You are wildly over estimating how much value a goalie one year from free agency has.

They look good for Winnipeg except for the Toronto deal, but your values are all over the place. Although the other teams likely turn them down.

There's just no way Winnipeg gives up one year of Hellebuyck for two of Marner. If the Jets trade Helle it means some degree of rebuild, so picks and prospects are what they'd be after. Two years of Marner does absolutely nothing for Winnipeg.

Oooof. Please don't get too offended by the shellacking you're about to take in this comments section

canes pass. trading Jarvis for a guy we wouldnt re-sign is a bad deal

A rental in Hellebuyck isn't returning Mitch Marner, Talk about living in la la land

The only way Kings trade for Hellebuyck is if Winnipeg retains 50% of his salary and even then I don't think they'll give up a 1st.

If Winnipeg takes back Cal Petersen, then I could see the Kings potentially including the 1st.

If I were the Jets, the best deal is the one with EDM.

I knew Helle was overrated but this is ridiculous, cant see any of these being a remote possibility, the LA one has the framework of a deal but that's about it.

You’re going to get wrecked!
Let’s start with the canes trade: they aren’t going to trade Jarvis or their other goalie. If they were to trade for Hellebuyck then it would be for picks and prospects.

For the Kings: they aren’t trading Durzi. The kings are contending and Durzi is a young, cheap, nhl ready player that can contribute. Again, you’re looking at picks and prospects.

For the Toronto trade: that’s just flat out laughable. Not even for Marner alone would leafs do that unless their new gm wants immediately fired lol. Idk if the nhl would even approve that trade. And it’d make no sense for WPG to rebuild and then trade Hellebuyck for Marner lol. You are looking at picks and taking Murray back and possibly retention.

Edmonton: again they are competing so they aren’t giving up a young top 4 D and a solid goalie who would be their 1B. You’re looking at taking a bad contract, retention, and getting picks in return.

Thanks for all the feedback everyone!

For everybody: what would be the trade that you would do?

I don't agree with this. I think that Durzi is one of the most likely Kings to get traded this summer.

Hellebuyck to Los Angeles would seem to be reasonable on the surface. But there are several problems with it. Number one: the cap situation. Los Angeles has no cap surplus right now (we have $7.5 million in cap space currently, with Gabe Vilardi, Rasmus Kupari and Tobias Bjornfot to re-sign as well as other obligations), so any trade has to be at least cap-neutral for us. And our cap situation next year (i.e., for the 2024-2025 season) is almost equally fraught, because Hellebuyck would probably be asking for at least $8 million on his next contract. Number two: the roster situation. Acquiring Hellebuyck gives us three goalies, which means we'd have to bury Petersen in the AHL while still bearing the burden of his $3.85 million cap hit there -- that's essentially depriving us of that sum against the cap. The alternative, trading Copley under duress, is hardly more palatable. Number three: the first-round-pick situation. We traded away our 2022 first in the Fiala deal and the 2023 first in the Gavrikov-Korpisalo deal, so it's unlikely that we'd have the imminent first-round pick that the Jets would probably require as an element of a Hellebuyck trade.

I just don't see it unless it's along the lines of Arvidsson, Durzi, Petersen and our 2024 second for Hellebuyck without retention, which I doubt is all that appealing to Winnipeg fans.

I think Walker would be more likely traded than Durzi. 🤷‍♂️

Both of them will be traded. Replaced by Bjornfot and Spence.

Bouchard is now (or should be) untouchable. QB of historically best powerplay. Getting better at defense...future 1D.