SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Team is Clearly Fine

Created by: PuckLuck_77
Team: 2019-20 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: May 15, 2019
Published: May 15, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Who needs to re-sign players like Thornton or Meier or Karlsson, Sharks have 3 other great players coming up. You could even say they're helping the team now! They don't even need to pay them against the cap, either!
Free Agent Signings
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
NHL Refs, Vegas 5Min Major
1$800,000
NHL Refs, Colorado Offsides
1$800,000
NHL Refs, St Louis Hand Pass
1$800,000
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2020
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the OTT
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$83,000,000$58,827,417$660,750$212,500$24,172,583
Left WingCentreRight Wing
NHL Refs, Vegas 5Min Major
$800,000$800,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
NHL Refs, Colorado Offsides
$800,000$800,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,635,000$1,635,000
LD
UFA - 1
NHL Refs, St Louis Hand Pass
$800,000$800,000
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$735,000$735,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,800,000$3,800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$675,000$675,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$675,000$675,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 15, 2019 at 11:21 p.m.
#1
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
Hahaha the Sharks can’t win 1 round without a controversial call
PuckLuck_77 liked this.
May 15, 2019 at 11:26 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 2,258
Quoting: klondikebar
Hahaha the Sharks can’t win 1 round without a controversial call


Bogus calls. Luckily for St. Louis this call didn't end their series. Lot of hockey left, and hopefully the Blues can bounce back and take this series.
May 15, 2019 at 11:27 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Yeah, you are fine. except that's the wrong team. You have 4 players. 1 Defender 1 Goalie and 2 Attackers Referee #1 Referee #2 Referee #3 Referee #4, and guess what you can thank them even tho your tax dollars is paying for the cup they could just steal your money and not agree to help you during the games. Hope you like the Referee Cup. San Jose Fans
May 15, 2019 at 11:30 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 2,258
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Yeah, you are fine. except that's the wrong team. You have 4 players. 1 Defender 1 Goalie and 2 Attackers Referee #1 Referee #2 Referee #3 Referee #4, and guess what you can thank them even tho your tax dollars is paying for the cup they could just steal your money and not agree to help you during the games. Hope you like the Referee Cup. San Jose Fans


I posted this because I'm absolutely disgusted by what the Sharks have gotten away with this year. I'm on your side, bud, and this team was entirely satirical. Definitely not a Sharks fan.
May 15, 2019 at 11:33 p.m.
#5
Cold spaghetti
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 2,134
???? this made me laugh so hard
May 15, 2019 at 11:40 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 903
Likes: 347
Not you sure why you are complaining about the Colorado offside. Landeskog was clearly offside, you would have to be blind to not see that.
May 15, 2019 at 11:43 p.m.
#7
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,679
Likes: 8,302
yeah I get it but I dont care what the call is you cant give up 4 shorthanded goals in 5 minutes
May 15, 2019 at 11:45 p.m.
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,049
Likes: 22,983
Just three referees on San Jose side won't be enough when the Sharks play the Bruins. League office on your team is worth a lot more than just three referees.
May 15, 2019 at 11:45 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: PuckLuck_77
I posted this because I'm absolutely disgusted by what the Sharks have gotten away with this year. I'm on your side, bud, and this team was entirely satirical. Definitely not a Sharks fan.


Talking to Sharks fans, not you....
May 15, 2019 at 11:46 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: BlueSeeker
Not you sure why you are complaining about the Colorado offside. Landeskog was clearly offside, you would have to be blind to not see that.


His skate was on the blueline which makes him onsides lol.
May 15, 2019 at 11:46 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 2,258
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Talking to Sharks fans, not you....


Gotcha. Your comment read like a pointed response to me after it's first sentence. I apologize if I misread it.
May 15, 2019 at 11:47 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: PuckLuck_77
Gotcha. Your comment read like a pointed response to me after it's first sentence. I apologize if I misread it.


Oh you're good.
May 15, 2019 at 11:49 p.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 353
NHL refs have done nothing but directly hand canes bruins and sharks games. It’s embarrassing.

That and they rigged the draft nhl is on fire.
May 15, 2019 at 11:50 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 903
Likes: 347
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
His skate was on the blueline which makes him onsides lol.


Just saw the replay again, it doesn't look like it was on the blueline, but it's really close. Also the refs don't decide whether or not the play is offside when the play is under review.
May 15, 2019 at 11:51 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,352
Likes: 2,738
Quoting: BlueSeeker
Just saw the replay again, it doesn't look like it was on the blueline, but it's really close. Also the refs don't decide whether or not the play is offside when the play is under review.


Even more reason to acknowledge that the League is rigged not just the referees.
May 15, 2019 at 11:54 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 2,258
Quoting: BlueSeeker
Just saw the replay again, it doesn't look like it was on the blueline, but it's really close. Also the refs don't decide whether or not the play is offside when the play is under review.


All I'll say is I never saw an angle with BOTH Landeskog and the puck that was DEFINITIVELY able to say that Landeskog was still in the zone at the same time as the puck, and therefore overturn the call made on the ice (which was good goal). But we don't have the same angles as Toronto, as the NHL is always fond of saying. Whether that's true or not.
May 16, 2019 at 12:27 a.m.
#17
BOLT LOVER
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 358
Creative post .. not sure about Colorado call but Vegas call and hand pass tonight were just plain clear errors by FOUR refs .. Columbus goal off netting against Bruins to me takes the cake on bad officiating
May 16, 2019 at 1:38 a.m.
#18
sjsharks82
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 208
Likes: 49
Why be mad at the sharks?

Mad at refs? Sure. Bad calls arent the sharks' fault. Pavs wasnt flopping. the offside was reviewed and decided by the league, no the sharks. hand passes happen all the time, and the refs are supposed to catch it.

I totally get the anger at the refs. I totally do not get anger at the sharks.

There is no bribery. no conspiracy. no backroom deals. Just some bad mistakes.

Still there was a head shot on bruan missed and a no doubt puck over glass missed. Refs missed a bunch.
May 16, 2019 at 5:41 a.m.
#19
BOLT LOVER
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 358
I think the point is . Without ref help .. the Sharks wouldn't be where they are tonight .. that unquestionably true .. but it is refs fault and what will cause major officiating changes next year.. why evert goal isnt reviewed is baffling to me .. like ever touchdown is in football. . #s about the same
May 16, 2019 at 12:48 p.m.
#20
sjsharks82
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 208
Likes: 49
Quoting: BOLTLOVER1
I think the point is . Without ref help .. the Sharks wouldn't be where they are tonight .. that unquestionably true .. but it is refs fault and what will cause major officiating changes next year.. why evert goal isnt reviewed is baffling to me .. like ever touchdown is in football. . #s about the same


I think that's likely true if you look only at the calls that went the sharks way and were wrong.

1. The big 5 minute major wrong call went the sharks way. In game 2, however, a goal was waived off and couture given a penalty on a goal that would have made it 4-3 sharks after falling behind 3-0 in the first. Instead, vegas scored on the PP: 2 goal swing and a horrific call. What happens in that series if the call is not made and the sharks win game 2?

2. Against colorado, the play was reviewed and called appropriately. It was offside. unfortunate that it was away from the play, but offside is offside. the refs didnt blow that call and neither did toronto. Just happens.

3. Last ngiht the refs missed 4 obvious penalties against the blues (1. a clear puck over glass, and then perron scores shortly after, 2. a head shot on Braun by Blais, 3. a nasty slash on haley's wrist., 4. Meier was tripped by bouwmeester seconds before the goal, which is why he was on his knees). What happens if the sharks get the four extra PP's they should have?

All the whining about the refs ignores calls that have gone the other way because the ones that went for the sharks happened at more visible moments. Perhaps if the sharks got the calls they should have in other occasions, then the game doesnt go to OT last night. Sharks win 5-3 in regulation and that's that. Against vegas, perhaps the sharks win game 2, go up 2-0 and win the series much earlier. Hell, even last night, perhaps the sharks win the game later in OT anyways (they had a grade chance chance by cooch shortly before). Its impossible to know what would have happened, but the sharks have gotten some key (wrong) calls and have been bitten badly by some too.
May 16, 2019 at 2:32 p.m.
#21
BOLT LOVER
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,120
Likes: 358
I think you should take off blinders and say nothing.
Trying to rationalize it is putrid .. Sharks only playing now due to calls ..but that OK sometimes life ain't fair and game is what it is .. NHL will change rules next year.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll