SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Saw this idea from another ACGM

Created by: History65
Team: 2023-24 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: May 31, 2023
Published: Jun. 1, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I like the idea of a new Czech line, it's just a matter of who to fill that void. Debated between Vrana and Zadina (change of scenery for him might help), and went with Zadina. If he fails, Hall can move up to line 1 and Zadina can go to line 3.

Kulikov could be replaced with someone like De Haan as a one year stop gap.

Before Detroit fans complain about Gryz, read the description in the trade. Can be used for a trade deadline deal (and he also played some right defense this year).
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
2$900,000
3$2,000,000
4$4,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,500,000
1$1,500,000
Trades
1.
DET
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt
  2. McLaughlin, Marc [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Yzerman can easily flip Gryz at the deadline if necessary.
2.
BOS
  1. 2023 4th round pick (WPG)
CBJ
  1. Forbort, Derek
Additional Details:
Another piece that can be flipped at the deadline, or kept if they are in a playoff race. Would depend on if Columbus is on his :no trade" list.
3.
BOS
  1. Durzi, Sean
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (LAK)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$81,458,334$4,500,000$0$2,041,666

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$11,250,000$11,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$900,000$900,000
G
RFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,137,500$1,137,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:03 p.m.
#1
RetireFedorov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 976
Likes: 745
The Red Wings have 5 NHL ready left dmen, this trade makes 0 sense, there is no room for gryz, so they pass all the way

Read the description. Still not close and a pass
MoSeider53, aedoran, DeadWingsv2 and 1 other person liked this.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:06 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,567
Likes: 6,152
It was obviously a Boston ACGM, because LA isn't giving up Durzi + 2nd for Ullmark.
buffbry9108 and JoeROFLCOPTER liked this.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:09 p.m.
#3
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Top pairing Walman-Seider
2nd pairing Edvinsson/Maatta-Chiarot
3rd pairing Edvinsson/Maatta-FA

So where do you expect we put Grzelcyk when we've absolutely no room for him?
aedoran, buffbry9108, DeadWingsv2 and 1 other person liked this.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:15 p.m.
#4
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 7,319
Likes: 7,154
"Easily flip"

If that's the case, then you guys "flip" him, we have zero interest in, or use for Grzelcyk. Look elsewhere.
buffbry9108 and JoeROFLCOPTER liked this.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:26 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 175
Likes: 27
Quoting: tkecanuck341
It was obviously a Boston ACGM, because LA isn't giving up Durzi + 2nd for Ullmark.


I forgot that Sean Durzi is the second coming of Bobby Orr. lol
rednwhite liked this.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:27 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 175
Likes: 27
Quoting: DeadWingsv2
"Easily flip"

If that's the case, then you guys "flip" him, we have zero interest in, or use for Grzelcyk. Look elsewhere.


So who do you suggest instead? Detroit obviously has no desire to keep Zadina, so what would the trade look like?
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:29 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 175
Likes: 27
Quoting: HockeyIsMyPassion61
Top pairing Walman-Seider
2nd pairing Edvinsson/Maatta-Chiarot
3rd pairing Edvinsson/Maatta-FA

So where do you expect we put Grzelcyk when we've absolutely no room for him?


I checked the Detroit depth charts on here before proposing the trade. If you don't think Gryz is an upgrade over a guy like Maatta, I can't help you.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:34 p.m.
#8
RetireFedorov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 976
Likes: 745
Quoting: History65
I checked the Detroit depth charts on here before proposing the trade. If you don't think Gryz is an upgrade over a guy like Maatta, I can't help you.


Hes not an upgrade over maata, not for what the wings need or want back there. Yzerman resigned him for a reason and doesn't draft small dmen for another reason. Maata did exactly what we wanted him to do + more.

There is literally nothing on Boston that we would want for zadina, so the trade doesn't happen unless you want to give up lysell which obviously you don't.

Lastly obviously bruins have better players then zadina and it's not close, but none of them are going to be available for him. You aren't trading McAvoy and that's really the only RD we would want or need
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:35 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 8,216
Griz could be the second best LHD, that's debatable, but we are committed to Maatta and Chiarot. That trade is honestly a gift for Detroit, we take that and just trade him elsewhere for more. Zadina deserves a fresh start.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:38 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 175
Likes: 27
Quoting: Lancebmx
Griz could be the second best LHD, that's debatable, but we are committed to Maatta and Chiarot. That trade is honestly a gift for Detroit, we take that and just trade him elsewhere for more. Zadina deserves a fresh start.


Exactly what I proposed. Gryz could be traded for different assets. Don't think people understood that. Thanks.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:39 p.m.
#11
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 7,319
Likes: 7,154
Quoting: History65
So who do you suggest instead? Detroit obviously has no desire to keep Zadina, so what would the trade look like?

What makes you think we have no desire to keep Zadina? He has not turned out to be what we hoped he would be with such a high pick, but his analytics are fantastic, he's very good defensively, has a modest caphit and is a great teammate. For a bottom 6 guy that we can move up and down the lineup, I see no reason to move him unless it adds value.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:41 p.m.
#12
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 7,319
Likes: 7,154
Quoting: Lancebmx
Griz could be the second best LHD, that's debatable, but we are committed to Maatta and Chiarot. That trade is honestly a gift for Detroit, we take that and just trade him elsewhere for more. Zadina deserves a fresh start.

I agree Zadina could use a fresh start, but this trade ain't it. There's a reason Gryz was a healthy scratch in the playoffs and he has nowhere near the value some think. The whole "flip them for more" mentality is honestly just silly and almost never happens, as they would just trade more in the initial trade.
JoeROFLCOPTER liked this.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:42 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,567
Likes: 6,152
Quoting: History65
I forgot that Sean Durzi is the second coming of Bobby Orr. lol


More like Ullmark is the second coming of Philipp Grubauer.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:52 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,832
Likes: 8,854
Quoting: tkecanuck341
It was obviously a Boston ACGM, because LA isn't giving up Durzi + 2nd for Ullmark.


Yes they would. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Jun. 1, 2023 at 6:54 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,832
Likes: 8,854
I’d for Grizz for Zadina 1 for 1. Not adding, if anything Wings add, but they are not interested in the deal anyway.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 7:22 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,567
Likes: 6,152
Quoting: Gofnut999
Yes they would. 🤷🏻‍♂️


Maybe if Boston retains 50% on Ullmark or takes back Cal Petersen. Aside from that, no chance.
JoeROFLCOPTER liked this.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 7:27 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,832
Likes: 8,854
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Maybe if Boston retains 50% on Ullmark or takes back Cal Petersen. Aside from that, no chance.


Lol.nope. And most of the LA fans on here completely disagree with you. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Jun. 1, 2023 at 7:31 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,394
Likes: 18,425
Serious question….why not keep Ullmark, trade Swayman? I get the numbers game and Swayman will be less $$, but they could get a lot more in a trade. Bruins don’t have a ton of ammo to use. Could be nice to get some picks and prospects to right-size the roster.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 7:38 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,567
Likes: 6,152
Quoting: Gofnut999
Lol.nope. And most of the LA fans on here completely disagree with you. 🤷🏻‍♂️


No they really don't. Consensus among Kings fans is that they'll give up a 2024 2nd for Ullmark.
JoeROFLCOPTER liked this.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 8:15 p.m.
#20
Joe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 7,677
Likes: 5,596
Quoting: History65
So who do you suggest instead? Detroit obviously has no desire to keep Zadina, so what would the trade look like?


If you ask me, I think Wings should just keep him. He's still an NHL caliber player, which is better than what we're most likely to get for him. Plus, if he learns how to shoot the puck again, he'll be a LOT better.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 9:06 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,832
Likes: 8,854
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Serious question….why not keep Ullmark, trade Swayman? I get the numbers game and Swayman will be less $$, but they could get a lot more in a trade. Bruins don’t have a ton of ammo to use. Could be nice to get some picks and prospects to right-size the roster.


In the end they may not have a choice, with Ullys 16 team NTC it’s possible he’s untradeable.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 9:07 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 175
Likes: 27
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Serious question….why not keep Ullmark, trade Swayman? I get the numbers game and Swayman will be less $$, but they could get a lot more in a trade. Bruins don’t have a ton of ammo to use. Could be nice to get some picks and prospects to right-size the roster.


That's not a terrible idea, but they would have to get the "perfect" return for what they're trying to do.
Jun. 1, 2023 at 9:08 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,832
Likes: 8,854
Quoting: tkecanuck341
No they really don't. Consensus among Kings fans is that they'll give up a 2024 2nd for Ullmark.


Not the ones i’ve talked to.

And it takes more than a 2nd, more like a pair of 2nds, preferably 1st and 3rd.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 12:10 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,567
Likes: 6,152
Quoting: Gofnut999
Not the ones i’ve talked to.

And it takes more than a 2nd, more like a pair of 2nds, preferably 1st and 3rd.


Then feel free to keep him.
Jun. 2, 2023 at 12:48 a.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,832
Likes: 8,854
Edited Jun. 2, 2023 at 12:57 a.m.
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Then feel free to keep him.


Some comparables:

1 year of Kuemper - 1st/cond 3rd/Timmins

RFA rights Andersen - 1st/2nd

1 year Talbot - 2nd/3rd/7th

2 years Corey Schneider - 9th overall pick

RFA rights Martin Jones - 1st/Kuraly

RFA rights Varlamov - 1st/2nd

4 years Tomas Vokoun - 1st/2nd/2nd

So….no. Honestly…the OP of 2nd/1 year of Durzi if anything…is light.

However his NTC may limit options, or even make him untradeable. At which point it would be Swayman.
rednwhite liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll