SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Moving up at the draft

Created by: KentMcNally
Team: 2023-24 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 2, 2024
Published: Apr. 2, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
If things remained as they are now and Montreal holds the #23 pick and New Jersey holds the #11 pick would New Jersey be willing to trade that pick to Montreal?

The Devils thought that they could be very good this year and that fell apart due to goaltending and defence, but perhaps they are close to competing and not overly interested in waiting for that #11 pick to be a key contributor in 3 or 4 years if they are in a win now mode.

Do Devil fans consider Palat a cap dump (he kind of looks like one to me, given his salary and his production, but I have not watched him much this year)?

If the trade package is not right, how should it be changed (by either team)?
Trades
MTL
  1. Palat, Ondrej
  2. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Farrell, Sean
  2. Matheson, Michael
  3. 2024 1st round pick (WPG)
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (MTL)
  5. 2025 2nd round pick (PIT)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$76,935,416$1,170,000$4,035,000$6,564,584
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$835,000$835,000 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LW, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$775,000$775,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$775,000$775,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$890,000$890,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$828,333$828,333
LD/RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 2 at 10:20 a.m.
#1
ht42
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 705
Devils will likely gonna trade their 1st round pick for a top goalie like Markstrom.
MoxNix liked this.
Apr. 2 at 10:29 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Fall River Habs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 886
Likes: 336
Quoting: ht42
Devils will likely gonna trade their 1st round pick for a top goalie like Markstrom.


I could see that happening. Although, it is rare for such a high pick to be traded for a goalie, but maybe Calgary and New Jersey work out some other details in a larger trade scenario.
Apr. 2 at 10:37 a.m.
#3
ht42
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 705
Quoting: KentMcNally
I could see that happening. Although, it is rare for such a high pick to be traded for a goalie, but maybe Calgary and New Jersey work out some other details in a larger trade scenario.


It's a ideal scenario for CGY because they will likely gonna want to draft Iginla.
MoxNix liked this.
Apr. 2 at 10:48 a.m.
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Both Devils and Palat say hell no.
MoxNix liked this.
Apr. 2 at 10:51 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 2,282
First, no way Palat waives for MTL. Second, why would the Devils be going after quantity over quality? Third, which was addressed in other posts, I can not see the Devils trading a top 15 pick for two years of Markstrom. It is not as if the market is that hot for him that other teams would be offering anything close to that ballpark. Markstrom probably goes for a conditional 2nd at best becoming a 1st if a team reaches the conference finals.
Apr. 2 at 11:14 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,557
Likes: 6,455
So last year it cost the Coyotes 27th + 2 2nd round picks for the 11th OVA pick but the Habs are gonna trade 2 1sts + 3 2nds for a winger we don't want or need and the same pick?! Hughes and company don't even consider this, take out Matheson, Farrell and Palat and that's the deal

Alternatively, Matheson for the Devils 1st + 2nd works too
Apr. 2 at 12:05 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6,877
Likes: 1,993
Quoting: NJDevils1317
First, no way Palat waives for MTL. Second, why would the Devils be going after quantity over quality? Third, which was addressed in other posts, I can not see the Devils trading a top 15 pick for two years of Markstrom. It is not as if the market is that hot for him that other teams would be offering anything close to that ballpark. Markstrom probably goes for a conditional 2nd at best becoming a 1st if a team reaches the conference finals.


Right now its a 11 OA pick, that is a lottery pick. So first off thats not going for JM. Next as noted a top 15 is worth more than JM. B's fans are offering Ullmark for a 2025 1st +. Thats a better option than Markey. We need a starter for sure, but the pressure to get in now is off, the prices wont be what they were for a guy like JM, if they are Jersey shouldn't pay them. I still think Fitz wanted him because of the extra yr to let our young guy get reps and see what we have. Allen changes that dynamic now so JM less of an option. Allen will backup New G next yr and Daws/Schmid (if he wants too stay)/Poultier/Brennan etc will be the following years backup IMO
Apr. 2 at 1:14 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,624
Likes: 797
Quoting: Campabee
So last year it cost the Coyotes 27th + 2 2nd round picks for the 11th OVA pick but the Habs are gonna trade 2 1sts + 3 2nds for a winger we don't want or need and the same pick?! Hughes and company don't even consider this, take out Matheson, Farrell and Palat and that's the deal

Alternatively, Matheson for the Devils 1st + 2nd works too


Matheson alone is worth a first and palat has negative value, this deal makes no sense whatsoever for MTL.
Apr. 2 at 1:29 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 2,282
Quoting: Smitty426
Right now its a 11 OA pick, that is a lottery pick. So first off thats not going for JM. Next as noted a top 15 is worth more than JM. B's fans are offering Ullmark for a 2025 1st +. Thats a better option than Markey. We need a starter for sure, but the pressure to get in now is off, the prices wont be what they were for a guy like JM, if they are Jersey shouldn't pay them. I still think Fitz wanted him because of the extra yr to let our young guy get reps and see what we have. Allen changes that dynamic now so JM less of an option. Allen will backup New G next yr and Daws/Schmid (if he wants too stay)/Poultier/Brennan etc will be the following years backup IMO


You understand I didn't mean this year right as it isn't as if we can still offer a conditional 2nd now, it would have to be 2025, and I'm not even saying it is NJ doing it.
Smitty426 liked this.
Apr. 2 at 1:29 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 2,282
Quoting: habs_need_Scoring
Matheson alone is worth a first and palat has negative value, this deal makes no sense whatsoever for MTL.


Matheson is not worth a top 15 pick.
Apr. 2 at 1:30 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,557
Likes: 6,455
Quoting: habs_need_Scoring
Matheson alone is worth a first and palat has negative value, this deal makes no sense whatsoever for MTL.


What?! I literally said to take out Matheson, Palat and Farrell or make the deal just Matheson for the Devils 2024 1st + a 2nd, you are just repeating what I said
Apr. 2 at 1:33 p.m.
#12
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,035
Likes: 3,189
Quoting: Campabee
What?! I literally said to take out Matheson, Palat and Farrell or make the deal just Matheson for the Devils 2024 1st + a 2nd, you are just repeating what I said


Wrong dman for that package. Try Kaiden Guhle if your ask is NJD 24 1st+2nd
Smitty426 liked this.
Apr. 2 at 2:22 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 6,877
Likes: 1,993
Quoting: NJDevils1317
You understand I didn't mean this year right as it isn't as if we can still offer a conditional 2nd now, it would have to be 2025, and I'm not even saying it is NJ doing it.


Yes definitely I was just stated for those who might be asking. And I dint state it properly but yes I agree with you on value, sorry bout dat.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll