SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Aggressive retool

Created by: Coachchippy
Team: 2023-24 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 17, 2023
Published: Aug. 17, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,500,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. McTavish, Mason
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (SJS)
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (ANA)
2.
DAL
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt
  2. van Riemsdyk, James
  3. Zacha, Pavel
  4. 2024 3rd round pick (SJS)
  5. 2025 2nd round pick (ANA)
3.
4.
TBL
  1. Beecher, John
  2. Hall, Curtis
  3. Marchand, Brad
  4. Toporowski, Luke
  5. 2025 1st round pick (BOS)
  6. 2025 3rd round pick (BOS)
  7. 2026 1st round pick (BOS)
  8. 2026 2nd round pick (BOS)
  9. 2026 3rd round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2026
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$83,500,000$70,123,335$4,500,000$6,000,000$13,376,665
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$11,250,000$11,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$900,000$900,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,475,000$3,475,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$900,000$900,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 17, 2023 at 11:36 p.m.
#1
Trad Breliving
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 841
Likes: 337
I would say this is a rebuild. also did not know Dellandrea is that highly valued. Underrated? 1000%. worth Zacha+ much more? Don't think so
Coachchippy liked this.
Aug. 17, 2023 at 11:37 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 111
Likes: 40
What
Aug. 17, 2023 at 11:40 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 227
Quoting: Leafs_Fan3416
I would say this is a rebuild. also did not know Dellandrea is that highly valued. Underrated? 1000%. worth Zacha+ much more? Don't think so


To me a rebuild is tearing the entire thing down for picks and building a new foundation through those guys. Which would probably mean getting rid of Pasta, Coyle, McAvoy, etc.
Leafs_Fan3416 liked this.
Aug. 17, 2023 at 11:40 p.m.
#4
Trad Breliving
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 841
Likes: 337
Quoting: Coachchippy
To me a rebuild is tearing the entire thing down for picks and building a new foundation through those guys. Which would probably mean getting rid of Pasta, Coyle, McAvoy, etc.


Fair enough but this is as close as you can get to a rebuild without actually rebuilding
Coachchippy liked this.
Aug. 17, 2023 at 11:55 p.m.
#5
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
McTavish > Ullmark, Plus Ullmark doesn't waive for the worst team in the NHL.

Outside of Marchand that garbage doesn't come close to getting you Victor Hedman.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 12:03 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 227
Quoting: MoSeider53
McTavish > Ullmark, Plus Ullmark doesn't waive for the worst team in the NHL.

Outside of Marchand that garbage doesn't come close to getting you Victor Hedman.


I disagree. I think McTavish and Ullmark have equal value especially after Ullmark's ridiculous performance last season. And the Ducks are doing fine on center depth they don't need him. And I doubt Anaheim would be on Ullmark's no-trade list. It's sunny Orange County California and there's a ton of young talent, they're only going to get better.

5 picks is not garbage for Hedman. Tampa Bay needs them desperately after what they pulled bringing in Jeannot
Aug. 18, 2023 at 1:04 a.m.
#7
Miss YA Killer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 3,797
Likes: 1,431
Quoting: Coachchippy
I disagree. I think McTavish and Ullmark have equal value especially after Ullmark's ridiculous performance last season. And the Ducks are doing fine on center depth they don't need him. And I doubt Anaheim would be on Ullmark's no-trade list. It's sunny Orange County California and there's a ton of young talent, they're only going to get better.

5 picks is not garbage for Hedman. Tampa Bay needs them desperately after what they pulled bringing in Jeannot


Stop with needs them desperately BULLS*** and there certainly not trading Hedman as Draft bait🙄 that is truly the most ridiculous argument I've read here. Don't want Marchand anywhere near this Team the rest is a whole lot of quantity and almost no quality. Besides it's Hagel too . TB counters McAvoy and Frederick for a 26 & 27 7first a2,3,4 ABB Cole Koepke Josh Archibald
Aug. 18, 2023 at 4:23 a.m.
#8
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 6,680
Quoting: Coachchippy
I disagree. I think McTavish and Ullmark have equal value especially after Ullmark's ridiculous performance last season. And the Ducks are doing fine on center depth they don't need him. And I doubt Anaheim would be on Ullmark's no-trade list. It's sunny Orange County California and there's a ton of young talent, they're only going to get better.

5 picks is not garbage for Hedman. Tampa Bay needs them desperately after what they pulled bringing in Jeannot


Then you've taken leave of your senses. Under no circumstances would Anaheim swap McTavish for Ullmark straight up, let alone add picks. Got too many centers? Fine, move someone to the wing, don't trade for a goalie who will be past his prime when our window opens. Too much center depth is the best problem to have.

Yeah, Anaheim has a surplus of young talent at center, and we COULD trade one of them away, but unless their name is Seidee or Jiricek, it's not happening.
Hockey_Soul, Jded and OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 6:37 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,518
Likes: 6,442
All I can say about the Habs trade is get real! Montreal isn't giving up Slaf for Savard 2.0 and Dvorak 2.0! Habs counter with Allen and Gallagher for Swayman
Aug. 18, 2023 at 8:06 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,448
Likes: 11,837
McTavish is worth a lot more than Ullmark there guy

This offer ruins the Ducks Bruins trade relationship
Hockey_Soul, Jded and OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 8:24 a.m.
#11
Be formless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 1,051
Edited Aug. 18, 2023 at 10:42 a.m.
Dude, I'm sorry but your valuations are all over the place.

Ullmark is great, but a young 1C is worth far more than any goalie. And WTF is that Dellandrea deal? Every piece coming from BOS is worth more than him. MTL easily declines, and both sides would be better off not making the Tampa deal.
Coachchippy, Jded and OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 10:00 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 227
Quoting: Boltsradynasty
Stop with needs them desperately BULLS*** and there certainly not trading Hedman as Draft bait🙄 that is truly the most ridiculous argument I've read here. Don't want Marchand anywhere near this Team the rest is a whole lot of quantity and almost no quality. Besides it's Hagel too . TB counters McAvoy and Frederick for a 26 & 27 7first a2,3,4 ABB Cole Koepke Josh Archibald


It doesn't concern you to not have a single first round pick for the next 3 years? Stamkos is almost 34. Hedman is 32. Kucherov is 30. You don't have much longer with your core before people start massively declining. And there's no shame in that at all, after so many deep playoff runs and bringing home 2 Stanley Cups. They did what had to be done. But you have to start planning for the future beyond the next couple of years. Acquiring picks is the way to do that
Aug. 18, 2023 at 10:03 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 227
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Then you've taken leave of your senses. Under no circumstances would Anaheim swap McTavish for Ullmark straight up, let alone add picks. Got too many centers? Fine, move someone to the wing, don't trade for a goalie who will be past his prime when our window opens. Too much center depth is the best problem to have.

Yeah, Anaheim has a surplus of young talent at center, and we COULD trade one of them away, but unless their name is Seidee or Jiricek, it's not happening.


But the entire point is that Anaheim's window can open SOON, even maybe a year from now, if they bring in some talent from other teams. It was messed up that the league screwed you out of Bedard. But Anaheim currently has MUCH better talent than the other teams who were in the Bedard sweepstakes, like Chicago or SJ for example.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 10:26 a.m.
#14
Miss YA Killer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 3,797
Likes: 1,431
Quoting: Coachchippy
It doesn't concern you to not have a single first round pick for the next 3 years? Stamkos is almost 34. Hedman is 32. Kucherov is 30. You don't have much longer with your core before people start massively declining. And there's no shame in that at all, after so many deep playoff runs and bringing home 2 Stanley Cups. They did what had to be done. But you have to start planning for the future beyond the next couple of years. Acquiring picks is the way to do that


With the core part duex of Sergachev, Cernak Perbix Point, Cirelli Paul, Hagel and still only 30 yo Vasilevskiy this team is definitely in good shape next 4-5 years and if cap goes up as expected they'll be more than fine
Hockey_Soul liked this.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 10:28 a.m.
#15
Be formless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 1,051
Quoting: Coachchippy
It doesn't concern you to not have a single first round pick for the next 3 years? Stamkos is almost 34. Hedman is 32. Kucherov is 30. You don't have much longer with your core before people start massively declining. And there's no shame in that at all, after so many deep playoff runs and bringing home 2 Stanley Cups. They did what had to be done. But you have to start planning for the future beyond the next couple of years. Acquiring picks is the way to do that


This is a bit hypocritical coming from a post on BOS, who has succeeded with elite players working well into their mid-30's. TBL is fine. You don't trade off star players in their early 30s for picks. You keep trying to win until they have nothing left.
Boltsradynasty liked this.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 10:31 a.m.
#16
Miss YA Killer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 3,797
Likes: 1,431
Quoting: Hockey_Soul
This is a bit hypocritical coming from a post on BOS, who has succeeded with elite players working well into their mid-30's. TBL is fine. You don't trade off star players in their early 30s for picks. You keep trying to win until they have nothing left.


Yeah ,but TB has been far more successful with their core
Hockey_Soul liked this.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 10:37 a.m.
#17
Be formless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 1,051
Quoting: Coachchippy
But the entire point is that Anaheim's window can open SOON, even maybe a year from now, if they bring in some talent from other teams. It was messed up that the league screwed you out of Bedard. But Anaheim currently has MUCH better talent than the other teams who were in the Bedard sweepstakes, like Chicago or SJ for example.


Anaheim is still 3-4 years off from having any window open. Their young dmen need time to develop. I'd say two more seasons, then they'll be looking to add some more reliable middle-6 wings and a new goaltender.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 10:41 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 1,705
Quoting: Coachchippy
I disagree. I think McTavish and Ullmark have equal value especially after Ullmark's ridiculous performance last season. And the Ducks are doing fine on center depth they don't need him. And I doubt Anaheim would be on Ullmark's no-trade list. It's sunny Orange County California and there's a ton of young talent, they're only going to get better.

5 picks is not garbage for Hedman. Tampa Bay needs them desperately after what they pulled bringing in Jeannot


I’m sorry but this take is so far off. McTavish was a top 2 pick in his draft, and I’d redone would still be a top 4 pick at worst. Nooooo chance Ullmark touches that value, or remotely close to it

Also, Anaheim is deep at goalie with Gibson and a top 5 NHL goalie prospect on the cusp of being a full time NHLer. McTavish plays great on the wing as well. This deal makes zero sense for ANA and isn’t close to market value. You will not find a single fan outside of Boston who thinks this trade is close to realistic. And honestly good luck finding any in BOS
OldNYIfan and Hockey_Soul liked this.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 11:18 a.m.
#19
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 9,889
Likes: 6,680
Edited Aug. 18, 2023 at 2:52 p.m.
Quoting: Coachchippy
But the entire point is that Anaheim's window can open SOON, even maybe a year from now, if they bring in some talent from other teams. It was messed up that the league screwed you out of Bedard. But Anaheim currently has MUCH better talent than the other teams who were in the Bedard sweepstakes, like Chicago or SJ for example.


Our holes in the roster are RW and RHD, Ullmark isn't going to change our window if we let him get shelled every night.

So if Boston wants to make Pastranak or McAvoy available (they won't) McTavish could be made available, but short of that, I can't see us giving up a young 1C who was in the Calder conversation this season.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 11:36 a.m.
#20
Jeff Gorton
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 523
A former 1st overall pick from 1 year ago for a #4 d man and a bottom 6 forward?
Aug. 18, 2023 at 12:36 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 2,731
Is there no salary cap on fantasy island?? 🤔
Jded liked this.
Aug. 18, 2023 at 4:02 p.m.
#22
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 1,238
Bro said i want the 18 yo first overall pick for brendan carlo and... (check notes) conor geekie
Aug. 18, 2023 at 4:52 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2023
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 227
Quoting: SMH
Bro said i want the 18 yo first overall pick for brendan carlo and... (check notes) conor geekie


Isn't he considered a huge bust by the Montreal fanbase? Not milk toast Lafreniere level, but like considered to actually suck?
Aug. 18, 2023 at 6:33 p.m.
#24
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 1,238
Quoting: Coachchippy
Isn't he considered a huge bust by the Montreal fanbase? Not milk toast Lafreniere level, but like considered to actually suck?


I'm not sure in what universe you live but in the real world he was and still is the best prospect from the 2022 draft
Hockey_Soul liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll