Lol rangers save the pick and just buyout goodrow

Ducks might give you Henrique with no retention for that. Asking for retention is going to drive up the cost by a bunch.

That's certainly going all in. Good thoughts on the trades.

The defense takes a big hit for 24-25 as we won’t be able to afford Skjei or Pesce with that that offense.

But at least we had one good year.

Also rangers say no

Rangers would rather just buy out Goodrow.

You can swap Drury for Jones 1 for 1 if you want, I'd say Rangers accept.

The sens trade isn't that bad but I wonder if other team do better considering your pick is a late one. I feel like Detroit could make a better offer

OTT declines, if Tuevo is involved they pass

Suggestion:

Nix the Forbort and Henrique trades, Considering the need for more offense, I would prompt this offer instead:

CAR gets:

Panarin, Artemi (waives NMC, with $3,645,827 retained)
Goodrow, Barclay
Jones, Zachary

NYR gets:
Drury, Jack (following trade request)
Necas, Martin
Pesce, Brett

No adjustments needed to stabilize roster. At $8 million for three years, Panarin continues his pure offense with new goal scoring threats Aho and Svechnikov; Kotkaniemi and DeBrincat are joined by Goodrow's size and stability on the second line. Jarvis's opportunity to have center ice, comes on the third line, joined by Martinook and MacEachern. Jordan Staal and Stefan Noesen are joined by a prospect.

The shift of over $5 million dollars allows Waddell to maneuver as needed. Elevating Chatfield and Coghlan instead of trading them, sets up for future movement, while leaving Brind'Amour little to do in terms of dealing with turnover.

You know, this is not bad. I don't hate it. And it pains me to say that to a Rangers fan, but It's not bad. Now I don't think anything this heavy would actually happen, but there's nothing wrong with this suggestion in general. It certainly is a nice break from the tiring Winnipeg trades.

Agreed I don't see Suzuki or Tuervo as good fits in the OTT line up for next season, good deal but wrong players.

Tuevo will be 29 when next season starts and 30 when his new contract kicks in, he will want 7M+ on his next and most likely last long term contract, no thanks also his production fell this year do to injury and no guarantee he will be back to pre injury production

That deal does nothing for carolina. Z Jones is a meh version of Bean. Goodrow doesn’t do anything for us and Panarin isn’t a Hurricanes type player. Panarin just does a lot of standing around and giving the puck away when challenged. It becomes worse in the playoffs too.

All reasonable points. As it was originally stated, Drury and Jones are a push, as each would be reclamation projects for their coaches. While Panarin does have that tendency, I think he will be challenged and prompted to change by Brind'Amour.

I love everyone thinks RBA is a miracle worker with players. At the same time you take that chance when you have very little risk in this deal. We have Necas and Pesce going in this deal with a ton of financial commitment to find out if Panarin will play a more complete game. That is a ton of risk and cost

On the contrary, the Rangers and Hurricanes roll through the same risk. Each Canes' player is on a one-year contract, while Drury is seeking a more opportune level of ice time. Make or break, Jones is a throw-in who is a local kid; given the incompletion of his game, there's still ceiling to reach for. Panarin and Goodrow can find lift in their games, surrounded by different teammates, mostly who've been in the same boat looking to get over the mountain.

The real risk would be the Rangers tangling with getting six players (Necas, Pesce, Drury, Kakko, Schneider and Lindgren) under contract. Perhaps as many as eight, depending on how much term is given to Lafreniere and Miller.

The risk is far too much to interest the canes

...to interest YOU. And, that is fine.

name the other high priced risky move the canes have done and ill concede.

This isn't a competition..but, since you insist: Jordan Staal. The original trade for him, was taking the back half of a 10-year deal, three years into it.

In man-games played, he's been in just about two-thirds of them regular season, while otherwise injured; the same issue he faced with Pittsburgh, prior to the trade.

Good on management to get him, as when he's healthy, is a true shutdown center.

By the way, Panarin has missed two games due to injury, six via COVID-19 and 10 due to a propaganda issue in Russia during his career..a total of 590 man-games played. By the way, you're talking about $8 million for three years, as my suggested deal does retain $3.6+ million.