(a) A rental 2C and a 1st and a 2nd isn't cutting it for Marner
(b) Danault literally said in an interview he was upset about playing time demotion to Suzuki. How's he gonna like playing under AM and JT?
(c) Mete is a 3rd pair D.
(d) Rielly 1 for 1 for Parayko is fair if both teams are inclined, but reality is that both teams love their player too much for that deal

Doesn't seem fair at all. Ottawa won't give up futures for one year of Anderson. Why does NTC Steen waive for Toronto? Like trying to cap for Marner but Mete and one year of Danault seems underwhelming

Marner has a lot more value than that.

Parayko for Rielly doesn't make any sense for the Blues, even including Steen in the deal.

Why would Ottawa trade good assets for one year of a goalie when they aren't competing?

Of all the piles and piles of Parayko-to-Toronto offers that have flooded this site, this is probably the best, smartest one yet. And still, I personally would kindly say no. But full marks for understanding the situation.

None makes sense here. I’m sorry. Values are close. Ish.

a) yes it is,,, shut your stupid mouth... trade has already been approved by the NHL
b) he has no say in this... he's already on Greyhound with a Nintendo Switch to keep him busy for the next 6 hours.
c) very accurate observation
d) i agree with you here.

OTT declines.

You might get some picks for Andersen, but it wont be from Ottawa

(a) no its not
(b) Never good to have a disgruntled and upset player

a) yes it is... what do you know?
b) I agree, but that's Toronto's problem lol