Quoting: yikes
I’ll still beat my Kaapo drum.
He’s been so good, he’s been overshadowed by Blackwood - lastnight vs Devils he literally stole the game.
Elvis is still a lateral financially and doesn’t move the needle imo with the pros vs cons, and Allen will be 34 - although he’s the only other realistic option.
Quoting: yikes
I also say though if you scout the Sharks games - Kaapo has let in a few stinkers but there hasn’t been more than 1 game I recall saying Kaapo lost us that (I think there was one where he just clearly had a bad showing). they were a brutal team to start the year and still kinda are, I don’t often watch and think “that’s on the goalies”. Kahkonens goals against lastnight for example, he played phenomenal and the goals that beat him were beyond average chances/ defensive breakdowns (1 pretty play/ exposing SJS, Hughes perfect snipe, and I can’t remember the other without watching VOD). Blackwoods just been unreal - and the analytics also help him.
I think EDM could get Kaapo and have him under a 3.5 aav and he himself at most, if Holland was hammered, would ever cost a 2nd (again that’s a pipe dream). So he’d really cost around a 3rd ish give or take at best. Which is far cheaper than Allen would probably be, and many of the other options are laterals.
If I am EDM I take a swing with Kaapo like VGK did with Adin Hill (and we see how well that worked out), and I also ask for Rutta/ Benning/ Knyzhov so they upgrade D depth. They each arent going to move the needle in terms of what EDM has to pay by much. And even more so, San Jose could be a one stop shop if they try and buy low on a SJS forward. To me, any team that needs cap help + upgrade could get a lot done if they try to get the most out of Grier.
Even if Kahkonen was being considered as a candidate (I wouldn't say no), there's still the issue of Campbell to be managed. A buyout is an excellent solution, but it is a solution over half a year away, with over four months of cost against the salary cap left to burn. I had previously discussed with a couple of Sharks and Oilers fans in an AGM where my offer of Bourgault, Broberg, the 2025 1st, and Campbell would not fetch Blackwood. The two netminders should be about equal in value given their situation: this is already a lot of capital to try and move for a maybe asset, having to add more makes this less and less worthwhile for Edmonton.
Likewise, Kaapo Kahkonen could be had next summer, presumably two weeks after Jack Campbell is bought out. Edmonton ends up eating some dead cap in the process, but keeps its assets for immediate roster improvement come the deadline. This is why, with the exception of the Merzlikins case, I will continue to insist that Halak or another sub-$1M temporary netminder is the optimal route for Edmonton. The Oilers don't need to pay the Greed Tax on teams taking advantage of their trying to move Campbell while upgrading their goaltending. Elvis comes at the unique opportunity of being a complete salary wash and about as good/bad as Campbell had been before his demotion.
In his last 10 starts, Skinner has delivered .900sv% goaltending and the Oilers are 7-3 in that span. The team played well enough where the losses to Tampa and Carolina statistically could have gone either way. Edmonton does not need .930sv% goaltending to win (goddamn, it would be nice though). They just need tolerable netminding. If this team gets a league-average goaltender who can maintain something within a point of league average (literally .903sv%) we can probably start re-engaging in Edmonton-as-a-contender conversations.