SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade deadline

Created by: myboykole
Team: 2022-23 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 3, 2022
Published: Nov. 3, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Johnson, Erik
  2. 2023 1st round pick (COL)
  3. 2024 1st round pick (COL)
  4. 2025 3rd round pick (COL)
COL
  1. Kane, Patrick ($5,200,000 retained)
2.
CBJ
  1. Toews, Jonathan ($5,200,000 retained)
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (TBL)
3.
CHI
  1. Hamonic, Travis
  2. 2024 4th round pick (TBL)
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (OTT)
4.
CHI
  1. Lorentz, Steven
  2. Vlasic, Marc-Édouard
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (SJS)
  4. 2025 1st round pick (SJS)
SJS
  1. 2023 4th round pick (CHI)
  2. 2024 4th round pick (TBL)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the COL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$77,767,629$237,500$0$4,732,371
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$975,000$975,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$866,667$866,667 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,050,000$1,050,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 3, 2022 at 3:26 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 894
Likes: 1,029
Toews is playing well and 3rd and 4th is a really paltry return for him - doubly so if CHI is retaining 50%.

Similarly it's going to cost SJS a lot more than a 1st and 2nd to get someone to eat that horrendous Vlasic deal, but CHI would probably start listening there.
Nov. 3, 2022 at 3:27 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 532
SJ isn't going to pay a 1st to dump Vlasic. They'll keep playing him and then buy him out at some point. There's no reason to open up cap space if they're not going to be competitive anyway
Xqb15a, glarson17 and Jco5ta5 liked this.
Nov. 3, 2022 at 3:27 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,585
Likes: 9,206
So if it’s at the deadline COL doesn’t need retention. EJ I guarantee blocks that. And COL isn’t moving the 23 1st for a straight rental. Now you want to do Kane for the 24 1st sure.
turtlemountain and TJTwolf liked this.
Nov. 3, 2022 at 3:28 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 378
Quoting: ginandtacos
Toews is playing well and a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th is a really paltry return for him - doubly so if CHI is retaining 50%.

Similarly it's going to cost SJS a lot more than a 1st and 2nd to get someone to eat that horrendous Vlasic deal, but CHI would probably start listening there.


The thing about toews is that he may start to get worse and Chicago does san jose by not getting a lot back because they have few draft picks and they are rebuilding. They still get a decent deal with San jose no matter what.
Nov. 3, 2022 at 3:28 p.m.
#5
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Firstly, Johnson doesn't waive to go to Chicago. He's almost certainly going to retire as an Av. Anyhow, the Avs probably don't want to get Kane. He's a great offensive player and definitely fits the Avs game with strong, fast skating, but he is trash defensively, isn't a center, and can't kill penalties, all things the Avs need.

Plus, even if we were to trade for Kane, it probably would be the 2023 1st, one of Beaucage or Meyers, and maybe some cap coming back (Compher?) with a lower pick (3rd?), and then again, Sakic won't let go of Compher, he loves him like you wouldn't believe.
TJTwolf liked this.
Nov. 3, 2022 at 3:29 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,705
Likes: 3,021
I know Kane is awesome but YEEESH that’s a huge return
Nov. 3, 2022 at 3:32 p.m.
#7
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Quoting: Xqb15a
So if it’s at the deadline COL doesn’t need retention. EJ I guarantee blocks that. And COL isn’t moving the 23 1st for a straight rental. Now you want to do Kane for the 24 1st sure.


Ehh I disagree, the 2023 1st has a substantial amount of value, could help us keep our prospects like Olausson and Behrens more easily. We're all-in and should keep our later 1sts unless we need to move them, IMO, once we see how deep the drafts will be.
Nov. 3, 2022 at 4:10 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,830
Likes: 2,481
Quoting: Nqutilus
Firstly, Johnson doesn't waive to go to Chicago. He's almost certainly going to retire as an Av. Anyhow, the Avs probably don't want to get Kane. He's a great offensive player and definitely fits the Avs game with strong, fast skating, but he is trash defensively, isn't a center, and can't kill penalties, all things the Avs need.

Plus, even if we were to trade for Kane, it probably would be the 2023 1st, one of Beaucage or Meyers, and maybe some cap coming back (Compher?) with a lower pick (3rd?), and then again, Sakic won't let go of Compher, he loves him like you wouldn't believe.


I agree with everything but the PK. Come playoffs we will have Nuch, Lehk, Helm, Cogs, LoC, Landy and JTC to be competent pk forwards. I think center depth is the main focus atm. Things can change by tdl.
Xqb15a, Nqutilus and TJTwolf liked this.
Nov. 3, 2022 at 4:21 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,585
Likes: 9,206
Quoting: Nqutilus
Ehh I disagree, the 2023 1st has a substantial amount of value, could help us keep our prospects like Olausson and Behrens more easily. We're all-in and should keep our later 1sts unless we need to move them, IMO, once we see how deep the drafts will be.

This is the deepest draft since 2015. The Avs have basically traded away every pick in the 2022 and 2023 drafts except for the 1st. It will sting a lot down the road if COL has a gaping massive development whole with no prospects because there were none taken. COL did all in last year, need to have some faith that a full season of Manson, Lehkonen, and Byram and continued development of Newhook along with Georgiev can at least bridge some of that Kadri, Burakovsky, Kuemper production. I mean sometimes you just have to dance with who you brought.
TJTwolf liked this.
Nov. 3, 2022 at 4:24 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,585
Likes: 9,206
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
I agree with everything but the PK. Come playoffs we will have Nuch, Lehk, Helm, Cogs, LoC, Landy and JTC to be competent pk forwards. I think center depth is the main focus atm. Things can change by tdl.


I agree, but I also think a play driving winger to stick with Newhook and push Lehkonen to the 3rd line creates a pretty dang solid bottom 6 of Compher Rodrigues Lehkonen on the 3rd and Cogs Helm LOC on the 4th if everybody is healthy
TJTwolf liked this.
Nov. 3, 2022 at 4:47 p.m.
#11
Hawks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 2,677
Likes: 1,713
Quoting: Nqutilus
Firstly, Johnson doesn't waive to go to Chicago. He's almost certainly going to retire as an Av. Anyhow, the Avs probably don't want to get Kane. He's a great offensive player and definitely fits the Avs game with strong, fast skating, but he is trash defensively, isn't a center, and can't kill penalties, all things the Avs need.

Plus, even if we were to trade for Kane, it probably would be the 2023 1st, one of Beaucage or Meyers, and maybe some cap coming back (Compher?) with a lower pick (3rd?), and then again, Sakic won't let go of Compher, he loves him like you wouldn't believe.


You basically just described Toews. Center, kills penalties, strong two way game. Same price (dollars, not trade value) as Kane with less coming back to Hawks and he’s having a strong offensive year. It’d be a good fit for what you’re describing.

Toews also isn’t going to Columbus. They’re worse than the Hawks so I don’t see them upgrading to Toews and I doubt he waives for them.
Nov. 3, 2022 at 5:18 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,759
Likes: 6,078
Hawks decline all of these
Nov. 3, 2022 at 5:24 p.m.
#13
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 939
Quoting: Xqb15a
This is the deepest draft since 2015. The Avs have basically traded away every pick in the 2022 and 2023 drafts except for the 1st. It will sting a lot down the road if COL has a gaping massive development whole with no prospects because there were none taken. COL did all in last year, need to have some faith that a full season of Manson, Lehkonen, and Byram and continued development of Newhook along with Georgiev can at least bridge some of that Kadri, Burakovsky, Kuemper production. I mean sometimes you just have to dance with who you brought.


I think this is just a difference in how we see things long-term. I'm willing to tank if it means we can get a few overpowered teams, obviously there are futurish-current assets we shouldn't move (Newhook, Byram) due to cap reasons, but I don't see a reason why we shouldn't go all-in while we have a window with MacKinnon, Makar, etc. Sure, we may deplete our prospect pool, but for a few more years, we can be contenders.
Nov. 4, 2022 at 12:00 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,356
Likes: 1,050
Vlasic is a easy buy out after this season. no need to trade him
Nov. 4, 2022 at 9:04 a.m.
#15
RETIRED
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 2,481
COL doesn’t do that deal. They aren’t desperate enough to need to move two 1sts for a Kane rental
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll