SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Will I Be Hated by this Fanbase

Created by: Wqrrior
Team: 2019-20 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 7, 2019
Published: Aug. 7, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,500,000
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Toffoli, Tyler ($1,300,000 retained)
LAK
  1. Hudon, Charles
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (MTL)
  3. 2020 4th round pick (ANA)
2.
MTL
    waivers
    Buyouts
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the CHI
    2021
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    2022
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$81,500,000$78,645,476$0$2,675,000$2,854,524
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $4,800,000$4,800,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,083,333$3,083,333
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,150,000$3,150,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $3,300,000$3,300,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $2,400,000$2,400,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $2,600,000$2,600,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $3,400,000$3,400,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,400,000$1,400,000
    C, RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    LD
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $7,857,143$7,857,143
    RD
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $10,500,000$10,500,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $925,000$925,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    RD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$175,000$175K)
    RD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    C
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 9:40 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 38,509
    Likes: 19,654
    why would LA do that?
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 9:41 p.m.
    #2
    Billy739
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 6,590
    Likes: 1,629
    pass on Gardiner
    he's 29 coming off an injury plagued season in which he declined 22 points from the previous season .
    even if he matches his career high again he's not worth more then 4-4.5m tops and only if its a buyout friendly contract with no signing or performance bonus's

    Mete at 21 going into his 3rd season is still the better option
    now if you signed Ben Hutton and wanted to play Mete in Laval to find his offensive game that would make sense
    Chariot and Hutton give us two high quality hitters/Shot blockers in the NHL on our blue line and Kulak there to help eat up minutes between them on Petry's line i'd say we're a better team

    Gardiner though isnt signed for a reason
    he hit his career high at 28 then declined hard but before that he was no prize and viewed by many including tons or irate Leafs fans as a Defensive Liability blaming him for their playoff loss to BOS .

    Huttons a better fit , a top 10 hitter in the league and only 26
    VAN didnt qualify him so we can just take him

    Chariot -Weber
    Kulak-Petry
    Hutton-Juulsen
    Folin

    now we got speed , skill , size , strength , and 5/7 will block shots or hit players every game regluarly .
    most of our new additions played smaller roles in other sytems but have shown potential for improvement still like Folin who's trained since May on his Skating in Finland or Chariot who's settled into MTL endearing himself to the fans with his basic French skill :P

    Hutton could be a guy like Benn who they bring in expecting him to match past success but instead he succeeds it
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 9:42 p.m.
    #3
    Log off the internet
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2017
    Posts: 7,834
    Likes: 3,867
    which one
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 9:46 p.m.
    #4
    Billy739
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 6,590
    Likes: 1,629
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    why would LA do that?


    same reason they gave away Pearson

    they tried holding out to get value and their prospect just got older and had bad seasons lowering their value
    4.8m cap for Paul Byron level Production makes Toffoli tough to get value on

    to me Pearson at his age and 1m less per year shoulda got more given
    they only got 7 more points out of an older Toffoli for that cap hit

    Hudon may have had a bad year but he's capable of 25-30 points for less then 1m
    Toffoli's making almost 5 m to retire in style on a team that seemed to have given up before Rob Blake took over .
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 9:49 p.m.
    #5
    Billy739
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 6,590
    Likes: 1,629
    Quoting: Hedman77
    which one


    Gardiner , we dont like Gardiner
    furthermore we're tired of hearing him linked to us
    MB wont pay a defensive liability with injury problems when we got Mete , Kulak or Chariot

    Claude plays a system where if you dont play well your benched whether your Pacioretty , Galchenyuk or Alzner
    so bringing Gardiner in makes the exact opposite of sense
    Frankyhabs liked this.
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 9:53 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 38,509
    Likes: 19,654
    Quoting: Billy739
    same reason they gave away Pearson

    they tried holding out to get value and their prospect just got older and had bad seasons lowering their value
    4.8m cap for Paul Byron level Production makes Toffoli tough to get value on

    to me Pearson at his age and 1m less per year shoulda got more given
    they only got 7 more points out of an older Toffoli for that cap hit

    Hudon may have had a bad year but he's capable of 25-30 points for less then 1m
    Toffoli's making almost 5 m to retire in style on a team that seemed to have given up before Rob Blake took over .


    Toffoli is WAY better than Pearson for 1 thing and if LA was having so much trouble getting value after their bad year why did Muzzin get the return he did? Toffoli is a 45+ point player, there should be no argument that this is an atrocious trade for LA they will get far better offers than this. Toffoli will at the ver least fetch a 2nd and a A/B prospect
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:03 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 4,292
    Likes: 2,340
    Anything you post on this website is angry fans attacking you
    habs_fan123, Billy739 and GMs liked this.
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:06 p.m.
    #8
    habs_fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2018
    Posts: 2,932
    Likes: 690
    Yes bc Hans fans are stupid
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:16 p.m.
    #9
    Billy739
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 6,590
    Likes: 1,629
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    Toffoli is WAY better than Pearson for 1 thing and if LA was having so much trouble getting value after their bad year why did Muzzin get the return he did? Toffoli is a 45+ point player, there should be no argument that this is an atrocious trade for LA they will get far better offers than this. Toffoli will at the ver least fetch a 2nd and a A/B prospect


    Toffoli was a 45+ point player
    everything points to decline and when LAK players decline they decline hard

    you trying to get value off what Toffoli did is like MTL trying to get Value off Galchenyuks 1 year he scored 30 goals
    how did that work ?

    we got a straight up 1 for 1 trade with a player who turned out great for us but at the time of the trade was being marketed as the lesser player who couldnt score more then Empty Net Goals and Kypreo's kept joking about . . (****ing NK lol ). Had Domi performed like he did in ARZ and not over achieved we would have effectively traded for a 2nd/3rd line winger similar to Andrew Shaw but we got lucky that he became Claude Juliens new Brad Marchand.


    if you want that value you got to risk keeping him and him continuing to decline there for leaving LAK no return .
    he's 27 a pending UFA this summer comming off a horrible season
    this is like PHI fans expecting Simmonds to land them a kings ransom and he got Hartman and a 4th
    Simmonds had more points then Toffoli in his off year to by double digits but recieved less

    yet you insist merely because of your bias in liking Toffoli that Faith should dictate value not success or lack of
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:36 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 14,569
    Likes: 6,152
    Kings can do better for Toffoli. Target should be a 2nd round pick and a young, expansion draft exempt B+ prospect (Ylönen maybe).

    I'd be okay with this return if the trade happens at the deadline.
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:37 p.m.
    #11
    Billy739
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 6,590
    Likes: 1,629
    Quoting: habs_fan123
    Yes bc Hans fans are stupid


    its a numbers game
    we got more fans by 10x most franchises
    law of average's says we got to have more dummies :P

    that being said Gardiner is not a good fit for MTL
    for many teams like MIN sure but MTL if you cant play Claude Juliens system as he asks
    you'll be benched and possibly even waived whether you're Chucky , or Alzner it doesnt matter to Claude if you cant play Defense at todays speeds .
    habs_fan123 liked this.
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:38 p.m.
    #12
    Billy739
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 6,590
    Likes: 1,629
    Quoting: tkecanuck341
    Kings can do better for Toffoli. Target should be a 2nd round pick and a young, expansion draft exempt B+ prospect (Ylönen maybe).

    I'd be okay with this return if the trade happens at the deadline.


    thats what y'all said about Pearson who i'd rather have then the elder Toffoli
    Then again VAN must agree as Pearson is in VAN and you've made no play for Toffoli
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:39 p.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 38,509
    Likes: 19,654
    Quoting: Billy739
    Toffoli was a 45+ point player
    everything points to decline and when LAK players decline they decline hard

    you trying to get value off what Toffoli did is like MTL trying to get Value off Galchenyuks 1 year he scored 30 goals
    how did that work ?

    we got a straight up 1 for 1 trade with a player who turned out great for us but at the time of the trade was being marketed as the lesser player who couldnt score more then Empty Net Goals and Kypreo's kept joking about . . (****ing NK lol ). Had Domi performed like he did in ARZ and not over achieved we would have effectively traded for a 2nd/3rd line winger similar to Andrew Shaw but we got lucky that he became Claude Juliens new Brad Marchand.


    if you want that value you got to risk keeping him and him continuing to decline there for leaving LAK no return .
    he's 27 a pending UFA this summer comming off a horrible season
    this is like PHI fans expecting Simmonds to land them a kings ransom and he got Hartman and a 4th
    Simmonds had more points then Toffoli in his off year to by double digits but recieved less

    yet you insist merely because of your bias in liking Toffoli that Faith should dictate value not success or lack of


    I'm not even a kings fan? I just know he's worth way more than the crap offer above? If he is so bad and a declining player then why would he play on MTL's 2nd line?
    He had a down year. 1 down year, not like Galchenyuk's 1 up year. Hes not declining at age 27. The guy had a 5.8 shooting percentage that's stupidly below average and he played on the team that was 2nd last in the league in GF. That means the entire team didn't produce. You can't rely on 1 person to do everything, so if the team can't set up scoring chances how is Toffoli supposed to produce.
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:47 p.m.
    #14
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 14,569
    Likes: 6,152
    Quoting: Billy739
    thats what y'all said about Pearson who i'd rather have then the elder Toffoli
    Then again VAN must agree as Pearson is in VAN and you've made no play for Toffoli


    The main benefit of dumping Pearson was getting out from under his 3 years of nearly $4M salary. The Kings hadn't blown up the team yet at that point and were trying to make tweaks to salvage the season. This afforded them the cap space to make other moves. When it was apparent that the Kings needed to blow it up, the Muzzin trade happened and cap no longer became a concern. Pearson had a terrible season in 2017-18 also, and that was the year that several Kings players had career years. He had been a disappointment for a while.

    Toffoli didn't have a bad season, he had an unlucky one. If you look at all his numbers, his scoring chances, expected goals for, high quality scoring chances, etc. were all on par with his career average. He hit an unbelievable amount of goal posts, had 3 goals called back (2 for offsides, 1 for goaltender interference), and played most of the season on a line with Jeff Carter, who was a shade of his old self, thus severely limiting the amount of assists he got. His shooting percentage was a full 4% lower than his career average. He's a player that is just screaming for regression.

    The Kings aren't going to sell low on Toffoli. He's only 27. He's young enough to be a part of the rebuild. They'll shop him this summer for a premium asking price, and if there are no takers, they'll keep him. They'll shop him again at the trade deadline, and if there's no one willing to pay their asking price, they'll keep him and re-sign him to a short- to mid-term contract in the summer.
    Billy739 liked this.
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 10:57 p.m.
    #15
    Billy739
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 6,590
    Likes: 1,629
    Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
    I'm not even a kings fan? I just know he's worth way more than the crap offer above? If he is so bad and a declining player then why would he play on MTL's 2nd line?
    He had a down year. 1 down year, not like Galchenyuk's 1 up year. Hes not declining at age 27. The guy had a 5.8 shooting percentage that's stupidly below average and he played on the team that was 2nd last in the league in GF. That means the entire team didn't produce. You can't rely on 1 person to do everything, so if the team can't set up scoring chances how is Toffoli supposed to produce.


    MTL's 1st,2nd and 3rd line have about a difference of about 60 seconds
    between them something you'd know if you paid attention to the systems you're commenting on
    not just assuming every team plays your teams style . . . . . . . . that's common sense .

    MTL's players get their minutes on special teams not in the top 6 at the expense of those in the bottom 6
    Claude has ALWAYS played a 4 line system usually relying on his 4th line for 12-14 minutes where as here he can only get 10-12 currently .
    top 2 lines always share top minute responsibility here's a link showing that in the first 12 games of last year .

    Claude will only continue this practice sharing minutes getting players like Domi , Danault , Drouin and Tatar more on special teams
    that's just Claude , always has been , always will be until he retires

    http://www.cs.unb.ca/~mwf/habs/linechart.html
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 11:12 p.m.
    #16
    Billy739
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 6,590
    Likes: 1,629
    Quoting: tkecanuck341
    The main benefit of dumping Pearson was getting out from under his 3 years of nearly $4M salary. The Kings hadn't blown up the team yet at that point and were trying to make tweaks to salvage the season. This afforded them the cap space to make other moves. When it was apparent that the Kings needed to blow it up, the Muzzin trade happened and cap no longer became a concern. Pearson had a terrible season in 2017-18 also, and that was the year that several Kings players had career years. He had been a disappointment for a while.

    Toffoli didn't have a bad season, he had an unlucky one. If you look at all his numbers, his scoring chances, expected goals for, high quality scoring chances, etc. were all on par with his career average. He hit an unbelievable amount of goal posts, had 3 goals called back (2 for offsides, 1 for goaltender interference), and played most of the season on a line with Jeff Carter, who was a shade of his old self, thus severely limiting the amount of assists he got. His shooting percentage was a full 4% lower than his career average. He's a player that is just screaming for regression.

    The Kings aren't going to sell low on Toffoli. He's only 27. He's young enough to be a part of the rebuild. They'll shop him this summer for a premium asking price, and if there are no takers, they'll keep him. They'll shop him again at the trade deadline, and if there's no one willing to pay their asking price, they'll keep him and re-sign him to a short- to mid-term contract in the summer.


    that's a weak defense
    if i said that about Hudon who legit had an unlucky one having his minutes handed to Armia because Kotkanemi needed a Finnish Mentor to help him adjust to north america even though Hudon earned his spot in Camp he lost it long term to Armia . (Lehkonen -KK-Hudon had success in camp and was thought to be the starting trio )

    that's bad luck especially when Armia scored at 40% efficiency and Hudon the year before had 42% with more hits , blocked shots and faceoffs taken /win rate . Hudon overall was the better player but he didnt speak Finnish sadly .

    what you just gave was an excuse for why a Veteran didnt step up after his Team traded a Core Member .
    if anything Toffoli should have imporved not declined same as Byron did when Weise and Fleischman left hitting career highs at the exact same age Toffoli is .
    Byron didnt need excuses , he stepped up for his team
    Toffoli did not
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 11:16 p.m.
    #17
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 14,569
    Likes: 6,152
    Quoting: Billy739
    that's a weak defense
    if i said that about Hudon who legit had an unlucky one having his minutes handed to Armia because Kotkanemi needed a Finnish Mentor to help him adjust to north america even though Hudon earned his spot in Camp he lost it long term to Armia . (Lehkonen -KK-Hudon had success in camp and was thought to be the starting trio )

    that's bad luck

    what you just gave was an excuse for why a Veteran didnt step up after his Team traded a Core Member .
    if anything Toffoli should have imporved not declined same as Byron did when Weise and Fleischman left hitting career highs at the exact same age Toffoli is .
    Byron didnt need excuses , he stepped up for his team
    Toffoli did not


    Hudon doesn't have any 30g seasons under his belt. Toffoli does.

    Blake will dangle Toffoli at a premium price. If someone wants to (over?)pay, then Kings will trade him. Otherwise he's staying put.
    Aug. 7, 2019 at 11:38 p.m.
    #18
    Billy739
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 6,590
    Likes: 1,629
    Quoting: tkecanuck341
    Hudon doesn't have any 30g seasons under his belt. Toffoli does.

    Blake will dangle Toffoli at a premium price. If someone wants to (over?)pay, then Kings will trade him. Otherwise he's staying put.


    you're ignoring Context in hopes i dont get hung up on how innaccurate that ''bad luck '' comment was
    (aka willfully manipulating the subject matter )

    i said Bad luck is the situation Hudon was in not Toffoli which is irrelevant to any season but last in context
    if Hudon was in Toffoli's situation last year he would have taken advantage of being played every game

    Toffoli didnt and no amount of bringing up the past changes that .
    like i tell habs fans when they boast about the dynasty years , that's over and this is now .
    Toffoli's shown as much signs of being a 30 goal scorer as Mccarron has of becoming an NHLer
    sure its possible , but the odds are not favorable .

    Blake's been Dangling Toffoli 2 summers and a TDL now
    he's gotten no interest because of the cap hit vs production
    MTL kicked the tires on him in the Pacioretty deal and again last summer
    they asked for Lehkonen to and talks ended quickly after that as Lehkonen since day 1 has been Juliens favorite player he brags up in the media more then any other .

    Toffoli hasnt just hit the market , Blake's done everything possible trying to land him a new home but no one's interested .
    DET had the same issues moving Tatar but Seattle hit a playoff run straight out the gate and bought high on him .
    IF LAK is to get more then it will only be from Seattle only IMO
    Aug. 8, 2019 at 1:05 a.m.
    #19
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 14,569
    Likes: 6,152
    Quoting: Billy739
    you're ignoring Context in hopes i dont get hung up on how innaccurate that ''bad luck '' comment was
    (aka willfully manipulating the subject matter )

    i said Bad luck is the situation Hudon was in not Toffoli which is irrelevant to any season but last in context
    if Hudon was in Toffoli's situation last year he would have taken advantage of being played every game

    Toffoli didnt and no amount of bringing up the past changes that .
    like i tell habs fans when they boast about the dynasty years , that's over and this is now .
    Toffoli's shown as much signs of being a 30 goal scorer as Mccarron has of becoming an NHLer
    sure its possible , but the odds are not favorable .

    Blake's been Dangling Toffoli 2 summers and a TDL now
    he's gotten no interest because of the cap hit vs production
    MTL kicked the tires on him in the Pacioretty deal and again last summer
    they asked for Lehkonen to and talks ended quickly after that as Lehkonen since day 1 has been Juliens favorite player he brags up in the media more then any other .

    Toffoli hasnt just hit the market , Blake's done everything possible trying to land him a new home but no one's interested .
    DET had the same issues moving Tatar but Seattle hit a playoff run straight out the gate and bought high on him .
    IF LAK is to get more then it will only be from Seattle only IMO


    Toffoli wasn't on the market until TDL 2019. Before Stevens was fired there weren't even any Toffoli trade rumors, let alone actual trade talk. The reason why he wasn't traded at the deadline is that Blake isn't willing to sell low. The trade value of every Kings player (except Campbell and Clifford) are at an all time low due to the terrible season the team just had. It's in the Kings best interest to hold on to their assets and give them a chance to rebound. If a team wants to pay a premium for Toffoli, then there's a deal to be made. If not, he's not going to be traded. I would say it's a 50/50 chance that he stays.

    You obviously didn't watch watch Toffoli play at all last year if you think he had a bad season. The numbers are down, but Toffoli, Brown, and Clifford were the only forwards that regularly showed up every game. Go look up his advanced stats. His numbers are the definition of bad puck luck.

    Toffoli is a 30 goal scorer. That's not debatable. The odds are not only favorable, but guaranteed because it has happened already. Hudon, on the other hand, has been included in just about every trade proposal made by Habs fans over the last two seasons. There's a reason for that. He's a replacement-level player.
    Aug. 8, 2019 at 10:21 a.m.
    #20
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 19,594
    Likes: 6,734
    As a Habs fan, I'd take both those in a heartbeat. Sadly, LAK nor Gardiner would.
    Hockeylover360 liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll