SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Looking Back On The Phil Kessel Trade

Created by: AnalyticsGeek
Team: 2019-20 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 30, 2020
Published: Jan. 30, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The off-season Phil Kessel trade was addition by subtraction because Phil’s laziness and attitude was killing the team. He didnt have the intensity to play for Sullivan and needed a fresh start. Even though the return the team got in Alex Galchenyuk didn’t work out, they are still a better team. That said, I do think Jim Rutherford could’ve got something more for a top player like Phil Kessel. What’d you guys think?
Trades
PIT
    Barrett Hayton
    ARI
      Phil Kessel
      Buried
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2020
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      2021
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the ANA
      2022
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      Logo of the PIT
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      20$81,500,000$59,265,375$132,500$850,000$22,234,625
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $1,250,000$1,250,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $8,700,000$8,700,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $750,000$750,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $3,500,000$3,500,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $9,500,000$9,500,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $5,300,000$5,300,000
      RW
      NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $750,000$750,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $3,500,000$3,500,000
      LW, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $4,900,000$4,900,000
      LW, C, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $700,000$700,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $833,750$833,750
      C, RW
      UFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $3,250,000$3,250,000
      LD
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $7,250,000$7,250,000
      RD
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $3,750,000$3,750,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $874,125$874,125
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      RD
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $675,000$675,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $850,000$850,000
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $700,000$700,000
      RD
      UFA - 2
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
      LW, RW, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $4,500,000$4,500,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $2,050,000$2,050,000
      C, RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $5,500,000$5,500,000
      RD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $4,100,000$4,100,000
      LD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Jan. 30, 2020 at 6:59 p.m.
      #1
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2016
      Posts: 8,034
      Likes: 3,234
      Are you saying they could have gotten Hayton? Because no way were they going to get him. Don't know if PIT could have gotten anymore for him because his NTC.
      mhockey91 liked this.
      Jan. 30, 2020 at 7:14 p.m.
      #2
      Thread Starter
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2019
      Posts: 5,011
      Likes: 1,636
      Quoting: ClockReads2113
      Are you saying they could have gotten Hayton? Because no way were they going to get him. Don't know if PIT could have gotten anymore for him because his NTC.


      I do think Hayton’s value was too high but maybe they could’ve gone after someone like Garland instead.
      Jan. 30, 2020 at 7:14 p.m.
      #3
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 7,261
      Likes: 2,706
      They def could have gotten "more" (by now I mean a competent NHLer and not bad spec, who had way higher value then compared to now) but no where close to Hayton
      Jan. 30, 2020 at 7:31 p.m.
      #4
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2017
      Posts: 21,719
      Likes: 12,057
      Isn't Galchenyuk just as lazy as Phil? I've heard that but I don't know.
      mhockey91 liked this.
      Jan. 30, 2020 at 7:32 p.m.
      #5
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 15,921
      Likes: 6,980
      Quoting: ClockReads2113
      Are you saying they could have gotten Hayton? Because no way were they going to get him. Don't know if PIT could have gotten anymore for him because his NTC.


      Exactly. His NTC hurt his value. We were boxed in a corner. I would’ve loved a patcioretty return but that clearly didn’t happen
      ClockReads2113 liked this.
      Jan. 30, 2020 at 7:32 p.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 15,921
      Likes: 6,980
      Quoting: aedoran
      Isn't Galchenyuk just as lazy as Phil? I've heard that but I don't know.


      Worse
      aedoran liked this.
      Jan. 30, 2020 at 7:34 p.m.
      #7
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Apr. 2019
      Posts: 7,125
      Likes: 1,640
      It was Kessels NTC that limited the return, but hey he helped to hoist 2 cups, was a fantastic playoff performer so not a loss at all
      mhockey91 liked this.
      Jan. 30, 2020 at 7:36 p.m.
      #8
      torontos finest
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2019
      Posts: 9,560
      Likes: 11,192
      You, yesterday:

      Quoting: MikeyThePensFan
      Penguins fans loved Kessel but the media hated him so they ran him out of town.
      DonkeyLips and dgfresh78 liked this.
      Jan. 30, 2020 at 9:02 p.m.
      #9
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2018
      Posts: 2,277
      Likes: 507
      Quoting: AFOX10900
      They def could have gotten "more" (by now I mean a competent NHLer and not bad spec, who had way higher value then compared to now) but no where close to Hayton


      Hinostroza and POJ or a lesser prospect would have been great.
      Dan10900 liked this.
      Jan. 30, 2020 at 10:01 p.m.
      #10
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: May 2015
      Posts: 19,594
      Likes: 6,734
      I mean, is it really worth dwelling on? Pens basically got Kessel for a song, solidified two stanley cups as a result of him and essentially got rid of his contract wiht barely aking any cap back long term. (Not too mention that it looks like Kessel is taking a step back this year to boot)

      Gms would kill for this level of amazingness in a 4 year span. I think you can survive without fleecing Arizona on this one.
      mhockey91 and dgfresh78 liked this.
      Jan. 30, 2020 at 11:57 p.m.
      #11
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 19,215
      Likes: 4,837
      I think the penguins are happy to be out of that contract.
      They got 2 cups and dished off the last years of that deal while he was clearly declining.
      I will say one thing though. Their power play really misses Kessel. You can say what ever you will. If they could have kept Phil as a 4th liner on a low contract to just do the PP, it would have been great. But it is what it is.
      Jan. 31, 2020 at 8:04 a.m.
      #12
      Thread Starter
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2019
      Posts: 5,011
      Likes: 1,636
      Quoting: aedoran
      Isn't Galchenyuk just as lazy as Phil? I've heard that but I don't know.


      Quoting: mhockey91
      Worse


      Yeah Galchenyuk doesn’t back check, he isn’t aggressive away from the puck and he offers no physicality.
      aedoran liked this.
      Jan. 31, 2020 at 8:07 a.m.
      #13
      Thread Starter
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2019
      Posts: 5,011
      Likes: 1,636
      Quoting: mondo
      You, yesterday:


      Well, just because the fans love him doesn’t mean that they acknowledge he didn’t fit the team.
      Jan. 31, 2020 at 8:10 a.m.
      #14
      Thread Starter
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2019
      Posts: 5,011
      Likes: 1,636
      Quoting: Boomer125
      It was Kessels NTC that limited the return, but hey he helped to hoist 2 cups, was a fantastic playoff performer so not a loss at all


      Quoting: F50marco
      I mean, is it really worth dwelling on? Pens basically got Kessel for a song, solidified two stanley cups as a result of him and essentially got rid of his contract wiht barely aking any cap back long term. (Not too mention that it looks like Kessel is taking a step back this year to boot)

      Gms would kill for this level of amazingness in a 4 year span. I think you can survive without fleecing Arizona on this one.


      Yeah I’m sure there are no regrets about bringing Kessel to the team. He gave the organization exactly what they were looking for. It doesn’t get much better than that.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll