Quoting: Random2152
Just a friendly reminder that the last time around the years purchased by this contract was going to cost 13.8 aav from reports.
We got 9 years at an average of 12.35 against the cap.
Vs 8 years at 13.8 against the cap.
If you cant see this as a win I don't know what to tell you
I gotta agree with you. I don't think it's a landslide win but it's definitely a great re-signing. People were crying $14m+ after his 60 goal season.
As a percentage of the cap he's probably right where he should be. Keeping in mind that we keep hearing rumours that the cap may take a decent jump next year, so Matthews could have easily waited this out and asked for the same share of a bigger pie next off-season. So yes, I think this deal shows he was willing to leave money on the table, get the deal done early, and spend the next 5 years in a Leaf jersey becoming the franchise's all time leading goal scorer.
And the more I thought about it, the more I liked the term. He'll be 31 when the contract ends which got me thinking, why do we want 8 years so badly? Why pay him as a top player in the league to his 34/35 age? Both player and team get to suss out the situation 5 years from now and see if the relationship is worth extending again and what the appropriate price point will be then.
Superstars handle their mid-30s differently. But we don't have to look past John Tavares and see that, at 32, we wish we weren't paying him $11m per for the next 2 years.
This is a great deal all around.