No it isn't. It's become an old myth now



?

Like you ignore evidence eh?

I don't ignore evidence, you misread it

You don't even present it. Go look on natural statrick at the Canucks last year where the majority of games are played under Boudreau. The team gave up more high danger chances than they created. That is and indisputable fact. Their possession numbers varied but most of their defence were negative. The 3rd pair was Abysmal. Poolman was definitely terrible. All of that can and is backed by evidence from a sight you can visit.

https://www.naturalstattrick.com/playerteams.php?fromseason=20212022&thruseason=20212022&stype=2&sit=5v5&score=all&stdoi=oi&rate=n&team=VAN&pos=S&loc=B&toi=0&gpfilt=none&fd=&td=&tgp=410&lines=single&draftteam=ALL

Poolman barely played when Boudreau was in. I never denied that they weren't still giving up some high danger scoring chances

You Devils fans don't have a great track record yourself

Great job generalizing

Your biased comments about the Canucks are getting ridiculous
No data to support your claims, just straight useless arguments
If you want to be known more than the biased Canucks fan that just s***posts, then do better

From my point of view it's you guys who are being biased

If The Eye Test Mattered, T.J Brodie would be a Top 10 D-Man in the NHL

Sounds like something a biased fan would say

More than they created. Good defensive teams don't do that.

Every fan base is saying the same thing about you here bud. This must just be a weird sport for you eh?

From my point of view, you have been obnoxious Canucks fan who just makes baseless arguments and acts ignorant when someone disproves your point with evidence





Absolutely childish behavior



From my eye test, Elias Pettersson is weak, sucks defensively, and is a 3rd liner center as best
From my eye test, JT Miller is a one hit wonder
From my eye test, Johnathan Bernier is better than Thatcher Demko

You can't tell me I'm wrong because you are a bad analyst

Look man, I get you want to defend Canucks players but this is just getting ridiculous. They are right, you aren't brining any evidence to back up your claims. Even by the eye test, Myers isn't that great. He isn't terrible but he is not really good either.

You defended me?, I though You Hate Me

I don’t hate people. I will disagree with anybody who I think is wrong. In this case, the other Canucks fan is going overboard with the bias

Never said Myers was anything special, but he's not bad either. Eye test shows as much, but some are still in denial of that. Don't see how that equates to any sort of bias

Because you are one of the only ones who think Myers is good while almost everyone else including Canucks fans knows he isn't. You show no evidence that he is "good" except the "eye test" which is just another word for being openly biased. I could say that Elias Pettersson is an overpaid center who should be in the ECHL because of the eye test. That's basically what you're doing. On top of that, when someone else tries to argue a player is good using the eye test and analytics, you stubbornly don't believe them since you think you're always right. For example Damon Severson. Until, you start showing some evidence backing up your statements and stop thinking you're always right, no one is going to respect you or your opinions

Is Myers good? No. Is he horrendous? No. Does he make the team worse? Other than his penalties taken, probably not. Would you want his cap hit? No. At the end of the day, his value to the team is that he is a MASSIVE RHD who sometimes makes good plays. Nothing really more than that

His value to the Canucks is higher than his value to the league in general. But should that come in the way of evaluating him as a player? No.



Cool, prove it. Stats, Analytics, Eye-Test (from non-bias people) all say he is below average




You from the future? How can you guarantee it? Other team have gotten better as well. No one is gonna take you seriously without proper reasoning.




Childish behavior

Do better

While I’m not going to argue about Tyler Myers, the Canucks have made many additions that should greatly benefited them. Our biggest weakness last year was our PK. It was pretty much league worst. If it was just average, we would’ve made the playoffs. This offseason, we acquired Lazar, and Mikheyev whom will both improve our PK. Nils Åman is also making a case for himself as another PK member. While our defense didn’t really improve, at least our PK did. The additions of Kuzmenko and Mikheyev should surely improve offense as well. As long as nothing terrible happens to Demko, it is more than fair to assume they will be better this season

Another note: Pettersson and Boeser are prime bounce back candidates. I don’t see a reason why they can’t outperform their down years last year

That's fair. All I was looking for was some reasoning. If Knuck3s just wrote this in the argument and something along these lines for the Myers argument, I wouldn't have a problem with it. The fact that he repeatedly does this is just sad

No there aren’t

You gonna say fake news next?

Dude, this is gonna sound weird, but i think you need to look up the definition of fact. You have a habit of thinking things that inherently cannot be a fact is a fact.