey? Considering their level of play and cap hit, it is far more likely Suter will provide more value than Bailey.

Bailey is 33 YO, he is so bad at 5v5 that whatever team he is on is better off A. making him 13 F or B. Only using him for special teams. Bailey hurts his team at 5v5 whenever he’s on the ice, Suter was a star defenseman most of his career and is aging pretty well. At this point any team that Bailey is on the top 9 can’t make the playoffs, he’s that much of a liability.


Whats hypocritical is that youre constantly complaining abput the age of the roster yet now youre advocating for a guy in his late 30s whose contract runs till 40 that you cant move unless he agrees bc he has an nmc.
I understand the idea of moving bailey and its actually one i agree with. But that doesnt mean make a bad trade just for the sake of moving him.
May 1, 2022 at 10:42 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 15,056
Likes: 12,108
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Whats hypocritical is that youre constantly complaining abput the age of the roster yet now youre advocating for a guy in his late 30s whose contract runs till 40 that you cant move unless he agrees bc he has an nmc.
I understand the idea of moving bailey and its actually one i agree with. But that doesnt mean make a bad trade just for the sake of moving him.


When you have a contract on the books as bad as Baileys, you have take calculated risks, and that might mean trading an old player like Bailey for an old (and more impactful) player like Suter. I’m only advocating trading for Suter if it gets rid of Bailey and his contract, me being a hypocrite would be trading a pick for Suter.
May 2, 2022 at 2:49 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 7,136
Likes: 3,156
Quoting: Sabresforlife
I agree with this - I think stat wise he looks like he's been solid and consistent but I'd want to know more about his health and just what type of guy he is - The NY press has some articles where they are basically saying he shouldn't be a starter and is too expensive to be a backup.


To be fair, we likely won’t have the pick of the litter
So Varlamov could be a legitimate option
I just don’t think he’d be the first choice

It’ll be an interesting offseason though
Looking forward to the moves we do make
May 2, 2022 at 10:01 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 4,799
Quoting: Czu8iks
I don't see Varlamov as goalie situation resolution for Sabres, so Buffalo pass. Certainly not long term!
Quoting: Sabresforlife
I agree with this Maybe! ... The NY press has some articles where they are basically saying he shouldn't be a starter and is too expensive to be a backup. This is of course a huge concern.
I would make this trade:
First, it is for only one year,
Second, Semyon's SV 0.911 is significantly better than Anderson/Tokarski duo last year 0.898.
Let's presume a team gives up 30 shots per game over 82 games Semyon would give up 219 goals while our best tandem last year would give up 251 goals, 32 fewer goals.
Third, Semyon would be an insurance policy in case Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen is not ready for full time NHL action.
Fourth, his salary would help the Sabres to reach the cap floor, while upgrading at the weakest position.
Fifth, if Semyon plays as well next year as he has this year, there will be many teams offering a second round pick for him.

IMO this is a no brainer, Buffalo upgrades their GK while allowing Luukkonen to develop, helps to reach the cap, would get the second back at the end of the year.
ALjet12 and GMTD liked this.
May 2, 2022 at 6:21 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 1,398
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
I would make this trade:
First, it is for only one year,
Second, Semyon's SV 0.911 is significantly better than Anderson/Tokarski duo last year 0.898.
Let's presume a team gives up 30 shots per game over 82 games Semyon would give up 219 goals while our best tandem last year would give up 251 goals, 32 fewer goals.
Third, Semyon would be an insurance policy in case Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen is not ready for full time NHL action.
Fourth, his salary would help the Sabres to reach the cap floor, while upgrading at the weakest position.
Fifth, if Semyon plays as well next year as he has this year, there will be many teams offering a second round pick for him.

IMO this is a no brainer, Buffalo upgrades their GK while allowing Luukkonen to develop, helps to reach the cap, would get the second back at the end of the year.


It's not about Varlamov not being upgrade over Tokarski or Anderson. The issue is that, Sabres must find 1A goalie, UPL will the backup. I think with all this cap space, Sabres can do better.
May 3, 2022 at 3:18 p.m.
#17
ALjet12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 320
Quoting: Db1899
When you have a contract on the books as bad as Baileys, you have take calculated risks, and that might mean trading an old player like Bailey for an old (and more impactful) player like Suter. I’m only advocating trading for Suter if it gets rid of Bailey and his contract, me being a hypocrite would be trading a pick for Suter.


I would rather give up a 2nd and a 5th to have someone like Arizona, Detorit or Ottawa take on his contract, or even buy him out, then take on Suter. Rather just wait and sign someone younger in free agency or trade for a Soucy, Sanheim or Rielly . We seen where the isles got with an aging defenseman like Green and Chara, I don't want to go on that road again even if Suter is having a resurgence in his late career. Just reminds of Giordano, too much risk to take on with where the organization is at right now.
May 3, 2022 at 3:34 p.m.
#18
ALjet12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 320
Quoting: Czu8iks
It's not about Varlamov not being upgrade over Tokarski or Anderson. The issue is that, Sabres must find 1A goalie, UPL will the backup. I think with all this cap space, Sabres can do better.


The problem is a 1A goaltender might not be available. In the UFA market you looking at Jack Campbell where you would have to outbid heavily to get him ( I don't think he wants to leave Toronto) . MAF is prob retiring. Kuemper is most likely resigning with the Ava's. Holbty is now a backup at this time. Realisticilly you looking at Korpisalo who have a horrendous season and is not as good as Varlamov . So unless you give a team a trade package that they can't refuse like NYR for Georgiev, (which the Rangers see pretty happy with their tandem ) or WASH for Vanecek Varlamov might be your best option.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
May 3, 2022 at 6:10 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 1,398
Quoting: ALjet12
The problem is a 1A goaltender might not be available. .


Then Sabres have to explore trade option. Right now, they can give any UFA goalie, that they like, 1,5-2mil aav over anybody else. Thay may lure some big name.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll