SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Chris Drury

Created by: Coachchippy
Team: 2024-25 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 10, 2023
Published: Aug. 10, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$825,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$4,750,000
5$4,500,000
4$3,275,000
5$4,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$775,000
1$775,000
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. Mittelstadt, Casey [RFA Rights]
BUF
  1. Belzile, Alex
  2. Jones, Zachary
  3. Panarin, Artemi ($5,500,000 retained)
  4. 2026 1st round pick (NYR)
2.
MIN
  1. Goodrow, Barclay
  2. Lindgren, Ryan [RFA Rights]
  3. 2025 4th round pick (DAL)
  4. 2025 5th round pick (MIN)
3.
TOR
  1. Kakko, Kaapo
  2. McConnell-Barker, Bryce
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (NYR)
  4. 2025 1st round pick (NYR)
4.
MTL
  1. Trocheck, Vincent ($1,000,000 retained)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2026
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$87,500,000$87,990,000$512,500$530,000-$490,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,437,500$4,437,500
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$450,000$450K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$775,000$775,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$838,333$838,333 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,872,000$3,872,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,666,667$5,666,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,450,000$2,450,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$775,000$775,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$846,667$846,667
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,275,000$3,275,000
RD
RFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 10, 2023 at 7:49 p.m.
#1
Servant of Chaos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 455
Is not nearly dumb enough to lose this many trades this badly.
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Aug. 10, 2023 at 7:51 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 228
Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
Is not nearly dumb enough to lose this many trades this badly.


Which do you think he's losing? Panarin, Goodrow, and Trocheck contracts are going to age terribly. Lindgren and Kakko are unfortunate casualties. But Marner, Mittelstadt, and Newhook would be good additions
Aug. 10, 2023 at 7:53 p.m.
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,770
Likes: 22,802
I would suggest you look at the players MNC or NTC or even M NTCs before posting trades like this.
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Aug. 10, 2023 at 7:54 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 228
Quoting: palhal
I would suggest you look at the players MNC or NTC or even M NTCs before posting trades like this.


They can always be convinced to waive
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 10, 2023 at 7:54 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,202
Likes: 5,207
Counter: Kakko, Laf, Schneider, pick for Marner, Jarnkrok, Timmins

ie. No thank you. And PS Marner declines, he has a full NMC
Aug. 10, 2023 at 7:58 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 228
Quoting: leafs101
Counter: Kakko, Laf, Schneider, pick for Marner, Jarnkrok, Timmins

ie. No thank you. And PS Marner declines, he has a full NMC


I'd actually consider sending all of those except Schneider. You don't think Marner could be convinced to waive, for NYC of all locations?
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 10, 2023 at 8:01 p.m.
#7
Servant of Chaos
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 455
Quoting: Coachchippy
Which do you think he's losing? Panarin, Goodrow, and Trocheck contracts are going to age terribly. Lindgren and Kakko are unfortunate casualties. But Marner, Mittelstadt, and Newhook would be good additions


Let's go top to bottom here, shall we?
- Panarin at 50% brings back a 1st+top prospect, minimum. Over the last 4 years, he's 4th in the league in points. Panarin @50% + 1st >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mittelstadt.
- Goodrow can be bought out for a pittance, and you have us trading Lindgren (a significantly better, not to mention younger, DMan than Middleton), to get rid of him, then adding picks on top
- You're giving up Kakko, a 1st, and a 2nd for a guy who can walk in a year, and will demand 10m+ in his next contract
- Newhook had every chance to earn a Top 6 spot in Colorado this year, and absolutely blew it. You're giving up the Rangers 2C for him. And retaining for 4 years.

In summary, every trade is a loss for the Rangers, and multiple are genuinely terrible.
gretzkyghosts, Fox_Czar_Cup, NYR1983 and 1 other person liked this.
Aug. 10, 2023 at 8:28 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,537
Likes: 6,451
Montreal isn't trading Newhook whomever they JUST acquired unless you are sending Laf the other way
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 10, 2023 at 9:32 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 228
Quoting: Campabee
Montreal isn't trading Newhook whomever they JUST acquired unless you are sending Laf the other way


This is for the 2024-25 year not the upcoming season
Aug. 10, 2023 at 9:35 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Quoting: Campabee
Montreal isn't trading Newhook whomever they JUST acquired unless you are sending Laf the other way


You should seriously reconcider. Trocheck with a little retention is worth way more than laf.
NYR1983 liked this.
Aug. 10, 2023 at 9:37 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
I cant believe how much worse you've made the rangers.
HOCKEYBOY448 liked this.
Aug. 10, 2023 at 10:19 p.m.
#12
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,770
Likes: 22,802
Quoting: Coachchippy
They can always be convinced to waive


I guess the cap means nothing too. Sorry just silly trades to entertain.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 10, 2023 at 10:36 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,537
Likes: 6,451
Quoting: DDossett
You should seriously reconcider. Trocheck with a little retention is worth way more than laf.


Trochek is on the wrong side of 30 to fit the Habs window, Laf would be worth the risk if you really believe he will hit his ceiling. I am not convinced he will but I can see Hughes taking that risk.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 11, 2023 at 12:56 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 228
Quoting: palhal
I guess the cap means nothing too. Sorry just silly trades to entertain.


These trades left the Rangers cap compliant though?
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 11, 2023 at 1:06 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 228
Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
Let's go top to bottom here, shall we?
- Panarin at 50% brings back a 1st+top prospect, minimum. Over the last 4 years, he's 4th in the league in points. Panarin 50% + 1st >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mittelstadt.
- Goodrow can be bought out for a pittance, and you have us trading Lindgren (a significantly better, not to mention younger, DMan than Middleton), to get rid of him, then adding picks on top
- You're giving up Kakko, a 1st, and a 2nd for a guy who can walk in a year, and will demand 10m+ in his next contract
- Newhook had every chance to earn a Top 6 spot in Colorado this year, and absolutely blew it. You're giving up the Rangers 2C for him. And retaining for 4 years.

In summary, every trade is a loss for the Rangers, and multiple are genuinely terrible.


Sadly I disagree about Panarin. He's aging, and since this team is for 2024-25 he would be pushing 35. Retaining salary is the only way to get another team to take on his albatross contract. Literally no one would want him (or those that would, wouldn't be able to because of cap) without doing that. You also probably need to add the first to sweeten the deal, and it still isn't going to land you someone like Draisaitl. Mittelstadt is 7 yrs younger than Panarin, was a top ten pick, and is good for putting up 60+ points per season. Not a bad return at all imo

Fair enough about Goodrow. I figured to package him up with Lindgren because Lindgren, while great, plays a style that ages extremely poorly. Like Dan Girardi. You can pay Middleton under 2.5 mil on a short term and he would be serviceable. Lindgren would likely ask for more money and a much longer term and it just doesn't fit with our needs imo.

I don't see what's wrong with signing Marner for more than 10 million, assuming that he would want to extend in NY. We are paying Panarin more than that to put up less points, plus Marner is defensively responsible (in fact Selke caliber) unlike Panarin. And again, Marner is significantly younger than Panarin. So if we are just talking extremely expensive wingers, Marner is an upgrade in every sense.

Trocheck honestly should have never been signed. We did Chytil dirty with that acquisition because he is going to be the real 2C probably even this upcoming year. Therefore, we don't need to be paying that much for a 3C (Trocheck). Newhook is serviceable and like half the price of Trocheck so I don't really get how it's that bad of a trade. It would be bad if we were playing him in the top six but we are burying him on the third/fourth line
Aug. 11, 2023 at 2:22 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,754
As a Sabres fan,
I’d accept that trade in a heart beat

Idk what you’re thinking though?
That’s an insane overpay by NyR
Aug. 11, 2023 at 9:57 a.m.
#17
Make it Work
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 772
Likes: 175
Quoting: Coachchippy
Sadly I disagree about Panarin. He's aging, and since this team is for 2024-25 he would be pushing 35. Retaining salary is the only way to get another team to take on his albatross contract. Literally no one would want him (or those that would, wouldn't be able to because of cap) without doing that. You also probably need to add the first to sweeten the deal, and it still isn't going to land you someone like Draisaitl. Mittelstadt is 7 yrs younger than Panarin, was a top ten pick, and is good for putting up 60+ points per season. Not a bad return at all imo

Fair enough about Goodrow. I figured to package him up with Lindgren because Lindgren, while great, plays a style that ages extremely poorly. Like Dan Girardi. You can pay Middleton under 2.5 mil on a short term and he would be serviceable. Lindgren would likely ask for more money and a much longer term and it just doesn't fit with our needs imo.

I don't see what's wrong with signing Marner for more than 10 million, assuming that he would want to extend in NY. We are paying Panarin more than that to put up less points, plus Marner is defensively responsible (in fact Selke caliber) unlike Panarin. And again, Marner is significantly younger than Panarin. So if we are just talking extremely expensive wingers, Marner is an upgrade in every sense.

Trocheck honestly should have never been signed. We did Chytil dirty with that acquisition because he is going to be the real 2C probably even this upcoming year. Therefore, we don't need to be paying that much for a 3C (Trocheck). Newhook is serviceable and like half the price of Trocheck so I don't really get how it's that bad of a trade. It would be bad if we were playing him in the top six but we are burying him on the third/fourth line


Just from a Habs perspective; even before what you just wrote above, the Habs are not doing this!
It'll cost you Laf if you want Newhook and the Habs may add a piece; It'll also cost you to get rid of Trocheck, Gallagher is offered as part of the return.
Coachchippy liked this.
Aug. 11, 2023 at 11:38 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Quoting: Campabee
Trochek is on the wrong side of 30 to fit the Habs window, Laf would be worth the risk if you really believe he will hit his ceiling. I am not convinced he will but I can see Hughes taking that risk.


Actually for the habs he's on the right side of 30. Unless your taking the sabres track and just collect prospect to get excited about losing. Compare yourself to past stanley cup winners and how many guys on those teams where "on the wrong side of 30". I believe montreal made a cup run not to long ago, thanks to two guys on the wrong side of 30 that came off IR for the year some how. If you think weber and price weren't major parts of that run then theres a reason your a pretend gm.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll