SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Season

Created by: exo2769
Team: 2023-24 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 17, 2023
Published: Jun. 17, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,500,000
3$1,500,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Yamamoto, Kailer
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Mitchell, Ian [RFA Rights]
  2. 2023 4th round pick (CHI)
Additional Details:
The only reason the Hawks even consider this is because we haven't properly utilized Ian Mitchell and mismanaged his development. That's on the Hawks organization imo.
2.
CHI
  1. Bailey, Josh
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (NYI)
NYI
  1. Anderson, Joey [RFA Rights]
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$83,500,000$63,243,457$0$1,387,500$20,256,543
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$505,000$505K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Islanders
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$859,167$859,167 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 17, 2023 at 8:26 a.m.
#1
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 5,872
I’m not sure i like how cheaply Edmonton is moving all of that cap. Seems like a generous offer for them.
exo2769, Snowhawk18, CoachQ and 3 others liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 8:31 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,750
Likes: 9,924
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
I’m not sure i like how cheaply Edmonton is moving all of that cap. Seems like a generous offer for them.


I agree, but we get to move up in the 2023, we get to do right by Ian Mitchell...finally, we get two NHLers. Let's see if they can turn things around. Maybe opens up a Murphy move, idk.
Garak and RicXX liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 8:34 a.m.
#3
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 5,872
Quoting: exo2769
I agree, but we get to move up in the 2023, we get to do right by Ian Mitchell...finally, we get two NHLers. Let's see if they can turn things around. Maybe opens up a Murphy move, idk.


Yam’s if fine, but I could do without Ceci. At the very least a zaitsev buyout has to be a corresponding move with this trade.
exo2769, Snowhawk18, Hawksguy81 and 2 others liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 8:35 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,750
Likes: 9,924
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
Yam’s if fine, but I could do without Ceci. At the very least a zaitsev buyout has to be a corresponding move with this trade.


Why buyout? Just rip off the the band aid. Why prolong the pain? It's not like we're against the cap ceiling.
Snowhawk18, Garak and RicXX liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 8:41 a.m.
#5
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 3,514
Quoting: exo2769
Why buyout? Just rip off the the band aid. Why prolong the pain? It's not like we're against the cap ceiling.


I agree, just fire Zaitsev into the sun and eat the full cap hit next season.
exo2769, Hawksguy81, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 8:44 a.m.
#6
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 3,514
For two year of Ceci at over $3m per and $8m in actual $$ as well as Yamamoto for over $3m next season, I think the return needs to be better then moving up two rounds in the draft, especially when it is not moving into the first round.
exo2769, Hawksguy81, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 8:48 a.m.
#7
CoachQ
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 153
Likes: 97
Quoting: exo2769
I agree, but we get to move up in the 2023, we get to do right by Ian Mitchell...finally, we get two NHLers. Let's see if they can turn things around. Maybe opens up a Murphy move, idk.


I agree that it's probably time to move on from Mitchell but I sort of disagree that the Hawks didn't do right by him. To me he's probably a #5 or #6 defenseman who has unfortunately had injuries and has been passed by guys like Phillips, Vlasic, Kaiser, and coming soon Del Mastro, Allan, and Korchinski. Doesn't have any stand out skills (i.e. skating, passing, shooting). Seems like a good kid, but timing was the timing just didn't work out for him.
Snowhawk18, exo2769, Hawksguy81 and 2 others liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 8:49 a.m.
#8
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 5,872
Quoting: exo2769
Why buyout? Just rip off the the band aid. Why prolong the pain? It's not like we're against the cap ceiling.


It saves real money, the buyout takes place over years (this and next) in which we won’t be up against the cap, and opens up a roster spot and does right by the player who can go back to Russia. It’s very similar to Brett Connolly and his buyout.
exo2769, Hawksguy81, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 8:53 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,750
Likes: 9,924
Quoting: CoachQ
I agree that it's probably time to move on from Mitchell but I sort of disagree that the Hawks didn't do right by him. To me he's probably a #5 or #6 defenseman who has unfortunately had injuries and has been passed by guys like Phillips, Vlasic, Kaiser, and coming soon Del Mastro, Allan, and Korchinski. Doesn't have any stand out skills (i.e. skating, passing, shooting). Seems like a good kid, but timing was the timing just didn't work out for him.


Has he had serious injuries? I don't recall that, but good Intel. I'm not always right. I thought I remembered him being a healthy scratch a bunch last year, but we kept playing Zaitsev at the end of the year.
Garak liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 8:54 a.m.
#10
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 3,514
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
It saves real money, the buyout takes place over years (this and next) in which we won’t be up against the cap, and opens up a roster spot and does right by the player who can go back to Russia. It’s very similar to Brett Connolly and his buyout.


I’m not sure on the rules but can they not just loan Zaitsev to a European professional team?
Garak liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 8:57 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,750
Likes: 9,924
Quoting: Snowhawk18
I’m not sure on the rules but can they not just loan Zaitsev to a European professional team?


I mean, waive/assign him to Rockford and be a good example to help the kids learn how to be professionals. If he refuses, terminate the contract. I mean, I'm all for trying to do right by the players, but sometimes that "doing right" for the team/ prospects means if you're a cap dump you just get onboard.
Snowhawk18, Garak and RicXX liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 9:37 a.m.
#12
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 5,872
Quoting: Snowhawk18
I’m not sure on the rules but can they not just loan Zaitsev to a European professional team?


I don’t think that’s possible.

Quoting: exo2769
I mean, waive/assign him to Rockford and be a good example to help the kids learn how to be professionals. If he refuses, terminate the contract. I mean, I'm all for trying to do right by the players, but sometimes that "doing right" for the team/ prospects means if you're a cap dump you just get onboard.


If Zaitsev would be onboard with that process I see nothing wrong with it, but I sincerely doubt that and figure he would much rather test his luck in FA or back home. In any case since the cap hit difference is negligible and the hawks save real money and a headache with the roster spot I think a buyout as a corresponding move for a D cap dump is the most realistic option. Of course if Zaitsev can play on the third pair as a tank commander then I see no need to do anything with him!
exo2769, Snowhawk18, Garak and 2 others liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 9:47 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,750
Likes: 9,924
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
I don’t think that’s possible.



If Zaitsev would be onboard with that process I see nothing wrong with it, but I sincerely doubt that and figure he would much rather test his luck in FA or back home. In any case since the cap hit difference is negligible and the hawks save real money and a headache with the roster spot I think a buyout as a corresponding move for a D cap dump is the most realistic option. Of course if Zaitsev can play on the third pair as a tank commander then I see no need to do anything with him!


Lol, yeah I guess I'm a bit meaner when it comes to players acquired through dumps. We don't owe them the say opportunities as we owed our draft picks/prospects. You don't go to Rockford...we terminate your contract.

You're correct that next year won't be an issue with cap space so buyout of Zaitsev might make sense, but at some point I hope we move away for prolonging the pain. Yes Owners/GMs play with real dollars and we're fans here, but the season tickets gained recently are real dollars too. At some point we need to be using that money cap for UFAs and making tbe team better. Yes, doesn't have to be this summer, but soon.
Snowhawk18, Garak, Kyle_Davidson and 1 other person liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 9:52 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,020
Likes: 10,879
I completely agree. Mitchell was mismanaged under Bowman and has been utilized improperly under Davidson because him and Richardson like big defensemen. Which I'm not knocking them for, but I don't think he has gotten a fair shake in CHI and selling low has a large possibility of regret in hindsight.
RicXX and Snowhawk18 liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 9:59 a.m.
#15
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 5,872
Quoting: exo2769
Lol, yeah I guess I'm a bit meaner when it comes to players acquired through dumps. We don't owe them the say opportunities as we owed our draft picks/prospects. You don't go to Rockford...we terminate your contract.

You're correct that next year won't be an issue with cap space so buyout of Zaitsev might make sense, but at some point I hope we move away for prolonging the pain. Yes Owners/GMs play with real dollars and we're fans here, but the season tickets gained recently are real dollars too. At some point we need to be using that money cap for UFAs and making tbe team better. Yes, doesn't have to be this summer, but soon.


Money should never be a real “Issue” in this market, but billionaires don’t stay billionaires without staying frugal. I imagine with all of the dead cap and backloaded Kane and Toews contracts that the Wirtz family made money hand over fist last year and with the lottery season tickets.
exo2769, RicXX and Garak liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 10:06 a.m.
#16
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,750
Likes: 9,924
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
Money should never be a real “Issue” in this market, but billionaires don’t stay billionaires without staying frugal. I imagine with all of the dead cap and backloaded Kane and Toews contracts that the Wirtz family made money hand over fist last year and with the lottery season tickets.


Yeah, but his dad is still "Dollar" Bill Wirtz.
Kyle_Davidson, RicXX and Garak liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 10:06 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 4,959
Don't mind these moves, I do expect KD to make some manuevers at the draft though. Just don't see us making 4 (or in this case 5) 2nd round picks. I also think its more likely we move into the back of the 1st round than it is we move up from 19, like many other people are suggesting. This draft is loaded, don't see any team moving a top 20 pick without a heavy premium. Dream case for me is the hawks get Bedard at 1, obviously, then Danielson at 19, then trade back into the end of the 1st and get a big body like Charlie Stramel. Hawks need to add size big time up front. Watching stramel at the back of the 1st or Honzek/But at 19
exo2769, Hawksguy81, RicXX and 2 others liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 10:08 a.m.
#18
Thread Starter
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,750
Likes: 9,924
Quoting: Wadejos123
Don't mind these moves, I do expect KD to make some manuevers at the draft though. Just don't see us making 4 (or in this case 5) 2nd round picks. I also think its more likely we move into the back of the 1st round than it is we move up from 19, like many other people are suggesting. This draft is loaded, don't see any team moving a top 20 pick without a heavy premium. Dream case for me is the hawks get Bedard at 1, obviously, then Danielson at 19, then trade back into the end of the 1st and get a big body like Charlie Stramel. Hawks need to add size big time up front. Watching stramel at the back of the 1st or Honzek/But at 19


So the 2nds in my mind would be to move up. STL had (3) 1sts, but zero 2nds. Not like within division matters for picks...I think.
Garak liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 10:13 a.m.
#19
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 5,872
Quoting: exo2769
So the 2nds in my mind would be to move up. STL had (3) 1sts, but zero 2nds. Not like within division matters for picks...I think.


I feel like between Chicago and STL it would. Especially if the the GM’s have a general idea of who each other would pick with the given selection. No way STL would let us trade up and pick Brindly.
Wadejos123, RicXX and Garak liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 10:21 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 4,959
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
I feel like between Chicago and STL it would. Especially if the the GM’s have a general idea of who each other would pick with the given selection. No way STL would let us trade up and pick Brindly.


Hawks look to add size in the 1st after Bedard, I think. And hoenstly I wouldn't rule out taking a D man. The RD prospect pool is sneaky weak. Looking at Reidenbacher, ASP, and Willander. At least 2/3 likley go before 19 but you never know
Hawksguy81, RicXX and Snowhawk18 liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 10:24 a.m.
#21
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 5,872
Quoting: Wadejos123
Hawks look to add size in the 1st after Bedard, I think. And hoenstly I wouldn't rule out taking a D man. The RD prospect pool is sneaky weak. Looking at Reidenbacher, ASP, and Willander. At least 2/3 likley go before 19 but you never know


We have a lot of LD prospects that are good, but IMO our forward pool lacks game breaking talent and this draft is full of it. Maybe we flip some of those LD prospects into RD guys later or spend more secondary capital (Oliver Bonk in 2nd round?)
RicXX and Snowhawk18 liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 11:02 a.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 1,841
I’m disappointed by the Hawks handling of Mitchell as well but think taking on Yamamoto & Ceci is trying to make two wrongs a right. Unless the Hawks get paid well for each of them, they should stay away. Giving other prospects they drafted the opportunities Mitchell never got would be the way to go.
exo2769, RicXX, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 11:29 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,020
Likes: 10,879
Quoting: Wadejos123
Don't mind these moves, I do expect KD to make some manuevers at the draft though. Just don't see us making 4 (or in this case 5) 2nd round picks. I also think its more likely we move into the back of the 1st round than it is we move up from 19, like many other people are suggesting. This draft is loaded, don't see any team moving a top 20 pick without a heavy premium. Dream case for me is the hawks get Bedard at 1, obviously, then Danielson at 19, then trade back into the end of the 1st and get a big body like Charlie Stramel. Hawks need to add size big time up front. Watching stramel at the back of the 1st or Honzek/But at 19


I highly doubt we have to move back into the 1st round to target Stramel, though. But, otherwise, I agree with all of this.

Quoting: Wadejos123
Hawks look to add size in the 1st after Bedard, I think. And hoenstly I wouldn't rule out taking a D man. The RD prospect pool is sneaky weak. Looking at Reidenbacher, ASP, and Willander. At least 2/3 likley go before 19 but you never know


Do you mean CHI's RD prospect pool, or the RD pool in the 2023 draft? Cuz if you're talking about the draft, I would actually say the opposite. There are tons of promising RD in this draft, we could probably wait until the 3rd round or later and still get one with a pretty high ceiling, albeit, probably a low floor/unproven etc.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 12:35 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 4,959
Quoting: Garak
I highly doubt we have to move back into the 1st round to target Stramel, though. But, otherwise, I agree with all of this.



Do you mean CHI's RD prospect pool, or the RD pool in the 2023 draft? Cuz if you're talking about the draft, I would actually say the opposite. There are tons of promising RD in this draft, we could probably wait until the 3rd round or later and still get one with a pretty high ceiling, albeit, probably a low floor/unproven etc.


CHI’s RD pool. Sneaky very weak and not being talked about from what I’ve seen. Wouldn’t be shocked to see them target ASP or Willander
Garak liked this.
Jun. 17, 2023 at 12:37 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 4,959
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
We have a lot of LD prospects that are good, but IMO our forward pool lacks game breaking talent and this draft is full of it. Maybe we flip some of those LD prospects into RD guys later or spend more secondary capital (Oliver Bonk in 2nd round?)


I like what we have at F more than RD by a lot though. Bedard, Reichel, Nazar, Hayes, Greene, Thompson, Dach, etc etc……. At RD we’ve got Rinzel who has always been seen as a project, and Regula who may or may not be anything. I could see KD targeting ASP or Willander for sure
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll