SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Massive Change

Created by: Hammerwise
Team: 2022-23 Philadelphia Flyers
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 7, 2022
Published: Jun. 7, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Just a bunch of ideas

10 youngsters, UFAs and trade acquisitions in that 26-28 yrs old range (Burakovsky, Vanicek, Dvorak)

and getting youngsters playing time to develop without having to shoulder load of production and most of the guys young enough to bridge the gap until the youngsters "arrive".

Very conscious of solid vet-youngster defensive pairings and having a forward corp with speed and some phtysicality
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$975,000
3$2,375,000
3$1,175,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$975,000
5$5,975,000
5$6,875,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Jiricek, David
3$883,000
Trades
1.
PHI
  1. Barron, Justin
  2. Dvorak, Christian
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (EDM)
  4. 2022 4th round pick (TBL)
  5. 2023 2nd round pick (MTL)
2.
PHI
  1. Vanecek, Vitek [RFA Rights]
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (WSH)
3.
PHI
  1. Vilardi, Gabriel [RFA Rights]
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (PIT)
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (LAK)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (LAK)
4.
PHI
  1. Suter, Ryan
Additional Details:
Suter would have to waive, would his relationship with Fletcher matter?
DAL
  1. van Riemsdyk, James
  2. 2022 5th round pick (PHI)
  3. 2023 3rd round pick (NYR)
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (LAK)
Additional Details:
The 3rds could be used to have a 3rd team retain.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
2023
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
2024
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$82,500,000$76,065,929$295,000$1,362,500$6,434,071
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,975,000$5,975,000
RW, LW
UFA - 5
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,571,429$3,571,429
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$975,000$975,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$975,000$975,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$975,000$975,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
$1,175,000$1,175,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$975,000$975,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,725,000$4,725,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,979,000$3,979,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$725,000$725K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,100,000$5,100,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,650,000$3,650,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Jiricek, David
$883,000$883,000
$2,375,000$2,375,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$756,667$756,667
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
RD
RFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$975,000$975,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$883,750$883,750 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$975,000$975,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$975,000$975,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 7, 2022 at 6:33 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,470
Likes: 19,634
Calgary will make you a much better offer for Couts (not that he will ever waive his NMC once it kicks in)

Zary + Valimaki + 1st + Monahan as a base?

I doubt Montreal has any interest at all in moving futures when they are rebuilding
Hammerwise and uncle_toto liked this.
Jun. 7, 2022 at 6:54 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2018
Posts: 6,335
Likes: 2,233
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Calgary will make you a much better offer for Couts (not that he will ever waive his NMC once it kicks in)

Zary + Valimaki + 1st + Monahan as a base?

I doubt Montreal has any interest at all in moving futures when they are rebuilding


You're not wrong, the diff between Dvorak and Couts is a solid RD prospect (PHI would have jiricek and Barron) and some later round picks, but maybe MTL doesn;t move (but I think a Suzuki, Couts, number 1 pick down the middle is a great team)

Always have a space for nice prospect in Zary and a 1st, but not sure Valimaki adds much (good youngster, just not sure where he'd fit: in the above I've moved Sanheim to give York 2LD time and acquired solid vet 3 LD to partner with youngster at RD). So while I think Valimaki has a NHL future, just not sure he is as "valued" in Philly where they have ample young LD, (right now: Provorov, Sanheim, York and both Zamula/Hogberg looked good in limited time).

And while I think a healthy Monahan is just as good, if not better, than Dvorak, I think the health/cap/contract length diff between Dvorak and Monahan works against CGY.

Maybe Zary, a 1st (or maybe a 2nd), Dube and Monahan (if PHI can get a 3rd party to retain and Monahan is healthy) would work. PHI would need a roster player (Dube or Monahan) and then Zary/the pick work for futures, but ultimately Couterier has good value and the pieces would have to work.

Couldn;t talk you into some kind of Tkachuk rights for Couterier?
Jun. 7, 2022 at 7:07 a.m.
#3
Michael
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 447
Likes: 61
Finally! someone else understands Couts is not the future and trading him while he still has value! Great job!
ReelBigFan liked this.
Jun. 7, 2022 at 7:12 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,470
Likes: 19,634
Quoting: Hammerwise
You're not wrong, the diff between Dvorak and Couts is a solid RD prospect (PHI would have jiricek and Barron) and some later round picks, but maybe MTL doesn;t move (but I think a Suzuki, Couts, number 1 pick down the middle is a great team)

Always have a space for nice prospect in Zary and a 1st, but not sure Valimaki adds much (good youngster, just not sure where he'd fit: in the above I've moved Sanheim to give York 2LD time and acquired solid vet 3 LD to partner with youngster at RD). So while I think Valimaki has a NHL future, just not sure he is as "valued" in Philly where they have ample young LD, (right now: Provorov, Sanheim, York and both Zamula/Hogberg looked good in limited time).

And while I think a healthy Monahan is just as good, if not better, than Dvorak, I think the health/cap/contract length diff between Dvorak and Monahan works against CGY.

Maybe Zary, a 1st (or maybe a 2nd), Dube and Monahan (if PHI can get a 3rd party to retain and Monahan is healthy) would work. PHI would need a roster player (Dube or Monahan) and then Zary/the pick work for futures, but ultimately Couterier has good value and the pieces would have to work.

Couldn;t talk you into some kind of Tkachuk rights for Couterier?


I understand what you want for Couts I just completely disagree with the logic behind Montreal doing it. First off they already need to be looking at replacing Petry (likely traded) and Weber (likely done playing now or soon). Barron is a great start for that. Not to mention they are drafting Shane Wright who is a strong 2-way center prospect for that same and potentially better 1-2 punch down the middle.

Valimaki is under the pretense that you are moving Sanheim like you did above. Even if not until the deadline it can allow you to run York on the 1st line on the Phantoms for a while. Valimaki also has a much higher ceiling than both Zamula and Hoberg. I would be open to moving Dube instead but I would probably want more balancing.

It's very likely Monahan will be healthy next season. He can also be flipped at the deadline if he puts up results.

Yeah no offense but Couts is a non-starter for Tkachuk
uncle_toto liked this.
Jun. 7, 2022 at 7:50 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 792
Kings need to add a lot

Caps offer is a definite no from Philly. Fed could easily be the best player in that deal by a lot
kevg028 liked this.
Jun. 7, 2022 at 7:58 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 109
Likes: 13
Quoting: ReelBigFan
Kings need to add a lot

Caps offer is a definite no from Philly. Fed could easily be the best player in that deal by a lot


Exactly, Vanceks celling as a fringe starter, Fedotov has elite potential, if things don't work out trade him, but give him time and the flyers could have the best goalies in the league
ReelBigFan liked this.
Jun. 7, 2022 at 8:45 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 1,682
That would be a pretty easy pass from MTL.

Couturier is a good player (or atleast was one before his almost season long injury) but that is a terrible contract on a player we dont need. I would much rather have Suzuki and Wright as the top 2 Cs in Mtl over the next 8 years than a 30 year old SC.

With the number of assets being offered the habs could pretty easily get a better younger player who fits our needs more
uncle_toto liked this.
Jun. 7, 2022 at 8:48 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 286
Don't think Kings do that for 1 year of Sanheim.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jun. 7, 2022 at 9:14 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 3,334
Likes: 1,899
Caps give up a third and vanacek for the privilege of paying a fourth liner 3 mil and a goalie prospect that is a year younger than vanacek and may never come over to the NHL??
Jun. 7, 2022 at 9:24 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 385
Likes: 270
Edited Jun. 7, 2022 at 12:20 p.m.
Sorry bro. Barron's a no go. Not withstanding his potential as a top-4 puck moving RHD, he's the only prospect we have playing the position who hasn't committed a felony.

Habs are rebuilding. They won't be spending assets to acquire older players. Hughes has stated this, or some form of it, on multiple occasions.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Jun. 7, 2022 at 10:16 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 1,006
Montreal is not trading good futures (especially Barron) plus Dvorak for a veteran center on a long term contract with injury issues. And I like Couturier a lot. But Montreal is rebuilding and already has a lot of money tied up in vets, there's zero chance they'd be interested unless it was deal built around Gallagher. They're rebuilding and will hopefully find their center partner for Suzuki in this draft (Wright or Cooley) or the next one.
uncle_toto liked this.
Jun. 7, 2022 at 12:14 p.m.
#12
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,451
Likes: 25,351
Kings aren't trading a potential top-6 winger for one year of Sanheim, even granting what a good player Sanheim is.
Jun. 7, 2022 at 12:28 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
I’d rather just buyout Suter
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll