SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

24-25 Sharks

Created by: redboi
Team: 2024-25 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 17, 2024
Published: Apr. 17, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR Enabled: Yes
Season Days: 192
Days Remaining: 192
Season Remaining: 100%
Projected Cap Hit Prior To Days Remaining Tooltip : $52,095,833
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,500,000
2$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
3$950,000
2$2,375,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
2$800,000
2$780,000
3$6,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Smith, Will
3$950,000
Celebrini, Macklin
3$950,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. 2024 1st round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. Benning, Matthew
  2. Granlund, Mikael
  3. 2025 4th round pick (WPG)
2.
SJS
  1. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (WPG)
NJD
  1. 2024 1st round pick (PIT)
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (NJD)
3.
SJS
  1. Schmidt, Nate
  2. 2026 1st round pick (WPG)
WPG
4.
SJS
  1. 2024 6th round pick (FLA)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$87,000,000$67,235,000$0$1,307,500$19,765,000
Prorated Cap Hit

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 2
Celebrini, Macklin
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
C, LW
RFA
Smith, Will
$950,000$950,000
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,375,000$2,375,000
RW, C
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LW
RFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,350,000$2,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
RFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Apr. 17 at 6:31 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 15,842
Likes: 7,048
Winnipeg definitely won't move Schmidt if it costs a 1st. They'll just buy him out if need be.
RationalHockeyFan, MisstheWhalers, Jets12Kozy and 1 other person liked this.
Apr. 17 at 6:46 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 614
Likes: 275
Can't see the devils moving back the pick is either traded or used on a LD or forward that falls
Apr. 17 at 7:11 p.m.
#3
sharks88
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 351
Likes: 175
Can't see leafs doing that even though the value might be around that - 5m on Granlund isn't where their focus would be, although a cheap, cost controlled 6D like Benning could be of interest.

Could see fair dump value for Schmidt being attaching a 3rd and mayyyybe another later one like a 6/7 and the Sharks would accept.
Apr. 17 at 7:13 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,234
Likes: 4,670
Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg definitely won't move Schmidt if it costs a 1st. They'll just buy him out if need be.


Yea maybe a 1st if there is a solid piece going back. But I have to agree here.
Windjammer and Mr_Canoehead liked this.
Apr. 17 at 7:14 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,234
Likes: 4,670
Quoting: Schuyler
Can't see the devils moving back the pick is either traded or used on a LD or forward that falls

And I don’t think this is a smart move for the sharks either!
Schuyler liked this.
Apr. 17 at 7:15 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,234
Likes: 4,670
Quoting: sharksdoee
Can't see leafs doing that even though the value might be around that - 5m on Granlund isn't where their focus would be, although a cheap, cost controlled 6D like Benning could be of interest.

Could see fair dump value for Schmidt being attaching a 3rd and mayyyybe another later one like a 6/7 and the Sharks would accept.


I was thinking the same thing right value, wrong team!
But to be honest having Granlund as a vet presence would be a good option to have around! Maybe a TDL type move though
Apr. 17 at 7:32 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 614
Likes: 275
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
And I don’t think this is a smart move for the sharks either!


Ya probably not they should just fire as many top 2 round picks as they can for the next few years
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Apr. 17 at 7:45 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 83
Likes: 31
We are not giving up a 1st for spare parts.
Apr. 17 at 7:59 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
redboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 6
Likes: 2
Quoting: sharksdoee
Can't see leafs doing that even though the value might be around that - 5m on Granlund isn't where their focus would be, although a cheap, cost controlled 6D like Benning could be of interest.


I’m new to CapFriendly, so didn’t know how to do this (if you even can), but I executed trade with the thought in mind that a third team would help retain 50% of Granlund’s contract and only have a 2.5 million cap hit for the leafs.
Apr. 17 at 8:09 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
redboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 6
Likes: 2
Quoting: DeclanLovesHockey
We are not giving up a 1st for spare parts.


Far from spare parts, Leafs have parted with their first for way worse in past (albeit at the deadline)
Apr. 17 at 8:13 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
redboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 6
Likes: 2
Edited Apr. 17 at 8:26 p.m.
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
And I don’t think this is a smart move for the sharks either!


My process on this was kind of a draft day situational type trade, theoretically, one of the top 6 dmen are still on the board and they jump the Sabres (who would be drafting the last of the 6) to land a top dman after snagging a forward with celebrini at 1. The devils are already stacked with talent and can see them wanting to move down and get their early 2nd back.

The sharks obviously already own their 2nd, but I can also see the sharks not wanting to part ways with either 2nd and limiting their darts thrown
Rob32sjsharks liked this.
Apr. 17 at 8:16 p.m.
#12
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,928
Likes: 2,577
Quoting: Schuyler
Can't see the devils moving back the pick is either traded or used on a LD or forward that falls


No reason to use a pick on an LD specifically, defensemen take forever to develop. My order of preference:
1. Demidov
2. Catton
3. trade for Swayman
4. trade for Saros
5. MBN or Iginla
6. trade back
7. other
Apr. 17 at 8:18 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
redboi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2024
Posts: 6
Likes: 2
Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg definitely won't move Schmidt if it costs a 1st. They'll just buy him out if need be.

Fair. My thought process: The Jets could be looking to resign a bunch of their acquired UFAs as well (Monahan, Toffolli) or even another top UFA with that money. I thought we could get a first looking at the Monahan trade, trade away a piece that’s a negative asset at 6 million dollars for a 1st two years (that could have conditions) down the line. Probably a bit unrealistic tho looking back.
Mr_Canoehead liked this.
Apr. 17 at 8:40 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,117
Likes: 2,294
Quoting: redboi
Fair. My thought process: The Jets could be looking to resign a bunch of their acquired UFAs as well (Monahan, Toffolli) or even another top UFA with that money. I thought we could get a first looking at the Monahan trade, trade away a piece that’s a negative asset at 6 million dollars for a 1st two years (that could have conditions) down the line. Probably a bit unrealistic tho looking back.


The way I look at it is that Schmidt has a value of -$1.1 million ($4.9 millon market value minus $6 million contract [The Athletic calcs]). Compensation for eating $1.1 million for one year would be the #68 overall pick according to PuckPedia's calculator.

I could see them trying to sign Monahan but Toffoli is probably too expensive in terms of dollars and term.
redboi liked this.
Apr. 17 at 8:57 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 614
Likes: 275
Quoting: pretzelcoatl
No reason to use a pick on an LD specifically, defensemen take forever to develop. My order of preference:
1. Demidov
2. Catton
3. trade for Swayman
4. trade for Saros
5. MBN or Iginla
6. trade back
7. other


I would be surprised if Demidov or Catton make it to 10 and I'd rather them take any one of Buium Dickinson Silayev Eiserman Yakemchuk or Parekh then Nygard or Iginla this is a pick where the devils can swing for a homerun instead of take a safe player. I'd like a swayman or saros trade with it though
Apr. 17 at 9:03 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,234
Likes: 4,670
Quoting: redboi
My process on this was kind of a draft day situational type trade, theoretically, one of the top 6 dmen are still on the board and they jump the Sabres (who would be drafting the last of the 6) to land a top dman after snagging a forward with celebrini at 1. The devils are already stacked with talent and can see them wanting to move down and get their early 2nd back.

The sharks obviously already own their 2nd, but I can also see the sharks not wanting to part ways with either 2nd and limiting their darts thrown


If Yakemchuk or Parekh are there at 10 this makes a ton of sense! Thanks for your insight.
redboi liked this.
Apr. 17 at 10:24 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2023
Posts: 83
Likes: 31
Quoting: redboi
Far from spare parts, Leafs have parted with their first for way worse in past (albeit at the deadline)


Two wrongs don't make a right lol
Apr. 18 at 3:59 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 323
Likes: 182
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
And I don’t think this is a smart move for the sharks either!


Purely looking at value, pick 14 would be 5.1 GSVA, pick 13 (if the Wild grab at least a point in their game) would be 5.3 GSVA, pick 10 is 6.0 GSVA, and pick 42 is 2.0 GSVA. The third rounder will be 0.5 or 0.6 GSVA. The Sharks would be giving up 7.1 to 7.3 GSVA for 6.5 or 6.6 GSVA. I looked through 18 trades where teams traded up in the 1st round and the team moving up typically paid around 10-20% extra as a sweetener. If they weren't sending back the 3rd and we were trading pick 14 it'd be a 18.33% sweetener, with the 3rd and 0.5 it's 9.23%, 3rd and 0.6 it's 7.58%. Pick 13 without the 3rd is 20%, with the 3rd at 0.5 it's 12.31%, with the 3rd at 0.6 it's 10.61%.

I suspect if the trade were to happen we wouldn't be getting the 3rd back but it really depends on how willing to move NJD is and how much we want the pick. (For reference when the Sharks traded back a few years back it was a 31.58% sweetener).
redboi liked this.
Apr. 18 at 10:26 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,234
Likes: 4,670
Quoting: jamnjon
Purely looking at value, pick 14 would be 5.1 GSVA, pick 13 (if the Wild grab at least a point in their game) would be 5.3 GSVA, pick 10 is 6.0 GSVA, and pick 42 is 2.0 GSVA. The third rounder will be 0.5 or 0.6 GSVA. The Sharks would be giving up 7.1 to 7.3 GSVA for 6.5 or 6.6 GSVA. I looked through 18 trades where teams traded up in the 1st round and the team moving up typically paid around 10-20% extra as a sweetener. If they weren't sending back the 3rd and we were trading pick 14 it'd be a 18.33% sweetener, with the 3rd and 0.5 it's 9.23%, 3rd and 0.6 it's 7.58%. Pick 13 without the 3rd is 20%, with the 3rd at 0.5 it's 12.31%, with the 3rd at 0.6 it's 10.61%.

I suspect if the trade were to happen we wouldn't be getting the 3rd back but it really depends on how willing to move NJD is and how much we want the pick. (For reference when the Sharks traded back a few years back it was a 31.58% sweetener).


Think if the sharks trade up it will be to jump ahead of a team in need of a RD to grab Parekh or Yakemchuk. And sharks would likely be willing to move their first and NJD or their own 2nd as a sweetener. But we will see!
redboi liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll