Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 782
Likes: 339
Ok the problem with your theory is that sabers don't have depth AROUND EICHEL. We did the depth without eichel thing already. So your gonna have to meet in the middle. I don't understand how you can look at the sabres and say owh we'll take away the number 1 center and not add a single existing top 3 player let alone a top 2c (you can argue with other rangers fans about strome and 2c) and think that helps this team. On top of that, the depth trade concept is flawed, you can get depth any time anywhere. We suck because our horrible gm made bad trades, bad signings, neglected the need for leadership, and held assets to long because he wasn't willing to get creative and or see reality in january. Im willing to hear about trades on eichel but please acknowledge we are trading you at least a top 15 center in the league and will require some one who can play his position to replace him in your offer. You can give me every 1st pick your team will ever have and the answer is no. Im not watching a team that puts eric staal as 1c to start the season with the hope a 20yr old kid will replace him next year so i can spin a wheel of opportunity every year with my horrible team destroying top league talent and getting hustled on top 3 pick rfa contracts every off season just to keep losing. NYRs trade Zibanejad and list stuff or don't bother thinking about the trade.