SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fixing Ottawa Maybe Idk anymore

Created by: Celtic
Team: 2024-25 Ottawa Senators
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 10, 2024
Published: Mar. 10, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Only trade for Ullmark if he’s at least open to the idea of an extension.

If you’re wondering how Norris would work if he comes back, BIG if he comes back during the season. You’d likely have to trade Joseph and Peeke , and run no scratches. Until then though we can’t wait for him to be healthy again.

Also hard to buy out Korpisalo cause of his term. But that could be possible as well, but my guess is they keep him.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$4,000,000
2$900,000
1$850,000
2$875,000
1$925,000
1$2,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$8,000,000
1$1,500,000
1$3,000,000
1$1,250,000
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Batherson, Drake
  2. Chychrun, Jakob
  3. Forsberg, Anton ($1,325,000 retained)
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (OTT)
  5. 2025 3rd round pick (FLA)
Additional Details:
3rd party retain for Forsberg, give them a 4th rounder
2.
CHI
  1. Boucher, Tyler
  2. Brännström, Erik
  3. Thomson, Lassi [RFA Rights]
  4. 2024 4th round pick (TBL)
  5. 2025 3rd round pick (OTT)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the DET
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
2025
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
2026
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the OTT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,500,000$87,525,714$850,000$0-$25,714
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,205,714$8,205,714
LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,350,000$8,350,000
C
UFA - 7
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$2,950,000$2,950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$900,000$900,000
LW
RFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$875,000$875,000
LW
RFA
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$835,000$835,000
C, RW
RFA - 1
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,050,000$8,050,000
LD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$8,000,000$8,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,600,000$4,600,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$805,000$805,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$7,950,000$7,950,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 10 at 8:23 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 7,144
Likes: 3,507
That's a massive overpayment for Ullmark. Take out Batherson and its fair.
csick liked this.
Mar. 10 at 8:27 p.m.
#2
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,249
Likes: 24,096
Too much
Mar. 10 at 8:38 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,832
Likes: 8,854
Ullmark. NTC
Mar. 10 at 9:02 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,724
Likes: 10,584
Hawks easily decline. 5 pieces and the Hawks don't want any of them.
LivingAnew, Snowhawk18, Garak and 1 other person liked this.
Mar. 10 at 10:03 p.m.
#5
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 3,430
Ahh yes, the standard quantity over quality proposal… Hawks decline.
Garak, PaulKorea and Hawksguy81 liked this.
Mar. 10 at 10:14 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,663
Likes: 5,833
What a crazy way to look at player values. Ullmark wouldn't fetch half that and there's not a single part of that Murphy trade chicago would actually want.
Garak, PaulKorea, Hawksguy81 and 1 other person liked this.
Mar. 10 at 11:17 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 100
Likes: 12
Quoting: Gofnut999
Ullmark. NTC


He’s got a modified NTC
Mar. 11 at 2:01 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,832
Likes: 8,854
Quoting: Celtic
He’s got a modified NTC


And Ottawa is on it🤷🏻‍♂️
Mar. 11 at 12:43 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 10,506
Likes: 3,721
lol that Batherson trade is horrendous. I know Sens goaltending has been the worst in the league this season but giving a top line forward and #2-3 D-man (both 25 y/o) to get a goalie with 1 year left is C.R.A.Z.Y.

Quoting: Hawksguy81
Hawks easily decline. 5 pieces and the Hawks don't want any of them.

Don't think Murphy has that much value left. Brannstrom has very sexy advanced stats and makes less, cost controlled and younger. Very versatile too

Quoting: SociallyHawkward
What a crazy way to look at player values. Ullmark wouldn't fetch half that and there's not a single part of that Murphy trade chicago would actually want.

What is Murphy value you think?
Mar. 11 at 1:14 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,663
Likes: 5,833
Quoting: Xspyrit
lol that Batherson trade is horrendous. I know Sens goaltending has been the worst in the league this season but giving a top line forward and #2-3 D-man (both 25 y/o) to get a goalie with 1 year left is C.R.A.Z.Y.


Don't think Murphy has that much value left. Brannstrom has very sexy advanced stats and makes less, cost controlled and younger. Very versatile too


What is Murphy value you think?


Murphy is a perfect top pair defenseman for any team that has a stud offensive LD. His numbers are ugly on the hawks cus everyone's numbers are ugly on the hawks. The team is bad by design. To other teams I think his value is probably a late 1st. For the hawks to actually consider moving him they'd probably want a 1st and a solid RD prospect. He's a leader for the young defenseman on the hawks so for them to give that up they would need an overpay. Now if he requested a trade that price would obviously come down but he seems pretty happy in chicago.

Also brannstrom is a lefty which is the deepest position chicago has.
Hawksguy81 and Xspyrit liked this.
Mar. 11 at 2:23 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 8,724
Likes: 10,584
Quoting: Xspyrit
Don't think Murphy has that much value left. Brannstrom has very sexy advanced stats and makes less, cost controlled and younger. Very versatile too


What is Murphy value you think?


Hawks likely don't consider trading Murphy for anything less than a 1st or an equivalent high end prospect. Hawks have been awful (by design) for the past two years. Murphy had no shot at putting up any sort of good stats. He has played most of this season w/ Korchinski, and it appears GM Kyle from Chicago and Coach Luke want that same pair together next season as well.

No hate meant for Branny, but the Hawks aren't looking for any more LD. They're loaded at LD. They've already moved former 1st rounder Nolan Allen over to his off side on the right so he has a path to the NHL.

That proposed package from Ottawa has a lot of pieces but nothing that would be very interesting from the Hawks perspective.
Snowhawk18 and Xspyrit liked this.
Mar. 12 at 11:09 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 10,506
Likes: 3,721
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
Murphy is a perfect top pair defenseman for any team that has a stud offensive LD. His numbers are ugly on the hawks cus everyone's numbers are ugly on the hawks. The team is bad by design. To other teams I think his value is probably a late 1st. For the hawks to actually consider moving him they'd probably want a 1st and a solid RD prospect. He's a leader for the young defenseman on the hawks so for them to give that up they would need an overpay. Now if he requested a trade that price would obviously come down but he seems pretty happy in chicago.

Also brannstrom is a lefty which is the deepest position chicago has.

Quoting: Hawksguy81
Hawks likely don't consider trading Murphy for anything less than a 1st or an equivalent high end prospect. Hawks have been awful (by design) for the past two years. Murphy had no shot at putting up any sort of good stats. He has played most of this season w/ Korchinski, and it appears GM Kyle from Chicago and Coach Luke want that same pair together next season as well.

No hate meant for Branny, but the Hawks aren't looking for any more LD. They're loaded at LD. They've already moved former 1st rounder Nolan Allen over to his off side on the right so he has a path to the NHL.

That proposed package from Ottawa has a lot of pieces but nothing that would be very interesting from the Hawks perspective.

I'll respond to both quotes since it's the same subject. Note that I am not trying to argue about Chicago needs as I don't know enough about them, simply trying to gauge value. But thanks for the input, I understand it makes no sense to trade a solid veteran for quantity of pieces you don't really need.

Regarding value, Boucher is worth about a 4th (value keeps going down), Thomson a 7th at most (lost pretty much all his value this season), but Brännström is worth a 2nd/3rd even if I would not trade him like that at all. I would trade Chychrun, keep Brannstrom and invest in a RHD. LD is strong as it is with Chabot, Sanderson, Brannstrom and Kleven. Good thing about Brann is he can play basically everywhere in the lineup outside of Center and Goalie. He played 1 game on the 4th line wing and that was the best game from a Sens 4th line in basically the whole rebuild. When Chabot/Sanderson is injured, he gets more ice/responsibility and does really well. He constantly flashes skill and plays smart 2-way hockey. Of course, he can't handle big forwards abut he's quick and smart. His biggest problem I'd say is that he isn't able to create enough offense with his shot.

So at worst you got two 3rd round picks and two 4th round picks. Hard to find exact comparable trade but I see Brenden Dillon traded in 2021 for two 2nd round picks. I think Brannstrom, Boucher and the picks is a bit more valuable.

But yeah, not the type of trade the Hawks would want/need to make. Sell Murphy for the best quality asset possible or just keep him for now.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll