Quoting: Digitalbooya06
Absolute insanity to call Reinhart and Hartman the same player. If Hartman isn’t stapled next to Kaprizov he’s a 30 point guy.
Hartman at 1C is a problem. He’s just not good enough. He should be 3RW and would be on a legit contender.
No... I never once intoned they were the
same player. I SAID they were of similar CALIBER. There's a important distinction there.
I'm calling two middle-six 2nd line centers.... MIDDLE SIX 2ND LINE CENTERS.
Reinhart was productive only when he was with Eichel in Buffalo or whenever he was with Barkov, both of which on the wing. Thinking he's a 1C is as foolish as thinking he'd automatically be better in that spot than Hartman is. Guess where Reinhart played during these Stanley cup run this year? 3rd line. Guess which position? Right Wing.
Victor Rask with Kaprizov was made to look like something too. He still didn't get past the 50 point mark.
Whether you agree or not, if Hartman were what you think he is, then he never cracks 60 points in a single season. Kaprizov or no Kaprizov.
My singular point isn't even a matter of talent. Which is secondary to the discussion at hand. I am saying that Hartman comes in cheaper, by several Million, on a new contract for a similar level of play as Reinhart. Why then do we waste assets to acquire a player who ISN'T better than Hartman, including Hartman, who is going to cost more and only give us at or near the same level of production.
Short Answer is, it doesn't.