SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is Jeff Skinner unmovable

Created by: Brain
Team: 2024-25 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 9, 2024
Published: Feb. 29, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Last year, Skinner-Thompson-Tuch was a top line combo, but this year, Tage has struggled and has been injured (likely still is), and both Tuch and Skinner are well under a PPG.

If there ever was a time to shop Skinner, it was last year coming off a PPG season, but he has the full NMC. With Dahlin and Power's extensions kicking in next year, and Peterka/Quinn/Levi coming up soon, Sabres would definitely like to free up as much money as possible, even though Skinners value is extremely low generally, let alone right now. Is there any team in the NHL that might want to acquire him, or is he unmovable (and assuming he would approve)?

The qualifications for a team trying to acquire him would be in need of a top 6 LW, playoff bound if not cup contender, and has the cap to fit 7-9 M. The Erik Karlsson deal had 1.5M retained by the sharks for approx 4 years, so Sabres would probably have to retain at least that, if not more, as Karlsson was coming off a Norris and 100 points and Skinner having a down year.

Teams that COULD potentially fit this bill: Colorado, Boston, New Jersey, and then outside chances of Blues and Kraken as fringe playoff teams, but Kraken have so many guys with M-NTC it's actually impressive. EDM and WPG were considered, but doubtful Skinner waives to go to a Canadian market.

Fans of these teams, would Skinner interest you at all if Sabres retained and added some other pieces?
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Skinner, Jeff
3$9,000,000
Skinner, Jeff
3$9,000,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Byram, Bowen
  2. Girard, Samuel
  3. Johansen, Ryan
Additional Details:
Colorado gets their 2C and has a top 6 of Mackinnon, Rantanen, Lehkohen, Mitts, Skinner, and Nichushkin, assuming Landeskog is done for career.

This is the least likely to happen as Colorado has a tough cap situation, but is this a starting point Avs fans? Maybe a third party gets involved?
COL
  1. Skinner, Jeff ($1,500,000 retained)
  2. Mittelstadt, Casey [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
The lower retained hit is due to COL receiving a better player in Mittlestadt. The players coming back would either be bought out (Johansen) or potentially moved for other pieces, as there's a logjam at LHD.
2.
BUF
  1. Marino, John
Additional Details:
Skinner, Meier, Bratt, Palat, Hughes, Hischier as a top 6 and they get a goalie that appears to have blossomed this year and figured things out.

NJD has Hamilton, Nemec at RD and Hughes and Siegenthaler at LD. Marino is good and not "expendable", but Nemec likely takes over in the top 4 sooner rather than later. Marino's 8 team M-NTC kicks in this offseason.

Would love Mercer or Bastian to be added here, but again, is this framework a convo starter?
NJD
  1. Skinner, Jeff ($2,000,000 retained)
  2. Luukkonen, Ukko-Pekka [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Trading UPL clears the path once again for Levi to start. Same analysis as Carlo, Top 4 RHD at a good cost, frees cap.
3.
BUF
  1. Carlo, Brandon
Additional Details:
Could this be a conversation starter?

Top 6 of Marchand, pasta, Skinner, Krebs, Coyle, and then one more in FA, to let Poitras develop. A third line with any combo of Zacha, Frederc, Geekie, Heinen, JVR seems very deep.

He does have a M-NTC of 10 teams, so my guess is the western conference Canadian teams, Winnipeg, Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary, the US bottom feeders (From last year) of Arizona, San Jose, Anaheim, Columbus, Chicago, and maybe Philly. Likely doesn't have to put OTT,MTL, or TOR on there as BOS likely wouldn't trade in division with them. IT does hurt D depth but Mcavoy and Lindholm as 1 and 2, might be able to part with Carlo.
BOS
  1. Krebs, Peyton [RFA Rights]
  2. Skinner, Jeff ($2,000,000 retained)
Retained Salary Transactions
  • Jeff Skinner: $1,500,000 (16.67%)
  • Jeff Skinner: $2,000,000 (22.22%)
  • Jeff Skinner: $2,000,000 (22.22%)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2025
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NSH
2026
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
17$87,500,000$80,331,070$0$2,500,000$7,168,930
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,142,857$7,142,857
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$855,833$855,833
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,100,000$7,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$11,000,000$11,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$8,350,000$8,350,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,333,333$3,333,333
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,285,714$4,285,714
LD
UFA - 6
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,850,000$3,850,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 29 at 12:43 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,038
Likes: 14,660
There is no reason to do this
BUFF742 liked this.
Feb. 29 at 12:44 p.m.
#2
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,542
Likes: 3,342
Devils would consider that imo
Feb. 29 at 12:46 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 28,038
Likes: 14,660
Quoting: dgibb10
Devils would consider that imo


Lol, of course you would.

You get a starting goalie and a top 6 forward with retention
Feb. 29 at 12:48 p.m.
#4
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,542
Likes: 3,342
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Lol, of course you would.

You get a starting goalie and a top 6 forward with retention


Depends on what UPLs contract looks like.

I’m not sure I view Skinner at 7 mill for the next 3 years as a positive at ages 32, 33, 34.

So then it’s if UPL on his contract will provide more value than Marino.
Feb. 29 at 12:49 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 26
Likes: 15
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
There is no reason to do this


The guy is about to hit 1000 games and has never made the playoffs. At what point do you do what's best for you as a player?
Feb. 29 at 12:54 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 26
Likes: 15
Quoting: dgibb10
Depends on what UPLs contract looks like.

I’m not sure I view Skinner at 7 mill for the next 3 years as a positive at ages 32, 33, 34.

So then it’s if UPL on his contract will provide more value than Marino.


My guess is around a Samsonov/Vanecek type of ~3.5 to 3.8M AAV. Send Vanacek back to Buffalo to pair with Levi for a year for a big cost is also an option.
Feb. 29 at 12:55 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 645
Col does not do that imo
Feb. 29 at 12:56 p.m.
#8
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,542
Likes: 3,342
Quoting: Brain
My guess is around a Samsonov/Vanecek type of ~3.5 to 3.8M AAV. Send Vanacek back to Buffalo to pair with Levi for a year for a big cost is also an option.


How many years? 3?
Feb. 29 at 12:56 p.m.
#9
Go-sabres
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 443
Likes: 267
Edited Feb. 29 at 1:02 p.m.
First he has ntc. Second hes 9 mil 3 more years. Unmovable. Third he's a Buffalo icon and great guy in dressing room so no
The only player in your list worthwhile is untouchable Carlo who's very unicorn like unavailable
So answer yes unlovable but loved
AntiAnalytics liked this.
Feb. 29 at 1:01 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 3,467
Avs probably have zero interest in Skinner unless the deal is too good to be true.

Landeskog is on track to return, but even in the worst case scenario where he can't, an expensive winger isn't going to be atop their wish list. No offense to the player. Colorado is just not the right fit.
Feb. 29 at 1:03 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 26
Likes: 15
Quoting: BUFF742
First he has ntc. Second hes 9 mil 3 more years. Unmovable. Third he's a Buffalo icon and great guy in dressing room so no
The only player in your list worthwhile is untouchable Carlo who's very unicorn like unavailable


First, Yes,, he does have a full NMC, but again, the guy might want to actually play a playoff game or have a chance to win. Hence why I focused on teams that are playoff teams/cup contenders or teams that should be in the playoffs.

Second, He's 9M for 3 more years, unless we retain. Erik Karlsson at 4 more years at 11.5 was also "unmovable". Bringing down Skinner's hit a couple million to be more reasonable number for his skills could make him more appealing to other teams.

Third, "Buffalo icon" that has been on the team for half of the team's playoff drought. Ryan Reaves is a great dressing room guy too, I bet Toronto is glad they signed him for 3 years at over 1.25M to be a dressing room guy.
Feb. 29 at 1:05 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 26
Likes: 15
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
Avs probably have zero interest in Skinner unless the deal is too good to be true.

Landeskog is on track to return, but even in the worst case scenario where he can't, an expensive winger isn't going to be atop their wish list. No offense to the player. Colorado is just not the right fit.


I hadn't seen anything on him returning so assumed he wasn't tracking back. It's def the least likely scenario, but didn't know if getting a 2C might have them reconsider.
Anus_McLeod liked this.
Feb. 29 at 1:06 p.m.
#13
Go-sabres
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 443
Likes: 267
Quoting: Brain
First, Yes,, he does have a full NMC, but again, the guy might want to actually play a playoff game or have a chance to win. Hence why I focused on teams that are playoff teams/cup contenders or teams that should be in the playoffs.

Second, He's 9M for 3 more years, unless we retain. Erik Karlsson at 4 more years at 11.5 was also "unmovable". Bringing down Skinner's hit a couple million to be more reasonable number for his skills could make him more appealing to other teams.
But yeah hos 9 million would sure make it easier to get Ep40

Third, "Buffalo icon" that has been on the team for half of the team's playoff drought. Ryan Reaves is a great dressing room guy too, I bet Toronto is glad they signed him for 3 years at over 1.25M to be a dressing room guy.


Ok but pretty sure he's not waiving. I totally see your point but don't think he wants or cares about playoffs but he'll see them next year. I promise
His 9 million would sure help to grab EP40 so I see your point
Feb. 29 at 1:07 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,890
Likes: 8,879
Edited Feb. 29 at 1:13 p.m.
Umm, no. Not even a thought. No,

Comical for you to think Krebs cracks Boston top 6 when he’d struggle to find 4th line time here. Everyone you mentioned for possible 3rd line is better than Krebs, significantly better.

They can add a top 6 FW through free agency and keep Carlo.
Feb. 29 at 1:08 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 3,467
Quoting: Brain
I hadn't seen anything on him returning so assumed he wasn't tracking back. It's def the least likely scenario, but didn't know if getting a 2C might have them reconsider.


They would definitely be interested in Mittelstadt if there was a deal without Skinner that made sense for both team, but I don't personally see one.
TJTwolf and sabres89 liked this.
Feb. 29 at 1:08 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 26
Likes: 15
Quoting: dgibb10
How many years? 3?


I think he has 2 years left at RFA, so at least 2, maybe 3 or more.
Feb. 29 at 1:33 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,711
Likes: 4,626
Aside from the value in the Avs trade which is diabolical for the Avs and decimates the D corps, it isn't a good fit for BUF and there's no way Skinner to the Avs really makes any sense. They can neither afford him even with retention, nor extend Mitts. So with regards to moving him to Colorado he's about as unmovable as it gets. I'm sure there may be other eminently suitable destinations though.
Feb. 29 at 1:38 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,378
Likes: 6,321
Quoting: Brain
The guy is about to hit 1000 games and has never made the playoffs. At what point do you do what's best for you as a player?


I mean I don't care at all about him as a player. The reason you move him is because he's played 1000 games and never made the playoffs.
Feb. 29 at 1:38 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 490
Likes: 531
Quoting: Brain
I hadn't seen anything on him returning so assumed he wasn't tracking back. It's def the least likely scenario, but didn't know if getting a 2C might have them reconsider.


https://coloradohockeynow.com/2024/02/17/video-gabriel-landeskog-moving-better-than-youd-expect-avalanche/
TJTwolf and Anus_McLeod liked this.
Feb. 29 at 2:40 p.m.
#20
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 3,816
Quoting: Brain
The guy is about to hit 1000 games and has never made the playoffs. At what point do you do what's best for you as a player?


Sabres are NOT going to trade Skinner
The End


If at some point he asks out- THEN MAYBE- we’d take a look & see what we could do
But these trade ideas you have for now just aren’t gonna happen
Best to just accept that & realize Skinner will be here
Feb. 29 at 2:44 p.m.
#21
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 3,816
Quoting: Brain
My guess is around a Samsonov/Vanecek type of ~3.5 to 3.8M AAV. Send Vanacek back to Buffalo to pair with Levi for a year for a big cost is also an option.


ZERO CHANCE we are trading UPL
Levi gets the job when he takes it away from UPL- just like when Miller took the job from Biron back in the day
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll