SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Thoughts On This Trade

Created by: DevilsFanZack13
Team: 2023-24 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 15, 2024
Published: Feb. 15, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The Score App had 5 possible trades on/before the trade deadline. They had this one between Calgary and NJ. As a Devils fan I say hell no and 3 out of the 4 writers said NJ says no. One said good deal. Let me know what you guys think, me personally, its horrible for NJ and guts the team.
Trades
CGY
  1. Casey, Seamus [Reserve List]
  2. Daws, Nico
  3. Holtz, Alexander
  4. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
  5. 2025 2nd round pick (NJD)
  6. 2026 1st round pick (NJD)
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$83,500,000$79,310,833$422,500$4,632,500$4,189,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,800,000$8,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,875,000$7,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,150,000$3,150,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$775,000$775,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,850,000$1,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$850,833$850,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$800,000$800,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 15 at 2:42 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,797
Likes: 1,510
that is such a overpay the NHL would block it
DevilsFanZack13 and Tintin liked this.
Feb. 15 at 2:43 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 1,404
Seems like an awful lot for a UFA and a goalie
DevilsFanZack13 liked this.
Feb. 15 at 2:45 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,225
Likes: 18,366
1st for Hanifin
Holtz for Markstrom

Daws, Casey, 1st, 2nd for _____?
DevilsFanZack13 liked this.
Feb. 15 at 2:52 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 102
Likes: 41
It's too much and I'm a Flames fan. Besides, the rumored Markstrom deal was scrapped over cap issues so there's no way NJ could afford to pay both Marky and Hanifin without sending cap back or Calgary retaining a lot.
DevilsFanZack13 liked this.
Feb. 15 at 2:54 p.m.
#5
Beanmachine
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 498
As a Flames fan I can say that that is a ridiculous overpay (but we would happily take it😁)
DevilsFanZack13 liked this.
Feb. 15 at 4:36 p.m.
#6
Thats an insult
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 142
Likes: 47
Quoting: NHLfan10506
1st for Hanifin
Holtz for Markstrom

Daws, Casey, 1st, 2nd for _____?


1st for Hanifin would've been done ages ago. Price is obviously higher.
Feb. 15 at 4:41 p.m.
#7
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,920
Likes: 3,144
Quoting: FrostyDog75
1st for Hanifin would've been done ages ago. Price is obviously higher.


Currently 15th overall 1st is not the same as a late 1st from a contender.

As it currently stands, I’d argue the 15th overall 1st on its own is more valuable than the entire package Calgary got for Lindholm.
Feb. 15 at 5:06 p.m.
#8
Thats an insult
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 142
Likes: 47
Quoting: dgibb10
Currently 15th overall 1st is not the same as a late 1st from a contender.

Clearly its more than just a mid 1st round pick otherwise he would've been traded already
Feb. 15 at 5:07 p.m.
#9
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,920
Likes: 3,144
Quoting: FrostyDog75
Clearly its more than just a mid 1st round pick otherwise he would've been traded already


Based on...?
Feb. 15 at 5:15 p.m.
#10
Thats an insult
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 142
Likes: 47
Quoting: dgibb10
Based on...?


You're bias toward NJD is causing you to overvalue its trade assets in what you're advocating for.

1st for Hanifin doesn't even consider the cap. Be Real
Feb. 15 at 5:17 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 419
Quoting: NHLfan10506
1st for Hanifin
Holtz for Markstrom

Daws, Casey, 1st, 2nd for _____?

Way to undervalue both Flames players. I agree it's an overpay, but not to the degree you are claiming.

Markstrom's value is closer to a 1st, Holtz and a cap dump (Vanecek), Hanifin should get at least what Hampus Lindholm did which was a 1st and a pair of 2nds.

So breaking it down, I would say something like this would be more reasonable:

1st in 2024 (Conditional, if NJD reach ECF the pick moves to 2026 because the pick would transfer to SJS), Holtz, Vanecek for Markstrom. Then 1st in 2025, Casey and a 3rd in 2024 for Hanifin.
Feb. 15 at 5:43 p.m.
#12
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,920
Likes: 3,144
Quoting: Lunatik
Way to undervalue both Flames players. I agree it's an overpay, but not to the degree you are claiming.

Markstrom's value is closer to a 1st, Holtz and a cap dump (Vanecek), Hanifin should get at least what Hampus Lindholm did which was a 1st and a pair of 2nds.

So breaking it down, I would say something like this would be more reasonable:

1st in 2024 (Conditional, if NJD reach ECF the pick moves to 2026 because the pick would transfer to SJS), Holtz, Vanecek for Markstrom. Then 1st in 2025, Casey and a 3rd in 2024 for Hanifin.


Laughable asks

If you want the hampus Lindholm return you would be taking back a multi year cap dump there, retaining, and Hanifin would have a sub 7 million dollar 8 year extension waiting to be signed when he arrives in jersey.

Since Hanifin in this case comes with none of those things. 25 1st+2nd or 25 1st+Bahl

Or again if you want to go get those things,
25 1st, 2nd, 2nd, Vanacek, Vilen for a 50% retained Hanifin with a cheap extension in place


Your unretained 6 million dollar 34 year old will not return holtz+1st
Feb. 15 at 5:46 p.m.
#13
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,920
Likes: 3,144
Quoting: FrostyDog75
You're bias toward NJD is causing you to overvalue its trade assets in what you're advocating for.

1st for Hanifin doesn't even consider the cap. Be Real


A mid round 1st is more valuable than a late 1st+secondary assets.

But again I’m happy to go trade Tyler toffoli for a late 1st and tack on a 2nd or a prospect if you prefer that. Or the 25 1st similarly
Feb. 15 at 5:50 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,225
Likes: 18,366
Quoting: Lunatik
Way to undervalue both Flames players. I agree it's an overpay, but not to the degree you are claiming.

Markstrom's value is closer to a 1st, Holtz and a cap dump (Vanecek), Hanifin should get at least what Hampus Lindholm did which was a 1st and a pair of 2nds.

So breaking it down, I would say something like this would be more reasonable:

1st in 2024 (Conditional, if NJD reach ECF the pick moves to 2026 because the pick would transfer to SJS), Holtz, Vanecek for Markstrom. Then 1st in 2025, Casey and a 3rd in 2024 for Hanifin.


Hampus Lindholm trade included $8m in salary dump.

Markstrom's value without retention has already been determined to be Holtz.
Feb. 15 at 5:52 p.m.
#15
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,920
Likes: 3,144
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Hampus Lindholm trade included $8m in salary dump.

Markstrom's value without retention has already been determined to be Holtz.


Hampus lindholms trade also included a very reasonable 6.5 million x8 extension signed the next day. One of the ONLY times a UFA was traded with an extension in place.

But hey I’d be happy to offer 25 1st+2nd+2nd+Vilen+Vitek for 50% retained Hanifin with a 6.75x8 extension in place
Feb. 15 at 6:02 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,225
Likes: 18,366
Quoting: FrostyDog75
1st for Hanifin would've been done ages ago. Price is obviously higher.


Hanifin may extend in Calgary…I believe that is the hold up.

1st+3rd is my guess if he doesn’t.
Feb. 15 at 6:03 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 419
Quoting: dgibb10
Laughable asks

If you want the hampus Lindholm return you would be taking back a multi year cap dump there, retaining, and Hanifin would have a sub 7 million dollar 8 year extension waiting to be signed when he arrives in jersey.

Since Hanifin in this case comes with none of those things. 25 1st+2nd or 25 1st+Bahl

Or again if you want to go get those things,
25 1st, 2nd, 2nd, Vanacek, Vilen for a 50% retained Hanifin with a cheap extension in place


Your unretained 6 million dollar 34 year old will not return holtz+1st

Believe what you want, but the Devils aren't in a favorable position, ever your own star player is calling out the goaltending. Everyone in the hockey world knows y'all are ****ed for goaltending and it's not like there are any good UFAs coming up.

The Devils choices are simple.

1) Keep riding your ****ty goaltending
2) Pay up and fill that need.

The Flames aren't going to throw away their season unless the deal is one they can't say no to. No team is.
Feb. 15 at 6:06 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 419
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Hampus Lindholm trade included $8m in salary dump.

Markstrom's value without retention has already been determined to be Holtz.


Lindholm was also older and isn't as good as Hanifin.

The rumors I've seen on Markstrom was Holtz, 1st and Vanecek. It was probably Holtz+ but then you had to pay up for dumping that piece of **** that is Vanecek
Feb. 15 at 6:09 p.m.
#19
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,920
Likes: 3,144
Quoting: Lunatik
Believe what you want, but the Devils aren't in a favorable position, ever your own star player is calling out the goaltending. Everyone in the hockey world knows y'all are ****ed for goaltending and it's not like there are any good UFAs coming up.

The Devils choices are simple.

1) Keep riding your ****ty goaltending
2) Pay up and fill that need.

The Flames aren't going to throw away their season unless the deal is one they can't say no to. No team is.


If that’s the ridiculous ask I’ll pass on the 34 year old making6 million.

We’ll wait for markstroms value to drop. Calgary is holding an asset that looks pretty now, but likely won’t return much of anything this time next year.

And there’s a LOT more teams selling goalies than buying.

Edmonton went away with Skinners recent play.
Samsonov looking better and Woll about to come back, let alone the fact that they can’t afford Markstrom.
Freddie Andersen is about to come back in Carolina.
With arvidsson coming back the kings have no cap space.

Kent Hughes just went out into the media talking about how hard it is to sell his goalies.

Nashville just for all intents and purposes put Saros out there.

And since our goaltending has been much better lately, we can wait.

Maybe in a few years you can sell him for future considerations like Vegas did with fleury
Feb. 15 at 6:10 p.m.
#20
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,920
Likes: 3,144
Quoting: Lunatik
Lindholm was also older and isn't as good as Hanifin.

The rumors I've seen on Markstrom was Holtz, 1st and Vanecek. It was probably Holtz+ but then you had to pay up for dumping that piece of **** that is Vanecek


A rental is a rental. Age is irrelevant. The center market is always hotter.

Please link a source that said NJD offered that?
Feb. 15 at 6:10 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,225
Likes: 18,366
Quoting: Lunatik
Lindholm was also older and isn't as good as Hanifin.

The rumors I've seen on Markstrom was Holtz, 1st and Vanecek. It was probably Holtz+ but then you had to pay up for dumping that piece of **** that is Vanecek


I haven’t seen anyone mention a 1st round pick in Markstrom deal. I have seen a few people say it was Holtz and the retention piece was undetermined

Doesn’t really matter now, because it sounds like that ship has sailed.
dgibb10 liked this.
Feb. 15 at 6:15 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,225
Likes: 18,366
Quoting: Lunatik
Believe what you want, but the Devils aren't in a favorable position, ever your own star player is calling out the goaltending. Everyone in the hockey world knows y'all are ****ed for goaltending and it's not like there are any good UFAs coming up.

The Devils choices are simple.

1) Keep riding your ****ty goaltending
2) Pay up and fill that need.

The Flames aren't going to throw away their season unless the deal is one they can't say no to. No team is.


Considering Markstrom’s inconsistency over last two years, I’d say there was just as much pressure on Calgary to sell high. They had a chance to add a player like Holtz. Hopefully they find another team as generous.
dgibb10 liked this.
Feb. 15 at 6:26 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 419
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Considering Markstrom’s inconsistency over last two years, I’d say there was just as much pressure on Calgary to sell high. They had a chance to add a player like Holtz. Hopefully they find another team as generous.

Yes, Markstrom was bad last year. But there is no reason to think that wasn't just a blip on the radar. This is Markstrom's 4th year in Calgary, in Year 1, he was the team MVP for 2/3 of the season, the middle 1/3 he struggled after returning from a concussion. Year 2, Vezina runner up. Year 3, he sucked, but it was also when his wife was pregnant and had their first kid. For anyone in that situation they don't have 100% focus, for a goaltender if you aren't completely focused you look terrible. This year? He's our MVP again. Even with a full ****ty season Markstrom has been out MVP for most of his time here.
Feb. 15 at 6:27 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 419
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I haven’t seen anyone mention a 1st round pick in Markstrom deal. I have seen a few people say it was Holtz and the retention piece was undetermined

Doesn’t really matter now, because it sounds like that ship has sailed.


Good because fans like you make Leafs fans look smart
Feb. 15 at 6:27 p.m.
#25
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 11,920
Likes: 3,144
Quoting: Lunatik
Yes, Markstrom was bad last year. But there is no reason to think that wasn't just a blip on the radar. This is Markstrom's 4th year in Calgary, in Year 1, he was the team MVP for 2/3 of the season, the middle 1/3 he struggled after returning from a concussion. Year 2, Vezina runner up. Year 3, he sucked, but it was also when his wife was pregnant and had their first kid. For anyone in that situation they don't have 100% focus, for a goaltender if you aren't completely focused you look terrible. This year? He's our MVP again. Even with a full ****ty season Markstrom has been out MVP for most of his time here.


"our 34 year old will never fall off" said every fanbase ever right before he falls off
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll