SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hanifin Deal With Secondary Prospects

Created by: Celtics21
Team: 2023-24 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 12, 2024
Published: Feb. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I don’t see Boston making this trade unless they covet knowing the salary slot for Hanifin for next years planning
Trades
BOS
  1. Hanifin, Noah ($2,000,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Only happens if there is concern that Hanifin signs elsewhere if traded
CGY
  1. Brunet, Frédéric
  2. Forbort, Derek
  3. Merkulov, Georgi
  4. 2025 1st round pick (BOS)
  5. 2026 3rd round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
If you view a first rounder as necessary, Boston moves to secondary prospects in Merkulov (who is a center prospect averaging a PPG in the AHL) and Brunet who is an interesting D prospect. The third round pick plus Brunet is the driver of retention. They can probably place Forbort on another team to save money.


Could substitute Grz for Forbort for 900k less.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2026
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$79,759,167$4,500,000$0$3,740,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$11,250,000$11,250,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,300,000$2,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$863,333$863,333
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$787,500$787,500
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,475,000$3,475,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
-$762,500-$762,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,687,500$3,687,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$800,000$800,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$870,000$870,000 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 12 at 1:24 p.m.
#1
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,985
Likes: 3,171
You might run into trouble with the delay's on the picks but 1st+3rd+a pair of secondary prospects+Cap filler should be enough to get it done
Feb. 12 at 1:29 p.m.
#2
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,326
Likes: 11,372
Heh. Secondary prospects. And retention. And a deferred 1st. And a cap dump. Good luck with all that.
Feb. 12 at 1:31 p.m.
#3
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,231
Likes: 7,011
Quoting: mokumboi
Heh. Secondary prospects. And retention. And a deferred 1st. And a cap dump. Good luck with all that.


its what most rental deals look like.
dgibb10 liked this.
Feb. 12 at 1:32 p.m.
#4
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,985
Likes: 3,171
Quoting: Bcarlo25
its what most rental deals look like.


It's literally quite similar to what the lindholm deal looked like lmao, although forbort is much less of a cap dump than kuzmenko.
Bcarlo25 liked this.
Feb. 12 at 2:06 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 372
It'd probably have to be grz, imagine calgary would be on forborts no trade list.
Feb. 12 at 2:08 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 489
Likes: 327
I've gone back and forth between Gryz and Forbort being the D to move and I think Gryz would be more likely. Forbort is just a big body that they tend to like as their 7th D in the playoffs but neither really inspires confidence when all is said and done
Feb. 12 at 2:31 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,502
Likes: 19,652
Lmao Calgary will certainly get a better offer elsewhere
mokumboi liked this.
Feb. 12 at 2:59 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 203
Likes: 69
Quoting: dgibb10
It's literally quite similar to what the lindholm deal looked like lmao, although forbort is much less of a cap dump than kuzmenko.


Lindholm got traded for a top prospect (recent first), Moore (dump), a first and two seconds.

The equivalent to this deal would be : Lohrei/Lysell + Forgot/Gyrz, 1st + 2 2nds.

Your trade doesn't have that value.
Feb. 12 at 3:23 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,507
Likes: 4,566
Quoting: Flames1217
Lindholm got traded for a top prospect (recent first), Moore (dump), a first and two seconds.

The equivalent to this deal would be : Lohrei/Lysell + Forgot/Gyrz, 1st + 2 2nds.

Your trade doesn't have that value.


Vaak at the time of trade was not as valuable as Lohrei/Lysell. He was 23yr old, has already gotten a significant concussion. He was a pending RFA that was struggling to get time in Boston's line-up and didn't have a future with the team.
dgibb10 liked this.
Feb. 12 at 3:42 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 1,179
Edited Feb. 12 at 3:48 p.m.
Quoting: ON3M4N
Vaak at the time of trade was not as valuable as Lohrei/Lysell. He was 23yr old, has already gotten a significant concussion. He was a pending RFA that was struggling to get time in Boston's line-up and didn't have a future with the team.


You can substitute Ian Mitchell for Frederic Brunet if you believe draft pedigree is more important. I’d rather have Brunet personally if I were Calgary, but completely OK doing that swap. Brunet was arguably in the top two defenders in the QMJHL last year. Substituting Mitchell would make the player the equivalent of Ukko as a comparable.

There is no cap dump the equivalent of John Moore in a cap constrained year. We are paying a bonus overage this year because we paid on a credit card last year. His inclusion basically made Bergeron / Krejci possible, which is why we paid the second 2nd round pick.

My perspective is you could flip Forbort or Grz with no cap implications to a third team. I’d personally think you’d rather have Grz to try an extend him, but have been told he’s of no interest. I don’t believe it, but I also believe he’d sign there if given an extension offer.

So then the open question is Merkulov and a 3rd worth a second?

Quoting: Shaun80
It'd probably have to be grz, imagine calgary would be on forborts no trade list.


It’s for 3 teams. I’d guess Winnipeg is on it, but who are the others?
Feb. 12 at 4:07 p.m.
#11
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,326
Likes: 11,372
Quoting: Bcarlo25
its what most rental deals look like.


Dude, it's not. If you're throwing five pieces at UFA Hanifin, you're just piling up quantity. And five teams easily top that offer if they want.
Feb. 12 at 4:55 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 816
Likes: 240
Solid trade, just don't know if Conroy would accept
Feb. 12 at 5:08 p.m.
#13
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,985
Likes: 3,171
Quoting: Flames1217
Lindholm got traded for a top prospect (recent first), Moore (dump), a first and two seconds.

The equivalent to this deal would be : Lohrei/Lysell + Forgot/Gyrz, 1st + 2 2nds.

Your trade doesn't have that value.


Moore was a legitimate AHLer:
Moore+2nd=0.

Vaak was nothing of meaning.
1st+2nd+Vaak

Forbort is a nothing move they could ship him somewhere for free (NJD would take him) and Calgary needs NHL caliber LD to get through the season.

It’s a slightly smaller offer but very similar and you’re looking at the absolute top of the rental market. Hanifin wants Boston which lowers the return (I’m not a Boston fan)
Feb. 12 at 5:26 p.m.
#14
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,231
Likes: 7,011
Quoting: mokumboi
Dude, it's not. If you're throwing five pieces at UFA Hanifin, you're just piling up quantity. And five teams easily top that offer if they want.


dude, it is. Find ONE...just one example of a trade where its a high end prospect and a first. usually its an okay prospect, a first, and a roster player.

notice, i didn't make this, so i'm not advocating for a 5 for 1 trade.
Feb. 12 at 5:32 p.m.
#15
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,985
Likes: 3,171
Quoting: mokumboi
Dude, it's not. If you're throwing five pieces at UFA Hanifin, you're just piling up quantity. And five teams easily top that offer if they want.


It's literally very similar to what the lindholm deal was.

1st+Prospect+Cap Filler/Dump+Later Pick+Nothing prospect

You can argue a gap between Bruz and Merkulov, but it's a 3rd instead of a 4th and a much smaller cap dump.
Feb. 12 at 8:55 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 1,179
Brunet scored 16 goals and 57 assists in the QJMHL. 73 points in 76 games and was I think the runner up for the defender of the year award behind Ducks prospect Tristan Laneau. He’s not played much in Providence in year 1, but looks like a boom or bust type prospect with upside. I’d argue he’s better than Joni Jurmo.
Feb. 12 at 9:33 p.m.
#17
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,326
Likes: 11,372
Quoting: dgibb10
It's literally very similar to what the lindholm deal was.

1st+Prospect+Cap Filler/Dump+Later Pick+Nothing prospect

You can argue a gap between Bruz and Merkulov, but it's a 3rd instead of a 4th and a much smaller cap dump.


Huuuuuuuuuuuuge gap between Brzzy and Merkulov. Also, the 1st is deferred a year.
Feb. 12 at 9:34 p.m.
#18
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,326
Likes: 11,372
Quoting: Bcarlo25
dude, it is. Find ONE...just one example of a trade where its a high end prospect and a first. usually its an okay prospect, a first, and a roster player.

notice, i didn't make this, so i'm not advocating for a 5 for 1 trade.


The 1st is deferred, and the prospect is not at same level. You may consider these small differences, but Calgary won't.
Feb. 12 at 9:35 p.m.
#19
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,985
Likes: 3,171
Quoting: mokumboi
Huuuuuuuuuuuuge gap between Brzzy and Merkulov. Also, the 1st is deferred a year.


Next year is a better draft class with much more upside on what the pick could be. At this point there is no chance the Vancouver pick is anything higher than like 25th
Celtics21 liked this.
Feb. 12 at 9:35 p.m.
#20
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,985
Likes: 3,171
Quoting: mokumboi
The 1st is deferred, and the prospect is not at same level. You may consider these small differences, but Calgary won't.


The cap dump is also 3 million dollars and not 11 million dollars
Feb. 12 at 9:38 p.m.
#21
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,326
Likes: 11,372
Quoting: dgibb10
The cap dump is also 3 million dollars and not 11 million dollars


Cap dump? $11M? Ehh nothing of that sort was in the trade. Moving cap to fit am acquisition is not the same thing as a cap dump, and Kuzy only has a year and change left, not two full years. And he scored in his first two games in Calgary. Kuzy was not a "cap dump", sir. He's a cap makeweight who is a rather useful player.
Feb. 12 at 9:44 p.m.
#22
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,985
Likes: 3,171
Quoting: mokumboi
Cap dump? $11M? Ehh nothing of that sort was in the trade. Moving cap to fit am acquisition is not the same thing as a cap dump, and Kuzy only has a year and change left, not two full years. And he scored in his first two games in Calgary. Kuzy was not a "cap dump", sir. He's a cap makeweight who is a rather useful player.


Interesting. I seem to remember a 6 million dollar, poor defensive, slow skater who used to be able to score at a high level. When a team (Calgary) wanted to move him out to bring in another acquisition it cost them a 1st.

Kuzmenko was a cap dump plain and simple.

If someone would have paid Vancouver assets for him they would have taken it in a heartbeat.
Feb. 12 at 9:53 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 1,179
Quoting: mokumboi
Huuuuuuuuuuuuge gap between Brzzy and Merkulov. Also, the 1st is deferred a year.


You do realize that Merkulov is outpacing Coronato statistically without having to basically take as many shots. While Brunet’s stat profile last year wasn’t as impressive as as Hunter’s this year, he did finish second in the QJMHL award for best defenseman while putting up 73 points in 76 games. I get it’s easy to criticize, but if you are going to continue to misvalue Lohrei … this is the type of deal you are looking at
Feb. 12 at 11:01 p.m.
#24
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,231
Likes: 7,011
Quoting: mokumboi
The 1st is deferred, and the prospect is not at same level. You may consider these small differences, but Calgary won't.


ya, the prospect is way better - actually, i don't know. what level are you talking about?

just find one trade that bucks this trend. one.
Feb. 12 at 11:50 p.m.
#25
mokumboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 29,326
Likes: 11,372
Quoting: dgibb10
Interesting. I seem to remember a 6 million dollar, poor defensive, slow skater who used to be able to score at a high level. When a team (Calgary) wanted to move him out to bring in another acquisition it cost them a 1st.

Kuzmenko was a cap dump plain and simple.

If someone would have paid Vancouver assets for him they would have taken it in a heartbeat.



Why do people act like they don't know what a cap dump is? Whatever, man. I'm so exhausted from conversing with Leafs fans who are completely detached from reality, I just don't have the energy for semantic squabbles over terms with actual definitions. Have a good one.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll