SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Different scenario - moves with TOR FLA TB EDM

Created by: justaBoss
Team: 2020-21 Dallas Stars
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 3, 2020
Published: Jun. 3, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
If the team fails completely in the playoffs, I think it would be time to make some acute changes to the team core, and start to think about the future of the team.

Logic behind the trades:

TOR trade - a blockbuster that fits to both teams' needs. DAL needs a young and skilled RW in Nylander, and they also lack RHD prospects and picks. TOR needs a cheap first pair RHD and a defensive center in Faksa, and they also get two future assets in Robertson and Honka.

FLA trade - FLA is in need of wingers if Hoffman and Dadonov walk, and their LHDs are also tad weak. In this way, Radulov and Oleksiak fit right to the team. However their owners have made clear that they need to save some money as well, so DAL agrees to take a subpar contract of Strålmans, with the addition of Saarela and two decent picks - which are assets DAL is lacking.

TB trade - Johns is about to hit free agency, so getting a good value him via trade should be done now. TBs are thin in RHDs but they're loaded with forwards. In a vacuum Johnson holds more value than Johns, but TB is also very much cap strapped, which probably makes them consider a swap as such as it fits to their needs pretty well and saves them close to $3M in cap.

EDM trade - basically a prospect swap. EDM receives a nice and big LW prospect that has a potential to become mid-to-top6 power forward, while DAL receives a good RW prospect who has lost his touch with EDM.

BUF trade - don't mind it. Just wanted that 7th rounder back lol.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
1$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,333,333
3$3,000,000
1$787,500
1$735,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,000,000
1$1,500,000
1$700,000
1$700,000
Trades
1.
2.
DAL
  1. Saarela, Aleksi [RFA Rights]
  2. Strålman, Anton
  3. 2020 2nd round pick (FLA)
  4. 2020 3rd round pick (FLA)
FLA
  1. Oleksiak, Jamie
  2. Radulov, Alexander
  3. 2020 6th round pick (BUF)
3.
4.
DAL
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Reserve List]
EDM
  1. Eriksson, Albin [Reserve List]
5.
DAL
  1. 2020 7th round pick (DAL)
BUF
  1. Brinkman, Ben [Reserve List]
Additional Details:
2019 6th round pick (173rd overall)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
2021
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
2022
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$82,581,064$3,047,866$2,900,000-$1,081,064
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$9,850,000$9,850,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$9,500,000$9,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,333,333$3,333,333
C
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$787,500$787,500
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$738,333$738,333
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$4,916,667$4,916,667
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$5,800,000$5,800,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$737,500$737,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$2,400,000$2,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:00 p.m.
#1
Saskoiler for now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,323
Likes: 9,237
Looks good to me, I like that trade from the leafs perspective. But is Johns worth Johnson? I’m not sure.
justaBoss liked this.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:01 p.m.
#2
Saskoiler for now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,323
Likes: 9,237
By the way, I wouldn’t put Lili 2nd pairing. Sign someone or keep Oleksiak.
justaBoss liked this.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:02 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,736
Likes: 31,467
Quoting: Saskleaf
Looks good to me, I like that trade from the leafs perspective. But is Johns worth Johnson? I’m not sure.


Me neither, but figured that since TB must save money and they're thin on RHDs and pretty heavy with wingers, it could be beneficial enough for both teams.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:03 p.m.
#4
Saskoiler for now
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,323
Likes: 9,237
Quoting: justaBoss
Me neither, but figured that since TB must save money and they're thin on RHDs and pretty heavy with wingers, it could be beneficial enough for both teams.


I agree they might move him. But not sure that is the trade.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:12 p.m.
#5
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
I don't see why TOR should make this move...

Klingberg is yet another offensive d-man and we all saw that this didn't work out with Barrie, learn from your mistakes
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:12 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,736
Likes: 31,467
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
I don't see why TOR should make this move...

Klingberg is yet another offensive d-man and we all saw that this didn't work out with Barrie, learn from your mistakes


Shhh don't tell them that sarcasm
SlevinKalevra liked this.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:15 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1,502
Looks like Albin Eriksson flopped badly this year highly doubt the Oilers take that 1 for 1
CD282 liked this.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:19 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,115
Likes: 7,780
Quoting: Bluetomorrow83
Looks like Albin Eriksson flopped badly this year highly doubt the Oilers take that 1 for 1


Yup. The value isn't close. Dallas would have to add their 1st for Holland to bite.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:19 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 2,732
I think Toronto is over paying. Klinger and JRob equals Nylander and Gren. Nylander has extra term remaining but Klinger has that yummy low cap hit. Faksa and Honka does not equal a first round pick. I’d say drop it to a third round pick. I like the idea of that trade tho. Just depends if Toronto gets so excited about getting a big name they forget he isn’t really what they need (looks at Nill and Pavs contract)
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:22 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,736
Likes: 31,467
Quoting: CD282
Yup. The value isn't close. Dallas would have to add their 1st for Holland to bite.


Yeah f*ck that.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:22 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 2,732
Quoting: Bluetomorrow83
Looks like Albin Eriksson flopped badly this year highly doubt the Oilers take that 1 for 1


He was always a risk/reward guy. The toolbox is there. He could be a stud. He could be a bust. I think the Stars would be smart to keep him and be patient. I think the Oilers would be smart to get more of a sure thing for PoolParty
justaBoss liked this.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:23 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,736
Likes: 31,467
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
I think Toronto is over paying. Klinger and JRob equals Nylander and Gren. Nylander has extra term remaining but Klinger has that yummy low cap hit. Faksa and Honka does not equal a first round pick. I’d say drop it to a third round pick. I like the idea of that trade tho. Just depends if Toronto gets so excited about getting a big name they forget he isn’t really what they need (looks at Nill and Pavs contract)


3rd is imo too low. If first is too hefty, maybe a 2nd+3rd then.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:24 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 2,732
I can’t decide how I feel about the Florida deal. Seems like fair value but that Stralman contract is rough
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:25 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 6,820
Likes: 5,299
Oof, I think that'd be a no from the Leafs.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:26 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 55
Likes: 26
Dubas is assassinated
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:27 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 2,732
Quoting: justaBoss
3rd is imo too low. If first is too hefty, maybe a 2nd+3rd then.


I was leaning towards a second. But I feel like Nylander has a little more value than Klinger. I guess in a deal like that the picks come down the GMs having a similar back and forth to ours lol
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:29 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,736
Likes: 31,467
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
I was leaning towards a second. But I feel like Nylander has a little more value than Klinger. I guess in a deal like that the picks come down the GMs having a similar back and forth to ours lol


Imo they're fairly equal. Kling has the position and cap advantage while Nylander has the term and age.

I personally believe that Robertson+Honka = Liljegren, and Faksa = low first. Defensive C's at his level are extremely hard to find. But I'd settle for 2nd and 3rd.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:29 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,115
Likes: 7,780
Quoting: justaBoss
Yeah f*ck that.


Goodbye then.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:31 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,736
Likes: 31,467
Quoting: CD282
Goodbye then.


Gladly.

You can stick up with the bust player that'll never play for your team.

At least there'll be two losers here.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:32 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 2,732
Quoting: justaBoss
Imo they're fairly equal. Kling has the position and cap advantage while Nylander has the term and age.

I personally believe that Robertson+Honka = Liljegren, and Faksa = low first. Defensive C's at his level are extremely hard to find. But I'd settle for 2nd and 3rd.


Fair. Fox is a stud but I don’t know if his value in the league is quite that high. If Robertson and Honks gets you Gren, then do that and shop Klinger elsewhere
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:34 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,736
Likes: 31,467
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Fair. Fox is a stud but I don’t know if his value in the league is quite that high. If Robertson and Honks gets you Gren, then do that and shop Klinger elsewhere


Meh. I'd rather just keep both Robertson and see how good he could become.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:37 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,115
Likes: 7,780
Quoting: justaBoss
Gladly.

You can stick up with the bust player that'll never play for your team.

At least there'll be two losers here.


LOL. If 3 points in 29 SHL games isn't "loser", I don't know what is.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:40 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,736
Likes: 31,467
Quoting: CD282
LOL. If 3 points in 29 SHL games isn't "loser", I don't know what is.


The guy is 19. And just last year he got 16 in 44 games. Give him some slack.

The idea behind the move is that this "loser" as you put it could be a good asset for you. There's a chance that he might be beneficial for you.

Pulju won't be that. He won't even sign with your team lol.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:44 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,115
Likes: 7,780
Quoting: justaBoss
The guy is 19. And just last year he got 16 in 44 games. Give him some slack.

The idea behind the move is that this "loser" as you put it could be a good asset for you. There's a chance that he might be beneficial for you.

Pulju won't be that. He won't even sign with your team lol.


Eriksson isn't a "good asset" though, that's the part you aren't grasping. Add the first or delete the trade.
Jun. 3, 2020 at 9:45 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,736
Likes: 31,467
Quoting: CD282
Eriksson isn't a "good asset" though, that's the part you aren't grasping. Add the first or delete the trade.


In what world would any team give up a 1st for a player that won't sign with the team that owns his rights? EDM has very little leverage regarding the guy. They have two real options here, sell him underpriced or wait for his rights to expire...
C_M_O_R liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll